Re: Please tell me about the attach of volume
Mr. Koushik Das Thank you for reply. I did not find a change log of specification changes in git. Thanks. :) -- Satoru Nakaya ( @giraffeforestg ) Japan CloudStack User Group 2015-03-02 18:28 GMT+09:00 Koushik Das koushik@citrix.com: Based on the DB dump your analysis looks correct. -Original Message- From: giraffeg forestg [mailto:giraffefore...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, 2 March 2015 14:46 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Please tell me about the attach of volume Hi All Please tell me about the attach of volume. The manual has been described below. http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-administration/en/4.4/storage.html Working With Volumes note CloudStack supports attaching up to 13 data disks to a VM on XenServer hypervisor versions 6.0 and above. For the VMs on other hypervisor types, the data disk limit is 6. The Manual is wrong. And the following is correct ? The specification has changed ? CloudStack supports attaching up to 13 data disks to a VM on the following type of hypervisor. 1. XenServer hypervisor versions 6.0 and above. 2. VMware versions 5.0 and above. For the VMs on other hypervisor types, the data disk limit is 6. CloudStack Version 4.3.2 mysql select hypervisor_type,hypervisor_version,max_data_volumes_limit from cloud.hypervisor_capabilities; +-+++ | hypervisor_type | hypervisor_version | max_data_volumes_limit | +-+++ | XenServer | default| 6 | | XenServer | XCP 1.0| 6 | | XenServer | 5.6| 6 | | XenServer | 5.6 FP1| 6 | | XenServer | 5.6 SP2| 6 | | XenServer | 6.0| 13 | | XenServer | 6.0.2 | 13 | | VMware | default| 13 | | VMware | 4.0| 13 | | VMware | 4.1| 13 | | VMware | 5.0| 13 | | KVM | default| 6 | | Ovm | default| 6 | | Ovm | 2.3| 6 | | XenServer | 6.1.0 | 13 | | XenServer | 6.2.0 | 13 | | VMware | 5.1| 13 | | LXC | default| 6 | | Hyperv | 6.2| 64 | | VMware | 5.5| 13 | +-+++ 20 rows in set (0.23 sec) mysql Thanks -- Satoru Nakaya ( @giraffeforestg ) Japan CloudStack User Group
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC4
+users Hi all, If you're unable to build from source, you may use the following (unsigned) repository for testing Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC4: CentOS7: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/centos7/4.5 CentOS6: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/centos/4.5 Debian: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/debian/4.5 Latest 4.5 SystemVM templates for Xen, KVM, VMWare and HyperV: http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5 On Monday 02 March 2015 10:19 PM, David Nalley wrote: Hi All, I've created yet another 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150302T1625 Commit: c066f0455fa126a2b41cccefa25b56421a445d99 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.0-rc4/ PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for at least 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: Please tell me about the attach of volume
The actual supported values are a) 13 data disks on all versions of VMware, XenServer hypervisor versions 6.0 and above b) 64 data disks on HyperV c) 6 data disks on other hypervisor types created a doc bug for it https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8295 Thanks, Harikrishna On 03-Mar-2015, at 11:22 am, Koushik Das koushik@citrix.commailto:koushik@citrix.com wrote: Refer to CLOUDSTACK-5416 for the details. -Original Message- From: giraffeg forestg [mailto:giraffefore...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, 3 March 2015 6:52 To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Please tell me about the attach of volume Mr. Koushik Das Thank you for reply. I did not find a change log of specification changes in git. Thanks. :) -- Satoru Nakaya ( @giraffeforestg ) Japan CloudStack User Group 2015-03-02 18:28 GMT+09:00 Koushik Das koushik@citrix.commailto:koushik@citrix.com: Based on the DB dump your analysis looks correct. -Original Message- From: giraffeg forestg [mailto:giraffefore...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, 2 March 2015 14:46 To: users@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Please tell me about the attach of volume Hi All Please tell me about the attach of volume. The manual has been described below. http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-administration/e n/4.4/storage.html Working With Volumes note CloudStack supports attaching up to 13 data disks to a VM on XenServer hypervisor versions 6.0 and above. For the VMs on other hypervisor types, the data disk limit is 6. The Manual is wrong. And the following is correct ? The specification has changed ? CloudStack supports attaching up to 13 data disks to a VM on the following type of hypervisor. 