Re: [slf4j-user] [POLL] Requiring JDK 1.5 for SLF4J

2009-03-27 Thread Erik van Oosten

yes

Ceki Gulcu wrote:

Do you accept SLF4J dropping JDK 1.3 compatibility and require JDK 1.5
instead?


___
user mailing list
user@slf4j.org
http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user


Re: [slf4j-user] [POLL] Requiring JDK 1.5 for SLF4J

2009-03-27 Thread Maarten Bosteels
yes

On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 8:39 AM, Erik van Oosten e.vanoos...@grons.nlwrote:

 yes

 Ceki Gulcu wrote:

 Do you accept SLF4J dropping JDK 1.3 compatibility and require JDK 1.5
 instead?


 ___
 user mailing list
 user@slf4j.org
 http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user

___
user mailing list
user@slf4j.org
http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user

Re: [slf4j-user] [POLL] Requiring JDK 1.5 for SLF4J

2009-03-27 Thread david varnes
* Ceki Gulcu wrote, On 27/03/09 04:16:

 Do you accept SLF4J dropping JDK 1.3 compatibility and require JDK 1.5
 instead?  If you respond, please do so on the u...@slf4j mailing list.

+1

davidv

___
user mailing list
user@slf4j.org
http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user


Re: [slf4j-user] [POLL] Requiring JDK 1.5 for SLF4J

2009-03-27 Thread Bjorn Danielsson
yes

Ceki Gulcu c...@qos.ch wrote:
 Do you accept SLF4J dropping JDK 1.3 compatibility and require JDK 1.5
 instead?

___
user mailing list
user@slf4j.org
http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user


Re: [slf4j-user] [slf4j-dev] [POLL] Requiring JDK 1.5 for SLF4J

2009-03-27 Thread Joern Huxhorn


On 26.03.2009, at 18:16, Ceki Gulcu wrote:


Do you accept SLF4J dropping JDK 1.3 compatibility and require JDK 1.5
instead?  If you respond, please do so on the u...@slf4j mailing list.



+1!

I'd also like to mention the following Sun program:
http://www.sun.com/software/javaseforbusiness/

The following link contains a news story about SAP paying Sun big time  
to keep supporting Java 1.4.x for their customers. Unfortunately, it's  
in german and I couldn't find that info in English:

http://www.heise.de/newsticker/SAP-bezahlt-Sun-aeltere-Java-Versionen-aktuell-zu-halten--/meldung/121816

This could also be interesting for you, Ceki. I guess you'd be ok if  
SAP paid you big time for bug fixes of the slf4j 1.5.6 line, right?


I'd also like to take the opportunity to remind everyone of http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70 
 and http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112 which would make  
varargs much more useful.
I'd be perfectly happy to contribute http://lilith.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/lilith/trunk/lilith-data/logging/src/main/java/de/huxhorn/lilith/data/logging/MessageFormatter.java?view=markup 
 (including tests), just let me know where I should sign :)


Cheers,
Joern.
___
user mailing list
user@slf4j.org
http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user


Re: [slf4j-user] [slf4j-dev] [POLL] Requiring JDK 1.5 for SLF4J

2009-03-27 Thread Thorbjoern Ravn Andersen

Joern Huxhorn skrev:


The following link contains a news story about SAP paying Sun big time 
to keep supporting Java 1.4.x for their customers. Unfortunately, it's 
in german and I couldn't find that info in English:
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/SAP-bezahlt-Sun-aeltere-Java-Versionen-aktuell-zu-halten--/meldung/121816 




Google provide a Translate link when searching on a link:

http://www.google.com/search?q=http://www.heise.de/newsticker/SAP-bezahlt-Sun-aeltere-Java-Versionen-aktuell-zu-halten--/meldung/121816

Even to Danish the translation is readable :)

For those REALLY interested the Java coming with OpenSolaris is this 
long term business support version.  I believe there is a license for 
it included automatically.


Perhaps SAP would buy Sun instead of IBM? :-o

--
 Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen  ...plus... Tubular Bells!

___
user mailing list
user@slf4j.org
http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user