Re: [Neo4j] Node safe in a Set
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Massimo Lusetti mluse...@gmail.com wrote: It's safe to use Node in a SetNode... I don't see it implements equals() nor hashCode() Of course it does! Node is the interface implemented by NodeProxy - the objects you get back and use as Nodes. NodeProxy implement equals() and hashCode() based on the id of the Node. Using them in a CollectionNode is safe. Cheers -- Massimo http://meridio.blogspot.com cheers, CG ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
Re: [Neo4j] Node safe in a Set
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Chris Gioran chris.gio...@neotechnology.com wrote: Of course it does! Node is the interface implemented by NodeProxy - the objects you get back and use as Nodes. NodeProxy implement equals() and hashCode() based on the id of the Node. Using them in a CollectionNode is safe. Thanks for the confirmation... Cheers -- Massimo http://meridio.blogspot.com ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
Re: [Neo4j] Node safe in a Set
What you can't have in a Set is RelationshipTypes. But that's clearly stated in the javadocs. /anders 2011-03-15 16:34, Massimo Lusetti skrev: On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Chris Gioran chris.gio...@neotechnology.com wrote: Of course it does! Node is the interface implemented by NodeProxy - the objects you get back and use as Nodes. NodeProxy implement equals() and hashCode() based on the id of the Node. Using them in a CollectionNode is safe. Thanks for the confirmation... Cheers ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