1. XenServer hypervisor versions 6.0 and above. 2. VMware versions 5.0 and above. For the VMs on other hypervisor types, the data disk limit is 6. CloudStack Version 4.3.2 mysql select mysql hypervisor_type,hypervisor_version,max_data_volumes_limit from cloud.hypervisor_capabilities; +-+++ | hypervisor_type | hypervisor_version | max_data_volumes_limit | +-+++ | XenServer | default| 6 | | XenServer | XCP 1.0| 6 | | XenServer | 5.6| 6 | | XenServer | 5.6 FP1| 6 | | XenServer | 5.6 SP2| 6 | | XenServer | 6.0| 13 | | XenServer | 6.0.2 | 13 | | VMware | default| 13 | | VMware | 4.0| 13 | | VMware | 4.1| 13 | | VMware | 5.0| 13 | | KVM | default| 6 | | Ovm | default| 6 | | Ovm | 2.3| 6 | | XenServer | 6.1.0 | 13 | | XenServer | 6.2.0 | 13 | | VMware | 5.1| 13 | | LXC | default| 6 | | Hyperv | 6.2| 64 | | VMware | 5.5| 13 | +-+++ 20 rows in set (0.23 sec) mysql Thanks -- Satoru Nakaya ( @giraffeforestg ) Japan CloudStack User Group
RE: Please tell me about the attach of volume
Refer to CLOUDSTACK-5416 for the details. -Original Message- From: giraffeg forestg [mailto:giraffefore...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, 3 March 2015 6:52 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Please tell me about the attach of volume Mr. Koushik Das Thank you for reply. I did not find a change log of specification changes in git. Thanks. :) -- Satoru Nakaya ( @giraffeforestg ) Japan CloudStack User Group 2015-03-02 18:28 GMT+09:00 Koushik Das koushik@citrix.com: Based on the DB dump your analysis looks correct. -Original Message- From: giraffeg forestg [mailto:giraffefore...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, 2 March 2015 14:46 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Please tell me about the attach of volume Hi All Please tell me about the attach of volume. The manual has been described below. http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-administration/e n/4.4/storage.html Working With Volumes note CloudStack supports attaching up to 13 data disks to a VM on XenServer hypervisor versions 6.0 and above. For the VMs on other hypervisor types, the data disk limit is 6. The Manual is wrong. And the following is correct ? The specification has changed ? CloudStack supports attaching up to 13 data disks to a VM on the following type of hypervisor. 1. XenServer hypervisor versions 6.0 and above. 2. VMware versions 5.0 and above. For the VMs on other hypervisor types, the data disk limit is 6. CloudStack Version 4.3.2 mysql select mysql hypervisor_type,hypervisor_version,max_data_volumes_limit from cloud.hypervisor_capabilities; +-+++ | hypervisor_type | hypervisor_version | max_data_volumes_limit | +-+++ | XenServer | default| 6 | | XenServer | XCP 1.0| 6 | | XenServer | 5.6| 6 | | XenServer | 5.6 FP1| 6 | | XenServer | 5.6 SP2| 6 | | XenServer | 6.0| 13 | | XenServer | 6.0.2 | 13 | | VMware | default| 13 | | VMware | 4.0| 13 | | VMware | 4.1| 13 | | VMware | 5.0| 13 | | KVM | default| 6 | | Ovm | default| 6 | | Ovm | 2.3| 6 | | XenServer | 6.1.0 | 13 | | XenServer | 6.2.0 | 13 | | VMware | 5.1| 13 | | LXC | default| 6 | | Hyperv | 6.2| 64 | | VMware | 5.5| 13 | +-+++ 20 rows in set (0.23 sec) mysql Thanks -- Satoru Nakaya ( @giraffeforestg ) Japan CloudStack User Group
RE: VNC bind address
Please report a bug in Jira -Sanjeev -Original Message- From: Alexey [mailto:humbugst...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, March 02, 2015 7:14 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: VNC bind address Hello. The question is regarding VNC bind address of qemu process. I have a multiple network interfaces on the hypervisor nodes. When I'm running VM then qemu process binding VNC to the specific IP address but not to 0.0.0.0. I want to manage how to bind it to all addresses (0.0.0.0) or where to specify an IP address that should be used for VNC. For example, I have the following IP/interfaces on my node: eth0 172.16.2.101 eth0:2 172.16.3.102 eth2 192.168.2.101 eth2:2 192.168.3.102 When I'm running VM it listen for VNC on 192.168.3.102:3: ps ax|grep qemu ... qemu-system-x86_64 . -vnc 192.168.3.102:3,password As you can see it listenening only on IP 192.168.3.102, that is not used for cloudstack in my config. If i will remove this IP alias and then restart cloudstack-agent, then next running VM will bind to another IP address. This is a problem as I have many IP aliases but only few on them I'm using for for CloudStack. Best regards, Alex
VNC bind address
