?????? ????cloudstack4.2????????????????????????
4.2 http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/ systemvmtemplate-2013-07-21-master-kvm.qcow2.bz2 systemvmtemplate64-2013-07-24-master-kvm.qcow2.bz2 -- -- ??: Wei ZHOU;ustcweiz...@gmail.com; : 2013??9??9??(??) 9:11 ??: users-cnusers-cn@cloudstack.apache.org; : Re: cloudstack4.2 4.2??systemvm template ?? 2013??9??9??3:02??WXR 474745...@qq.com?? cloudstack??4.2??hypervisor??KVM?? ??4.0??4.1??4.2??starting?? ?? http://snag.gy/5PbjC.jpg ??4.2??
Re: win7+cygwin+cloudstack启动异常
cygwin下？还是好好到linux下折腾吧。 On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 1:38 PM, 黑洞 heids...@sina.com wrote: 按照github cloudstack源码中 INSTANL.md文件配置好相关环境 1、cygwin环境已配置好 2、数据库初始化成功 3、mvn -pl :cloud-client-ui jetty:run 启动后报异常 具体异常为: lassPostProcessor$ImportAwareBeanPostProcessor#0]; root of factory hierarchy ERROR [web.context.ContextLoader] (main:) Context initialization failed org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanCreationException: Error creating bean with name 'niciraNvpDaoImpl' defined in class path resource [componentContext.xml]: BeanPostProcessor before instantiation of bean failed; nested exception is net.sf.cglib.core.CodeGenerationException: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException--null at org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.createBean(AbstractAutowireCapableBeanFactory.java:452) at org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractBeanFactory$1.getObject(AbstractBeanFactory.java:294) at org.springframework.beans.factory.support.DefaultSingletonBeanRegistry.getSingleton(DefaultSingletonBeanRegistry.java:225) at org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractBeanFactory.doGetBean(AbstractBeanFactory.java:291) at org.springframework.beans.factory.support.AbstractBeanFactory.getBean(AbstractBeanFactory.java:193) at org.springframework.beans.factory.support.DefaultListableBeanFactory.preInstantiateSingletons(DefaultListableBeanFactory.java:609) at org.springframework.context.support.AbstractApplicationContext.finishBeanFactoryInitialization(AbstractApplicationContext.java:918) 云计算基础架构师 Github:https://github.com/heidsoft Weibo: http://weibo.com/liuganbin 研究方向：云计算（云安全）、大数据（数据处理分析） 主要学习: Linux / C / C++ / JAVA /Python Email:heids...@sina.com Tell:18601706743
?????? ?????? ?????? ????cloudstack4.2????????????????????????
??4.0??4.1??cloud-install-sys-tmplttemplate/tmpl/1/3/.qcow2265M?? -- -- ??: Wei ZHOU;ustcweiz...@gmail.com; : 2013??9??10??(??) 3:47 ??: users-cnusers-cn@cloudstack.apache.org; : Re: ?? ?? cloudstack4.2 bz2 ??cloudstack??systemvm template template/tmpl/1/3/template
Re: 回复：Re: win7+cygwin+cloudstack启动异常
linux下也可以用Eclipse啊 在 2013年9月10日下午4:02，黑洞 heids...@sina.com写道： win下虽然麻烦挺多，但更易于开发！所以对于win环境的cs开发经验丰富的工程师，还请多多指教！ - 原始邮件 - 发件人：Tao Lin linba...@gmail.com 收件人：users-cn@cloudstack.apache.org, heids...@sina.com 主题：Re: win7+cygwin+cloudstack启动异常 日期：2013年09月10日 15点08分
?????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ????cloudstack4.2????????????????????????
