Hello Ashish,
Regarding a way to not have to create a java class for your result class, you
could very easily just set your resultClass to a java.util.HashMap. This will
be popultated for any results for the key being the name of the field being
returned and the value being the value.
As far as the best way to design your java classes for mapping; My opinion is
that you should try to not let your current database design dictate how your
object model will look. Design your java objects in a way that makes sense
from an object oriented point of view. Decide what makes the best sense in
terms of what objects you will need perform your business logic.
-Jonathan
-Original Message-
From: Ashish Kulkarni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 10:16 AM
To: user-java@ibatis.apache.org
Subject: Best way to define java class for mapping
Hi
What is the best way to design java class for mapping,
for example suppose i have a SQL querry which join 2-3
tables and returns the data,
should i design java class to match this SQL querry,
or should i design java class to match tables, and
then create a Map in xml file and then populate data
in 2-3 tables.
Is there a utility which will create java class from
resultset,
or is there any utility where i may not have to create
java class, like DynaActionForm in struts
ashish
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
