Done.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5637
Best
Mario
> On 2 Nov 2017, at 16:24 , Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
>
> Dear Mario,
>
> you are right - that appears to be a bug. Could you just copy/paste your
> analysis into a Jira issue please?
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/
>
> Best,
>
> -- Richard
>
>> On 01.11.2017, at 18:02, Mario Juric wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was wondering what exactly the semantics of JCasUtil.selectAt is supposed
>> to be after looking into the implementation, since the JavaDoc isn’t very
>> precise. I initially thought that it would select annotations of the given
>> type with the exact begin and end, but this is not the case when inspecting
>> the implementation. The problem is in CasUtil.selectAt with the following
>> while loop:
>>
>> while (it.isValid()) {
>> AnnotationFS a = it.get();
>> // If the offsets do not match the specified offets, we're done
>> if (a.getBegin() != aBegin && a.getEnd() != aEnd) {
>> break;
>> }
>> it.moveToNext();
>> list.add(a);
>> }
>>
>> I would have expected that either begin or end must be different to drop the
>> item, i.e. "if (a.getBegin() != aBegin || a.getEnd() != aEnd)" instead. This
>> is obviously not the case, and it does not have the same behaviour like
>> selectCovered either, so what is the intend if it’s not a bug?
>>
>> Best,
>> Mario
>
