Re: High commit size

2012-09-10 Thread Oleg Dulin

It is memory-mapped I/O. I wouldn't worry about it.

BTW, Windows might not be the best choice to run Cassandra on. My 
experience running Cassandra on Windows has not been positive one. We 
no longer support Windows as our production platform.


Regards,
Oleg


On 2012-09-10 09:00:02 +, Rene Kochen said:


Hi all,

On my test cluster I have three Windows Server 2008 R2 machines running 
Cassandra 1.0.11


If i use memory mapped IO (the default), then the nodes freeze after a 
while. Paging is disabled.


The private bytes are OK (8GB). That is the amount I use in the -Xms 
and -Xmx arguments. The virtual size is big as expected because of the 
memory mapped IO. However, the working set size (size in RAM) is 24 GB 
(my total RAM usage). If I look with Process Explorer to the physical 
memory section I see a very high value in the WS Sharable section.


Anyone has a clue what is going om here?

Many thanks!

Rene
image



--
Regards,
Oleg Dulin
NYC Java Big Data Engineer
http://www.olegdulin.com/




Re: High commit size

2012-09-10 Thread Rene Kochen
The problem is that the system just freezes and nodes are dying. The system
becomes very unresponsive and it always happens when the shareable amount
of RAM reaches the total number of bytes in the system.

Is there something in Windows that I can tune in order to avoid this
behavior? I cannot easily migrate to Linux right now.

Thanks,

Rene


2012/9/10 Oleg Dulin oleg.du...@gmail.com

 It is memory-mapped I/O. I wouldn't worry about it.

 BTW, Windows might not be the best choice to run Cassandra on. My
 experience running Cassandra on Windows has not been positive one. We no
 longer support Windows as our production platform.

 Regards,
 Oleg


 On 2012-09-10 09:00:02 +, Rene Kochen said:

  Hi all,

 On my test cluster I have three Windows Server 2008 R2 machines running
 Cassandra 1.0.11

 If i use memory mapped IO (the default), then the nodes freeze after a
 while. Paging is disabled.

 The private bytes are OK (8GB). That is the amount I use in the -Xms and
 -Xmx arguments. The virtual size is big as expected because of the memory
 mapped IO. However, the working set size (size in RAM) is 24 GB (my total
 RAM usage). If I look with Process Explorer to the physical memory section
 I see a very high value in the WS Sharable section.

 Anyone has a clue what is going om here?

 Many thanks!

 Rene
 image



 --
 Regards,
 Oleg Dulin
 NYC Java Big Data Engineer
 http://www.olegdulin.com/





RE: High commit size

2012-09-10 Thread Viktor Jevdokimov
Do not use mmap/auto on Windows, standard access mode only. In cassandra.yaml:
disk_access_mode: standard


Best regards / Pagarbiai
Viktor Jevdokimov
Senior Developer

Email: viktor.jevdoki...@adform.commailto:viktor.jevdoki...@adform.com
Phone: +370 5 212 3063, Fax +370 5 261 0453
J. Jasinskio 16C, LT-01112 Vilnius, Lithuania
Follow us on Twitter: @adforminsiderhttp://twitter.com/#!/adforminsider
What is Adform: watch this short videohttp://vimeo.com/adform/display

[Adform News] http://www.adform.com

Visit us at Dmexco: Hall: 7, Aisle: A, Stand: 030
September 12-13 Cologne, Germany
[dmexco] http://www.dmexco.de/


Disclaimer: The information contained in this message and attachments is 
intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee and may be 
confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are reminded that the 
information remains the property of the sender. You must not use, disclose, 
distribute, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. If you have received this 
message in error, please contact the sender immediately and irrevocably delete 
this message and any copies.

From: Rene Kochen [mailto:rene.koc...@emea.schange.com]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 14:47
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: High commit size

The problem is that the system just freezes and nodes are dying. The system 
becomes very unresponsive and it always happens when the shareable amount of 
RAM reaches the total number of bytes in the system.

Is there something in Windows that I can tune in order to avoid this behavior? 
I cannot easily migrate to Linux right now.

Thanks,

Rene

2012/9/10 Oleg Dulin oleg.du...@gmail.commailto:oleg.du...@gmail.com
It is memory-mapped I/O. I wouldn't worry about it.

