Re: Karaf 3.0.3 OSGi Version
Thank you for the Clarification. Alex -- View this message in context: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Karaf-3-0-3-OSGi-Version-tp4039091p4039114.html Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Karaf 3.0.3 OSGi Version
Hi JB, I think it makes sense to upgrade the felix framework in K3 at least to be aligned with K2.4.Z in order to avoid confusion. Or maybe K3 won't have any improvements and all the effort should be concentrated on K4. I think the documentation should be clearer for this topic, shouldn't it ? Regards, Arnaud 2015-03-17 11:23 GMT+01:00 agrz alexander.grze...@medisite.de: Thank you for the Clarification. Alex -- View this message in context: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Karaf-3-0-3-OSGi-Version-tp4039091p4039114.html Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Karaf 3.0.3 OSGi Version
Hi Arnaud, if we move this way, it would make sense to go to Karaf 3.1.x as it's a major update on K3. But I think it makes sense. Thoughts ? Regards JB On 03/17/2015 01:42 PM, Arnaud Deprez wrote: Hi JB, I think it makes sense to upgrade the felix framework in K3 at least to be aligned with K2.4.Z in order to avoid confusion. Or maybe K3 won't have any improvements and all the effort should be concentrated on K4. I think the documentation should be clearer for this topic, shouldn't it ? Regards, Arnaud 2015-03-17 11:23 GMT+01:00 agrz alexander.grze...@medisite.de mailto:alexander.grze...@medisite.de: Thank you for the Clarification. Alex -- View this message in context: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Karaf-3-0-3-OSGi-Version-tp4039091p4039114.html Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Karaf 3.0.3 OSGi Version
well, I guess that would be true as a minor version upgrade on the framework would suggest a minor version bump on K3. tbh, I'd rather would like to see K4 released ... but it might be a possible solution to have a lighter upgrade to it again. regards, Achim 2015-03-17 13:48 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net: Hi Arnaud, if we move this way, it would make sense to go to Karaf 3.1.x as it's a major update on K3. But I think it makes sense. Thoughts ? Regards JB On 03/17/2015 01:42 PM, Arnaud Deprez wrote: Hi JB, I think it makes sense to upgrade the felix framework in K3 at least to be aligned with K2.4.Z in order to avoid confusion. Or maybe K3 won't have any improvements and all the effort should be concentrated on K4. I think the documentation should be clearer for this topic, shouldn't it ? Regards, Arnaud 2015-03-17 11:23 GMT+01:00 agrz alexander.grze...@medisite.de mailto:alexander.grze...@medisite.de: Thank you for the Clarification. Alex -- View this message in context: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Karaf-3-0-3-OSGi-Version- tp4039091p4039114.html Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com -- Apache Member Apache Karaf http://karaf.apache.org/ Committer PMC OPS4J Pax Web http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/ Committer Project Lead blog http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/ Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master
Re: Karaf 3.0.3 OSGi Version
I'd rather would like to see K4 released too but I don't know when it will be planned. As far as I know there are still lot of work to do for a K4 release. As I'm not (yet) involved in it, it's a supposition based on the changelog :-). Currently, I think there are some confusion with the actual version 2.4.Z and 3.0.Z. I think it's a bit strange to a lambda user that karaf 2.4.Z has a full support for OSGi 5 and Karaf 3.0.Z has only a partial support. So I think that - whether the documentation should be clearer to say that K3 will be abandoned - whether we should have a K3.1.Z release as JB said I think the solution 2 is better regarding the lambda user than the solution 1 but the work to do may be too hard if we have to throw it away regarding K4. I don't know actually. Regards, Arnaud 2015-03-17 13:51 GMT+01:00 Achim Nierbeck bcanh...@googlemail.com: well, I guess that would be true as a minor version upgrade on the framework would suggest a minor version bump on K3. tbh, I'd rather would like to see K4 released ... but it might be a possible solution to have a lighter upgrade to it again. regards, Achim 2015-03-17 13:48 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net: Hi Arnaud, if we move this way, it would make sense to go to Karaf 3.1.x as it's a major update on K3. But I think it makes sense. Thoughts ? Regards JB On 03/17/2015 01:42 PM, Arnaud Deprez wrote: Hi JB, I think it makes sense to upgrade the felix framework in K3 at least to be aligned with K2.4.Z in order to avoid confusion. Or maybe K3 won't have any improvements and all the effort should be concentrated on K4. I think the documentation should be clearer for this topic, shouldn't it ? Regards, Arnaud 2015-03-17 11:23 GMT+01:00 agrz alexander.grze...@medisite.de mailto:alexander.grze...@medisite.de: Thank you for the Clarification. Alex -- View this message in context: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Karaf-3-0-3-OSGi-Version- tp4039091p4039114.html Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com -- Apache Member Apache Karaf http://karaf.apache.org/ Committer PMC OPS4J Pax Web http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/ Committer Project Lead blog http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/ Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master
