Re: Some doubts 'bout Revolution
Did you tried to create a manifest for Revolution? If revolution uses the default Windows System Button, then the manifest would draw it as Luna or other style on XP. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 12:39 AM Subject: Re: Some doubts 'bout Revolution i'd rather have my buttons looking native in winXP ;-) -Original Message- Set the lookAndFeel to MacOSX -- would be a nice Christmas present ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra. Scan engine: VirusScan / Atualizado em 01/10/2003 / Versão: 1.4.0 Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://www.emailprotegido.terra.com.br/ ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: Some doubts 'bout Revolution
I believe for the manifest to work the executable needs to link to and initialize ComCtl32.dll. I tried using Resource Tuner (great program by the way -restuner.com) to add the manifest to an executable I built with Distribution Builder but apparently the Rev executables are not linked to this file so it won't work. At least that is what Resource Tuner says. I don't have XP handy so I couldn't test it but I could send someone a test executable if they wanted to see if it did. -- Trevor DeVore Blue Mango Multimedia [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Monday, October 6, 2003, at 05:19 AM, Júlio César Ködel wrote: Did you tried to create a manifest for Revolution? If revolution uses the default Windows System Button, then the manifest would draw it as Luna or other style on XP. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 12:39 AM Subject: Re: Some doubts 'bout Revolution i'd rather have my buttons looking native in winXP ;-) -Original Message- Set the lookAndFeel to MacOSX -- would be a nice Christmas present ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra. Scan engine: VirusScan / Atualizado em 01/10/2003 / Versão: 1.4.0 Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://www.emailprotegido.terra.com.br/ ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: Some doubts 'bout Revolution
At 10:44 PM -0300 10/4/2003, Júlio César Ködel wrote: My question was: it is possible to make this look and feel of Classic MacOS in a Rev. application running in Windows (i.e. I make a application, that is distributed for Windows machines, and want to apply ClassicMacOS style on it, as it is possible in the development stage) Set the lookAndFeel property to Macintosh to get the Platinum appearance. (This is what the menu item in the development environment does.) -- Jeanne DeVoto ~ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ http://www.runrev.com/ Runtime Revolution - User-Centric Development Tools ~~~ Check our web site for new Revolution editions special offers ~~~ ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: Some doubts 'bout Revolution
I don't think that's what Júlio meant. I think he wants his app to *look like* aqua when it runs in Windoze, not just in development. I suppose one could create 'aqua like' graphic objects such as invisible buttons, but the scrollbars in fields would be a problem, not to mention menus. There also might be some 'look and feel' copyright issues with Apple, depending on how far one went. Besides, it would probably be disconcerting for a Windoze user to see what he is not used to At 10:44 PM -0300 10/4/2003, Júlio César Ködel wrote: My question was: it is possible to make this look and feel of Classic MacOS in a Rev. application running in Windows (i.e. I make a application, that is distributed for Windows machines, and want to apply ClassicMacOS style on it, as it is possible in the development stage) Set the lookAndFeel property to Macintosh to get the Platinum appearance. (This is what the menu item in the development environment does.) -- Jeanne DeVoto ~ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ http://www.runrev.com/ ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: Some doubts 'bout Revolution
At 12:57 AM -0700 10/5/2003, Stephen Quinn Barncard wrote: I don't think that's what Júlio meant. I think he wants his app to *look like* aqua when it runs in Windoze, not just in development. He said classic Mac OS, though. (Julio?) -- Jeanne DeVoto ~ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ http://www.runrev.com/ Runtime Revolution - User-Centric Development Tools ~~~ Check our web site for new Revolution editions special offers ~~~ ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: Some doubts 'bout Revolution
At 10:44 PM -0300 10/4/2003, Júlio César Ködel wrote: My question was: it is possible to make this look and feel of Classic MacOS in a Rev. application running in Windows (i.e. I make a application, that is distributed for Windows machines, and want to apply ClassicMacOS style on it, as it is possible in the development stage) Set the lookAndFeel property to Macintosh to get the Platinum appearance. (This is what the menu item in the development environment does.) -- Jeanne DeVoto ~ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ http://www.runrev.com/ Runtime Revolution - User-Centric Development Tools ~~~ Check our web site for new Revolution editions special offers ~~~ Jeanne, Are there any plans for Rev to simulate the Aqua appearance in the same way? It would be nice for those of us who develop apps on Windows that will be used on OS X to be able to preview the look and feel. Set the lookAndFeel to MacOSX -- would be a nice Christmas present this year. Thanks. Roger Eller [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: Some doubts 'bout Revolution