Hello. The question is regarding VNC bind address of qemu process. I have a multiple network interfaces on the hypervisor nodes. When I'm running VM then qemu process binding VNC to the specific IP address but not to 0.0.0.0. I want to manage how to bind it to all addresses (0.0.0.0) or where to specify an IP address that should be used for VNC. For example, I have the following IP/interfaces on my node: eth0 172.16.2.101 eth0:2 172.16.3.102 eth2 192.168.2.101 eth2:2 192.168.3.102 When I'm running VM it listen for VNC on 192.168.3.102:3: ps ax|grep qemu ... qemu-system-x86_64 . -vnc 192.168.3.102:3,password As you can see it listenening only on IP 192.168.3.102, that is not used for cloudstack in my config. If i will remove this IP alias and then restart cloudstack-agent, then next running VM will bind to another IP address. This is a problem as I have many IP aliases but only few on them I'm using for for CloudStack. Best regards, Alex
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.3.1 RC4
+1 (binding) On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 5:56 AM, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Rohit, I like the idea of making settings linked to the profile and not global, but maybe with a set of Global settings that new profiles inherit when they are created etc. Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3603 0542tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540tel: +442036030540 | M: +447968161581tel:+447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.commailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.comhtp://www.shapeblue.com/ | Twitter:@cloudstackguru https://twitter.com/#!/cloudstackguru ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HSx-apple-data-detectors://5 On 1 Mar 2015, at 10:01, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.commailto: rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Ian, CloudMonkey's config system design was sort of based on git and similar command line tools. The config is independent of multiple sessions per user, though every user has their own config file. The only difference in this design wrt git is that CloudMonkey does not provide a local vs global scope like git as there is no concept of repo/directories to implement that. So, if you want to use CloudMonkey and running a cron job; make sure they are not run by the same user as they will share the same gitconfig. At the same time, CloudMonkey has a way to profile server profiles, so except for few global settings (color, output etc) you can talk to multiple ACS mgmt servers and switch between them. Though when multiple cloudmonkeys are already running they can have different in-memory configs which are synchronized with the user's config whenever a set command is called. A quick solution I can think of is to move those global settings to server profiles, so if in a server profile a global setting is redefined (say color, output type, etc) we can load those settings whenever you do a set profile profile name. This way you can run multiple cloudmonkeys, by cron and on shell etc, with a requirement that before you run anything you do run the set commands (choose profile, or change options) and then continue etc. I don't have a strong motivation to change this, as this is how many command line tools work. But, if it would be great if you have a better design to propose then let's discuss it (perhaps in a different thread). On Saturday 28 February 2015 05:05 AM, Ian Forde wrote: Thanks for the feedback Geoff. I’ll have to update my scripts to reflect that. Are there any plans to change cloudmonkey’s behavior in that regard? -I On 2/27/15, 3:31 PM, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.commailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Ian, I always have a standatd set of commands at the beginning of every script defining the required settings such as color false etc. If I need to use a specific setting such as table output, I always set it back to default as soon as possible within the script. This is just my methodology but I make very heavy use of cloudmonkey scripts and it has not let me down yet. Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3603 0542tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540tel:+442036030540 | M: +447968161581tel:+447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.commailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.comhttp://www.shapeblue.comhtp://www.shapeblue.com/ | Twitter:@cloudstackguruhttps://twitter.com/#!/cloudstackguru ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HSx-apple-data-detectors://5 On 27 Feb 2015, at 23:20, Ian Forde ifo...@marketo.commailto:ifo...@marketo.commailto:ifo...