Snapshots timeouts
I am currently trying to create another hbase cluster by exporting snapshots from our main storage. While it worked well for the smaller tables, it failed on timeouts on larger tables while trying to CREATE the snapshots. I read a bit about it and found out that increasing hbase.snapshot.master.timeoutMillis and hbase.snapshot.region.timeout may help. Where should I set those configurations? -- View this message in context: http://apache-hbase.679495.n3.nabble.com/Snapshots-timeouts-tp4057961.html Sent from the HBase User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Snapshots timeouts
There are actually three timeouts, and I only had success when increasing all three. Adding the following to hbase-site.xml should do the trick. property namehbase.snapshot.master.timeoutMillis/name value120/value /property property namehbase.snapshot.region.timeout/name value120/value /property property namehbase.snapshot.master.timeout.millis/name value120/value /property -- View this message in context: http://apache-hbase.679495.n3.nabble.com/Snapshots-timeouts-tp4057961p4057962.html Sent from the HBase User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Snapshots timeouts
HMaster hbase-site.xml! On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 12:17 PM, yanivG yaniv.yancov...@gmail.com wrote: I am currently trying to create another hbase cluster by exporting snapshots from our main storage. While it worked well for the smaller tables, it failed on timeouts on larger tables while trying to CREATE the snapshots. I read a bit about it and found out that increasing hbase.snapshot.master.timeoutMillis and hbase.snapshot.region.timeout may help. Where should I set those configurations? -- View this message in context: http://apache-hbase.679495.n3.nabble.com/Snapshots-timeouts-tp4057961.html Sent from the HBase User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Bharath Vissapragada http://www.cloudera.com
ycsb error
Hi all: when i used ycsb, and executed this command $YCSB_HOME/bin/ycsb load hbase -P workloads/workloada -p columnfamily=f1 -p recordcount=1 -s workloada.dat, an error occured, show as below: java.lang.RuntimeException: java.io.IOException: Unable to determine ZooKeeper ensemble at com.yahoo.ycsb.db.HBaseClient$HTableFactory.createHTableInterface(HBaseClient.java:85) at com.yahoo.ycsb.db.HBaseClient$HTablePool.getTable(HBaseClient.java:112) at com.yahoo.ycsb.db.HBaseClient.getHTable(HBaseClient.java:200) at com.yahoo.ycsb.db.HBaseClient.update(HBaseClient.java:380) at com.yahoo.ycsb.db.HBaseClient.insert(HBaseClient.java:435) at com.yahoo.ycsb.DBWrapper.insert(DBWrapper.java:148) at com.yahoo.ycsb.workloads.CoreWorkload.doInsert(CoreWorkload.java:514) at com.yahoo.ycsb.ClientThread.run(Client.java:269) Caused by: java.io.IOException: Unable to determine ZooKeeper ensemble at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.zookeeper.ZKUtil.connect(ZKUtil.java:120) at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.zookeeper.ZooKeeperWatcher.init(ZooKeeperWatcher.java:165) at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.zookeeper.ZooKeeperWatcher.init(ZooKeeperWatcher.java:134) at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.ZooKeeperKeepAliveConnection.init(ZooKeeperKeepAliveConnection.java:43) at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.HConnectionManager$HConnectionImplementation.getKeepAliveZooKeeperWatcher(HConnectionManager.java:1768) at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.ZooKeeperRegistry.isTableOnlineState(ZooKeeperRegistry.java:100) at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.HConnectionManager$HConnectionImplementation.isTableDisabled(HConnectionManager.java:930) at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.HConnectionManager$HConnectionImplementation.relocateRegion(HConnectionManager.java:1083) at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.HConnectionManager$HConnectionImplementation.locateRegionInMeta(HConnectionManager.java:1314) at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.HConnectionManager$HConnectionImplementation.locateRegion(HConnectionManager.java:1110) at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.HConnectionManager$HConnectionImplementation.locateRegion(HConnectionManager.java:1067) at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.HTable.finishSetup(HTable.java:326) at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.HTable.init(HTable.java:192) at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.HTable.init(HTable.java:165) at com.yahoo.ycsb.db.HBaseClient$HTableFactory.createHTableInterface(HBaseClient.java:80) ... 7 more thanks for any help
issue about failed to move out of transition within timeout 120000ms
hi,maillist:
hi ,when i check hbase use hbck ,i find 3 inconsistent ,so i use
-repair option to fix it ,but get the following error ,anyone know how to
handle this?
