Good morning Xiaoxiang, hope you are well

1. JDBC source is a feature which in development, it will be supported
later.

===============

May I know when will the JDBC be available? as well as is there any change
in Kylin 5 release date

Thank you and best regards


On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 2:15 PM Xiaoxiang Yu <x...@apache.org> wrote:

> 1. JDBC source is a feature which in development, it will be supported
> later.
>
> 2. Kylin supports kerberos now, I will write a doc as soon as possible.
> (I will let you know.)
>
> 3. I think ranger and Kerberos are not doing the same things, one for
> authentication, one for authorization. So they cannot replace each other.
> Ranger can integrate with Kerberos, please check ranger's website for
> information.
>
> ------------------------
> With warm regard
> Xiaoxiang Yu
>
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 9, 2023 at 8:01 AM Nam Đỗ Duy <na...@vnpay.vn.invalid> wrote:
>
> > Thank you Xiaoxiang for your reply
> >
> > ————————————-
> > Do you have any suggestions/wishes for kylin 5(except real-time feature)?
> > ————————————-
> > Yes: please answer to help me clear this headache:
> >
> > 1. Can Kylin access the existing star schema in Oracle datawarehouse ? If
> > not then do we have any work around?
> >
> > 2. My team is using kerberos for authentication, do you have any
> > document/casestudy about integrating kerberos with kylin 4.x and kylin
> 5.x
> >
> > 3. Should we use apache ranger instead of kerberos for authentication and
> > for security purposes?
> >
> > Thank you again
> >
> > On Thu, 7 Dec 2023 at 15:00 Xiaoxiang Yu <x...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > I guess the release date should be 2024/01 .
> > > Do you have any suggestions/wishes for kylin 5(except real-time
> feature)?
> > >
> > > ------------------------
> > > With warm regard
> > > Xiaoxiang Yu
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 3:44 PM Nam Đỗ Duy <na...@vnpay.vn.invalid>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Thank you very much xiaoxiang, I did the presentation this morning
> > already
> > >> so there is no time for you to comment. Next time I will send you in
> > >> advance. The meeting result was that we will implement both druid and
> > >> kylin
> > >> in the next couple of projects because of its realtime feature. Hope
> > that
> > >> kylin will have same feature soon.
> > >>
> > >> May I ask when will you release kylin 5.0?
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 9:26 AM Xiaoxiang Yu <x...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Since 2018 there are a lot of new features and code refactor.
> > >> > If you like, you can share your ppt to me privately, maybe I can
> > >> > give some comments.
> > >> >
> > >> > Here is the reference of advantages of Kylin since 2018:
> > >> > - https://kylin.apache.org/blog/2022/01/12/The-Future-Of-Kylin/
> > >> > -
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://kylin.apache.org/blog/2021/07/02/Apache-Kylin4-A-new-storage-and-compute-architecture/
> > >> > - https://kylin.apache.org/5.0/docs/development/roadmap
> > >> >
> > >> > ------------------------
> > >> > With warm regard
> > >> > Xiaoxiang Yu
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 6:53 PM Nam Đỗ Duy <na...@vnpay.vn.invalid>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> Hi Xiaoxiang, tomorrow is the main presentation between Kylin and
> > >> Druid in
> > >> >> my team.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> I found this article and would like you to update me the advantages
> > of
> > >> >> Kylin since 2018 until now (especially with version 5 to be
> released)
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Apache Kylin | Why did Meituan develop Kylin On Druid (part 1 of
> 2)?
> > >> >> <
> > >> >>
> > >>
> >
> https://kylin.apache.org/blog/2018/12/12/why-did-meituan-develop-kylin-on-druid-part1-of-2/
> > >> >> >
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 9:34 AM Nam Đỗ Duy <na...@vnpay.vn> wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> > Thank you very much for your prompt response, I still have
> several
> > >> >> > questions to seek for your help later.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Best regards and have a good day
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 9:11 AM Xiaoxiang Yu <x...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >> Done. Github branch changed to kylin5.
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> ------------------------
> > >> >> >> With warm regard
> > >> >> >> Xiaoxiang Yu
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 11:13 AM Xiaoxiang Yu <x...@apache.org>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> > A JIRA ticket has been opened, waiting for INFRA :
> > >> >> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-25238 .
