Re: Cellar 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT
Awesome, thanks!! :) -- View this message in context: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Cellar-3-0-0-SNAPSHOT-tp4028863p4029075.html Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Cellar 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT
Good call! I just assumed it would use whatever followed as the command and just didn't care about quotes. So I'm guessing by the s at the end of features? I think I almost finished up the work I wanted to do on that fork. One quick fix to make and check in which should fix a random error I see with Hazelcast 3.0. I think think the blueprint files in 3.0 might have had some cyclical type dependencies and a lot of unnecessary service references. It feels much faster to me. I slimmed down a lot of stuff and have been diffing against the latest code, luckily for me it hasn't changed much, to make sure I'm not losing anything that is needed by accident. -- View this message in context: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Cellar-3-0-0-SNAPSHOT-tp4028863p4029076.html Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Cellar 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT
Will -p be added to 3.0.0 as well? Otherwise unit tests using 3.0.0 that create and connect to a child instance won't be able to in an integration test. Ryan -- View this message in context: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Cellar-3-0-0-SNAPSHOT-tp4028863p4029056.html Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Cellar 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT
Hi Ryan, exactly, it's the plan. I gonna update 3.0.0 that way. Regards JB On 06/17/2013 04:56 PM, rkmoquin wrote: Will -p be added to 3.0.0 as well? Otherwise unit tests using 3.0.0 that create and connect to a child instance won't be able to in an integration test. Ryan -- View this message in context: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Cellar-3-0-0-SNAPSHOT-tp4028863p4029056.html Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Cellar 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT
Ok, cool, I figured but just wanted to make sure. Is there an rough estimate on on that feature? Just trying to plan ahead :) Thanks! -- View this message in context: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Cellar-3-0-0-SNAPSHOT-tp4028863p4029058.html Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Cellar 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT
Let say tonight (my time) ;) I reopen the Jira and work on that ;) Regards JB On 06/17/2013 05:12 PM, rkmoquin wrote: Ok, cool, I figured but just wanted to make sure. Is there an rough estimate on on that feature? Just trying to plan ahead :) Thanks! -- View this message in context: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Cellar-3-0-0-SNAPSHOT-tp4028863p4029058.html Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Cellar 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT
By the way, I checked the Cellar itests and I saw an issue in the destroyCellarChild method. We properly uninstall the cellar feature using: System.err.println(executeCommand(admin:connect + name + features:uninstall cellar)); but it's not correct as features:uninstall and cellar are consider as two different arguments. We should use System.err.println(executeCommand(admin:connect + name + \features:uninstall cellar\)); for instance. I'm fixing issues like this in the itests. Regards JB On 06/17/2013 05:12 PM, rkmoquin wrote: Ok, cool, I figured but just wanted to make sure. Is there an rough estimate on on that feature? Just trying to plan ahead :) Thanks! -- View this message in context: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Cellar-3-0-0-SNAPSHOT-tp4028863p4029058.html Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Cellar 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT
Hi Guys, I already fixes some of that a couple weeks ago, but this is mostly related to the subshells. Sometimes in the unit tests it doesn't find the ssh command needed from inside the Instance command. It should usually work inside Karaf but sometimes it really hangs there ... regards, Achim 2013/5/29 Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net Yes, it's a change on Karaf trunk. The -p option should work to provide the password (I did it backward compatible, as I did for other branches). Let me check if it's really the case on trunk. Regards JB On 05/29/2013 05:33 AM, Ryan Moquin wrote: So I finally am getting close to getting the Cellar 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT integration tests working, but a bunch of the tests, after they create a new instance, will cause a Login prompt to appear in the console. The command to start the instance(s) eventually times out as a result.. is there a way to handle that? or is there a parameter I could use to allow the login to happen? I think it's on the instance:connect. I'm going to look a little more into it. Thanks for any help! Ryan -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com -- Apache Karaf http://karaf.apache.org/ Committer PMC OPS4J Pax Web http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/ Committer Project Lead OPS4J Pax for Vaadin http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home Commiter Project Lead blog http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/