3ed95_1396634339085,1396647514974.ffa8948e67909192db20a889cbcc7fac.',
STARTKEY =
'20140405_10_001_20_93889f73fab14378a5ae8fbfb813ed95_1396634339085', ENDKEY
= '20140405_10_001_20_ea00636717d946e39fbd3cbae6aadc71_1396636206669',
ENCODED = ffa8948e67909192db20a889cbcc7fac,}
Exception in thread main java.io.IOException: Region {NAME =
'monitor_info,20140405_10_001_20_93889f73fab14378a5ae8fbfb813ed95_1396634339085,1396647514974.ffa8948e67909192db20a889cbcc7fac.',
STARTKEY =
'20140405_10_001_20_93889f73fab14378a5ae8fbfb813ed95_1396634339085', ENDKEY
= '20140405_10_001_20_ea00636717d946e39fbd3cbae6aadc71_1396636206669',
ENCODED = ffa8948e67909192db20a889cbcc7fac,} failed to move out of
transition within timeout 12ms
at
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.HBaseFsckRepair.waitUntilAssigned(HBaseFsckRepair.java:137)
at
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.HBaseFsck.tryAssignmentRepair(HBaseFsck.java:1577)
at
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.HBaseFsck.checkRegionConsistency(HBaseFsck.java:1710)
at
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.HBaseFsck.checkAndFixConsistency(HBaseFsck.java:1405)
at
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.HBaseFsck.onlineConsistencyRepair(HBaseFsck.java:418)
at
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.HBaseFsck.onlineHbck(HBaseFsck.java:437)
at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.HBaseFsck.exec(HBaseFsck.java:3667)
at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.HBaseFsck.run(HBaseFsck.java:3486)
at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:70)
at org.apache.hadoop.util.ToolRunner.run(ToolRunner.java:84)
at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.HBaseFsck.main(HBaseFsck.java:3480)
14/04/08 17:08:55 DEBUG hfile.LruBlockCache: Stats: total=65.35 MB,
free=7.72 GB, max=7.78 GB, blocks=0, accesses=0, hits=0, hitRatio=0,
cachingAccesses=0, cachingHits=0, cachingHitsRatio=0, evictions=0,
evicted=0, evictedPerRun=NaN
is hbase 0.97 64 bit or 32 bit?
is hbase 0.97 support 64 bit? or should complied from 32 bit to 64 bit? Thanks! beatls
Re: is hbase 0.97 64 bit or 32 bit?
Can you clarify which hbase release you're looking at ? The latest release for 0.96 was 0.96.2 Latest release for 0.98 was 0.98.1 Cheers On Apr 8, 2014, at 6:55 AM, hua beatls bea...@gmail.com wrote: is hbase 0.97 support 64 bit? or should complied from 32 bit to 64 bit? Thanks! beatls
Re: is hbase 0.97 64 bit or 32 bit?