@marketo.com wrote: Question - Currently, options set in Cloudmonkey seem to persist into ~/.cloudmonkey/config. For example, if one uses cloudmonkey interactively, and changes the display setting from json to table (without putting the setting back to json when finished), any cron jobs that depend on the output set to json will break. (Unless they explicitly set that option in their cron script.) I was wondering if that was a feature? I suppose I could always have separate cloudmonkey config files for different scripts, but I was wondering what other folks do… -I (LLAP) On 2/27/15, 1:27 AM, Abhinandan Prateek abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.commailto:abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com mailto:abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com wrote: +1 I have been using cloud monkey to bootstrap a cloud with advance zone. -abhi On 27-Feb-2015, at 11:33 am, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.commailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.commailto: rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Lucian/Geoff, Yeah, I had included both users@ and dev@ ML so please reply to dev@ or both to get it on dev@ :) On 26-Feb-2015, at 9:11 pm, Nux! n...@li.nux.romailto:n...@li.nux.ro mailto:n...@li.nux.ro wrote: +1 from me, as well. PS:
Please tell me about the attach of volume
Hi All Please tell me about the attach of volume. The manual has been described below. http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-administration/en/4.4/storage.html Working With Volumes note CloudStack supports attaching up to 13 data disks to a VM on XenServer hypervisor versions 6.0 and above. For the VMs on other hypervisor types, the data disk limit is 6. The Manual is wrong. And the following is correct ? The specification has changed ? CloudStack supports attaching up to 13 data disks to a VM on the following type of hypervisor. 1. XenServer hypervisor versions 6.0 and above. 2. VMware versions 5.0 and above. For the VMs on other hypervisor types, the data disk limit is 6. CloudStack Version 4.3.2 mysql select hypervisor_type,hypervisor_version,max_data_volumes_limit from cloud.hypervisor_capabilities; +-+++ | hypervisor_type | hypervisor_version | max_data_volumes_limit | +-+++ | XenServer | default| 6 | | XenServer | XCP 1.0| 6 | | XenServer | 5.6| 6 | | XenServer | 5.6 FP1| 6 | | XenServer | 5.6 SP2| 6 | | XenServer | 6.0| 13 | | XenServer | 6.0.2 | 13 | | VMware | default| 13 | | VMware | 4.0| 13 | | VMware | 4.1| 13 | | VMware | 5.0| 13 | | KVM | default| 6 | | Ovm | default| 6 | | Ovm | 2.3| 6 | | XenServer | 6.1.0 | 13 | | XenServer | 6.2.0 | 13 | | VMware | 5.1| 13 | | LXC | default| 6 | | Hyperv | 6.2| 64 | | VMware | 5.5| 13 | +-+++ 20 rows in set (0.23 sec) mysql Thanks -- Satoru Nakaya ( @giraffeforestg ) Japan CloudStack User Group
RE: Please tell me about the attach of volume
Based on the DB dump your analysis looks correct. -Original Message- From: giraffeg forestg [mailto:giraffefore...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, 2 March 2015 14:46 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Please tell me about the attach of volume Hi All Please tell me about the attach of volume. The manual has been described below. http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-administration/en/4.4/storage.html Working With Volumes note CloudStack supports attaching up to 13 data disks to a VM on XenServer hypervisor versions 6.0 and above. For the VMs on other hypervisor types, the data disk limit is 6. The Manual is wrong. And the following is correct ? The specification has changed ? CloudStack supports attaching up to 13 data disks to a VM on the following type of hypervisor. 1. XenServer hypervisor versions 6.0 and above. 2. VMware versions 5.0 and above. For the VMs on other hypervisor types, the data disk limit is 6. CloudStack Version 4.3.2 mysql select hypervisor_type,hypervisor_version,max_data_volumes_limit from cloud.hypervisor_capabilities; +-+++ | hypervisor_type | hypervisor_version | max_data_volumes_limit | +-+++ | XenServer | default| 6 | | XenServer | XCP 1.0| 6 | | XenServer | 5.6| 6 | | XenServer | 5.6 FP1| 6 | | XenServer | 5.6 SP2| 6 | | XenServer | 6.0| 13 | | XenServer | 6.0.2 | 13 | | VMware | default| 13 | | VMware | 4.0| 13 | | VMware | 4.1| 13 | | VMware | 5.0| 13 | | KVM | default| 6 | | Ovm | default| 6 | | Ovm | 2.3| 6 | | XenServer | 6.1.0 | 13 | | XenServer | 6.2.0 | 13 | | VMware | 5.1| 13 | | LXC | default| 6 | | Hyperv | 6.2| 64 | | VMware | 5.5| 13 | +-+++ 20 rows in set (0.23 sec) mysql Thanks -- Satoru Nakaya ( @giraffeforestg ) Japan CloudStack User Group
?????? ????: vrouter??????