Re: Cellar 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT
I tried -p and it complains it's not a valid parameter, is there anyway to turn off security temporarily so I can see if I was able to fix 3.0.0? I'm still crossing my fingers, but I'm thinking I might have. -- View this message in context: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Cellar-3-0-0-SNAPSHOT-tp4028863p4028885.html Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Cellar 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT
AFAIR, I introduce -p for backward compatibility only in 2.x series. Let me check for the trunk. Regards JB On 05/30/2013 12:58 AM, rkmoquin wrote: I tried -p and it complains it's not a valid parameter, is there anyway to turn off security temporarily so I can see if I was able to fix 3.0.0? I'm still crossing my fingers, but I'm thinking I might have. -- View this message in context: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Cellar-3-0-0-SNAPSHOT-tp4028863p4028885.html Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Cellar 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT
Yes, it's a change on Karaf trunk. The -p option should work to provide the password (I did it backward compatible, as I did for other branches). Let me check if it's really the case on trunk. Regards JB On 05/29/2013 05:33 AM, Ryan Moquin wrote: So I finally am getting close to getting the Cellar 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT integration tests working, but a bunch of the tests, after they create a new instance, will cause a Login prompt to appear in the console. The command to start the instance(s) eventually times out as a result.. is there a way to handle that? or is there a parameter I could use to allow the login to happen? I think it's on the instance:connect. I'm going to look a little more into it. Thanks for any help! Ryan -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Karaf Cellar 3.0.0 SNAPSHOT
Sounds great to me. So out of curiosity, if I'm checking out the source, is it better for me to get it from github.com, git.apache.org, or apache svn? It looks like JB checked in some changes when I look at the git.apache.org karaf-cellar repo, which I tried merging with my checkout from github. Git said I was up to date though. I tried checking out from svn and building and the build fails. Is the build still not working or is something wrong on my end? I just want to make sure that something isn't wrong on my end... I figured if JB checked some stuff in then it was probably working... Ryan On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 3:33 AM, Achim Nierbeck bcanh...@googlemail.comwrote: Great to hear, and as I already said we love Contributions :D Yeah those pull requests from Github don't really work out well with projects hosted at Apache. So Patches is much easier and afaik also better for IP clearances :) thanks and regards, Achim 2013/1/22 Ryan Moquin fragility...@gmail.com That's my intention :-) I did submit a couple the other day linked to Cellar pull requests regarding a discontinued Hazelcast component (JB already took care of that one), an issue with the version of the pax-mvn-url artifact and creating a kar for cellar as well as moving the config files around since when I build a custom Karaf archive, the cellar config files don't get put into the etc directory even though the features XML says they should be. So contributing as much as I can is certainly my intent. :-) Anyhow, pull requests are a pain in the rear to get setup with the correct changes.. I think I should just go back to creating patch files and attaching those. I'm hoping once JB has a chance to check-in I'll be able to make some more contributions, Cellar is a project that really interests me subject matter wise, so I like digging around in it when something doesn't go as planned. :-) Ryan On Jan 22, 2013 3:07 AM, Achim Nierbeck bcanh...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi Ryan, it's always nice to have some code contribution. And even nicer if those are attached to Jira Issues ;) Would be great if you could add some of the missing pieces as patches to jiras. thanks, Achim 2013/1/22 Ryan Moquin fragility...