it is 0.96.2 thanks! beatls On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote: Can you clarify which hbase release you're looking at ? The latest release for 0.96 was 0.96.2 Latest release for 0.98 was 0.98.1 Cheers On Apr 8, 2014, at 6:55 AM, hua beatls bea...@gmail.com wrote: is hbase 0.97 support 64 bit? or should complied from 32 bit to 64 bit? Thanks! beatls
Re: Snapshots timeouts
Snapshots are a two-phase commit like operation, with the master coordinating the region servers. http://blog.cloudera.com/blog/2013/06/introduction-to-apache-hbase-snapshots-part-2-deeper-dive/ so, you have 2 timeout - on master side you have to set hbase.snapshot.master.timeoutMillis. (The master is waiting response from every RS involved in the snapshot operation) - on region server side you have to set hbase.snapshot.region.timeout. (The region server is the one taking the snapshot of the regions that is hosting) the properties must be set in the hbase-site.xml of Master/RSs Matteo On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 12:23 AM, Bharath Vissapragada bhara...@cloudera.com wrote: HMaster hbase-site.xml! On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 12:17 PM, yanivG yaniv.yancov...@gmail.com wrote: I am currently trying to create another hbase cluster by exporting snapshots from our main storage. While it worked well for the smaller tables, it failed on timeouts on larger tables while trying to CREATE the snapshots. I read a bit about it and found out that increasing hbase.snapshot.master.timeoutMillis and hbase.snapshot.region.timeout may help. Where should I set those configurations? -- View this message in context: http://apache-hbase.679495.n3.nabble.com/Snapshots-timeouts-tp4057961.html Sent from the HBase User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Bharath Vissapragada http://www.cloudera.com
How to decide the next HMaster?
Could someone explain me which it's the process to select the next HMaster when the current one is gone down?? I've been looking for information about it in the documentation, but, I haven't found anything.
Re: is hbase 0.97 64 bit or 32 bit?
It runs fine on 64 bit JVMs if that is what you are asking. From: hua beatls bea...@gmail.com To: user@hbase.apache.org user@hbase.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, April 8, 2014 6:28 AM Subject: Re: is hbase 0.97 64 bit or 32 bit? it is 0.96.2 thanks! beatls On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote: Can you clarify which hbase release you're looking at ? The latest release for 0.96 was 0.96.2 Latest release for 0.98 was 0.98.1 Cheers On Apr 8, 2014, at 6:55 AM, hua beatls bea...@gmail.com wrote: is hbase 0.97 support 64 bit? or should complied from 32 bit to 64 bit? Thanks! beatls
Re: How to decide the next HMaster?
It's a simple leader election via ZooKeeper. J-D On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 7:18 AM, gortiz gor...@pragsis.com wrote: Could someone explain me which it's the process to select the next HMaster when the current one is gone down?? I've been looking for information about it in the documentation, but, I haven't found anything.
Hadoop Summit EU HBase Meetup Review
We had Hadoop Summit Europe last week where we had an HBase Meetup. First we had Enis talk about HBase Architectureand then Lars talked about some interesting HBase Use CasesFinally, we opened it up to the public where we had a frank discussion on the Uptake of HBase vs. other NoSQL DB's such as Mongo and Cassandra. This wasn't about bashing other DB's, just understanding how the spectrum of NoSQL DB's was leading to a evaluation/production use of HBase. It was also partly based on the report from InfoWorldhttp://podcasts.infoworld.com/d/big-data/big-data-showdown-cassandra-vs-hbase-239592Anyways these were the major points we discussed(Lars and Jon Hsieh from Cloudera, Enis and Devaraj from Hortonworks contributed with about input from 12 other users from the community)Documentation - Cassandra has a better web page than HBase does. Even though HBase's documentation is complete, finding the documentation is a bit hard. Installation - HBase is hard to install for the newbie. I think there has been some effort to make this more friendly by wrapping the master in RegionServersVendor Pushes - Cassandra has DataStax, Pentaho pushes Mongo, Cloudera pushes Impala, MapR is pushing their proprietary FS, IBM their own DB's. Even though HBase is part of the Hadoop Ecosystem, there is no one vendor that is exclusively pushing HBase to uptake by the community or even by the Hadoop communityMessaging - HBase has been at the backend of a no. of negative marketing by various vendors over things that were possibly true in the past. For e.g. Lars mentioned that a certain vendor was incorrectly stating that HBase has issue with SPOF even though this hasn't been true for quite some time. Similarly, Jon mentioned that a certain slide where he was talking about the complexity of HBase was taken out of context and shown as a negative implementation of HBaseSQL based solutions - Even though there are a no. of efforts to showcase that HBase has some SQL based interfaces available like Phoenix, Impala Hive(Albeit some issues), there is still misconception that HBase is purely accessed via JavaSecurity in HBase - Even though 0.98 has Security, it needs to be road tested.Some recommendations:Push messaging out and make it more clear - Apache blogs, Hortonworks