??vlan?? -- -- ??: jinyue@criwell.com;jinyue@criwell.com; : 2015??3??2??(??) 4:11 ??: users-cnusers-cn@cloudstack.apache.org; : : : vrouter?? ?? host??bonding?? jinyue@criwell.com Mr.?? ?? 2015-03-02 14:04 users-cn ?? ?? : vrouter?? ??trunk??vlan??host??bonding??bonding?? -- -- ??: jinyue@criwell.com;jinyue@criwell.com; : 2015??3??2??(??) 1:50 ??: users-cnusers-cn@cloudstack.apache.org; : : : vrouter?? ?? centos6.5 64?? Linux 2.6.32-431.el6.x86_6 dell r720 ?? Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5720 Gigabit Ethernet PCIe H3C s5120. jinyue@criwell.com Star Guo ?? 2015-03-02 13:37 users-cn@cloudstack.apache.org ?? : vrouter?? kernel version Best Regards, Star Guo -- ??: jinyue@criwell.com [mailto:jinyue@criwell.com] : 2015??3??2?? 13:31 ??: users-cn : vrouter?? Dear all, ?? ??KVM ping??VR?? ping??VR?? ?? 1.??IPping pingVR?? 2.vr??vr ??ping??VR??ping??VR?? ??
答复: 回复： 回复: vrouter的问题
非常感谢您的回复。 centos6.5 64位 Linux 2.6.32-431.el6.x86_6 服务器：dell r720 网卡： Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5720 Gigabit Ethernet PCIe 交换机：H3C s5120. 我建议如下： A. 检查交换机配置，特别是VLAN设定（不过你说你手动配置可以互ping，查看一下手 册是否有其他设定）； B. 更换kvm host到ubuntu 14.04操作系统，尝试排查OS驱动问题引起（你的高级网络 是bridge还是ovs？），broadcom很难说； C. 如果上述都不能解决问题，最后建议：换了交换机； Best Regards, Star Guo -邮件原件- 发件人: Mr.博 [mailto:289254...@qq.com] 发送时间: 2015年3月2日 16:25 收件人: users-cn 主题: 回复： 回复: vrouter的问题 那你交换机要配置啊，要不然vlan流量出不去 -- 原始邮件 -- 发件人: jinyue@criwell.com;jinyue@criwell.com; 发送时间: 2015年3月2日(星期一) 下午4:11 收件人: users-cnusers-cn@cloudstack.apache.org; 主题: 回复: 回复: vrouter的问题 交换机未设置。 host机未做bonding。 jinyue@criwell.com 发件人： Mr.博 发送时间： 2015-03-02 14:04 收件人： users-cn 主题： 回复： 答复: vrouter的问题 交换机是否设置trunk，是否允许对应vlan？host机网卡有没有做bonding？做了 bonding的话交换机有没有设置链路聚合？ -- 原始邮件 -- 发件人: jinyue@criwell.com;jinyue@criwell.com; 发送时间: 2015年3月2日(星期一) 中午1:50 收件人: users-cnusers-cn@cloudstack.apache.org; 主题: 回复: 答复: vrouter的问题 非常感谢您的回复。 centos6.5 64位 Linux 2.6.32-431.el6.x86_6 服务器：dell r720 网卡： Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5720 Gigabit Ethernet PCIe 交换机：H3C s5120. jinyue@criwell.com 发件人： Star Guo 发送时间： 2015-03-02 13:37 收件人： users-cn@cloudstack.apache.org 主题： 答复: vrouter的问题 描述一下环境的操作系统（kernel version），服务器硬件（网卡），交换机型号。 Best Regards, Star Guo -邮件原件- 发件人: jinyue@criwell.com [mailto:jinyue@criwell.com] 发送时间: 2015年3月2日 13:31 收件人: users-cn 主题: vrouter的问题 Dear all, 我遇到了如下的问题： 环境描述：高级网络 两台主机，都是基于KVM的。 问题描述：隔离网络，第一台主机创建的实例可以ping通VR，运行在第二台基于 同网络的实例不能ping通VR。 实验如下： 1.强行给第二台主机的实例添加IP后，实例之间可以互相ping，而不能 pingVR。 2.vr运行在第一台主机上，将vr迁移到第二台主机后，发现可以第二台主机上 的实例可以ping通VR，而第一天主机的实例则不能ping通VR。 不明白产生以上现象的原因，非常感谢大家的帮助。
????: ????: vrouter??????