I think that would be a problem, since both Windows XP and MacOS X use, in a large scale, alpha blending (those shadows and a lot of other window gadgets). Would be impossible to achieve a complete MacOS X look and feel in Windows 32, Windows NT 4 and Linuxes environments. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 10:15 AM Subject: Re: Some doubts 'bout Revolution At 10:44 PM -0300 10/4/2003, Júlio César Ködel wrote: My question was: it is possible to make this look and feel of Classic MacOS in a Rev. application running in Windows (i.e. I make a application, that is distributed for Windows machines, and want to apply ClassicMacOS style on it, as it is possible in the development stage) Set the lookAndFeel property to Macintosh to get the Platinum appearance. (This is what the menu item in the development environment does.) -- Jeanne DeVoto ~ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ http://www.runrev.com/ Runtime Revolution - User-Centric Development Tools ~~~ Check our web site for new Revolution editions special offers ~~~ Jeanne, Are there any plans for Rev to simulate the Aqua appearance in the same way? It would be nice for those of us who develop apps on Windows that will be used on OS X to be able to preview the look and feel. Set the lookAndFeel to MacOSX -- would be a nice Christmas present this year. Thanks. Roger Eller [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra. Scan engine: VirusScan / Atualizado em 01/10/2003 / Versão: 1.4.0 Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://www.emailprotegido.terra.com.br/ ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: Some doubts 'bout Revolution
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Set the lookAndFeel to MacOSX -- would be a nice Christmas present this year. I'd rather have a new bicycle. :) Emulating OS X'x complex Appearance Manager would be a tremendous amount of work, effectively requiring the reverse-engineering and re-implementation of the Quartz rendering engine along with it for it to look right. I'd much rather see that amount of effort go into a hundred other new features, the sum of all of which would likely cost less. Besides, OS X is such an odd beast that the best way to build apps for it is to at least spend some time tweaking on that OS natively. One of the downsides to implementing Aqua emulation would be to encourage a false confidence for things that might look good buy do not work properly once actually deployed there. -- Richard Gaskin Fourth World Media Corporation Developer of WebMerge: Publish any database on any Web site ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.FourthWorld.com Tel: 323-225-3717 AIM: FourthWorldInc ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: Some doubts 'bout Revolution
Le dim 05/10/2003 18:50, Jlio Csar Kdel a crit : No... I was thinking in Platinum... ;-) After some time, users get a little tired about the look and feel of their OSes (that's why exists skins modules for Windows and Linux). It would be nice to change the look of my app without any effort. One thing that I'm getting some problem is on buttons. It would be nice if we could make buttons like the skins programs. Let's suppose a PNG file: +-+ !*! +-+ A Skin program would divide a PNG file in a 3x3 matrix, then, apply the + on corners, repeat -, * and - on center (H) and ! on vertical, mouting this way a button (independent of its size). Would be a nice addition to Rev a way to make a fixed 32x32 PNG and apply it to a button (whatever the button changes in size, it will reorganize the matrix making the graphic fit to any size without magnifications). Hi Jlio, In between many good addresses, you will find most of what you are thinking about in visiting the Chipp's web site at http://www.altuit.com/webs/altuit2/RunRev/About.htm, the Richard's one at http://www.fourthworld.com/rev/, the Jacque's one at http://www.hyperactivesw.com/, the Rev's developers home at http://www.runrev.com/Revolution1/developercentral/usercontributions.html etc, etc... Just see how it's always, in between us, a Revolutionnary to gohead, in what each other is searching about ;-) Cool, is'n it ? Bests, Pierre - Original Message - From: Stephen Quinn Barncard [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 4:57 AM Subject: Re: Some doubts 'bout Revolution I don't think that's what Jlio meant. I think he wants his app to *look like* aqua when it runs in Windoze, not just in development. I suppose one could create 'aqua like' graphic objects such as invisible buttons, but the scrollbars in fields would be a problem, not to mention menus. There also might be some 'look and feel' copyright issues with Apple, depending on how far one went. Besides, it would probably be disconcerting for a Windoze user to see what he is not used to At 10:44 PM -0300 10/4/2003, Jlio Csar Kdel wrote: My question was: it is possible to make this look and feel of Classic MacOS in a Rev. application running in Windows (i.e. I make a application, that is distributed for Windows machines, and want to apply ClassicMacOS style