Blogs, Cloudera blogsDocumentation - David Worms, who is a consultant out of France, has volunteered to help make the website better. You may want to reach out to him - fr.linkedin.com/pub/david-worms/7/626/630Cost Calculator - Lars made a great point of having a cost calculator ability to estimate the cost of various operations. This makes it very likely by bigger organizations to pick and choose HBase by understanding how they affect the bottom line Update from Andrew - HBase has had strong security since 0.94 if not 0.92 - secure RPC and ACLs at the table and column family level. We had these features before Cassandra and even Accumulo.Why stuff like that gets lost is we are a bunch of engineers not marketers. The trouble with messaging is someone has to write it. Since it's a joyless job for most engineers, someone must be paid to do it. Thanks Subash
RE: Hadoop Summit EU HBase Meetup Review
Very interesting write up, but quite hard to read. configuration, installation, complexity, documentation ... these can be improved, no doubts, some other features (Inter DC replication and high availability) are still behind of Cassandra's I think and this should be prioritized by HBase community. I do not count MongoDB as a real contender - its in another league and will become niche product for quick mash-ups of web apps very soon. The real problem of HBase, I agree - its does not have real corporate sponsor similar to Cassandra's DataStax. Best regards, Vladimir Rodionov Principal Platform Engineer Carrier IQ, www.carrieriq.com e-mail: vrodio...@carrieriq.com From: Subash DSouza [subashdso...@outlook.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 6:07 PM To: user@hbase.apache.org Subject: Hadoop Summit EU HBase Meetup Review We had Hadoop Summit Europe last week where we had an HBase Meetup. First we had Enis talk about HBase Architectureand then Lars talked about some interesting HBase Use CasesFinally, we opened it up to the public where we had a frank discussion on the Uptake of HBase vs. other NoSQL DB's such as Mongo and Cassandra. This wasn't about bashing other DB's, just understanding how the spectrum of NoSQL DB's was leading to a evaluation/production use of HBase. It was also partly based on the report from InfoWorldhttp://podcasts.infoworld.com/d/big-data/big-data-showdown-cassandra-vs-hbase-239592Anyways these were the major points we discussed(Lars and Jon Hsieh from Cloudera, Enis and Devaraj from Hortonworks contributed with about input from 12 other users from the community)Documentation - Cassandra has a better web page than HBase does. Even though HBase's documentation is complete, finding the documentation is a bit hard. Installation - HBase is hard to install for the newbie. I think there has been some effort to make this more friendly by wrapping the master in RegionServersVendor Pushes - Cassandra has DataStax, Pentaho pushes Mongo, Cloudera pushes Impala, MapR is pushing their proprietary FS, IBM their own DB's. Even though HBase is part of the Hadoop Ecosystem, there is no one vendor that is exclusively pushing HBase to uptake by the community or even by the Hadoop communityMessaging - HBase has been at the backend of a no. of negative marketing by various vendors over things that were possibly true in the past. For e.g. Lars mentioned that a certain vendor was incorrectly stating that HBase has issue with SPOF even though this hasn't been true for quite some time. Similarly, Jon mentioned that a certain slide where he was talking about the complexity of HBase was taken out of context and shown as a negative implementation of HBaseSQL based solutions - Even though there are a no. of efforts to showcase that HBase has some SQL based interfaces available like Phoenix, Impala Hive(Albeit some issues), there is still misconception that HBase is purely accessed via JavaSecurity in HBase - Even though 0.98 has Security, it needs to be road tested.Some recommendations:Push messaging out and make it more clear - Apache blogs, Hortonworks Blogs, Cloudera blogsDocumentation - David Worms, who is a consultant out of France, has volunteered to help make the website better. You may want to reach out to him - fr.linkedin.com/pub/david-worms/7/626/630Cost Calculator - Lars made a great point of having a cost calculator ability to estimate the cost of various operations. This makes it very likely by bigger organizations to pick and choose HBase by understanding how they affect the bottom line Update from Andrew - HBase has had strong security since 0.94 if not 0.92 - secure RPC and ACLs at the table and column family level. We had these features before Cassandra and even Accumulo.Why stuff like that gets lost is we are a bunch of engineers not marketers. The trouble with messaging is someone has to write it. Since it's a joyless job for most engineers, someone must be paid to do it. Thanks Subash Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this message, including any attachments hereto, may be confidential and is intended to be read only by the individual or entity to whom this message is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent or designee of the intended recipient, please note that any review, use, disclosure or distribution of this message or its attachments, in any form, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender and/or notificati...@carrieriq.com and delete or destroy any copy of this message and its attachments.
