RE: Namespace prefix throws spanner in works

2005-05-23 Thread Adam Hardy
A question about xmlbeans: if I change the schema locally and compile my
xmlbeans into a jar, is that elementFormDefault attribute ( all schema
info) compiled into my jar, or will xmlbeans validate() try to reference
the schema again?

In my current set-up in Eclipse, I am certain that the app is not
accessing the schemas once running. 


Thanks
Adam



 -Original Message-
 From: Lawrence Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: 20 May 2005 17:44
 To: user@xmlbeans.apache.org
 Subject: RE: Namespace prefix throws spanner in works
 
 
 Hi Adam
 
 Without seeing the schema in full it's hard to tell, but 
 here's my guess. I guess that you've declared the 
 mediumName element as a local element in the schema (this 
 will happen if it is not an immediate child of the top-level 
 schema element).
 
 How you refer to local elements and specifically whether you 
 should include a namespace prefix or not is controlled by the 
 form attribute on the element's declaration in the schema. If 
 the form attribute is missing then it's controlled by the 
 elementFormDefault attribute on the surrounding schema 
 element. The default in both these cases (and therefore what 
 will happen if they are both missing) is unqualified. This 
 means that local elements _must_ be referred to without a 
 namespace. I'm guessing that this is what has happened in your case.
 
 If the form value is unqualified then it is an error to 
 refer to the local element using a namespace prefix and the 
 validator correctly points this out.
 
 It sounds like you have control over the schema. If so then 
 you can change it so that either that specific element 
 declaration has form=qualified or you can set the same rule 
 for the whole schema by setting 
 elementFormDefault=qualified in the schema element instead.
 
 Note that it is equally an error for you to be expecting a 
 namespace and not to see one - so if you update your schema 
 in this way be sure that all clients know about it and will 
 ensure that all local elements are namespace qualified in all 
 the instance documents.
 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/

This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain
personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically
stated.
If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system. 
Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in
reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the
BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. 
Further communication will signify your consent to this.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Namespace prefix throws spanner in works

2005-05-20 Thread Adam Hardy
Hi,

I hope someone give me a clue how to proceed with this issue: I compiled
a set of beans against my schema and now I'm using them in my app. 

I parse an XML doc into the document, and then when I call
doc.validate(), I get a series of validation errors. 

My xml header looks like this:

?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
epg xmlns:epg=http://www.worlddab.org/schemas/epg; 
xmlns:xsi=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance; 
xsi:schemaLocation=http://www.worlddab.org/schemas/epg
epgSchedule_11.xsd
system=DAB
Etc etc

And the xml where the first error occurs looks like this:

programme shortId=59033
epg:mediumNamePM/epg:mediumName
[snip...]
/programme

And the error says:

Expected element mediumName at the end of the content in element
programme

If I remove the epg: namespace prefix from the elements, then it
validates fine, but I can't do that in the live environment - the app
will receive these xml files from an outside source.

The 'programme' element is defined in my epgSchedule_11.xsd which is
referenced as you can see above in the xml root element. The mediumName
element is defined in a separate schema which the epgSchedule_11.xsd
schema includes.

I have researched extensively across the xmlbeans site, the mailing
lists and google, but can't find my problem - I guess it's a case of not
seeing the wood for the trees. Hopefully someone can help.

Thanks a lot
Adam

http://www.bbc.co.uk/

This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain
personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically
stated.
If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system. 
Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in
reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the
BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. 
Further communication will signify your consent to this.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]