@gmail.com Awesome, OK, I figured but I wanted to check since I hadn't seen any check ins yet. It was a good exercise in getting more familiar with the Cellar code, glad you already have it dealt with. I don't think I've seen that one yet, but I guess I'll find out. :-) No prob, when you check in those fixes I can move further on my usage of Cellar and see if I can fix anything that you haven't gotten to yet and submit. Thanks for your work on Cellar, can't wait to see it working with the other project I'm working. Thanks! Ryan On Jan 21, 2013 9:46 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net wrote: Hi Ryan, I already fixed that on my local working copy. FYI, you may see an issue with Cellar Features which pollutes the Karaf features service. For now, I'm focus on Cellar 2.3.x (fixes, itests, etc). I will commit both on Cellar 2.3.x and Cellar trunk in the middle of this week. Regards JB On 01/22/2013 03:43 AM, Ryan Moquin wrote: I don't know if you are interested by my apache cellar fork has all the changes necessary to update the tests to use the apache karaf 3.0.0 commands which are different. I also added a group manager property in a couple blueprint files to prevent NPEs during startup. Unfortunately, even though those problems s are fixed, cellars 3.0.0 deadlocks during startup, one of the blocked threads seemed to be waiting on the Karaf User Console which didn't seem to make sense. When it doesn't deadlock, it will error out after a few seconds D's with concurrent modification exceptions due to the combined class loader being constantly requested to load a RemoteRepositoryEvent by simultaneous threads. When I hooked in a debugger, there were alternating RemoteRepositoryEvents saying the cellar feature repository was remove and added. They just kept rapidly firing and the console would show a concurrent modification except stack trace every few minutes. Unfortunately this looks .like it's going to be a pain in the but of a problem to fix have you seen that happen with Cellar 3.x yet? Ryan On Jan 16, 2013 10:54 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net mailto:j...@nanthrax.net wrote: Hi Ryan, yes, I started to work on both Cellar 2.3.x and trunk yesterday. It should be better by the end of this week. Regards JB On 01/16/2013 05:12 AM, Ryan Moquin wrote: I know I was told that this version isn't stable yet, but I still wanted to see if the build should be able to complete successfully or not. I want to determine if some issues I'm having are something on my end or not. Currently the itests always seem to fail with cellar trunk,
Re: Karaf Cellar 3.0.0 SNAPSHOT
Hi Ryan, it's always nice to have some code contribution. And even nicer if those are attached to Jira Issues ;) Would be great if you could add some of the missing pieces as patches to jiras. thanks, Achim 2013/1/22 Ryan Moquin fragility...@gmail.com Awesome, OK, I figured but I wanted to check since I hadn't seen any check ins yet. It was a good exercise in getting more familiar with the Cellar code, glad you already have it dealt with. I don't think I've seen that one yet, but I guess I'll find out. :-) No prob, when you check in those fixes I can move further on my usage of Cellar and see if I can fix anything that you haven't gotten to yet and submit. Thanks for your work on Cellar, can't wait to see it working with the other project I'm working. Thanks! Ryan On Jan 21, 2013 9:46 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net wrote: Hi Ryan, I already fixed that on my local working copy. FYI, you may see an issue with Cellar Features which pollutes the Karaf features service. For now, I'm focus on Cellar 2.3.x (fixes, itests, etc). I will commit both on Cellar 2.3.x and Cellar trunk in the middle of this week. Regards JB On 01/22/2013 03:43 AM, Ryan Moquin wrote: I don't know if you are interested by my apache cellar fork has all the changes necessary to update the tests to use the apache karaf 3.0.0 commands which are different. I also added a group manager property in a couple blueprint files to prevent NPEs during startup. Unfortunately, even though those problems s are fixed, cellars 3.0.0 deadlocks during startup, one of the blocked threads seemed to be waiting on the Karaf User Console which didn't seem to make sense. When it doesn't deadlock, it will error out after a few seconds D's with concurrent modification exceptions due to the combined class loader being constantly requested to load a RemoteRepositoryEvent by simultaneous threads. When I hooked in a debugger, there were alternating RemoteRepositoryEvents saying the cellar feature repository was remove and added. They just kept rapidly firing and the console would show a concurrent modification except stack trace every few minutes. Unfortunately this looks .like it's going to be a pain in the but of a problem to fix have you seen that happen with Cellar 3.x yet? Ryan On Jan 16, 2013 10:54 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net mailto:j...