Shale + Ajax4jsf

[Reynolds, James]

I've been trying to incorporate ajax4jsf into my app.  After having
troubles, I found some threads on the web indicating that there may be a
conflict between the ajax4jsf filter and the Shale filter.

Is this the case?  Is anyone currently using these two technologies
together?

My set up is Shale 1.1.0 + myfaces RI 1.1.1 + facelets 1.1.11





E-Mail messages may contain viruses, worms, or other malicious code. By reading 
the message and opening any attachments, the recipient accepts full 
responsibility for taking protective action against such code. Sender is not 
liable for any loss or damage arising from this message.

The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. 
It is intended solely for the addressee(s). Access to this e-mail by anyone 
else is unauthorized.

Duplicate Client-id for ShaleViewRoot

[Reynolds, James]

Hello Shale + Facelets bretheren,

I'm having a weird issue where facelets is reporting a Client-id : _id0
is duplicated in the faces tree error where ShaleViewRoot is
supposedly the source of the duplicate id.

It seems to be related with commandLinks on my page.  If I remove them,
the page loads fine.  The command links do not have duplicate ids and I
have no idea why this would be happening.  Any suggestions?





E-Mail messages may contain viruses, worms, or other malicious code. By reading 
the message and opening any attachments, the recipient accepts full 
responsibility for taking protective action against such code. Sender is not 
liable for any loss or damage arising from this message.

The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. 
It is intended solely for the addressee(s). Access to this e-mail by anyone 
else is unauthorized.

RE: Shale + Facelets + Tomahawk [OT?]

[Reynolds, James]

I do have that setting and I should mention that Facelets + Shale are
working great together.  The problem I'm having is only with the
addition of myfaces tomahawk.  In the absence of any obvious conflict,
I'll run off to bother the myfaces mailing list for a change :)

Thanks for the suggestion and have a great day!


On 1/26/07, Reynolds, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I'm having trouble configuring myfaces tomahawk components to work
with
 Facelets and I'm wondering if there is a conflict with Shale.  Is
anyone
 else using this combination successfully?


I've seen people say they did, but can't point directly at a mail thread
for
you.

One critical link for Facelets to work is setting the default suffix
context init parameter.  Did you do that as well?

context-param
param-namejavax.faces.DEFAULT_SUFFIX/param-name
param-value.xhtml/param-value !-- Or whatever your pages
use
--
/context-param

Without this setting, JSF is going to assume the extension is .jsp

Craig

Based on instructions at the facelets wiki, this is what I've done so
 far:

 I've created a file named tomahawk.taglib.xml under /WEB-INF:
 ?xml version=1.0?
 !DOCTYPE facelet-taglib PUBLIC
   -//Sun Microsystems, Inc.//DTD Facelet Taglib 1.0//EN
   http://java.sun.com/dtd/facelet-taglib_1_0.dtd;

 facelet-taglib
 !-- Just in case my email client removes them for me, note
that
 the namespace tags are included below  --
 namespacehttp://myfaces.apache.org/tomahawk/namespace

 tag
 tag-namecommandLink/tag-name
 component


component-typeorg.apache.myfaces.component.html.ext.HtmlCommandLink/c
 omponent-type


renderer-typeorg.apache.myfaces.renderkit.html.HtmlLinkRenderer/rende
 rer-type
 /component
 /tag
 /facelet-taglib

 I've registered the file in my web.xml:
 ...
 context-param
 param-namefacelets.LIBRARIES/param-name
 param-value/WEB-INF/tomahawk.taglib.xml/param-value
 /context-param
 ...

 I've referenced the namespace declared in the taglib file in the root
 html element of my page as such:
 xmlns:t=http://myfaces.apache.org/tomahawk;

 Is there something else I need to do on the Shale side to make this
 work?

 Thanks





 E-Mail messages may contain viruses, worms, or other malicious code.
By
 reading the message and opening any attachments, the recipient accepts
full
 responsibility for taking protective action against such code. Sender
is not
 liable for any loss or damage arising from this message.

 The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
 privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee(s). Access to this
 e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized.







