[fileupload]FileCleanerCleanup causes null pointer exception in contextDestroyed()

2009-07-31 Thread Arnaud Quillaud

Hello,

I'm facing a problem which has already been reported some time back 
(FileCleanerCleanup causes null pointer exception in contextDestroyed() 
see 
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/commons-user/200811.mbox/%3c1bcb7c7f0811211256h7cd7f07bicd4aed9a253e6...@mail.gmail.com%3e 
).


It looks like the contextDestroyed() method is trying to get the 
FileCleaningTracker by using the ServletContext.getAttribute() method.


But if I can believe the following post 
(http://forums.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=597964), the attributes are 
removed before the contextDetroyed(), hence the NPE.


Arnaud Q

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org



Re: Release codec 1.4?

2009-07-31 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Julius Daviesjuliusdav...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi, Tom,


 Codec-1.4 rc2 is here if you want play around:

 http://people.apache.org/~niallp/codec-1.4-rc2/

 Note:  rc2 definitely won't be the final release.  There will at least
 be an rc3.

snip/

Yup, to clarify, rc = release candidate. Please note that the above
are merely code snapshots, and not released artifacts (i.e. not for
general/production use at all).

-Rahul

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org



Re: Release codec 1.4?

2009-07-31 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 9:20 PM, Gary
Gregoryggreg...@seagullsoftware.com wrote:
 Hi Tom:

 I need to look at the patch for [CODEC-59] and then make sure our test 
 coverage is a good as before the patch. Then we can cut another RC and people 
 can look at the bits and vote.

 My intention is to look at [CODEC-59] later today or over the weekend.

I'm going on holiday in just over a week so perhaps better if someone
else does the RM role. If noone else wants to do it, then I could
probably do it if its ready to go in the next day or so - or after I
get back.

Niall

 Gary

 -Original Message-
 From: TomStrummer [mailto:tomstrum...@gmail.com]
 Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 1:10 PM
 To: user@commons.apache.org
 Subject: RE: Release codec 1.4?


 Not to bug you Gary, but any update on this?

 I'm really looking for CODEC-69 (Streaming Base64).  Are the current
 1.4-SNAPSHOT builds published anywhere?  The project website says the
 current version is 1.4-SNAPSHOT but I only see downloads for 1.3.  The
 http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/ doesn't seem to have
 anything from commons-codec.

 Thanks.
 -Tom



 Gary Gregory wrote:
 
  Julius,
 
  I will look at CODEC-75 this week.
 
  Gary
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Julius Davies [mailto:juliusdav...@gmail.com]
  Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 11:05 AM
  To: Commons Users List
  Subject: Re: Release codec 1.4?
 
  Hi,
 
  I'm mostly happy with the state of the CODEC in the repository.
  Base64 can be properly streamed when using the repository version, and
  I believe it's at least 33% faster than any of these:
 
  1. http://iharder.sourceforge.net/base64/   (2 times faster)
  2. sun.misc.BASE64Decoder   (2 times faster)
  3. openssl enc -base64 -d   (about 33% faster?)
 
  Obviously I wish the patch I submitted for CODEC-75 would be applied
  (I'm privately forking for my own needs).
 
 
  yours,
 
  Julius
 
 
 
  On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 4:55 PM, da...@davidkarlsen.com wrote:
   On Sun, 12 Jul 2009, Gary Gregory wrote:
  
   Note that due to the Caverphone class, the requirement for a Codec
 1.4
   release will be changed from Java 1.3.1 to 1.4.2. I think this is
 fine
  and
   reworking Caverphone to be Java 1.3 compliant is not worth the
 effort.
  
   Is that an issue for anyone?
  
   Not for me - and can't really imagine for any else either, actually
 1.4
  was
   EOSL October last year: http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/download.html
  
   If they haven't moved yet they'll have bigger problems than commons
  codec
   requiring it from v1.4 :)
  
   And - a big thanks!
  