Efficiently scan table segments with coprocessor
Hi, We have a short and tall hbase table structure where a single user's data is stored across a set of rows in hbase. New events are inserted into a user's data, and the sorting of the rows handles the structure of the users data. Most of our user base is inactive at any given time. When a user's data is updated, we want to run a computation on the user's data and update the user's stats. Because of our userbase pattern, running a full scan is very inefficient. We basically want to stream updates every time a user takes an action. I am thinking that the best way to do this is through a RegionObserver coprocessor, using either prePut or postPut. Only problem is that we would need to instantiate a new scan each time pre or postPut is called, which might we inefficient. Since hbase already has a pointer to the user's data via the Put, is there any way to leverage this to scan that local data more efficiently than using a new InternalScanner? Thanks, Dave
Re: Efficiently scan table segments with coprocessor
bq. a single user's data is stored across a set of rows Have you looked at HBASE-9488 'Improve performance for small scan' ? Cheers On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 8:30 PM, David Quigley dquigle...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, We have a short and tall hbase table structure where a single user's data is stored across a set of rows in hbase. New events are inserted into a user's data, and the sorting of the rows handles the structure of the users data. Most of our user base is inactive at any given time. When a user's data is updated, we want to run a computation on the user's data and update the user's stats. Because of our userbase pattern, running a full scan is very inefficient. We basically want to stream updates every time a user takes an action. I am thinking that the best way to do this is through a RegionObserver coprocessor, using either prePut or postPut. Only problem is that we would need to instantiate a new scan each time pre or postPut is called, which might we inefficient. Since hbase already has a pointer to the user's data via the Put, is there any way to leverage this to scan that local data more efficiently than using a new InternalScanner? Thanks, Dave
RE: Hadoop Summit EU HBase Meetup Review
Yeah Sorry. I formatted it nicely but it got lost while posting to the list Subash -Original Message- From: Vladimir Rodionov [mailto:vrodio...@carrieriq.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 8, 2014 7:10 PM To: user@hbase.apache.org; user@hbase.apache.org Subject: RE: Hadoop Summit EU HBase Meetup Review Very interesting write up, but quite hard to read. configuration, installation, complexity, documentation ... these can be improved, no doubts, some other features (Inter DC replication and high availability) are still behind of Cassandra's I think and this should be prioritized by HBase community. I do not count MongoDB as a real contender - its in another league and will become niche product for quick mash-ups of web apps very soon. The real problem of HBase, I agree - its does not have real corporate sponsor similar to Cassandra's DataStax. Best regards, Vladimir Rodionov Principal Platform Engineer Carrier IQ, www.carrieriq.com e-mail: vrodio...@carrieriq.com From: Subash DSouza [subashdso...@outlook.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 6:07 PM To: user@hbase.apache.org Subject: Hadoop Summit EU HBase Meetup Review We had Hadoop Summit Europe last week where we had an HBase Meetup. First we had Enis talk about HBase Architectureand then Lars talked about some interesting HBase Use CasesFinally, we opened it up to the public where we had a frank discussion on the Uptake of HBase vs. other NoSQL DB's such as Mongo and Cassandra. This wasn't about bashing other DB's, just understanding how the spectrum of NoSQL DB's was leading to a evaluation/production use of HBase. It was also partly based on the report from InfoWorldhttp://podcasts.infoworld.com/d/big-data/big-data-showdown-cassandr a-vs-hbase-239592Anyways these were the major points we discussed(Lars and Jon Hsieh from Cloudera, Enis and Devaraj