acton-systemvm-02062012.qcow2.bz2??4.1270??M4.1qcow2690??M ??4.2??bz2??261M4.2??qcow2??265M??cloudstack?? -- -- ??: Wei ZHOU;ustcweiz...@gmail.com; : 2013??9??10??(??) 10:19 ??: users-cnusers-cn@cloudstack.apache.org; : Re: ?? ?? ?? cloudstack4.2 ??4.2??200??M??qcow2?? ?? ??vnc?? ?? 2013??9??10??9:55??WXR 474745...@qq.com?? ??4.0??4.1??cloud-install-sys-tmplttemplate/tmpl/1/3/.qcow2265M?? -- -- ??: Wei ZHOU;ustcweiz...@gmail.com; : 2013??9??10??(??) 3:47 ??: users-cnusers-cn@cloudstack.apache.org; : Re: ?? ?? cloudstack4.2 bz2 ??cloudstack??systemvm template template/tmpl/1/3/template
RE: Multiple guest IP on a VM?
Hi, This feature is in 4.2 Thanks, Jayapal -Original Message- From: Indra Pramana [mailto:in...@sg.or.id] Sent: Monday, 9 September 2013 9:04 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Multiple guest IP on a VM? Hi Jayapal, Good day to you, and thank you for your e-mail. I tried to go into the UI Instance NIC section but I can't find View IP addresses tab on the NIC details. See the screenshot here: https://www.dropbox.com/s/x2enudh43orh55b/Screenshot%20- %20Cloudstack%20GUI%20-%20Instance_NIC.jpg Where can I see the View IP addresses tab? I am using CloudStack 4.1.1. Looking forward to your reply, thank you. Cheers. On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com wrote: Hi, In UI go to Instance - Nic: In nic details you can find 'View Ip addresses' tab. In this page you can find 'Acquire ip address'. Thanks, Jayapal On 08-Sep-2013, at 1:10 PM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com wrote: Hi, Please find my inline comments. Thanks, Jayapal On 08-Sep-2013, at 1:01 AM, Indra Pramana in...@sg.or.id wrote: Dear all, In addition to my previous e-mail below, earlier I did some tests by creating the normal isolated type network with Offering for Isolated networks with Source Nat service enabled network offering, and then create a VM instance using the network. The VM instance is created successfully using a private guest IP address. I then tried to acquire a public IP address (Network the network name View IP Addresses Acquire New IP) and once the public IP address is acquired, I can map the public IP to the VM using Static NAT. However, when I tried to acquire another new IP address, and try to static NAT it to the same VM, it refuses to do so with this error message: Failed to enable static nat for the ip address id=1752 as vm id=1934 is already associated with ip id=1568. Two questions: 1. Can we create static NAT for two (or more) public IP addresses into one single VM? No. In one to one NAT (static NAT) one public ip can be mapped to one guest VM ip. 2. Can we assign two (or more) guest IP addresses on a single VM instance? Multiple ips to nic can be added using addiptonic API. In UI, Instance - Nic - acquire ip to nic Looking forward to your reply, thank you. Cheers. On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Indra Pramana in...@sg.or.id wrote: Dear all, We are implementing shared network type instead of isolated network type, which means that we are assigning public IP address as guest IP for all our VMs. This means that our VMs are using public IP instead of private IP configured on the NIC interfaces, without any network address translation done by the virtual router. My question: is it possible to assign multiple guest/public IP addresses into one VM? I can't find this option on the current setting. Is multiple public IP addresses only supported on isolated network and is not supported on shared network? I found this article while Googling, but I'm not too sure whether this can been implemented? https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/multiple-ip-address-per-nic.ht ml I am using CloudStack 4.1.1 and KVM hypervisor, and running advanced network type (instead of basic). Looking forward to your reply, thank you. Cheers.
Re: Multiple guest IP on a VM?