@nanthrax.net wrote: Hi Ryan, yes, I started to work on both Cellar 2.3.x and trunk yesterday. It should be better by the end of this week. Regards JB On 01/16/2013 05:12 AM, Ryan Moquin wrote: I know I was told that this version isn't stable yet, but I still wanted to see if the build should be able to complete successfully or not. I want to determine if some issues I'm having are something on my end or not. Currently the itests always seem to fail with cellar trunk, is that the current known state of it? Or is it failing on my side only? Thanks, Ryan -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org mailto:jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com -- Apache Karaf http://karaf.apache.org/ Committer PMC OPS4J Pax Web http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/ Committer Project Lead OPS4J Pax for Vaadin http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home Commiter Project Lead blog http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/
Re: Karaf Cellar 3.0.0 SNAPSHOT
That's my intention :-) I did submit a couple the other day linked to Cellar pull requests regarding a discontinued Hazelcast component (JB already took care of that one), an issue with the version of the pax-mvn-url artifact and creating a kar for cellar as well as moving the config files around since when I build a custom Karaf archive, the cellar config files don't get put into the etc directory even though the features XML says they should be. So contributing as much as I can is certainly my intent. :-) Anyhow, pull requests are a pain in the rear to get setup with the correct changes.. I think I should just go back to creating patch files and attaching those. I'm hoping once JB has a chance to check-in I'll be able to make some more contributions, Cellar is a project that really interests me subject matter wise, so I like digging around in it when something doesn't go as planned. :-) Ryan On Jan 22, 2013 3:07 AM, Achim Nierbeck bcanh...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi Ryan, it's always nice to have some code contribution. And even nicer if those are attached to Jira Issues ;) Would be great if you could add some of the missing pieces as patches to jiras. thanks, Achim 2013/1/22 Ryan Moquin fragility...@gmail.com Awesome, OK, I figured but I wanted to check since I hadn't seen any check ins yet. It was a good exercise in getting more familiar with the Cellar code, glad you already have it dealt with. I don't think I've seen that one yet, but I guess I'll find out. :-) No prob, when you check in those fixes I can move further on my usage of Cellar and see if I can fix anything that you haven't gotten to yet and submit. Thanks for your work on Cellar, can't wait to see it working with the other project I'm working. Thanks! Ryan On Jan 21, 2013 9:46 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net wrote: Hi Ryan, I already fixed that on my local working copy. FYI, you may see an issue with Cellar Features which pollutes the Karaf features service. For now, I'm focus on Cellar 2.3.x (fixes, itests, etc). I will commit both on Cellar 2.3.x and Cellar trunk in the middle of this week. Regards JB On 01/22/2013 03:43 AM, Ryan Moquin wrote: I don't know if you are interested by my apache cellar fork has all the changes necessary to update the tests to use the apache karaf 3.0.0 commands which are different. I also added a group manager property in a couple blueprint files to prevent NPEs during startup. Unfortunately, even though those problems s are fixed, cellars 3.0.0 deadlocks during startup, one of the blocked threads seemed to be waiting on the Karaf User Console which didn't seem to make sense. When it doesn't deadlock, it will error out after a few seconds D's with concurrent modification exceptions due to the combined class loader being constantly requested to load a RemoteRepositoryEvent by simultaneous threads. When I hooked in a debugger, there were alternating RemoteRepositoryEvents saying the cellar feature repository was remove and added. They just kept rapidly firing and the console would show a concurrent modification except stack trace every few minutes. Unfortunately this looks .like it's going to be a pain in the but of a problem to fix have you seen that happen with Cellar 3.x yet? Ryan On Jan 16, 2013 10:54 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net mailto:j...@nanthrax.net wrote: Hi Ryan, yes, I started to work on both Cellar 2.3.x and trunk yesterday. It should be better by the end of this week. Regards JB On 01/16/2013 05:12 AM, Ryan Moquin wrote: I know I was told that this version isn't stable yet, but I still wanted to see if the build should be able to complete successfully or not. I want to determine if some issues I'm having are something on my end or not. Currently the itests always seem to fail with cellar trunk, is that the current known state of it? Or is it failing on my side only? Thanks, Ryan -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org mailto:jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com -- Apache Karaf http://karaf.apache.org/ Committer PMC OPS4J Pax Web http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/ Committer Project Lead OPS4J Pax for Vaadin http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home Commiter Project Lead blog http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/