?? host??bonding?? jinyue@criwell.com Mr.?? ?? 2015-03-02 14:04 users-cn ?? ?? : vrouter?? ??trunk??vlan??host??bonding??bonding?? -- -- ??: jinyue@criwell.com;jinyue@criwell.com; : 2015??3??2??(??) 1:50 ??: users-cnusers-cn@cloudstack.apache.org; : : : vrouter?? ?? centos6.5 64?? Linux 2.6.32-431.el6.x86_6 dell r720 ?? Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5720 Gigabit Ethernet PCIe H3C s5120. jinyue@criwell.com Star Guo ?? 2015-03-02 13:37 users-cn@cloudstack.apache.org ?? : vrouter?? kernel version Best Regards, Star Guo -- ??: jinyue@criwell.com [mailto:jinyue@criwell.com] : 2015??3??2?? 13:31 ??: users-cn : vrouter?? Dear all, ?? ??KVM ping??VR?? ping??VR?? ?? 1.??IPping pingVR?? 2.vr??vr ??ping??VR??ping??VR?? ??
Re: Hardware question
Hi Mads, Imo, if you want that flexibility you should go with non-local storage. CEPH is a popular choice here, but you will need 10 Gbps between hypervisors and storage servers if you want reasonable performance. So, if you need more storage just add more CEPH servers. Need more compute, add more hypervisors. HTH Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Mads Nordholm m...@nordholm.dk To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Monday, 2 March, 2015 17:19:40 Subject: Hardware question I am planning a small Cloudstack setup (using KVM for virtualisation) that will allow me to run roughly 100 VPSs with these average requirements: - 1 core - 512 MB RAM - 20 GB SSD I am interested in input regarding a hardware configuration that will support this, and how to best build a small setup that will scale easily as I grow. Within a year or so, I expect to have more than 1,000 guest running. I basically need a setup that will not completely break the bank as I start out, but also one that will scale well as I grow. I am particularly concerned with being able to add only the resources I need. If I need more storage, I want to be able to add only that (preferably just by adding disks to a RAID array), and if I need more computing power, I want to be able to add only that. Any input greatly appreciated. -- Mads Nordholm
[CFP IS NOW OPEN] CloudStack Days 2015
Hi all, The CFP is now open for all five CloudStack Days 2015. Important CFP Deadlines Links: CloudStack Day Austin 2015 CFP Deadline: March 13, 2015 ( http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/cloudstack-austin/program/cfp) CloudStack Day Tokyo 2015 CFP Deadline: April 10, 2015 ( http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/cloudstack-tokyo/program/cfp) CloudStack Day Seattle 2015 CFP Deadline: June 12, 2015 ( http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/cloudstack-seattle/program/cfp) CloudStack Day Budapest 2015 CFP Deadline: July 31, 2015 ( http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/cloudstack-budapest/program/cfp) CloudStack Day Dublin 2015 CFP Deadline: August 7, 2015 ( http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/cloudstack-dublin) Link to all five CloudStack Days 2015: http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/cloudstack-dublin/attend/additional-cloudstack-days-events- Thanks, Karen On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 3:19 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: I hereby display my boldness to cross post this to dev and users. especially the cfp assessments are of interest to all of us! On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote: On Feb 26, 2015, at 5:09 PM, Karen Vuong karen.vu...@citrix.com wrote: ... The Linux Foundation will be helping the Apache CloudStack community with the logistics for CloudStack Days 2015. There will be CloudStack Days Planning meetings held every other Tuesday beginning on Tuesday, March 10th, 2015 9:00am – 9:40am Pacific. Open to the community - the planning calls are open to the community. Feel free to share your feedback, ideas and suggestions on these calls. If you would like to join, please send me a note and I will send you the meeting invitation. Thanks Karen. This is a very important point. While Citrix is the main backer making planning these events possible. It is important that everyone feels welcome to help organize them. We need everyone support to keep making our conferences big successes and draw more people to our awesome project. So folks reading this, join in, help plan and help find sponsors. CFP Committee – if you are an Apache CloudStack committer and would like to volunteer to help review and vote on proposals for a specific CloudStack Day, please reach out to Sebastien Goasguen and David Nalley (cc’d). The CFP for CloudStack Days Austin will open next week. There too and just like previous CCC, the program committee is open to anyone. The CFPs will be posted soon Sponsors – Cloud Foundry has signed up to sponsor all five CloudStack Days. Thank you! There are several other companies that are currently considering. Sponsorship prospectus can be found here: http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/cloudstack-seattle/sponsor Registration – CloudStack Days 2015 is free to attend. Bi-monthly updates – I will be sending bi-monthly updates from the CloudStack Days planning calls to the CloudStack marketing list. Meeting notes are located here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ZnA88_UWyHjIVEZTBuC2JdgdTzdE2BgK2m98jiI7Uqc/edit?usp=sharing Websites: http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/cloudstack-austin http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/cloudstack-tokyo http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/cloudstack-seattle http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/cloudstack-budapest http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/cloudstack-dublin Thanks, Karen -- Daan