> > >> >> >> > ------------------------
> > >> >> >> > With warm regard
> > >> >> >> > Xiaoxiang Yu
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> > On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 10:30 AM Nam Đỗ Duy
> > <na...@vnpay.vn.invalid
> > >> >
> > >> >> >> wrote:
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >> Thank you Xiaoxiang, please update me when you have changed
> > your
> > >> >> >> default
> > >> >> >> >> branch. In case people are impressed by the numbers then I
> hope
> > >> to
> > >> >> turn
> > >> >> >> >> this situation to reverse direction.
> > >> >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> >> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 9:02 AM Xiaoxiang Yu <x...@apache.org
> >
> > >> >> wrote:
> > >> >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> >>> The default branch is for 4.X which is a maintained branch,
> > the
> > >> >> active
> > >> >> >> >>> branch is kylin5.
> > >> >> >> >>> I will change the default branch to kylin5 later.
> > >> >> >> >>>
> > >> >> >> >>> ------------------------
> > >> >> >> >>> With warm regard
> > >> >> >> >>> Xiaoxiang Yu
> > >> >> >> >>>
> > >> >> >> >>>
> > >> >> >> >>>
> > >> >> >> >>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 9:12 AM Nam Đỗ Duy
> > >> <na...@vnpay.vn.invalid>
> > >> >> >> >>> wrote:
> > >> >> >> >>>
> > >> >> >> >>>> Hi Xiaoxiang, Sirs / Madams
> > >> >> >> >>>>
> > >> >> >> >>>> Can you see the atttached photo
> > >> >> >> >>>>
> > >> >> >> >>>> My boss asked that why druid commit code regularly but
> kylin
> > >> had
> > >> >> not
> > >> >> >> >>>> been committed since July
> > >> >> >> >>>>
> > >> >> >> >>>>
> > >> >> >> >>>> On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 at 15:33 Xiaoxiang Yu <x...@apache.org>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >> >> >>>>
> > >> >> >> >>>>> I think so.
> > >> >> >> >>>>>
> > >> >> >> >>>>> Response time is not the only factor to make a decision.
> > Kylin
> > >> >> could
> > >> >> >> >>>>> be cheaper
> > >> >> >> >>>>> when the query pattern is suitable for the Kylin model,
> and
> > >> Kylin
> > >> >> >> can
> > >> >> >> >>>>> guarantee
> > >> >> >> >>>>> reasonable query latency. Clickhouse will be quicker in an
> > ad
> > >> hoc
> > >> >> >> >>>>> query scenario.
> > >> >> >> >>>>>
> > >> >> >> >>>>> By the way, Youzan and Kyligence combine them together to
> > >> provide
> > >> >> >> >>>>> unified data analytics services for their customers.
> > >> >> >> >>>>>
> > >> >> >> >>>>> ------------------------
> > >> >> >> >>>>> With warm regard
> > >> >> >> >>>>> Xiaoxiang Yu
> > >> >> >> >>>>>
> > >> >> >> >>>>>
> > >> >> >> >>>>>
> > >> >> >> >>>>> On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 4:01 PM Nam Đỗ Duy
> > >> <na...@vnpay.vn.invalid
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >>>>> wrote:
> > >> >> >> >>>>>
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> Hi Xiaoxiang, thank you
> > >> >> >> >>>>>>
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> In case my client uses cloud computing service like gcp
> or
> > >> aws,
> > >> >> >> which
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> will cost more: precalculation feature of kylin or
> > clickhouse
> > >> >> >> (incase
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> of
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> kylin, I have a thought that the query execution has been
> > >> done
> > >> >> once
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> and
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> stored in cube to be used many times so kylin uses less
> > cloud
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> computation,
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> is that true)?
> > >> >> >> >>>>>>
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 2:46 PM Xiaoxiang Yu <
> > x...@apache.org
> > >> >
> > >> >> >> wrote:
> > >> >> >> >>>>>>
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> > Following text is part of an article(
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> > https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/343394287) .