Thanks Jayapal for the confirmation! I really hope that CloudStack 4.2 can be released this week. Have been monitoring the vote discussion on the dev mailing list. Cheers. On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com wrote: Hi, This feature is in 4.2 Thanks, Jayapal -Original Message- From: Indra Pramana [mailto:in...@sg.or.id] Sent: Monday, 9 September 2013 9:04 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Multiple guest IP on a VM? Hi Jayapal, Good day to you, and thank you for your e-mail. I tried to go into the UI Instance NIC section but I can't find View IP addresses tab on the NIC details. See the screenshot here: https://www.dropbox.com/s/x2enudh43orh55b/Screenshot%20- %20Cloudstack%20GUI%20-%20Instance_NIC.jpg Where can I see the View IP addresses tab? I am using CloudStack 4.1.1. Looking forward to your reply, thank you. Cheers. On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com wrote: Hi, In UI go to Instance - Nic: In nic details you can find 'View Ip addresses' tab. In this page you can find 'Acquire ip address'. Thanks, Jayapal On 08-Sep-2013, at 1:10 PM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com wrote: Hi, Please find my inline comments. Thanks, Jayapal On 08-Sep-2013, at 1:01 AM, Indra Pramana in...@sg.or.id wrote: Dear all, In addition to my previous e-mail below, earlier I did some tests by creating the normal isolated type network with Offering for Isolated networks with Source Nat service enabled network offering, and then create a VM instance using the network. The VM instance is created successfully using a private guest IP address. I then tried to acquire a public IP address (Network the network name View IP Addresses Acquire New IP) and once the public IP address is acquired, I can map the public IP to the VM using Static NAT. However, when I tried to acquire another new IP address, and try to static NAT it to the same VM, it refuses to do so with this error message: Failed to enable static nat for the ip address id=1752 as vm id=1934 is already associated with ip id=1568. Two questions: 1. Can we create static NAT for two (or more) public IP addresses into one single VM? No. In one to one NAT (static NAT) one public ip can be mapped to one guest VM ip. 2. Can we assign two (or more) guest IP addresses on a single VM instance? Multiple ips to nic can be added using addiptonic API. In UI, Instance - Nic - acquire ip to nic Looking forward to your reply, thank you. Cheers. On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Indra Pramana in...@sg.or.id wrote: Dear all, We are implementing shared network type instead of isolated network type, which means that we are assigning public IP address as guest IP for all our VMs. This means that our VMs are using public IP instead of private IP configured on the NIC interfaces, without any network address translation done by the virtual router. My question: is it possible to assign multiple guest/public IP addresses into one VM? I can't find this option on the current setting. Is multiple public IP addresses only supported on isolated network and is not supported on shared network? I found this article while Googling, but I'm not too sure whether this can been implemented? https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/multiple-ip-address-per-nic.ht ml I am using CloudStack 4.1.1 and KVM hypervisor, and running advanced network type (instead of basic). Looking forward to your reply, thank you. Cheers.
cs 4.2 systemvm
Hi all. I'm trying to test CS 4.2 and it seems that old systemvm(acton-systemvm-02062012.qcow2.bz2) does not work with it. After debugging I found that consoleproxy/ssvm does not get its NICs configured. It seems that method of passing network configuration parameters from HV to system vms has changed - now /usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/vm/hypervisor/kvm/patchviasocket.plis used to send configuration to the system vm - /etc/init.d/cloud-early-config tries to read it from /dev/vport0p1. However, there is no such device in system VMs. So, should I use new systemvm image? Where can I get it ? ENV used: CS 4.2 (compiled revision 2852 from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/) CentOS 6.4 qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.355.0.1.el6.centos.7.x86_64 acton-systemvm-02062012.qcow2.bz2 template for systemvm -- Regards, Valery http://protocol.by/slayer
Re: 4.2 VMware memory overcommit
