Does SELECT … IN () use parallel dispatch?

2014-07-25 Thread Kevin Burton
Say I have about 50 primary keys I need to fetch.

I'd like to use parallel dispatch.  So that if I have 50 hosts, and each
has record, I can read from all 50 at once.

I assume cassandra does the right thing here ?  I believe it does… at least
from reading the docs but it's still a bit unclear.

Kevin

-- 

Founder/CEO Spinn3r.com
Location: *San Francisco, CA*
blog: http://burtonator.wordpress.com
… or check out my Google+ profile
https://plus.google.com/102718274791889610666/posts
http://spinn3r.com


Re: Does SELECT … IN () use parallel dispatch?

2014-07-25 Thread DuyHai Doan
Nope. Select ... IN() sends one request to a coordinator. This coordinator
dispatch the request to 50 nodes as in your example and waits for 50
responses before sending back the final result. As you can guess this
approach is not optimal since the global request latency is bound to the
slowest latency among 50 nodes.

 On the other hand if you use async feature from the native protocol, you
client will issue 50 requests in parallel and the answers arrive as soon as
they are fetched from different nodes.

 Clearly the only advantage of using IN() clause is ease of query. I would
advise to use IN() only when you have a few values, not 50.


On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 8:08 PM, Kevin Burton bur...@spinn3r.com wrote:

 Say I have about 50 primary keys I need to fetch.

 I'd like to use parallel dispatch.  So that if I have 50 hosts, and each
 has record, I can read from all 50 at once.

 I assume cassandra does the right thing here ?  I believe it does… at
 least from reading the docs but it's still a bit unclear.

 Kevin

 --

 Founder/CEO Spinn3r.com
 Location: *San Francisco, CA*
 blog: http://burtonator.wordpress.com
  … or check out my Google+ profile
 https://plus.google.com/102718274791889610666/posts
 http://spinn3r.com




Re: Does SELECT … IN () use parallel dispatch?

2014-07-25 Thread Graham Sanderson
Of course the driver in question is allowed to be smarter and can do so if use 
use a ? parameter for a list or even individual elements

I'm not sure which if any drivers currently do this but we plan to combine this 
with token aware routing in our scala driver in the future 

Sent from my iPhone

 On Jul 25, 2014, at 1:14 PM, DuyHai Doan doanduy...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Nope. Select ... IN() sends one request to a coordinator. This coordinator 
 dispatch the request to 50 nodes as in your example and waits for 50 
 responses before sending back the final result. As you can guess this 
 approach is not optimal since the global request latency is bound to the 
 slowest latency among 50 nodes.
 
  On the other hand if you use async feature from the native protocol, you 
 client will issue 50 requests in parallel and the answers arrive as soon as 
 they are fetched from different nodes.
 
  Clearly the only advantage of using IN() clause is ease of query. I would 
 advise to use IN() only when you have a few values, not 50.
 
 
 On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 8:08 PM, Kevin Burton bur...@spinn3r.com wrote:
 Say I have about 50 primary keys I need to fetch.
 
 I'd like to use parallel dispatch.  So that if I have 50 hosts, and each has 
 record, I can read from all 50 at once.
 
 I assume cassandra does the right thing here ?  I believe it does… at least 
 from reading the docs but it's still a bit unclear.
 
 Kevin
 
 -- 
 Founder/CEO Spinn3r.com
 Location: San Francisco, CA
 blog: http://burtonator.wordpress.com
 … or check out my Google+ profile
 
 


Re: Does SELECT … IN () use parallel dispatch?

2014-07-25 Thread Kevin Burton
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 11:14 AM, DuyHai Doan doanduy...@gmail.com wrote:

 Nope. Select ... IN() sends one request to a coordinator. This coordinator
 dispatch the request to 50 nodes as in your example and waits for 50
 responses before sending back the final result. As you can guess this
 approach is not optimal since the global request latency is bound to the
 slowest latency among 50 nodes.


Maybe it's the wording but it sounds like the coordinator is doing parallel
dispatch?

Kevin

-- 

Founder/CEO Spinn3r.com
Location: *San Francisco, CA*
blog: http://burtonator.wordpress.com
… or check out my Google+ profile
https://plus.google.com/102718274791889610666/posts
http://spinn3r.com


Re: Does SELECT … IN () use parallel dispatch?

2014-07-25 Thread Laing, Michael
We use IN (keeping the number down). The coordinator does parallel dispatch
AND applies ORDERED BY to the aggregate results, which we would otherwise
have to do ourselves. Anyway, worth it for us.

ml


On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Kevin Burton bur...@spinn3r.com wrote:

 Perhaps the best strategy is to have the datastax java-driver do this and
 I just wait or each result individually.  This will give me parallel
 dispatch.


 On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Graham Sanderson gra...@vast.com
 wrote:

 Of course the driver in question is allowed to be smarter and can do so
 if use use a ? parameter for a list or even individual elements

 I'm not sure which if any drivers currently do this but we plan to
 combine this with token aware routing in our scala driver in the future

 Sent from my iPhone

 On Jul 25, 2014, at 1:14 PM, DuyHai Doan doanduy...@gmail.com wrote:

 Nope. Select ... IN() sends one request to a coordinator. This
 coordinator dispatch the request to 50 nodes as in your example and waits
 for 50 responses before sending back the final result. As you can guess
 this approach is not optimal since the global request latency is bound to
 the slowest latency among 50 nodes.

  On the other hand if you use async feature from the native protocol, you
 client will issue 50 requests in parallel and the answers arrive as soon as
 they are fetched from different nodes.

  Clearly the only advantage of using IN() clause is ease of query. I
 would advise to use IN() only when you have a few values, not 50.


 On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 8:08 PM, Kevin Burton bur...@spinn3r.com wrote:

 Say I have about 50 primary keys I need to fetch.

 I'd like to use parallel dispatch.  So that if I have 50 hosts, and each
 has record, I can read from all 50 at once.

 I assume cassandra does the right thing here ?  I believe it does… at
 least from reading the docs but it's still a bit unclear.

 Kevin

 --

 Founder/CEO Spinn3r.com
 Location: *San Francisco, CA*
 blog: http://burtonator.wordpress.com
  … or check out my Google+ profile
 https://plus.google.com/102718274791889610666/posts
 http://spinn3r.com





 --

 Founder/CEO Spinn3r.com
 Location: *San Francisco, CA*
 blog: http://burtonator.wordpress.com
 … or check out my Google+ profile
 https://plus.google.com/102718274791889610666/posts
 http://spinn3r.com