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >
> > >> >> >> >>>>>>
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >>
> >
> ===============================================================================
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> > Kylin is suitable for aggregation queries with fixed
> > modes
> > >> >> >> because
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> of its
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> > pre-calculated technology, for example, join, group by,
> > and
> > >> >> where
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> condition
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> > modes in SQL are relatively fixed, etc. The larger the
> > data
> > >> >> >> volume
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> is, the
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> > more obvious the advantages of using Kylin are; in
> > >> particular,
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> Kylin is
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> > particularly advantageous in the scenarios of
> de-emphasis
> > >> >> (count
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> distinct),
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> > Top N, and Percentile. In particular, Kylin's
> advantages
> > in
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> de-weighting
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> > (count distinct), Top N, Percentile and other scenarios
> > are
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> especially
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> > huge, and it is used in a large number of scenarios,
> such
> > >> as
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> Dashboard, all
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> > kinds of reports, large-screen display, traffic
> > statistics,
> > >> >> and
> > >> >> >> user
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> > behavior analysis. Meituan, Aurora, Shell Housing, etc.
> > use
> > >> >> Kylin
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> to build
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> > their data service platforms, providing millions to
> tens
> > of
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> millions of
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> > queries per day, and most of the queries can be
> completed
> > >> >> within
> > >> >> >> 2
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> - 3
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> > seconds. There is no better alternative for such a high
> > >> >> >> concurrency
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> > scenario.
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> > ClickHouse, because of its MPP architecture, has high
> > >> >> computing
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> power and
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> > is more suitable when the query request is more
> flexible,
> > >> or
> > >> >> when
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> there is
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> > a need for detailed queries with low concurrency.
> > Scenarios
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> include: very
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> > many columns and where conditions are arbitrarily
> > combined
> > >> >> with
> > >> >> >> the
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> user
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> > label filtering, not a large amount of concurrency of
> > >> complex
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> on-the-spot
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> > query and so on. If the amount of data and access is
> > large,
> > >> >> you
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> need to
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> > deploy a distributed ClickHouse cluster, which is a
> > higher
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> challenge for
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> > operation and maintenance.
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> > If some queries are very flexible but infrequent, it is
> > >> more
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> > resource-efficient to use now-computing. Since the
> number
> > >> of
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> queries is
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> > small, even if each query consumes a lot of
> computational
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> resources, it is
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> > still cost-effective overall. If some queries have a
> > fixed
> > >> >> >> pattern
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> and the
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> > query volume is large, it is more suitable for Kylin,
> > >> because
> > >> >> the
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> query
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> > volume is large, and by using large computational
> > >> resources to
> > >> >> >> save
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> the
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> > results, the upfront computational cost can be
> amortized
> > >> over
> > >> >> >> each
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> query,
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> > so it is the most economical.
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> > --- Translated with DeepL.com (free version)
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> > ------------------------
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> > With warm regard
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> > Xiaoxiang Yu
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> > On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 3:16 PM Nam Đỗ Duy
> > >> >> <na...@vnpay.vn.invalid
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> wrote:
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> Thank you Xiaoxiang for the near real time streaming
> > >> feature.
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> That's
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> great.
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >>
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> This morning there has been a new challenge to my
> team:
> > >> >> >> clickhouse
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> offered
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> us the speed of calculating 8 billion rows in
> > millisecond
> > >> >> which
> > >> >> >> is
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> faster
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> than my demonstration (I used Kylin to do calculating
> 1
> > >> >> billion
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> rows in
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> 2.9
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> seconds)
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >>
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> Can you briefly suggest the advantages of kylin over
> > >> >> clickhouse
> > >> >> >> so
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> that I
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> can defend my demonstration.
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >>
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 1:55 PM Xiaoxiang Yu <
> > >> x...@apache.org
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> wrote:
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >>
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > 1. "In this important scenario of realtime
> analytics,
> > >> the
> > >> >> >> reason
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> here is
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > that
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > kylin has lag time due to model update of new
> segment
> > >> >> build,
> > >> >> >> is
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> that
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > correct?"
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > You are correct.
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > 2. "If that is true, then can you suggest a
> > work-around
> > >> of
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> combination
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> of
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > ... "
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > Kylin is planning to introduce NRT streaming(coding
> is
> > >> >> >> completed
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> but not
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > released),
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > which can make the time-lag to about 3 minutes(that
> is
> > >> my
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> estimation
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> but I
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > am
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > quite certain about it).