E-Mail messages may contain viruses, worms, or other malicious code. By reading 
the message and opening any attachments, the recipient accepts full 
responsibility for taking protective action against such code. Sender is not 
liable for any loss or damage arising from this message.

The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. 
It is intended solely for the addressee(s). Access to this e-mail by anyone 
else is unauthorized.

JSF 1.1 vs. JSF 1.2

[Reynolds, James]

I think I get it now (thanks to help from this list).  If I want to use
JSF 1.2 with Shale, I must use a J2EE 5 servlet container.  However, I
may not be able to convince my company to switch from Tomcat 5.5.*

If that is the case, I need to decide between the following two setups:

1. JSF 1.2  Facelets or
2. JSF 1.1, Facelets  Shale

Practically speaking, the main improvements in JSF 1.2 may not offer too
much to me since I'm using Facelets.  Specifically:

1. EL unification.  Since I'm not using JSPs, this isn't a big deal
2. Improved Messages.  From what I've read, Shale's info/warn/error
methods provide much of the same improvements to 1.1 as there is out of
the box in 1.2.

Finally, I'll need to consider bug fixes, like the multiple button
press issue.

In your experience, is developing JSF 1.2 far superior to JSF 1.1?  Are
there any major tradeoffs that I'm overlooking?

Thanks for your time and any advice.





E-Mail messages may contain viruses, worms, or other malicious code. By reading 
the message and opening any attachments, the recipient accepts full 
responsibility for taking protective action against such code. Sender is not 
liable for any loss or damage arising from this message.

The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. 
It is intended solely for the addressee(s). Access to this e-mail by anyone 
else is unauthorized.

RE: JSF 1.1 vs. JSF 1.2

[Reynolds, James]

 If you want to run JSF 1.2 on Tomcat, you really want 6.0 not 5.5.  It
might
be technically feasible to hack together a JSF 1.2 implementation that
would
execute on Tomcat 5.5, but it's hard to see how you could have a
completely
spec compliant implementation in the absence of JSP 2.1 (which is part
of
Tomcat 6; Tomcat 5 and 5.5 provide JSP 2.0).

You're right, *I* really want Tomcat 6, but my employers are leery of
its beta status.  They are also concerned about supporting an additional
container.

Just curious ... is this based on a belief that  JSF 1.2 + Facelets +
Shale
does not work (if it doesn't that is a bug that needs to be fixed), or
that
Shale does not provide you anything extra if you have JSF 1.2?  I
confess
that I don't recall any details of which Shale features you are looking
at
from your previous comments ... but there is quite a lot of different
things
available.

I didn't explain myself clearly, I'd prefer to use Shale in either case.
My problem is that I may be stuck in Tomcat 5.5.17, which (for me) would
necessitate using JSF 1.1.  

I need to decide if yesterday's setup is good enough, or if it's worth
pushing my employers really hard to add a Tomcat 6 setup (and risk being
thrown out on my rear).  






E-Mail messages may contain viruses, worms, or other malicious code. By reading 
the message and opening any attachments, the recipient accepts full 
responsibility for taking protective action against such code. Sender is not 
liable for any loss or damage arising from this message.

The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. 
It is intended solely for the addressee(s). Access to this e-mail by anyone 
else is unauthorized.

Swallowed Exceptions?

[Reynolds, James]

I have a Shale 1.0.3 + Facelets + JSF 1.1 setup running nicely.
However, I observed a disconcerting problem.  

I neglected to package a necessary library (buisness code, not framework
code) with my project and then ran the application.  Normally, a
bone-headed move like this would be rewarded with a stack trace a mile
long.  Surprisingly, the only error I saw was a 505 error reported in
the browser.  Nothing on the console and nothing in the logs.

This issue is causing me a lot of anxiety because I tend to commit a
large number of bone-headed moves.  Is there a debug setting I need to
add somewhere to ensure that Exceptions bubble all the way up?





E-Mail messages may contain viruses, worms, or other malicious code. By reading 
the message and opening any attachments, the recipient accepts full 
responsibility for taking protective action against such code. Sender is not 
liable for any loss or damage arising from this message.

The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. 
It is intended solely for the addressee(s). Access to this e-mail by anyone 
else is unauthorized.