Hardware question
I am planning a small Cloudstack setup (using KVM for virtualisation) that will allow me to run roughly 100 VPSs with these average requirements: - 1 core - 512 MB RAM - 20 GB SSD I am interested in input regarding a hardware configuration that will support this, and how to best build a small setup that will scale easily as I grow. Within a year or so, I expect to have more than 1,000 guest running. I basically need a setup that will not completely break the bank as I start out, but also one that will scale well as I grow. I am particularly concerned with being able to add only the resources I need. If I need more storage, I want to be able to add only that (preferably just by adding disks to a RAID array), and if I need more computing power, I want to be able to add only that. Any input greatly appreciated. -- Mads Nordholm
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.3.1 RC4
+1 (binding) tested basic functionality - seems to work well. On 2/27/15 1:27 AM, Abhinandan Prateek wrote: +1 I have been using cloud monkey to bootstrap a cloud with advance zone. -abhi On 27-Feb-2015, at 11:33 am, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hi Lucian/Geoff, Yeah, I had included both users@ and dev@ ML so please reply to dev@ or both to get it on dev@ :) On 26-Feb-2015, at 9:11 pm, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: +1 from me, as well. PS: shouldn't this also go to dev@ ? -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 26 February, 2015 15:19:46 Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.3.1 RC4 +1 Have been using on a daily basis for a number of weeks using both command line and heavily in many different scripts. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 26 February 2015 10:56 To: dev; users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.3.1 RC4 Hi All, CloudMonkey master branch has been rather stable since last two months. It has been already tested by many since the last three 5.3.1 RC candidates. Please take some time to do basic tests and vote for a speedy release. Thanks. I've created a 5.3.1 release candidate of CloudMonkey, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-cloudmonkey.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/master Commit: 7b66d39376d2711443a4b91af8375bdf3ae690b5 List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-cloudmonkey.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES.md Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/cloudmonkey-5.3.1/ PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS For ease of testing, the CloudMonkey 5.3.1 RC4 candidate is uploaded on PYPI and can be installed using: pip install cloudmonkey==5.3.1 Though the PYPI page will have 5.3.0 as default until we unhide 5.3.1 package on https://pypi.python.org/pypi/cloudmonkey For usage and other information please refer to this wiki: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+cloudmonkey+CLI Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
Re: Hardware question
Thanks a lot for your answer, Lucian. CEPH sounds like a very interesting solution. I will have to do some more research on that. -- Mads Nordholm On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 12:32 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Hi Mads, Imo, if you want that flexibility you should go with non-local storage. CEPH is a popular choice here, but you will need 10 Gbps between hypervisors and storage servers if you want reasonable performance. So, if you need more storage just add more CEPH servers. Need more compute, add more hypervisors. HTH Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Mads Nordholm m...@nordholm.dk To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Monday, 2 March, 2015 17:19:40 Subject: Hardware question I am planning a small Cloudstack setup (using KVM for virtualisation) that will allow me to run roughly 100 VPSs with these average requirements: - 1 core - 512 MB RAM - 20 GB SSD I am interested in input regarding a hardware configuration that will support this, and how to best build a small setup that will scale easily as I grow. Within a year or so, I expect to have more than 1,000 guest running. I basically need a setup that will not completely break the bank as I start out, but also one that will scale well as I grow. I am particularly concerned with being able to add only the resources I need. If I need more storage, I want to be able to add only that (preferably just by adding disks to a RAID array), and if I need more computing power, I want to be able to add only that. Any input greatly appreciated. -- Mads Nordholm