Re: Karaf Cellar 3.0.0 SNAPSHOT
Great to hear, and as I already said we love Contributions :D Yeah those pull requests from Github don't really work out well with projects hosted at Apache. So Patches is much easier and afaik also better for IP clearances :) thanks and regards, Achim 2013/1/22 Ryan Moquin fragility...@gmail.com That's my intention :-) I did submit a couple the other day linked to Cellar pull requests regarding a discontinued Hazelcast component (JB already took care of that one), an issue with the version of the pax-mvn-url artifact and creating a kar for cellar as well as moving the config files around since when I build a custom Karaf archive, the cellar config files don't get put into the etc directory even though the features XML says they should be. So contributing as much as I can is certainly my intent. :-) Anyhow, pull requests are a pain in the rear to get setup with the correct changes.. I think I should just go back to creating patch files and attaching those. I'm hoping once JB has a chance to check-in I'll be able to make some more contributions, Cellar is a project that really interests me subject matter wise, so I like digging around in it when something doesn't go as planned. :-) Ryan On Jan 22, 2013 3:07 AM, Achim Nierbeck bcanh...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi Ryan, it's always nice to have some code contribution. And even nicer if those are attached to Jira Issues ;) Would be great if you could add some of the missing pieces as patches to jiras. thanks, Achim 2013/1/22 Ryan Moquin fragility...@gmail.com Awesome, OK, I figured but I wanted to check since I hadn't seen any check ins yet. It was a good exercise in getting more familiar with the Cellar code, glad you already have it dealt with. I don't think I've seen that one yet, but I guess I'll find out. :-) No prob, when you check in those fixes I can move further on my usage of Cellar and see if I can fix anything that you haven't gotten to yet and submit. Thanks for your work on Cellar, can't wait to see it working with the other project I'm working. Thanks! Ryan On Jan 21, 2013 9:46 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net wrote: Hi Ryan, I already fixed that on my local working copy. FYI, you may see an issue with Cellar Features which pollutes the Karaf features service. For now, I'm focus on Cellar 2.3.x (fixes, itests, etc). I will commit both on Cellar 2.3.x and Cellar trunk in the middle of this week. Regards JB On 01/22/2013 03:43 AM, Ryan Moquin wrote: I don't know if you are interested by my apache cellar fork has all the changes necessary to update the tests to use the apache karaf 3.0.0 commands which are different. I also added a group manager property in a couple blueprint files to prevent NPEs during startup. Unfortunately, even though those problems s are fixed, cellars 3.0.0 deadlocks during startup, one of the blocked threads seemed to be waiting on the Karaf User Console which didn't seem to make sense. When it doesn't deadlock, it will error out after a few seconds D's with concurrent modification exceptions due to the combined class loader being constantly requested to load a RemoteRepositoryEvent by simultaneous threads. When I hooked in a debugger, there were alternating RemoteRepositoryEvents saying the cellar feature repository was remove and added. They just kept rapidly firing and the console would show a concurrent modification except stack trace every few minutes. Unfortunately this looks .like it's going to be a pain in the but of a problem to fix have you seen that happen with Cellar 3.x yet? Ryan On Jan 16, 2013 10:54 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net mailto:j...@nanthrax.net wrote: Hi Ryan, yes, I started to work on both Cellar 2.3.x and trunk yesterday. It should be better by the end of this week. Regards JB On 01/16/2013 05:12 AM, Ryan Moquin wrote: I know I was told that this version isn't stable yet, but I still wanted to see if the build should be able to complete successfully or not. I want to determine if some issues I'm having are something on my end or not. Currently the itests always seem to fail with cellar trunk, is that the current known state of it? Or is it failing on my side only? Thanks, Ryan -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org mailto:jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com -- Apache Karaf http://karaf.apache.org/ Committer PMC OPS4J Pax Web http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/ Committer Project Lead OPS4J Pax for Vaadin http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home Commiter Project Lead blog http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/ -- Apache Karaf