on it, as it is possible in the development stage) Set the lookAndFeel property to Macintosh to get the Platinum appearance. (This is what the menu item in the development environment does.) -- Jeanne DeVoto ~ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ http://www.runrev.com/ ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra. Scan engine: VirusScan / Atualizado em 01/10/2003 / Verso: 1.4.0 Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://www.emailprotegido.terra.com.br/ ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution -- Bien cordialement, Pierre Sahores 100, rue de Paris F - 77140 Nemours GSM: +33 6 03 95 77 70 Pro: +33 1 41 60 52 68 Dom: +33 1 64 45 05 33 Fax: +33 1 64 45 05 33 Inspection acadmique de Seine-Saint-Denis Applications et SGBD ACID SQL (WEB et PGI) Penser et produire delta de rentabilit ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: Some doubts 'bout Revolution
Hi Richard, Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2003 11:33:13 -0700 Subject: Re: Some doubts 'bout Revolution From: Richard Gaskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] One of the downsides to implementing Aqua emulation would be to encourage a false confidence for things that might look good buy do not work properly once actually deployed there. -- Dumb question from someone who hasn't followed all of this. Why would someone want to emulate Mac OSX Aqua on a Windoze platform to begin with? Ken N. ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: Some doubts 'bout Revolution
'Cos is beaultiful??? =P For Windows XP, it's not a problem, since there is Aqua-like styles for Windows XP wich make Windows works as Aqua does. But, for other Windows (like 95 and 98), the user is REALLY bored of that non-gracefull gray window, every day, year by year... It's just a cosmetic trick to bring more hapiness to the user, just this ;-) (Besides: someone here knows of a Media Player that works in a default window, with default buttons and all those gray stuffs? No. Almost all media players are skinned to have a better appearence. Sometimes it's good to change the user experience within your application). Windows XP uses Luna interface, MacOS uses Platinum, MacOSX use Aqua, Linux use, well, I don't know what the hell is that, he he he... It's just graphics... nothing more. And I'm not asking nothing about Aqua... Just Platinum =) - Original Message - From: Ken Norris [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 5:00 PM Subject: Re: Some doubts 'bout Revolution Hi Richard, Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2003 11:33:13 -0700 Subject: Re: Some doubts 'bout Revolution From: Richard Gaskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] One of the downsides to implementing Aqua emulation would be to encourage a false confidence for things that might look good buy do not work properly once actually deployed there. -- Dumb question from someone who hasn't followed all of this. Why would someone want to emulate Mac OSX Aqua on a Windoze platform to begin with? Ken N. ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra. Scan engine: VirusScan / Atualizado em 01/10/2003 / Versão: 1.4.0 Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://www.emailprotegido.terra.com.br/ ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
RE: Some doubts 'bout Revolution
Are there any plans for Rev to simulate the Aqua appearance in the same way? It would be nice for those of us who develop apps on Windows that will be used on OS X to be able to preview the look and feel. Ummm... no offence Roger but wouldn't it be nice to get even an emulated XP look and feel before RunRev goes trying to emulate OS X? If we had full XP theme support you could get OS X look anyway. Many of us have been frustrated by the focus on OS X look and feel while a far more popular OS is 2 years out of date. I'm reasonably sure that XP theme support is just around the corner. I'm also reasonably sure that we won't ever get OS X emulation seeing as by the time it was emulated Apple would have changed it ;-) Cheers Monte ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: Some doubts 'bout Revolution
i'd rather have my buttons looking native in winXP ;-) -Original Message- Set the lookAndFeel to MacOSX -- would be a nice Christmas present ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: Some doubts 'bout Revolution
On Sunday, October 5, 2003, at 05:07 PM, Monte Goulding wrote: Ummm... no offence Roger but wouldn't it be nice to get even an emulated XP look and feel before RunRev goes trying to emulate OS X? If we had full XP theme support you could get OS X look anyway. Many of us have been frustrated by the focus on OS X look and feel while a far more popular OS is 2 years out of date. I'm reasonably sure that XP theme support is just around the corner. I hope so. It's like swimming upstream I guess. They are planning a new style UI again http://news.com.com/2100-1016-5083491.html Avalon is the graphics and media plumbing within Longhorn that software developers use to build applications. Aero is the company's name for the actual graphical user interface (GUI) in Longhorn that the end user sees. Also keep in mind that the Aqua/Appearance Manager look and feel is the only one currently offered by Rev that uses native widgets. All the others are emulated. I agree with what Richard said: it would be difficult or impossible to emulate. All those drop shadows and gradients and animated buttons. Too much. Alex Rice [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Mindlube Software | http://mindlube.com what a waste of thumbs that are opposable to make machines that are disposable -Ani DiFranco ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Some doubts 'bout Revolution