RE: Getting started...again.

[Reynolds, James]

That sounds great!  Thanks for doing this and letting me know.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Matthias Wessendorf
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 9:23 AM
To: user@shale.apache.org
Subject: Re: Getting started...again.

James-

I am creating a sorta kickstart project, using technologies like

Apache MyFaces
Facelets
Apache Trinidad (formal Oracle ADF Faces)
Shale (View and application.manager (test will follow soon))
JPA
Toplink Essentials

as the container I am using jetty.

check here:
http://code.google.com/p/facesgoodies/

-M

On 1/15/07, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 1/15/07, Reynolds, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Steps 0  1 are complete :)
 
  I'm much closer as I can see Tomcat behaving as I'd expect, though I
did
  end up with a couple errors in the log:
 
  1. java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: javax/el/ExpressionFactory


 This is supposed to be pulled in by the dependencies for MyFaces
 (commons-el?)  if you're using JSF 1.1.  It'll be part of the server
if
 you're using JSF 1.2 (the RI, since MyFaces doesn't support this yet).

 2. org.apache.commons.chain.web.ChainListener


 Make sure commons chain is not *also* in your Tomcat shared or common
dirs.

 Commons-chain is definitely in my project, but I can't locate
  javax/el/ExpressionFactory in my jsf libs.  Should this be in my
server
  or J2EE libs?  I'm attempting to use Tomcat 5.5.20


 Does the prebuilt war in the 1.0.4 test builds work out of the box?
If so,
 it'd be interesting to do a detailed comparison of JARs in yours
versus that
 one.  If not, we've got something else weird, because the
out-of-the-box one
 runs for me.

 Craig

 On 1/15/07, Reynolds, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   I've been on a hiatus from Shale since changing jobs last year;
  however,
   my new company is considering it based on my gushing
recommendation.
  
   Embarrassingly enough, I can't fire up the shale-blank
application.
   When I run the app, I see the output below in the console then -
   nothing.  No errors in tomcat or anything (that I can see).  This
  output
   has changed since I last ran Shale.  Do you see anything that
might
   explain the silent failure?
 
 
  I've never tried it with the Shale libraries or facelets installed
in
  Tomcat's common/lib directory ... FIrst thing I would try is a
  completely
  vanilla Tomcat install, with the Shale jars deployed inside the
webapp
  (as
  they should default when shale-blank builds).
 
  Actually, the zeroth thing I would try is the 1.0.4 release instead
of
  1.0.3:-).  Rahul is in the process of getting it out there; his test
  build is
  available at http://people.apache.org/~rahul/shale/v104/.
 
  Craig
 
  Thanks!
  
  
   cmd /c C:\apache-tomcat-5.5.20\bin\catalina.bat run
   Using CATALINA_BASE:   C:\Documents and
   Settings\jReynolds\.IntelliJIdea60\system\tomcat_Unnamed_5094815
   Using CATALINA_HOME:   C:\apache-tomcat-5.5.20
   Using CATALINA_TMPDIR: C:\apache-tomcat-5.5.20\temp
   Using JRE_HOME:C:\Java\jdk1.5.0_09
   log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger
   (org.apache.catalina.startup.Embedded).
   log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
   ContextListener:
  attributeAdded('org$apache$shale$view$VIEW_CALLBACKS',
  
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]')
   ContextListener:
   attributeAdded('org.apache.shale.tiger.FACES_CONFIG_CONFIG',
   '[EMAIL PROTECTED]')
   ContextListener:
   attributeAdded('org.apache.myfaces.config.RuntimeConfig',
   '[EMAIL PROTECTED]')
   ContextListener:
   attributeAdded('org.apache.myfaces.webapp.webxml.WebXml',
   '[EMAIL PROTECTED]')
   ContextListener:
  
 
attributeAdded('org.apache.myfaces.webapp.StartupServletContextListener.
   FACES_INIT_DONE', 'true')
   ContextListener:
  attributeAdded('org$apache$shale$view$VIEW_CALLBACKS',
  