BTW, Windows might not be the best choice to run Cassandra on. My experience 
running Cassandra on Windows has not been positive one. We no longer support 
Windows as our production platform.

Regards,
Oleg


On 2012-09-10 09:00:02 +, Rene Kochen said:
Hi all,

On my test cluster I have three Windows Server 2008 R2 machines running 
Cassandra 1.0.11

If i use memory mapped IO (the default), then the nodes freeze after a while. 
Paging is disabled.

The private bytes are OK (8GB). That is the amount I use in the -Xms and -Xmx 
arguments. The virtual size is big as expected because of the memory mapped IO. 
However, the working set size (size in RAM) is 24 GB (my total RAM usage). If I 
look with Process Explorer to the physical memory section I see a very high 
value in the WS Sharable section.

Anyone has a clue what is going om here?

Many thanks!

Rene
image


--
Regards,
Oleg Dulin
NYC Java Big Data Engineer
http://www.olegdulin.com/


inline: signature-logoc64.pnginline: dmexco-logofa6.png

Re: High commit size

2012-09-10 Thread Rene Kochen
For performance reasons I switched to memory mapped IO. Is there a way to
make memory-mapped IO work in Windows?

Thanks!


2012/9/10 Viktor Jevdokimov viktor.jevdoki...@adform.com

  Do not use mmap/auto on Windows, standard access mode only. In
 cassandra.yaml:

 disk_access_mode: standard

 ** **

 ** **
Best regards / Pagarbiai
 *Viktor Jevdokimov*
 Senior Developer

 Email: viktor.jevdoki...@adform.com
 Phone: +370 5 212 3063, Fax +370 5 261 0453
 J. Jasinskio 16C, LT-01112 Vilnius, Lithuania
 Follow us on Twitter: @adforminsider http://twitter.com/#!/adforminsider
 What is Adform: watch this short video http://vimeo.com/adform/display
  [image: Adform News] http://www.adform.com
 * *
 *Visit us at Dmexco:* Hall: 7, Aisle: A, Stand: 030
 September 12-13 Cologne, Germany
 [image: dmexco] http://www.dmexco.de/

 Disclaimer: The information contained in this message and attachments is
 intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee and may be
 confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are reminded that
 the information remains the property of the sender. You must not use,
 disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. If you have
 received this message in error, please contact the sender immediately and
 irrevocably delete this message and any copies.

   *From:* Rene Kochen [mailto:rene.koc...@emea.schange.com]
 *Sent:* Monday, September 10, 2012 14:47
 *To:* user@cassandra.apache.org
 *Subject:* Re: High commit size

 ** **

 The problem is that the system just freezes and nodes are dying. The
 system becomes very unresponsive and it always happens when the shareable
 amount of RAM reaches the total number of bytes in the system.

 Is there something in Windows that I can tune in order to avoid this
 behavior? I cannot easily migrate to Linux right now.

 Thanks,

 Rene

 

 2012/9/10 Oleg Dulin oleg.du...@gmail.com

 It is memory-mapped I/O. I wouldn't worry about it.

 BTW, Windows might not be the best choice to run Cassandra on. My
 experience running Cassandra on Windows has not been positive one. We no
 longer support Windows as our production platform.

 Regards,
 Oleg


 On 2012-09-10 09:00:02 +, Rene Kochen said:

 Hi all,

 On my test cluster I have three Windows Server 2008 R2 machines running
 Cassandra 1.0.11

 If i use memory mapped IO (the default), then the nodes freeze after a
 while. Paging is disabled.

 The private bytes are OK (8GB). That is the amount I use in the -Xms and
 -Xmx arguments. The virtual size is big as expected because of the memory
 mapped IO. However, the working set size (size in RAM) is 24 GB (my total
 RAM usage). If I look with Process Explorer to the physical memory section
 I see a very high value in the WS Sharable section.

 Anyone has a clue what is going om here?

 Many thanks!