from Hortonworks contributed with about input from 12 other users from the community)Documentation - Cassandra has a better web page than HBase does. Even though HBase's documentation is complete, finding the documentation is a bit hard. Installation - HBase is hard to install for the newbie. I think there has been some effort to make this more friendly by wrapping the master in RegionServersVendor Pushes - Cassandra has DataStax, Pentaho pushes Mongo, Cloudera pushes Impala, MapR is pushing their proprietary FS, IBM their own DB's. Even though HBase is part of the Hadoop Ecosystem, there is no one vendor that is exclusively pushing HBase to uptake by the community or even by the Hadoop communityMessaging - HBase has been at the backend of a no. of negative marketing by various vendors over things that were possibly true in the past. For e.g. Lars mentioned that a certain vendor was incorrectly stating that HBase has issue with SPOF even though this hasn't been true for quite some time. Similarly, Jon mentioned that a certain slide where he was talking about the complexity of HBase was taken out of context and shown as a negative implementation of HBaseSQL based solutions - Even though there are a no. of efforts to showcase that HBase has some SQL based interfaces available like Phoenix, Impala Hive(Albeit some issues), there is still misconception that HBase is purely accessed via JavaSecurity in HBase - Even though 0.98 has Security, it needs to be road tested.Some recommendations:Push messaging out and make it more clear - Apache blogs, Hortonworks Blogs, Cloudera blogsDocumentation - David Worms, who is a consultant out of France, has volunteered to help make the website better. You may want to reach out to him - fr.linkedin.com/pub/david-worms/7/626/630Cost Calculator - Lars made a great point of having a cost calculator ability to estimate the cost of various operations. This makes it very likely by bigger organizations to pick and choose HBase by understanding how they affect the bottom line Update from Andrew - HBase has had strong security since 0.94 if not 0.92 - secure RPC and ACLs at the table and column family level. We had these features before Cassandra and even Accumulo.Why stuff like that gets lost is we are a bunch of engineers not marketers. The trouble with messaging is someone has to write it. Since it's a joyless job for most engineers, someone must be paid to do it. Thanks Subash Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this message, including any attachments hereto, may be confidential and is intended to be read only by the individual or entity to whom this message is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent or designee of the intended recipient, please note that any review, use, disclosure or distribution of this message or its attachments, in any form, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender and/or notificati...@carrieriq.com and delete or destroy any copy of this message and its attachments.
Inconsistent configuration. Previous configuration for using table name in metrics: true, new configuration: false
hi,maillist: i try check content of storefile use HFile tool,but i get error ,anyone know how to fix it? i use hbase-0.94.6. # hbase org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.HFile -v -f /hbaseroot/monitor_cookie/7d92d877b470e3b5e0e6a8c55a80c6bd/info/b38124cd1a9441af8af7771c3da4357d 14/04/09 11:52:08 WARN conf.Configuration: hadoop.native.lib is deprecated. Instead, use io.native.lib.available 14/04/09 11:52:08 INFO util.ChecksumType: Checksum using org.apache.hadoop.util.PureJavaCrc32 14/04/09 11:52:08 INFO util.ChecksumType: Checksum can use org.apache.hadoop.util.PureJavaCrc32C 14/04/09 11:52:08 WARN conf.Configuration: fs.default.name is deprecated. Instead, use fs.defaultFS Scanning - /hbaseroot/monitor_cookie/7d92d877b470e3b5e0e6a8c55a80c6bd/info/b38124cd1a9441af8af7771c3da4357d 14/04/09 11:52:09 INFO hfile.CacheConfig: Allocating LruBlockCache with maximum size 7.8 G 14/04/09 11:52:09 ERROR metrics.SchemaMetrics: Inconsistent configuration. Previous configuration for using table name in metrics: true, new configuration: false Scanned kv count - 4964
