Re: Zookeeper 3.5.X beta to stable versoin

2018-11-20 Thread rammohan ganapavarapu 
I think lot of people wait for 3.5  as me :)

Ram

On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 6:22 AM Norbert Kalmar 
wrote:

> Hi Gopi,
>
> I (and pretty much everyone) can only give you estimates, unfortunately.
> So, my guess: January.
> But I am not the release manager, nor a "binding voter".
> I'm just also closely monitoring 3.5 stable release as well, and working on
> one of the blocking issues.
>
> Regards,
> Norbert
>
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 2:14 PM Testing Ideas 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Do you have a time of when we can expect the stable release of Zookeeper
> > 3.5? I got from your community that you are working on to release the
> > stable version ASAP, but a gross time would help us to communicate with
> my
> > stakeholders on the release and plan our migration.
> >
> > Many thanks,
> > Gopi
> >
>

Re: Zookeeper 3.5.X beta to stable versoin

2018-11-20 Thread Norbert Kalmar 
Hi Gopi,

I (and pretty much everyone) can only give you estimates, unfortunately.
So, my guess: January.
But I am not the release manager, nor a "binding voter".
I'm just also closely monitoring 3.5 stable release as well, and working on
one of the blocking issues.

Regards,
Norbert

On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 2:14 PM Testing Ideas  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Do you have a time of when we can expect the stable release of Zookeeper
> 3.5? I got from your community that you are working on to release the
> stable version ASAP, but a gross time would help us to communicate with my
> stakeholders on the release and plan our migration.
>
> Many thanks,
> Gopi
>

Zookeeper 3.5.X beta to stable versoin

2018-11-20 Thread Testing Ideas 
Hi,

Do you have a time of when we can expect the stable release of Zookeeper
3.5? I got from your community that you are working on to release the
stable version ASAP, but a gross time would help us to communicate with my
stakeholders on the release and plan our migration.

Many thanks,
Gopi

Re: ZooKeeper 3.6.0 Release (fix for a large number of watches)

2018-11-20 Thread Norbert Kalmar 
Hi Kevin,

Unfortunately, 3.4 and 3.5 is in a feature freeze. You could ask the
community to backport this feature (vote on it), but personally I don't
think it will go through, sorry. It could be backported to first 3.5
release after stable (3.5.5  think). But were still talking months here,
possibly 3.5.5 would be ready at the same time 3.6 is.
The plan is to push 3.5 stable out ASAP, and do a 3.6 release very quick
after (6 months?).

Regards,
Norbert



On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 9:24 PM Kevin Verhoeven  wrote:

> Thanks Enrico,
>
> Would it be possible to backport the fix (PR # 590) into a previous
> version? For example, 3.4.x or 3.5.x? This could potentially release an
> important fix quicker.
>
> Kevin
>
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 12:52 PM Enrico Olivelli 
> wrote:
>
> > Kevin,
> > I guess there is no 3.6.0 very soon.
> > The community is working hard in order to release a 'stable' 3.5.x, then
> we
> > will go for 3.6.0.
> > I think any help I very appreciated to speed up the process.
> >
> > The others (like Facebook friends) on this list can talk about uses of
> > 3.6.0 in production.
> >
> > Just my 2c
> >
> > Enrico
> >
> > Il ven 16 nov 2018, 20:32 Kevin Verhoeven  ha
> scritto:
> >
> > > I am running Accumulo with a large number of tables (> 10k). Each table
> > > sets up a number of watches in ZooKeeper, and we have many (> 50
> million
> > > watches). We are running 5 ZooKeeper servers and the watches are spread
> > > evenly across the servers. We see Accumulo performance degrade sharply
> > when
> > > we add more than 6k tables and it appears this is related to the number
> > of
> > > watches in ZooKeeper. However, there seems to be a performance fix for
> a
> > > large number of watches, in issue # 1177[1], that was resolved Aug 2018
> > and
> > > merged into master with PR # 590 in release 3.6.0.
> > >
> > > My question is how can I get the ZooKeeper 3.6.0 release? I'd like to
> > > download a copy of the 3.6.0 jar and test with this version. If all
> goes
> > > well, this will resolve my performance issue with Accumulo watches.
> > >
> > > A second question would be: is there a way to tune ZooKeeper for better
> > > performance with a large number of watches? This does not seem to be a
> > > optimal running state for ZooKeeper, but we are constrained by Accumulo
> > and
> > > their use of watches.
> > >
> > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1177
> > > [2] https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/590
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Kevin
> > >
> > --
> >
> >
> > -- Enrico Olivelli
> >
>