Using the latest build fixed this issue for me. Thank you. On 10 September 2013 06:48, Harikrishna Patnala harikrishna.patn...@citrix.com wrote: Hi, There was a bug opened on this global parameter vmware.reserve.mem( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4498) and it was fixed. Can you please try with latest 4.2. -Harikrishna On 23-Aug-2013, at 9:38 PM, Sean Hamilton s...@seanhamilton.co.uk wrote: Hey guys, I'm playing around with 4.2 and VMware vSphere (version 5.0). We're interested in memory overcommit, but the observed behaviour isn't what I expected. I'm seeing my instances being created in vCenter with a memory reservation that is equal to the configured memory. If I then change the overcommit setting to 2.0 I see instances being created with a reservation that is half of the configured memory. There is a global setting of vmware.reserve.mem that is set to false, but I don't see it making a difference. I get the same behaviour if it's true or false. Can anyone help? Thanks, Sean
RE: cs 4.2 systemvm
Hi, Xenserver : http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-07-12-master-xen.vhd.bz2 KVM : http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-06-12-master-kvm.qcow2.bz2 VMware : http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-4.2-vh7.ova Thanks, Sailaja.M -Original Message- From: Valery Ciareszka [mailto:valery.teres...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 1:45 PM To: users Subject: cs 4.2 systemvm Hi all. I'm trying to test CS 4.2 and it seems that old systemvm(acton-systemvm-02062012.qcow2.bz2) does not work with it. After debugging I found that consoleproxy/ssvm does not get its NICs configured. It seems that method of passing network configuration parameters from HV to system vms has changed - now /usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/vm/hypervisor/kvm/patchviasocket.plis used to send configuration to the system vm - /etc/init.d/cloud-early-config tries to read it from /dev/vport0p1. However, there is no such device in system VMs. So, should I use new systemvm image? Where can I get it ? ENV used: CS 4.2 (compiled revision 2852 from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/) CentOS 6.4 qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.355.0.1.el6.centos.7.x86_64 acton-systemvm-02062012.qcow2.bz2 template for systemvm -- Regards, Valery http://protocol.by/slayer
Re: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS or 14.04 on XenServer 6.0.2 with CS 4.1.1? templates in general?
Thank you Rafael. Now we have an additional VHD image available. Because i'm already using Carloses solution which works nicely (even has cloud init scripts), i'm not going to test yours. I would suggest you gzip it before sharing next time. It will be much smaller. I'm also thinking about setting up public free repository for templates, now that i have a few. Will open a new mail thread on developers forum for that. Regards, F. On 10/9/13 1:37 AM, Rafael Weingartner wrote: Guys, I am following this discussion for a while. And googling about the idea of converting a HVM template to PV, I found out that it is an error prone task and the best thing to do is to create a PV VM and then a template that is based on a PV image. So, I did it, I do not actually know if I can do this, but I would like to share it with you. The Template has already the password script that CS need to change a user password trough the interface (I configured the root user). Ubuntu 12.04.03 LTS 64 bits, you just need to download it and add to the CS as a template, do not forget to select the Other PV 64 bits on the OS type selection box and enable the password reset function, so when you create a VM it will create a password to the root user. https://www.dropbox.com/s/kf9pp4zfu550hg8/Ubuntu%2012.04LTS%20-%20PV%20VM%20with%20XenScripts.vhd 2013/9/9 France mailingli...@isg.si Regarding createVHD.sh, which requires XenServer with NFS SR. Doesn't createUbuntuCSimageXen.sh basically create a RAW image? If so, it could be converted to VHD using vhd-util: http://blogs.citrix.com/2012/**10/04/convert-a-raw-image-to-** xenserver-vhd/http://blogs.citrix.com/2012/10/04/convert-a-raw-image-to-xenserver-vhd/ What do you think? Regards, F. On 7/9/13 4:17 AM, Carlos Reategui wrote: Hi France I made some last minute adjustments so the script may have some issues but hopefully should be straight forward enough. If not let me know. You will need to include the xe-guest-utilities_6.0.2-766_**amd64.deb in the directory from the XenServer tools install iso. I could not find a place to download it from. You should run the createUbuntuCSimageXen.sh script on an ubuntu 12.04 machine for best results and make sure the directory it runs in has plenty of room 10+G. Once it creates the ubuntu-12.04.3-server-**cloudimg-amd64.fs file you will need to move that file to a XenServer host to run the createVDH.sh script. Let me know how it goes. https://github.com/creategui/**CloudStackImageScriptshttps://github.com/creategui/CloudStackImageScripts Actually I am having trouble pushing my files... I'll email them to you later tonight. I have to leave the office now... Cheers, Carlos
cs 4.2 HA
Hi all.