 Rene
 image



 --
 Regards,
 Oleg Dulin
 NYC Java Big Data Engineer
 http://www.olegdulin.com/

 

 ** **

signature-logoc64.pngdmexco-logofa6.png

RE: High commit size

2012-09-10 Thread Viktor Jevdokimov
We used Cassandra on Windows for more than a year in production for RTB and 
other staff, that requires lowest possible latency. We used mmap before issues 
like yours, switched to mmap index only and finally to standard. No big 
difference in performance, standard was most stable. The huge difference is to 
run C* on Linux instead of Windows. Migration was pretty easy.


Best regards / Pagarbiai
Viktor Jevdokimov
Senior Developer

Email: viktor.jevdoki...@adform.commailto:viktor.jevdoki...@adform.com
Phone: +370 5 212 3063, Fax +370 5 261 0453
J. Jasinskio 16C, LT-01112 Vilnius, Lithuania
Follow us on Twitter: @adforminsiderhttp://twitter.com/#!/adforminsider
What is Adform: watch this short videohttp://vimeo.com/adform/display

[Adform News] http://www.adform.com

Visit us at Dmexco: Hall: 7, Aisle: A, Stand: 030
September 12-13 Cologne, Germany
[dmexco] http://www.dmexco.de/


Disclaimer: The information contained in this message and attachments is 
intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee and may be 
confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are reminded that the 
information remains the property of the sender. You must not use, disclose, 
distribute, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. If you have received this 
message in error, please contact the sender immediately and irrevocably delete 
this message and any copies.

From: Rene Kochen [mailto:rene.koc...@emea.schange.com]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 17:03
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: High commit size

For performance reasons I switched to memory mapped IO. Is there a way to make 
memory-mapped IO work in Windows?

Thanks!

2012/9/10 Viktor Jevdokimov 
viktor.jevdoki...@adform.commailto:viktor.jevdoki...@adform.com
Do not use mmap/auto on Windows, standard access mode only. In cassandra.yaml:
disk_access_mode: standard


Best regards / Pagarbiai
Viktor Jevdokimov
Senior Developer

Email: viktor.jevdoki...@adform.commailto:viktor.jevdoki...@adform.com
Phone: +370 5 212 3063tel:%2B370%205%20212%203063, Fax +370 5 261 
0453tel:%2B370%205%20261%200453
J. Jasinskio 16C, LT-01112 Vilnius, Lithuania
Follow us on Twitter: @adforminsiderhttp://twitter.com/#!/adforminsider
What is Adform: watch this short videohttp://vimeo.com/adform/display

[Adform News]http://www.adform.com

Visit us at Dmexco: Hall: 7, Aisle: A, Stand: 030
September 12-13 Cologne, Germany
[dmexco]http://www.dmexco.de/


Disclaimer: The information contained in this message and attachments is 
intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee and may be 
confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are reminded that the 
information remains the property of the sender. You must not use, disclose, 
distribute, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. If you have received this 
message in error, please contact the sender immediately and irrevocably delete 
this message and any copies.

From: Rene Kochen 
[mailto:rene.koc...@emea.schange.commailto:rene.koc...@emea.schange.com]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 14:47
To: user@cassandra.apache.orgmailto:user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: High commit size

The problem is that the system just freezes and nodes are dying. The system 
becomes very unresponsive and it always happens when the shareable amount of 
RAM reaches the total number of bytes in the system.

Is there something in Windows that I can tune in order to avoid this behavior? 
I cannot easily migrate to Linux right now.

Thanks,

Rene
2012/9/10 Oleg Dulin oleg.du...@gmail.commailto:oleg.du...@gmail.com
It is memory-mapped I/O. I wouldn't worry about it.

BTW, Windows might not be the best choice to run Cassandra on. My experience 
running Cassandra on Windows has not been positive one. We no longer support 
Windows as our production platform.

Regards,
Oleg


On 2012-09-10 09:00:02 +, Rene Kochen said:
Hi all,

On my test cluster I have three Windows Server 2008 R2 machines running 
Cassandra 1.0.11

If i use memory mapped IO (the default), then the nodes freeze after a while. 
Paging is disabled.

The private bytes are OK (8GB). That is the amount I use in the -Xms and -Xmx 
arguments. The virtual size is big as expected because of the memory mapped IO. 
However, the working set size (size in RAM) is 24 GB (my total RAM usage). If I 
look with Process Explorer to the physical memory section I see a very high 
value in the WS Sharable section.

