It has been discussed in past in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-4175.
I believe it is fixed in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8099, though we have not
evaluated the performance. Will be glad if someone can reply with
benchmarks.
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Atul Saroha
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Some time back, I had seen a Jira which tells me that the limitation to
> use small column names for performance benefit is no longer valid. Now
> cassandra generate some unique identifier for each column name in the
> table. So larger table name and column names are no longer an issue for
> performance and data storage.
>
> Is this true for cassandra 3.0.3?
> Does anyone knows that Jira number as i missed it?
>
> -
> Atul Saroha
> *Sr. Software Engineer*
> *M*: +91 8447784271 *T*: +91 124-415-6069 *EXT*: 12369
> Plot # 362, ASF Centre - Tower A, Udyog Vihar,
> Phase -4, Sector 18, Gurgaon, Haryana 122016, INDIA
>