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]')
   ContextListener:
   attributeAdded('org.apache.shale.tiger.FACES_CONFIG_CONFIG',
   '[EMAIL PROTECTED]')
   ContextListener:
   attributeAdded('org.apache.myfaces.config.RuntimeConfig',
   '[EMAIL PROTECTED]')
   ContextListener:
   attributeAdded('org.apache.myfaces.webapp.webxml.WebXml',
   '[EMAIL PROTECTED]')
   ContextListener:
  
 
attributeAdded('org.apache.myfaces.webapp.StartupServletContextListener.
   FACES_INIT_DONE', 'true')
   ContextListener:
   attributeRemoved('org.apache.shale.tiger.FACES_CONFIG_CONFIG',
   '[EMAIL PROTECTED]')
   ContextListener:
attributeRemoved('org.apache.catalina.jsp_classpath',
  
 
'/C:/apache-tomcat-5.5.20/webapps/servlets-examples/WEB-INF/classes/;/C:
  
 
/apache-tomcat-5.5.20/common/classes/;/C:/apache-tomcat-5.5.20/common/i1
  
 
8n/tomcat-i18n-en.jar;/C:/apache-tomcat-5.5.20/common/i18n/tomcat-i18n-e
  
 
s.jar;/C:/apache-tomcat-5.5.20/common/i18n/tomcat-i18n-fr.jar;/C:/apache
  
 
-tomcat-5.5.20/common/i18n/tomcat-i18n-ja.jar;/C:/apache-tomcat-5.5.20/c
  
 
ommon/lib/commons-beanutils-1.7.0.jar;/C:/apache-tomcat-5.5.20/common/li
  
 
b/commons

RE: Getting started...again.

[Reynolds, James]

Oh, thank you!  I'll drop my Tomcat version and go again.

:)


-Original Message-
From: Hermod Opstvedt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 11:01 AM
To: user@shale.apache.org
Subject: SV: Getting started...again.

Hi

Just don't attempt to use Shale with 5.5.20 and jdk5. It works with any
version below 5.5.20 and jdk5. If your stuck to 5.5.20 you need to be
running jdk1.4

Hermod


-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] På vegne av
Matthias Wessendorf
Sendt: 16. januar 2007 17:23
Til: user@shale.apache.org
Emne: Re: Getting started...again.

James-

I am creating a sorta kickstart project, using technologies like

Apache MyFaces
Facelets
Apache Trinidad (formal Oracle ADF Faces)
Shale (View and application.manager (test will follow soon))
JPA
Toplink Essentials

as the container I am using jetty.

check here:
http://code.google.com/p/facesgoodies/

-M

On 1/15/07, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 1/15/07, Reynolds, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Steps 0  1 are complete :)
 
  I'm much closer as I can see Tomcat behaving as I'd expect, though I did
  end up with a couple errors in the log:
 
  1. java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: javax/el/ExpressionFactory


 This is supposed to be pulled in by the dependencies for MyFaces
 (commons-el?)  if you're using JSF 1.1.  It'll be part of the server if
 you're using JSF 1.2 (the RI, since MyFaces doesn't support this yet).

 2. org.apache.commons.chain.web.ChainListener


 Make sure commons chain is not *also* in your Tomcat shared or common
dirs.

 Commons-chain is definitely in my project, but I can't locate
  javax/el/ExpressionFactory in my jsf libs.  Should this be in my server
  or J2EE libs?  I'm attempting to use Tomcat 5.5.20


 Does the prebuilt war in the 1.0.4 test builds work out of the box?  If
so,
 it'd be interesting to do a detailed comparison of JARs in yours versus
that
 one.  If not, we've got something else weird, because the out-of-the-box
one
 runs for me.

 Craig

 On 1/15/07, Reynolds, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   I've been on a hiatus from Shale since changing jobs last year;
  however,
   my new company is considering it based on my gushing recommendation.
  
   Embarrassingly enough, I can't fire up the shale-blank application.
   When I run the app, I see the output below in the console then -
   nothing.  No errors in tomcat or anything (that I can see).  This
  output
   has changed since I last ran Shale.  Do you see anything that might
   explain the silent failure?
 