Anyone has a clue what is going om here?

Many thanks!

Rene
image


--
Regards,
Oleg Dulin
NYC Java Big Data Engineer
http://www.olegdulin.com/


inline: image001.pnginline: image002.pnginline: signature-logo5395.pnginline: dmexco-logo634e.png

Re: High commit size

2012-09-10 Thread Henrik Schröder
When we ran Cassandra on windows, we got better performance without memory
mapped IO. We had the same problems your are describing, what happens is
that Windows is rather aggressive about swapping out memory when all the
memory is used, and it starts swapping out unused parts of the heap,
which causes problems later when it has to swap it in again. We tried a
bunch of solutions to limit the mmap memory, to reduce swappiness, etc, but
nothing worked.

Switching to standard disk access mode worked like a charm though, and
performance improved. You still have the disk cache instead of the mmap, so
you still use all the RAM of the machine, but you won't run into swapping
hell.

So, disable mmap, benchmark it, and see if it outperforms running with
mmap. I'm pretty sure you will find that it does.


/Henrik


On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Rene Kochen
rene.koc...@emea.schange.comwrote:

 For performance reasons I switched to memory mapped IO. Is there a way to
 make memory-mapped IO work in Windows?

 Thanks!



 2012/9/10 Viktor Jevdokimov viktor.jevdoki...@adform.com

  Do not use mmap/auto on Windows, standard access mode only. In
 cassandra.yaml:

 disk_access_mode: standard

 ** **

 ** **
Best regards / Pagarbiai
 *Viktor Jevdokimov*
 Senior Developer

 Email: viktor.jevdoki...@adform.com
 Phone: +370 5 212 3063, Fax +370 5 261 0453
 J. Jasinskio 16C, LT-01112 Vilnius, Lithuania
 Follow us on Twitter: @adforminsiderhttp://twitter.com/#!/adforminsider
 What is Adform: watch this short video http://vimeo.com/adform/display
  [image: Adform News] http://www.adform.com
 * *
 *Visit us at Dmexco:* Hall: 7, Aisle: A, Stand: 030
 September 12-13 Cologne, Germany
 [image: dmexco] http://www.dmexco.de/

 Disclaimer: The information contained in this message and attachments is
 intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee and may be
 confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are reminded that
 the information remains the property of the sender. You must not use,
 disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. If you have
 received this message in error, please contact the sender immediately and
 irrevocably delete this message and any copies.

   *From:* Rene Kochen [mailto:rene.koc...@emea.schange.com]
 *Sent:* Monday, September 10, 2012 14:47
 *To:* user@cassandra.apache.org
 *Subject:* Re: High commit size

 ** **

 The problem is that the system just freezes and nodes are dying. The
 system becomes very unresponsive and it always happens when the shareable
 amount of RAM reaches the total number of bytes in the system.

 Is there something in Windows that I can tune in order to avoid this
 behavior? I cannot easily migrate to Linux right now.

 Thanks,

 Rene

 

 2012/9/10 Oleg Dulin oleg.du...@gmail.com

 It is memory-mapped I/O. I wouldn't worry about it.

 BTW, Windows might not be the best choice to run Cassandra on. My
 experience running Cassandra on Windows has not been positive one. We no
 longer support Windows as our production platform.

 Regards,
 Oleg


 On 2012-09-10 09:00:02 +, Rene Kochen said:

 Hi all,

 On my test cluster I have three Windows Server 2008 R2 machines running
 Cassandra 1.0.11

 If i use memory mapped IO (the default), then the nodes freeze after a
 while. Paging is disabled.

 The private bytes are OK (8GB). That is the amount I use in the -Xms and
 -Xmx arguments. The virtual size is big as expected because of the memory
 mapped IO. However, the working set size (size in RAM) is 24 GB (my total
 RAM usage). If I look with Process Explorer to the physical memory section
 I see a very high value in the WS Sharable section.

 Anyone has a clue what is going om here?

 Many thanks!

 Rene
 image



 --
 Regards,
 Oleg Dulin
 NYC Java Big Data Engineer
 http://www.olegdulin.com/

 

 ** **



signature-logoc64.pngdmexco-logofa6.png