I'm testing HA and when I power down one node, VM with ha offering enabled
does not start on other node.
env used:
management + 2 hypervisors + nfs server
management/hypervisors: CentOS 6.4 + CS-4.2(revision 2852) + advanced zone
+ KVM
I have the following nullpointerexception in logs:
2013-09-10 15:06:48,583 INFO [cloud.ha.HighAvailabilityManagerImpl]
(HA-Worker-0:work-28) Processing HAWork[28-HA-246-Running-Investigating]
2013-09-10 15:06:48,586 INFO [cloud.ha.HighAvailabilityManagerImpl]
(HA-Worker-0:work-28) HA on VM[User|hahaha]
2013-09-10 15:06:48,588 DEBUG [cloud.ha.CheckOnAgentInvestigator]
(HA-Worker-0:work-28) Unable to reach the agent for VM[User|hahaha]:
Resource [Host:4] is unreachable: Host 4: Host with specified id is not in
the right state: Down
2013-09-10 15:06:48,588 INFO [cloud.ha.HighAvailabilityManagerImpl]
(HA-Worker-0:work-28) SimpleInvestigator found VM[User|hahaha]to be alive?
null
2013-09-10 15:06:48,593 INFO [cloud.ha.HighAvailabilityManagerImpl]
(HA-Worker-0:work-28) XenServerInvestigator found VM[User|hahaha]to be
alive? null
2013-09-10 15:06:48,593 DEBUG [cloud.ha.UserVmDomRInvestigator]
(HA-Worker-0:work-28) testing if VM[User|hahaha] is alive
2013-09-10 15:06:48,598 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl]
(HA-Worker-0:work-28) Host with id null doesn't exist
2013-09-10 15:06:48,598 DEBUG [cloud.ha.UserVmDomRInvestigator]
(HA-Worker-0:work-28) VM[User|hahaha] could not be pinged, returning that
it is unknown
2013-09-10 15:06:48,599 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
(HA-Worker-0:work-28) Seq 1-1213400199: Sending { Cmd , MgmtId:
161332943028, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 100011,
[{com.cloud.agent.api.PingTestCommand:{_routerIp:169.254.0.190,_privateIp:10.10.10.17,wait:20}}]
}
2013-09-10 15:06:52,804 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
(HA-Worker-0:work-28) Seq 1-1213400199: Received: { Ans: , MgmtId:
161332943028, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, { Answer } }
2013-09-10 15:06:52,804 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl]
(HA-Worker-0:work-28) Details from executing class
com.cloud.agent.api.PingTestCommand: PING 10.10.10.17 (10.10.10.17): 56
data bytes64 bytes from 10.10.10.222: Destination Host UnreachableVr HL TOS
Len ID Flg off TTL Pro cks Src Dst Data 4 5 00 5400
0 0040 40 01 a711 10.10.10.222 10.10.10.17 --- 10.10.10.17 ping
statistics ---1 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet
lossUnable to ping the vm, exiting
2013-09-10 15:06:52,804 DEBUG [cloud.ha.UserVmDomRInvestigator]
(HA-Worker-0:work-28) VM[User|hahaha] could not be pinged, returning that
it is unknown
2013-09-10 15:06:52,804 DEBUG [cloud.ha.UserVmDomRInvestigator]
(HA-Worker-0:work-28) Returning null since we're unable to determine state
of VM[User|hahaha]
2013-09-10 15:06:52,804 INFO [cloud.ha.HighAvailabilityManagerImpl]
(HA-Worker-0:work-28) null found VM[User|hahaha]to be alive? null
2013-09-10 15:06:52,804 DEBUG [cloud.ha.ManagementIPSystemVMInvestigator]
(HA-Worker-0:work-28) Not a System Vm, unable to determine state of
VM[User|hahaha] returning null
2013-09-10 15:06:52,804 DEBUG [cloud.ha.ManagementIPSystemVMInvestigator]
(HA-Worker-0:work-28) Testing if VM[User|hahaha] is alive
