[MLLib] Is the order of the coefficients in a LogisticRegresionModel kept ?

2016-02-02 Thread jmvllt
Hi everyone,

This may sound like a stupid question but I need to be sure of this :

Given a dataframe composed by « n » features  : f1, f2, …, fn

For each row of my dataframe, I create a labeled point : 
val row_i = LabeledPoint(label, Vectors.dense(v1_i,v2_i,…, vn_i) ) 
where v1_i,v2_i,…, vn_i are respectively the values of the features f1, f2,
…, fn of the i th row.

Then, I fit a pipeline composed by a standardScaler and a logisticRegression
model.
When I get back my LogisticRegressionModel and StandardScalerModel from the
pipeline, I’m calling the getters : 
LogisticRegressionModel.coefficients, StandardScalerModel.mean and
StandardScalerModel.std

This gives me 3 vectors of length « n » 

My question is the following : 
Am I assured that the element of index « j » of each vectors correspond to 
the feature « j »  ? Is the "*order*" of the feature kept ?
e.g : Is StandardScalerModel.mean(j) the mean of the feature « j » of my
data frame ? 

Thanks for your time.
Regards,
J.




--
View this message in context: 
http://apache-spark-user-list.1001560.n3.nabble.com/MLLib-Is-the-order-of-the-coefficients-in-a-LogisticRegresionModel-kept-tp26137.html
Sent from the Apache Spark User List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@spark.apache.org



Re: Is it relevant to use BinaryClassificationMetrics.aucROC / aucPR with LogisticRegressionModel ?

2015-11-25 Thread jmvllt
Hi filthysocks,

Thanks for the answer. Indeed, using the clearThreshold() function solved my
problem :).

Regards,
Jean.



--
View this message in context: 
http://apache-spark-user-list.1001560.n3.nabble.com/Is-it-relevant-to-use-BinaryClassificationMetrics-aucROC-aucPR-with-LogisticRegressionModel-tp25465p25475.html
Sent from the Apache Spark User List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@spark.apache.org



Is it relevant to use BinaryClassificationMetrics.aucROC / aucPR with LogisticRegressionModel ?

2015-11-24 Thread jmvllt
Hi guys,

This may be a stupid question. But I m facing an issue here.

I found the class BinaryClassificationMetrics and I wanted to compute the
aucROC or aucPR of my model. 
The thing is that the predict method of a LogisticRegressionModel only
returns the predicted class, and not the probability of belonging to the
positive class. So I will get:

val metrics = new BinaryClassificationMetrics(predictionAndLabels)
val aucROC = metrics.areaUnderROC

with predictionAndLabels as a RDD[(predictedClass,label)]. 

Here, because the predicted class will always be 0 or 1, there is no way to
vary the threshold to get the aucROC, right  Or am I totally wrong ? 

So, is it relevant to use BinaryClassificationMetrics.areUnderROC with
MLlib's classification models which in many cases only return the predicted
class and not the probability ?

Nevertheless, an easy solution for LogisticRegression would be to create my
own method who takes the weights' vector of the model as a parameter and
computes a predictionAndLabels with the real belonging probabilities. But is
this the only solution 

Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Jean.  




--
View this message in context: 
http://apache-spark-user-list.1001560.n3.nabble.com/Is-it-relevant-to-use-BinaryClassificationMetrics-aucROC-aucPR-with-LogisticRegressionModel-tp25465.html
Sent from the Apache Spark User List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@spark.apache.org