Re: Karaf Cellar 3.0.0 SNAPSHOT
I don't know if you are interested by my apache cellar fork has all the changes necessary to update the tests to use the apache karaf 3.0.0 commands which are different. I also added a group manager property in a couple blueprint files to prevent NPEs during startup. Unfortunately, even though those problems s are fixed, cellars 3.0.0 deadlocks during startup, one of the blocked threads seemed to be waiting on the Karaf User Console which didn't seem to make sense. When it doesn't deadlock, it will error out after a few seconds D's with concurrent modification exceptions due to the combined class loader being constantly requested to load a RemoteRepositoryEvent by simultaneous threads. When I hooked in a debugger, there were alternating RemoteRepositoryEvents saying the cellar feature repository was remove and added. They just kept rapidly firing and the console would show a concurrent modification except stack trace every few minutes. Unfortunately this looks .like it's going to be a pain in the but of a problem to fix have you seen that happen with Cellar 3.x yet? Ryan On Jan 16, 2013 10:54 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net wrote: Hi Ryan, yes, I started to work on both Cellar 2.3.x and trunk yesterday. It should be better by the end of this week. Regards JB On 01/16/2013 05:12 AM, Ryan Moquin wrote: I know I was told that this version isn't stable yet, but I still wanted to see if the build should be able to complete successfully or not. I want to determine if some issues I'm having are something on my end or not. Currently the itests always seem to fail with cellar trunk, is that the current known state of it? Or is it failing on my side only? Thanks, Ryan -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Karaf Cellar 3.0.0 SNAPSHOT
Hi Ryan, I already fixed that on my local working copy. FYI, you may see an issue with Cellar Features which pollutes the Karaf features service. For now, I'm focus on Cellar 2.3.x (fixes, itests, etc). I will commit both on Cellar 2.3.x and Cellar trunk in the middle of this week. Regards JB On 01/22/2013 03:43 AM, Ryan Moquin wrote: I don't know if you are interested by my apache cellar fork has all the changes necessary to update the tests to use the apache karaf 3.0.0 commands which are different. I also added a group manager property in a couple blueprint files to prevent NPEs during startup. Unfortunately, even though those problems s are fixed, cellars 3.0.0 deadlocks during startup, one of the blocked threads seemed to be waiting on the Karaf User Console which didn't seem to make sense. When it doesn't deadlock, it will error out after a few seconds D's with concurrent modification exceptions due to the combined class loader being constantly requested to load a RemoteRepositoryEvent by simultaneous threads. When I hooked in a debugger, there were alternating RemoteRepositoryEvents saying the cellar feature repository was remove and added. They just kept rapidly firing and the console would show a concurrent modification except stack trace every few minutes. Unfortunately this looks .like it's going to be a pain in the but of a problem to fix have you seen that happen with Cellar 3.x yet? Ryan On Jan 16, 2013 10:54 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net mailto:j...@nanthrax.net wrote: Hi Ryan, yes, I started to work on both Cellar 2.3.x and trunk yesterday. It should be better by the end of this week. Regards JB On 01/16/2013 05:12 AM, Ryan Moquin wrote: I know I was told that this version isn't stable yet, but I still wanted to see if the build should be able to complete successfully or not. I want to determine if some issues I'm having are something on my end or not. Currently the itests always seem to fail with cellar trunk, is that the current known state of it? Or is it failing on my side only? Thanks, Ryan -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org mailto:jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Karaf Cellar 3.0.0 SNAPSHOT