2013-09-10 15:06:52,808 DEBUG [cloud.ha.ManagementIPSystemVMInvestigator]
(HA-Worker-0:work-28) Unable to find a management nic, cannot ping this
system VM, unable to determine state of VM[User|hahaha] returning null
2013-09-10 15:06:52,808 INFO [cloud.ha.HighAvailabilityManagerImpl]
(HA-Worker-0:work-28) null found VM[User|hahaha]to be alive? null
2013-09-10 15:06:52,812 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
(HA-Worker-0:work-28) Seq 1-1213400206: Sending { Cmd , MgmtId:
161332943028, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 100011,
[{com.cloud.agent.api.CheckOnHostCommand:{host:{guid:6807c438-876d-3f73-ba01-8ad718fd774d-LibvirtComputingResource,privateNetwork:{ip:77.72.128.116,netmask:255.255.255.240,mac:00:25:90:36:20:6a,isSecurityGroupEnabled:false},storageNetwork1:{ip:77.72.128.116,netmask:255.255.255.240,mac:00:25:90:36:20:6a,isSecurityGroupEnabled:false}},wait:20}}]
}
2013-09-10 15:06:52,921 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
(HA-Worker-0:work-28) Seq 1-1213400206: Received: { Ans: , MgmtId:
161332943028, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, { Answer } }
2013-09-10 15:06:52,921 INFO [cloud.ha.HighAvailabilityManagerImpl]
(HA-Worker-0:work-28) KVMInvestigator found VM[User|hahaha]to be alive? null
2013-09-10 15:06:52,921 DEBUG [cloud.ha.HighAvailabilityManagerImpl]
(HA-Worker-0:work-28) Fencing off VM that we don't know the state of
2013-09-10 15:06:52,921 DEBUG [cloud.ha.XenServerFencer]
(HA-Worker-0:work-28) Don't know how to fence non XenServer hosts KVM
2013-09-10 15:06:52,921 INFO [cloud.ha.HighAvailabilityManagerImpl]
(HA-Worker-0:work-28) Fencer null returned null
2013-09-10 15:06:52,926 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
(HA-Worker-0:work-28) Seq 1-1213400207: Sending { Cmd , MgmtId:
161332943028, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 100011,
Firewall API
Hello everyone Just wondering if there is a I could configure port forwarding via api example ( I would like to forward port 3000 to 22 ) to one of my virtual machines. Thank you
[VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fourth round)
The vote has *passed* with the following results (binding PMC votes indicated with a * next to their name: +1 : Edison*, Chiradeep*, Sebastien*, Prasanna*, Rajesh Batala, Ove Ewerlid -1 : Marcus*, Chip*, Simon Weller I'm going to proceed with moving the release into the distribution repo now and work on release notes and other documentation tasks The -1 are recorded for the CLVM issue [1]. A fix for this issue is available and fixed in 4.2-forward branch and will be available for 4.2.1. If anyone needs the fix now they can cherry-pick from 4.2-forward with commitId f2c5b5fbfe45196dfad2821fca513ddd6efa25c9. This issue will be release noted. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4618 Thanks Animesh
Re: Firewall API
Thanks I will check it out On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.comwrote: On Sep 10, 2013, at 3:28 PM, Dean Kamali dean.kam...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everyone Just wondering if there is a I could configure port forwarding via api example ( I would like to forward port 3000 to 22 ) to one of my virtual machines. Thank you If you are using sourceNAT, you can use the createPortForwardingRule api call.