 
  I've never tried it with the Shale libraries or facelets installed in
  Tomcat's common/lib directory ... FIrst thing I would try is a
  completely
  vanilla Tomcat install, with the Shale jars deployed inside the webapp
  (as
  they should default when shale-blank builds).
 
  Actually, the zeroth thing I would try is the 1.0.4 release instead of
  1.0.3:-).  Rahul is in the process of getting it out there; his test
  build is
  available at http://people.apache.org/~rahul/shale/v104/.
 
  Craig
 
  Thanks!
  
  
   cmd /c C:\apache-tomcat-5.5.20\bin\catalina.bat run
   Using CATALINA_BASE:   C:\Documents and
   Settings\jReynolds\.IntelliJIdea60\system\tomcat_Unnamed_5094815
   Using CATALINA_HOME:   C:\apache-tomcat-5.5.20
   Using CATALINA_TMPDIR: C:\apache-tomcat-5.5.20\temp
   Using JRE_HOME:C:\Java\jdk1.5.0_09
   log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger
   (org.apache.catalina.startup.Embedded).
   log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
   ContextListener:
  attributeAdded('org$apache$shale$view$VIEW_CALLBACKS',
   '[EMAIL PROTECTED]')
   ContextListener:
   attributeAdded('org.apache.shale.tiger.FACES_CONFIG_CONFIG',
   '[EMAIL PROTECTED]')
   ContextListener:
   attributeAdded('org.apache.myfaces.config.RuntimeConfig',
   '[EMAIL PROTECTED]')
   ContextListener:
   attributeAdded('org.apache.myfaces.webapp.webxml.WebXml',
   '[EMAIL PROTECTED]')
   ContextListener:
  
  attributeAdded('org.apache.myfaces.webapp.StartupServletContextListener.
   FACES_INIT_DONE', 'true')
   ContextListener:
  attributeAdded('org$apache$shale$view$VIEW_CALLBACKS',
   '[EMAIL PROTECTED]')
   ContextListener:
   attributeAdded('org.apache.shale.tiger.FACES_CONFIG_CONFIG',
   '[EMAIL PROTECTED]')
   ContextListener:
   attributeAdded('org.apache.myfaces.config.RuntimeConfig',
   '[EMAIL PROTECTED]')
   ContextListener:
   attributeAdded('org.apache.myfaces.webapp.webxml.WebXml',
   '[EMAIL PROTECTED]')
   ContextListener:
  
  attributeAdded('org.apache.myfaces.webapp.StartupServletContextListener.
   FACES_INIT_DONE', 'true')
   ContextListener:
   attributeRemoved('org.apache.shale.tiger.FACES_CONFIG_CONFIG',
   '[EMAIL PROTECTED]')
   ContextListener: attributeRemoved('org.apache.catalina.jsp_classpath',
  
  '/C:/apache-tomcat-5.5.20/webapps/servlets-examples/WEB-INF/classes/;/C:
  
  /apache-tomcat-5.5.20/common/classes/;/C:/apache-tomcat-5.5.20

RE: Getting started...again.

[Reynolds, James]

I've been setting it up from scratch, since (oh the shame) I haven't used Maven 
yet.  This is yet another reason why I'd better hop on the bandwagon and set it 
up.  I'll check out that project too.

Thanks so much!


-Original Message-
From: Hermod Opstvedt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 12:46 PM
To: user@shale.apache.org
Subject: SV: Getting started...again.

Hi

How are you creating it? As a complete Maven2 project, or as Maven2
archetype?

Reason for asking, is that I recently submitted Shale/Clay kickstart project
(The first of more to come with other faces libs included). Take a look in
the shale sandbox under maven

Hermod


-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] På vegne av
Matthias Wessendorf
Sendt: 16. januar 2007 17:23
Til: user@shale.apache.org
Emne: Re: Getting started...again.