Re: Karaf 3.0.3 OSGi Version
Hi guys, as reminder, K4 is plan for end of April. Regards JB On 03/17/2015 02:36 PM, Arnaud Deprez wrote: I'd rather would like to see K4 released too but I don't know when it will be planned. As far as I know there are still lot of work to do for a K4 release. As I'm not (yet) involved in it, it's a supposition based on the changelog :-). Currently, I think there are some confusion with the actual version 2.4.Z and 3.0.Z. I think it's a bit strange to a lambda user that karaf 2.4.Z has a full support for OSGi 5 and Karaf 3.0.Z has only a partial support. So I think that * whether the documentation should be clearer to say that K3 will be abandoned * whether we should have a K3.1.Z release as JB said I think the solution 2 is better regarding the lambda user than the solution 1 but the work to do may be too hard if we have to throw it away regarding K4. I don't know actually. Regards, Arnaud 2015-03-17 13:51 GMT+01:00 Achim Nierbeck bcanh...@googlemail.com mailto:bcanh...@googlemail.com: well, I guess that would be true as a minor version upgrade on the framework would suggest a minor version bump on K3. tbh, I'd rather would like to see K4 released ... but it might be a possible solution to have a lighter upgrade to it again. regards, Achim 2015-03-17 13:48 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net mailto:j...@nanthrax.net: Hi Arnaud, if we move this way, it would make sense to go to Karaf 3.1.x as it's a major update on K3. But I think it makes sense. Thoughts ? Regards JB On 03/17/2015 01:42 PM, Arnaud Deprez wrote: Hi JB, I think it makes sense to upgrade the felix framework in K3 at least to be aligned with K2.4.Z in order to avoid confusion. Or maybe K3 won't have any improvements and all the effort should be concentrated on K4. I think the documentation should be clearer for this topic, shouldn't it ? Regards, Arnaud 2015-03-17 11:23 GMT+01:00 agrz alexander.grze...@medisite.de mailto:alexander.grze...@medisite.de mailto:alexander.grzesik@__medisite.de mailto:alexander.grze...@medisite.de: Thank you for the Clarification. Alex -- View this message in context: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.__com/Karaf-3-0-3-OSGi-Version-__tp4039091p4039114.html http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Karaf-3-0-3-OSGi-Version-tp4039091p4039114.html Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org mailto:jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com -- Apache Member Apache Karaf http://karaf.apache.org/ Committer PMC OPS4J Pax Web http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/ Committer Project Lead blog http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/ Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Karaf 3.0.3 OSGi Version
Hi, I am a little bit confused what is the OSGi Specification Version supported in Karaf 3.0.3. On the main page (http://karaf.apache.org/) it states Karaf 3.x supports OSGi 4.3. On the dependency matrix page (http://karaf.apache.org/index/documentation/karaf-dependencies/karaf-deps-3.0.x.html) it shows OSGi Core is Version 5.0.0 and the felix version is 4.2.1 which should also support OSGi 5 as far as I know. What is the exact version of OSGi Framework Karaf 3.0.3 supports and is tested for? Thank You Alexander -- View this message in context: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Karaf-3-0-3-OSGi-Version-tp4039091.html Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Karaf 3.0.3 OSGi Version
Hi Alex, Felix 4.2.1 doesn't have full OSGi r5 support, even if it supports most of the features (it just didn't go through the different validation). So K3 with Felix 4.2.1 is full OSGi r4.3, and mostly r5 compliant. If you use Equinox, you have full r5 supports. Could make sense to upgrade the Felix framework version to have full r5 support. Regards JB On 03/16/2015 04:37 PM, agrz wrote: Hi, I am a little bit confused what is the OSGi Specification Version supported in Karaf 3.0.3. On the main page (http://karaf.apache.org/) it states Karaf 3.x supports OSGi 4.3. On the dependency matrix page (http://karaf.apache.org/index/documentation/karaf-dependencies/karaf-deps-3.0.x.html) it shows OSGi Core is Version 5.0.0 and the felix version is 4.2.1 which should also support OSGi 5 as far as I know. What is the exact version of OSGi Framework Karaf 3.0.3 supports and is tested for? Thank You Alexander -- View this message in context: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Karaf-3-0-3-OSGi-Version-tp4039091.html Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