Awesome, OK, I figured but I wanted to check since I hadn't seen any check ins yet. It was a good exercise in getting more familiar with the Cellar code, glad you already have it dealt with. I don't think I've seen that one yet, but I guess I'll find out. :-) No prob, when you check in those fixes I can move further on my usage of Cellar and see if I can fix anything that you haven't gotten to yet and submit. Thanks for your work on Cellar, can't wait to see it working with the other project I'm working. Thanks! Ryan On Jan 21, 2013 9:46 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net wrote: Hi Ryan, I already fixed that on my local working copy. FYI, you may see an issue with Cellar Features which pollutes the Karaf features service. For now, I'm focus on Cellar 2.3.x (fixes, itests, etc). I will commit both on Cellar 2.3.x and Cellar trunk in the middle of this week. Regards JB On 01/22/2013 03:43 AM, Ryan Moquin wrote: I don't know if you are interested by my apache cellar fork has all the changes necessary to update the tests to use the apache karaf 3.0.0 commands which are different. I also added a group manager property in a couple blueprint files to prevent NPEs during startup. Unfortunately, even though those problems s are fixed, cellars 3.0.0 deadlocks during startup, one of the blocked threads seemed to be waiting on the Karaf User Console which didn't seem to make sense. When it doesn't deadlock, it will error out after a few seconds D's with concurrent modification exceptions due to the combined class loader being constantly requested to load a RemoteRepositoryEvent by simultaneous threads. When I hooked in a debugger, there were alternating RemoteRepositoryEvents saying the cellar feature repository was remove and added. They just kept rapidly firing and the console would show a concurrent modification except stack trace every few minutes. Unfortunately this looks .like it's going to be a pain in the but of a problem to fix have you seen that happen with Cellar 3.x yet? Ryan On Jan 16, 2013 10:54 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net mailto:j...@nanthrax.net wrote: Hi Ryan, yes, I started to work on both Cellar 2.3.x and trunk yesterday. It should be better by the end of this week. Regards JB On 01/16/2013 05:12 AM, Ryan Moquin wrote: I know I was told that this version isn't stable yet, but I still wanted to see if the build should be able to complete successfully or not. I want to determine if some issues I'm having are something on my end or not. Currently the itests always seem to fail with cellar trunk, is that the current known state of it? Or is it failing on my side only? Thanks, Ryan -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org mailto:jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Karaf Cellar 3.0.0 SNAPSHOT
Hi Ryan, yes, I started to work on both Cellar 2.3.x and trunk yesterday. It should be better by the end of this week. Regards JB On 01/16/2013 05:12 AM, Ryan Moquin wrote: I know I was told that this version isn't stable yet, but I still wanted to see if the build should be able to complete successfully or not. I want to determine if some issues I'm having are something on my end or not. Currently the itests always seem to fail with cellar trunk, is that the current known state of it? Or is it failing on my side only? Thanks, Ryan -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Karaf Cellar 3.0.0 SNAPSHOT
No problem, I just want to figure out what the state of things are so I know if it's just me or if it's possible it doesn't build. If it's possible it doesn't I can file a couple jiras with suggested fixes for you. The is also an enhancement request to file along with the suggested fixes. Anyhow, I don't want to file jiras that are false and take up your time, but if I can help you to resolve some issues quicker, then I wantbto do that. If you want me to file what I think are problems then I'll just go ahead. :) Ryan On Jan 16, 2013 10:54 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net wrote: Hi Ryan, yes, I started to work on both Cellar 2.3.x and trunk yesterday. It should be better by the end of this week. Regards JB On 01/16/2013 05:12 AM, Ryan Moquin wrote: I know I was told that this version isn't stable yet, but I still wanted to see if the build should be able to complete successfully or not. I want to determine if some issues I'm having are something on my end or not. Currently the itests always seem to fail with cellar trunk, is that the current known state of it? Or is it failing on my side only? Thanks, Ryan -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Karaf Cellar 3.0.0 SNAPSHOT
I know I was told that this version isn't stable yet, but I still wanted to see if the build should be able to complete successfully or not. I want to determine if some issues I'm having are something on my end or not. Currently the itests always seem to fail with cellar trunk, is that the current known state of it? Or is it failing on my side only? Thanks, Ryan