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > NRT stands for 'near real-time', it will run a job
> and
> > >> do
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> micro-batch
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > aggregation and persistence periodically. The price
> is
> > >> that
> > >> >> >> you
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> need to
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> run
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > and monitor a long-running
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >  job. This feature is based on Spark Streaming, so
> you
> > >> need
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> knowledge of
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > it.
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > I am curious about what is the maximum time-lag your
> > >> >> customers
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > can tolerate?
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > Personally, I guess minute level time-lag is ok for
> > most
> > >> >> >> cases.
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > ------------------------
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > With warm regard
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > Xiaoxiang Yu
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 12:28 PM Nam Đỗ Duy
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> <na...@vnpay.vn.invalid>
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> wrote:
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > Druid is better in
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > - Have a real-time datasource like Kafka etc.
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > >
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > ==========================
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > >
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > Hi Xiaoxiang, thank you for your response.
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > >
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > In this important scenario of realtime alalytics,
> > the
> > >> >> reason
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> here is
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> that
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > kylin has lag time due to model update of new
> > segment
> > >> >> build,
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> is that
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > correct?
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > >
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > If that is true, then can you suggest a
> work-around
> > of
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> combination of
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> :
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > >
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > (time - lag kylin cube) + (realtime DB update) to
> > >> provide
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > realtime capability ?
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > >
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > IMO, the point here is to find that (realtime DB
> > >> update)
> > >> >> and
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> integrate it
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > with (time - lag kylin cube).
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > >
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 1:53 PM Xiaoxiang Yu <
> > >> >> >> x...@apache.org>
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> wrote:
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > >
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > > I researched and tested Druid two years ago(I
> > don't
> > >> >> know
> > >> >> >> too
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> much
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> about
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > >  the change of Druid in these two years. New
> > >> features
> > >> >> >> that I
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> know
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> are :
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > > new UI, fully on K8s etc).
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > >
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > > Here are some cases you should consider using
> > Druid
> > >> >> other
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> than Kylin
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > > at the moment (using Kylin 5.0-beta to compare
> the
> > >> >> Druid
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> which I
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> used
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > two
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > > years ago):
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > >
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > > - Have a real-time datasource like Kafka etc.
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > > - Most queries are small(Based on my test
> result,
> > I
> > >> >> think
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> Druid had
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > better
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > > response time for small queries two years ago.)
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > > - Don't know how to optimize Spark/Hadoop, want
> to
> > >> use
> > >> >> the
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> K8S/public
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > >   cloud platform as your deployment platform.
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > >
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > > But I do think there are many scenarios in which
> > >> Kylin
> > >> >> >> could
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> be
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> better,
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > > like:
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > >
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > > - Better performance for complex/big queries.
> > Kylin
> > >> can
> > >> >> >> have
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> a more
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > > exact-match/fine-grained
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > >   Index for queries containing different `Group
> By
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> dimensions`.
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > > - User-friendly UI for modeling.
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > > - Support 'Join' better? (Not sure at the
> moment)
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > > - ODBC driver for different BI.(its website did
> > not
> > >> >> show
> > >> >> >> it
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> supports
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > ODBC
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > > well)
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > > - Looks like Kylin supports ANSI SQL better than
> > >> Druid.
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > >
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > >
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > > I don't know Pinot, so I have nothing to say
> about
> > >> it.
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > > Hope to help you, or you are free to share your
> > >> >> opinion.
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > >
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > > ------------------------
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > > With warm regard
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > > Xiaoxiang Yu
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > >
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > >
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > >
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > > On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 11:11 AM Nam Đỗ Duy
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> <na...@vnpay.vn.invalid>
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > wrote:
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > >
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > >> Dear Xiaoxiang,
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > >> Sirs/Madams,
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > >>
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > >> May I post my boss's question:
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > >>
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > >> What are the pros and cons of the OLAP platform
> > >> Kylin
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> compared to
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > Pinot
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > >> and
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > >> Druid?
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > >>
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > >> Please kindly let me know
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > >>
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > >> Thank you very much and best regards
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > >>
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > >
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > >
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >>
> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >
> > >> >> >> >>>>>>
> > >> >> >> >>>>>
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to