Each day I'm more convinced that Revolution is a great program tool. Some things are amazing easy to do, and seems so powerfull that I think no program CAN'T be developed in Rev. But, I must ask some questions: (first, sorry by comparing Rev with VB, but I'm a BASIC programmer since 1986, and VB is my current world ;-] ) 1) Nowadays, more and more applications (especially those developed in RAD tools) are using HTML, for display data, forms, or whatever. In my case, I use HTML for custom relats (my program parses tags in HTML file and then replace them with some data. It's a easy way to make relats customizable for the final user). Revolution doesn't have a control that show HTML pages (I know there is a DLL, which I assume that use IE engine, but work only for Windows). There is some way to display full HTML pages within cards, in all plataforms (or, at least, Windows and *nix)? Or, if not, at least a "standard" way to "execute" a HTML file (some kind of shell that would open the default Web Browser of OS and display a local file). 2) Someone know a site where there is some Rev. applications to download (to study, of course, open source)? 3) Since Windows 95, both Mac and *nix plataforms are using controls like the Windows TreeView and ListItems controls. There is something like this for Revolution (TV and LI objects are used, for example, in a Windows Explorer window, wich TreeView is the object that shows a "tree" of folders and ListItems is the object that show items with icons, tabs and subitems) 4) Is therea IDE for Revolution other than the current? 5) Revolution IDE is capable of showing the "look and feel" of other plataforms (for example, MacOS and Motif). In a distributed application, there is some way to make it look like a Mac, for example, by default (in other words:Can Imake a Revolution application in Windows that mantain the "look" of Mac?) 6) When making a compiled application from Revolution, I noticed that it would NOT support Microsoft icons other than 16 colors... There's no way to use 256 colors icons? (the best would be if Rev. could use TrueColor or RGBA icons, but 256 colors are the minimal to nowadays Windows stardards). Well... I guess it's "only" this... Thanx in advance for all ;-)
Re: Some doubts 'bout Revolution
Júlio César Ködel wrote: 1) Nowadays, more and more applications (especially those developed in RAD tools) are using HTML, for display data, forms, or whatever. In my case, I use HTML for custom relats (my program parses tags in HTML file and then replace them with some data. It's a easy way to make relats customizable for the final user). Revolution doesn't have a control that show HTML pages (I know there is a DLL, which I assume that use IE engine, but work only for Windows). There is some way to display full HTML pages within cards, in all plataforms (or, at least, Windows and *nix)? Or, if not, at least a standard way to execute a HTML file (some kind of shell that would open the default Web Browser of OS and display a local file). What's a relat? Rev's native support for HTML is limited to tags that have a meaningful representation in Rev field objects: links, images, and text styling attributes like bold, italic, underline, strikethrough, superscript, and subscript. Expanding the field objects to handle more of the HTML DOM is on the request list. But the full HTML spec is big, and I don't know if we'll ever see everything supported, from form elements to CSS; I'm not sure how they would match th object models up. In the meantime, opening a page in the user's preferred browser is a one-liner, and its text parsing fast enough that there's a lot you can do with custom tags. Check out the XML external that ships with Rev for ideas on sectioning displayable HTML in more complex custom structures. 2) Someone know a site where there is some Rev. applications to download (to study, of course, open source)? Already on your hard drive: see the menu item Development-Plugins-Go_RevNet That launches an online service for downloading dozens of third-party examples stacks and tools. 3) Since Windows 95, both Mac and *nix plataforms are using controls like the Windows TreeView and ListItems controls. There is something like this for Revolution (TV and LI objects are used, for example, in a Windows Explorer window, wich TreeView is the object that shows a tree of folders and ListItems is the object that show items with icons, tabs and subitems) A native tree view object is on the request list. In the meantime a scripted solution is available from the Contributions page at RunRev.com's Developer Central. 4) Is there a IDE for Revolution other than the current? There are two others: The MetaCard IDE was written by the inventor of the engine. Much more spartan than Rev's, it's also a little more nimble. You can get it at metacard.com. There's also FreeGUI, an open source project that aims to provide the simplicity of the HyperCard experience to Transcript developers. It has a group on Yahoo Groups. 