trubleshooting os boot issues
Hello everyone Just wondering if it is possible to attach ISO boot CD and start the VM in recovery mode. I have noticed that if you deploy a VM rom a template then attach an ISO then restarting the VM it won't boot from ISO. However for VM deployed from ISO, it will honer the selection and it will let me use the ISO disk. can anyone verify ?? Thanks
Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fourth round)
I changed the fix version for the clvm issue to 4.2.1 seemed appropriate On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: The vote has *passed* with the following results (binding PMC votes indicated with a * next to their name: +1 : Edison*, Chiradeep*, Sebastien*, Prasanna*, Rajesh Batala, Ove Ewerlid -1 : Marcus*, Chip*, Simon Weller I'm going to proceed with moving the release into the distribution repo now and work on release notes and other documentation tasks The -1 are recorded for the CLVM issue [1]. A fix for this issue is available and fixed in 4.2-forward branch and will be available for 4.2.1. If anyone needs the fix now they can cherry-pick from 4.2-forward with commitId f2c5b5fbfe45196dfad2821fca513ddd6efa25c9. This issue will be release noted. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4618 Thanks Animesh
Re: Firewall API
On Sep 10, 2013, at 3:28 PM, Dean Kamali dean.kam...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everyone Just wondering if there is a I could configure port forwarding via api example ( I would like to forward port 3000 to 22 ) to one of my virtual machines. Thank you If you are using sourceNAT, you can use the createPortForwardingRule api call.
Re: trubleshooting os boot issues
Should be possible. What hypervisor are you using friend? regards, David Comerford Tel: +353 87 1238295 Email: davest...@gmail.com Website: http://dave.ie GPG key: http://gpg.dave.ie On 10 September 2013 20:58, Dean Kamali dean.kam...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everyone Just wondering if it is possible to attach ISO boot CD and start the VM in recovery mode. I have noticed that if you deploy a VM rom a template then attach an ISO then restarting the VM it won't boot from ISO. However for VM deployed from ISO, it will honer the selection and it will let me use the ISO disk. can anyone verify ?? Thanks
Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fourth round)
I am very disappointed that 4.2 will be released without fixing longstanding documentation problems. There is no point is asking us to file JIRA issues if the developers are not going to fix them. The first impression for CloudStack is made in the installation docs. It is makes the whole project look amateurish when the installation does not work. Ron On 10/09/2013 4:12 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: The vote has *passed* with the following results (binding PMC votes indicated with a * next to their name: +1 : Edison*, Chiradeep*, Sebastien*, Prasanna*, Rajesh Batala, Ove Ewerlid -1 : Marcus*, Chip*, Simon Weller I'm going to proceed with moving the release into the distribution repo now and work on release notes and other documentation tasks The -1 are recorded for the CLVM issue [1]. A fix for this issue is available and fixed in 4.2-forward branch and will be available for 4.2.1. If anyone needs the fix now they can cherry-pick from 4.2-forward with commitId f2c5b5fbfe45196dfad2821fca513ddd6efa25c9. This issue will be release noted. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4618 Thanks Animesh -- Ron Wheeler President Artifact Software Inc email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com skype: ronaldmwheeler phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fourth round)
The beauty of open source projects is that if you are not good at development you can still help the project by contributing to the documentation. Regards, Kirk Jantzer http://about.me/kirkjantzer On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Ron Wheeler rwhee...