   --
   David J. M. Karlsen - +47 90 68 22 43
   http://www.davidkarlsen.com
   http://mp3.davidkarlsen.com
  
   -
   To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
   For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org
  
  
 
 
 
  --
  yours,
 
  Julius Davies
  250-592-2284 (Home)
  250-893-4579 (Mobile)
  http://juliusdavies.ca/logging.html
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org
 
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org
 
 
 

 --
 View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Release-codec-1.4--
 tp2263p24762389.html
 Sent from the Commons - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org



RE: Release codec 1.4?

2009-07-31 Thread Gary Gregory
WRT: [CODEC-59] Add methods to Base64 which work with String instead of byte[]. 

Patch applied with one added test code line to keep line code coverage at 100%. 
Branch coverage is up to 92% from 91%.

I would still like to see code coverage (especially in the language package) 
improved as indicated in previous messages, but not much luck getting 
volunteers.

Other than that, Niall can cut another RC.

Gary

 -Original Message-
 From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:niall.pember...@gmail.com]
 Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 3:13 PM
 To: Commons Users List
 Subject: Re: Release codec 1.4?
 
 On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 9:20 PM, Gary
 Gregoryggreg...@seagullsoftware.com wrote:
  Hi Tom:
 
  I need to look at the patch for [CODEC-59] and then make sure our test
 coverage is a good as before the patch. Then we can cut another RC and
 people can look at the bits and vote.
 
  My intention is to look at [CODEC-59] later today or over the weekend.
 
 I'm going on holiday in just over a week so perhaps better if someone
 else does the RM role. If noone else wants to do it, then I could
 probably do it if its ready to go in the next day or so - or after I
 get back.
 
 Niall
 
  Gary
 
  -Original Message-
  From: TomStrummer [mailto:tomstrum...@gmail.com]
  Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 1:10 PM
  To: user@commons.apache.org
  Subject: RE: Release codec 1.4?
 
 
  Not to bug you Gary, but any update on this?
 
  I'm really looking for CODEC-69 (Streaming Base64).  Are the current
  1.4-SNAPSHOT builds published anywhere?  The project website says the
  current version is 1.4-SNAPSHOT but I only see downloads for 1.3.  The
  http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/ doesn't seem to
 have
  anything from commons-codec.
 
  Thanks.
  -Tom
 
 
 
  Gary Gregory wrote:
  
   Julius,
  
   I will look at CODEC-75 this week.
  
   Gary
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Julius Davies [mailto:juliusdav...@gmail.com]
   Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 11:05 AM
   To: Commons Users List
   Subject: Re: Release codec 1.4?
  
   Hi,
  
   I'm mostly happy with the state of the CODEC in the repository.
   Base64 can be properly streamed when using the repository version,
 and
   I believe it's at least 33% faster than any of these:
  
   1. http://iharder.sourceforge.net/base64/   (2 times faster)
   2. sun.misc.BASE64Decoder   (2 times faster)
   3. openssl enc -base64 -d   (about 33% faster?)
  
   Obviously I wish the patch I submitted for CODEC-75 would be applied
   (I'm privately forking for my own needs).
  
  
   yours,
  
   Julius
  
  
  
   On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 4:55 PM, da...@davidkarlsen.com wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jul 2009, Gary Gregory wrote:
   
Note that due to the Caverphone class, the requirement for a
 Codec
  1.4
release will be changed from Java 1.3.1 to 1.4.2. I think this is
  fine
   and
reworking Caverphone to be Java 1.3 compliant is not worth the
  effort.
   
Is that an issue for anyone?
   
Not for me - and can't really imagine for any else either,
 actually
  1.4
   was
EOSL October last year:
 http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/download.html
   
If they haven't moved yet they'll have bigger problems than
 commons
   codec
requiring it from v1.4 :)
   
And - a big thanks!
   
--
David J. M. Karlsen - +47 90 68 22 43
http://www.davidkarlsen.com
http://mp3.davidkarlsen.com
   
--
 ---
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org
   
   
  
  
  
   --
   yours,
  
   Julius Davies
   250-592-2284 (Home)
   250-893-4579 (Mobile)
   http://juliusdavies.ca/logging.html
  
   
 -
   To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
   For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org
  
  
   -
   To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
   For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org
  
  
  
 
  --
  View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Release-codec-1.4--
  tp2263p24762389.html
  Sent from the Commons - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
 
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org
 
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org
 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org