James-

I am creating a sorta kickstart project, using technologies like

Apache MyFaces
Facelets
Apache Trinidad (formal Oracle ADF Faces)
Shale (View and application.manager (test will follow soon))
JPA
Toplink Essentials

as the container I am using jetty.

check here:
http://code.google.com/p/facesgoodies/

-M

On 1/15/07, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 1/15/07, Reynolds, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Steps 0  1 are complete :)
 
  I'm much closer as I can see Tomcat behaving as I'd expect, though I did
  end up with a couple errors in the log:
 
  1. java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: javax/el/ExpressionFactory


 This is supposed to be pulled in by the dependencies for MyFaces
 (commons-el?)  if you're using JSF 1.1.  It'll be part of the server if
 you're using JSF 1.2 (the RI, since MyFaces doesn't support this yet).

 2. org.apache.commons.chain.web.ChainListener


 Make sure commons chain is not *also* in your Tomcat shared or common
dirs.

 Commons-chain is definitely in my project, but I can't locate
  javax/el/ExpressionFactory in my jsf libs.  Should this be in my server
  or J2EE libs?  I'm attempting to use Tomcat 5.5.20


 Does the prebuilt war in the 1.0.4 test builds work out of the box?  If
so,
 it'd be interesting to do a detailed comparison of JARs in yours versus
that
 one.  If not, we've got something else weird, because the out-of-the-box
one
 runs for me.

 Craig

 On 1/15/07, Reynolds, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   I've been on a hiatus from Shale since changing jobs last year;
  however,
   my new company is considering it based on my gushing recommendation.
  
   Embarrassingly enough, I can't fire up the shale-blank application.
   When I run the app, I see the output below in the console then -
   nothing.  No errors in tomcat or anything (that I can see).  This
  output
   has changed since I last ran Shale.  Do you see anything that might
   explain the silent failure?
 
 
  I've never tried it with the Shale libraries or facelets installed in
  Tomcat's common/lib directory ... FIrst thing I would try is a
  completely
  vanilla Tomcat install, with the Shale jars deployed inside the webapp
  (as
  they should default when shale-blank builds).
 
  Actually, the zeroth thing I would try is the 1.0.4 release instead of
  1.0.3:-).  Rahul is in the process of getting it out there; his test
  build is
  available at http://people.apache.org/~rahul/shale/v104/.
 
  Craig
 
  Thanks!
  
  
   cmd /c C:\apache-tomcat-5.5.20\bin\catalina.bat run
   Using CATALINA_BASE:   C:\Documents and
   Settings\jReynolds\.IntelliJIdea60\system\tomcat_Unnamed_5094815
   Using CATALINA_HOME:   C:\apache-tomcat-5.5.20
   Using CATALINA_TMPDIR: C:\apache-tomcat-5.5.20\temp
   Using JRE_HOME:C:\Java\jdk1.5.0_09
   log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger
   (org.apache.catalina.startup.Embedded).
   log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
   ContextListener:
  attributeAdded('org$apache$shale$view$VIEW_CALLBACKS',
   '[EMAIL PROTECTED]')
   ContextListener:
   attributeAdded('org.apache.shale.tiger.FACES_CONFIG_CONFIG',
   '[EMAIL PROTECTED]')
   ContextListener:
   attributeAdded('org.apache.myfaces.config.RuntimeConfig',
   '[EMAIL PROTECTED]')
   ContextListener:
   attributeAdded('org.apache.myfaces.webapp.webxml.WebXml',
   '[EMAIL PROTECTED]')
   ContextListener:
  
  attributeAdded('org.apache.myfaces.webapp.StartupServletContextListener.
   FACES_INIT_DONE', 'true')
   ContextListener:
  attributeAdded('org$apache$shale$view$VIEW_CALLBACKS',
   '[EMAIL PROTECTED]')
   ContextListener:
   attributeAdded('org.apache.shale.tiger.FACES_CONFIG_CONFIG',
   '[EMAIL PROTECTED]')
   ContextListener:
   attributeAdded('org.apache.myfaces.config.RuntimeConfig',
   '[EMAIL PROTECTED]')
   ContextListener:
   attributeAdded('org.apache.myfaces.webapp.webxml.WebXml',
   '[EMAIL PROTECTED]')
   ContextListener:
  
  attributeAdded('org.apache.myfaces.webapp.StartupServletContextListener.
   FACES_INIT_DONE', 'true')
   ContextListener:
   attributeRemoved