@artifact-software.com wrote: I am very disappointed that 4.2 will be released without fixing longstanding documentation problems. There is no point is asking us to file JIRA issues if the developers are not going to fix them. The first impression for CloudStack is made in the installation docs. It is makes the whole project look amateurish when the installation does not work. Ron On 10/09/2013 4:12 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: The vote has *passed* with the following results (binding PMC votes indicated with a * next to their name: +1 : Edison*, Chiradeep*, Sebastien*, Prasanna*, Rajesh Batala, Ove Ewerlid -1 : Marcus*, Chip*, Simon Weller I'm going to proceed with moving the release into the distribution repo now and work on release notes and other documentation tasks The -1 are recorded for the CLVM issue [1]. A fix for this issue is available and fixed in 4.2-forward branch and will be available for 4.2.1. If anyone needs the fix now they can cherry-pick from 4.2-forward with commitId f2c5b5fbfe45196dfad2821fca513d**dd6efa25c9. This issue will be release noted. [1] https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4618https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4618 Thanks Animesh -- Ron Wheeler President Artifact Software Inc email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com skype: ronaldmwheeler phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
RE: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fourth round)
Ron I am not too happy with the documentation side too and will put in time in next 2-3 days to clear up whatever I can on documentation before the formal annoucement. This is a community effort and every help is appreciated. Animesh -Original Message- From: Ron Wheeler [mailto:rwhee...@artifact-software.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 3:56 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org; d...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fourth round) I am very disappointed that 4.2 will be released without fixing longstanding documentation problems. There is no point is asking us to file JIRA issues if the developers are not going to fix them. The first impression for CloudStack is made in the installation docs. It is makes the whole project look amateurish when the installation does not work. Ron On 10/09/2013 4:12 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: The vote has *passed* with the following results (binding PMC votes indicated with a * next to their name: +1 : Edison*, Chiradeep*, Sebastien*, Prasanna*, Rajesh Batala, Ove +Ewerlid -1 : Marcus*, Chip*, Simon Weller I'm going to proceed with moving the release into the distribution repo now and work on release notes and other documentation tasks The -1 are recorded for the CLVM issue [1]. A fix for this issue is available and fixed in 4.2-forward branch and will be available for 4.2.1. If anyone needs the fix now they can cherry-pick from 4.2-forward with commitId f2c5b5fbfe45196dfad2821fca513ddd6efa25c9. This issue will be release noted. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4618 Thanks Animesh -- Ron Wheeler President Artifact Software Inc email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com skype: ronaldmwheeler phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fourth round)
Soon. Regards, Kirk Jantzer http://about.me/kirkjantzer On Sep 10, 2013 8:56 PM, Dean Kamali dean.kam...@gmail.com wrote: No one, yet mentioned when 4.2 will be released ?? On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: Ron I am not too happy with the documentation side too and will put in time in next 2-3 days to clear up whatever I can on documentation before the formal annoucement. This is a community effort and every help is appreciated. Animesh -Original Message- From: Ron Wheeler [mailto:rwhee...@artifact-software.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 3:56 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org; d...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fourth round) I am very disappointed that 4.2 will be released without fixing longstanding documentation problems. There is no point is asking us to file JIRA issues if the developers are not going to fix them. The first impression for CloudStack is made in the installation docs. It is makes the whole project look amateurish when the installation does not work. Ron On 10/09/2013 4:12 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: The vote has *passed* with the following results (binding PMC votes indicated with a * next to their name: +1 : Edison*, Chiradeep*, Sebastien*, Prasanna*, Rajesh Batala, Ove +Ewerlid -1 : Marcus*, Chip*, Simon Weller I'm going to proceed with moving the release into the distribution repo now and work on release notes and other documentation tasks The -1 are recorded for the CLVM issue [1]. A fix for this issue is available and fixed in 4.2-forward branch and will be available for 4.2.1. If anyone needs the fix now they can cherry-pick from 4.2-forward with commitId f2c5b5fbfe45196dfad2821fca513ddd6efa25c9. This issue will be release noted. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4618 Thanks Animesh -- Ron Wheeler President Artifact Software Inc email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com skype: ronaldmwheeler phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