5) Revolution IDE is capable of showing the look and feel of other plataforms (for example, MacOS and Motif). In a distributed application, there is some way to make it look like a Mac, for example, by default (in other words: Can I make a Revolution application in Windows that mantain the look of Mac?) Classic, but not OS X. That's the only one you can't at this time. While the other OS appearances are emulated it would be way too much work to emulate Apple's Aqua Appearance Manager. 6) When making a compiled application from Revolution, I noticed that it would NOT support Microsoft icons other than 16 colors... There's no way to use 256 colors icons? (the best would be if Rev. could use TrueColor or RGBA icons, but 256 colors are the minimal to nowadays Windows stardards). 256 color icons in a hotly requested item these days. At the moment it's just the 16 colors, but I'm told that with the interest in 256-color Win icons it's definitely on the list. -- Richard Gaskin Fourth World Media Corporation Developer of WebMerge: Publish any database on any Web site ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.FourthWorld.com Tel: 323-225-3717 AIM: FourthWorldInc ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: Some doubts 'bout Revolution
Hi Jlio, To see an example of a full working Revolution+PostgreSQL application, here as the Web issue (there is a Rev's client side app available too), developped in less than some days, have an eye at : http://acacia93.dyndns.org/citalis.xml and let me know, off-list, if you need more infos or sources stack about how to run this kind of Rev's process. Bests, Pierre Le sam 04/10/2003 23:26, Jlio Csar Kdel a crit : Each day I'm more convinced that Revolution is a great program tool. Some things are amazing easy to do, and seems so powerfull that I think no program CAN'T be developed in Rev. But, I must ask some questions: (first, sorry by comparing Rev with VB, but I'm a BASIC programmer since 1986, and VB is my current world ;-] ) 1) Nowadays, more and more applications (especially those developed in RAD tools) are using HTML, for display data, forms, or whatever. In my case, I use HTML for custom relats (my program parses tags in HTML file and then replace them with some data. It's a easy way to make relats customizable for the final user). Revolution doesn't have a control that show HTML pages (I know there is a DLL, which I assume that use IE engine, but work only for Windows). There is some way to display full HTML pages within cards, in all plataforms (or, at least, Windows and *nix)? Or, if not, at least a standard way to execute a HTML file (some kind of shell that would open the default Web Browser of OS and display a local file). 2) Someone know a site where there is some Rev. applications to download (to study, of course, open source)? 3) Since Windows 95, both Mac and *nix plataforms are using controls like the Windows TreeView and ListItems controls. There is something like this for Revolution (TV and LI objects are used, for example, in a Windows Explorer window, wich TreeView is the object that shows a tree of folders and ListItems is the object that show items with icons, tabs and subitems) 4) Is there a IDE for Revolution other than the current? 5) Revolution IDE is capable of showing the look and feel of other plataforms (for example, MacOS and Motif). In a distributed application, there is some way to make it look like a Mac, for example, by default (in other words: Can I make a Revolution application in Windows that mantain the look of Mac?) 6) When making a compiled application from Revolution, I noticed that it would NOT support Microsoft icons other than 16 colors... There's no way to use 256 colors icons? (the best would be if Rev. could use TrueColor or RGBA icons, but 256 colors are the minimal to nowadays Windows stardards). Well... I guess it's only this... Thanx in advance for all ;-) -- Bien cordialement, Pierre Sahores 100, rue de Paris F - 77140 Nemours GSM: +33 6 03 95 77 70 Pro: +33 1 41 60 52 68 Dom: +33 1 64 45 05 33 Fax: +33 1 64 45 05 33 Inspection acadmique de Seine-Saint-Denis Applications et SGBD ACID SQL (WEB et PGI) Penser et produire delta de rentabilit ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Re: Some doubts 'bout Revolution
What's a relat? Ops... It's a report, he he he... Well... Opening a local html file it's fine. I don't know if is possible on all systems, but, in Windows, it's possible to get a HTML Browser within a OLE Object. I know that Macitosh also have OLE Objects support from Microsoft (and, if there is a IE for Macs, I think it would be possible to make this trick on Mac), but I don't know about Linux... Classic, but not OS X. That's the only one you can't at this time. While the other OS appearances are emulated it would be way too much work to emulate Apple's Aqua Appearance Manager. My question was: it is possible to make this look and feel of Classic MacOS in a Rev. application running in Windows (i.e. I make a application, that is distributed for Windows machines, and want to apply ClassicMacOS style on it, as it is possible in the development stage) Thanx for the help ;-) ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
