Re: Swift storage

2015-05-29 Thread Sanjeev N
No issues with S3 provider.

On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
wrote:

 auth v1, old libraries, lot's of limitations (cant extract/download
 ISO/template from ACS, dont see if register/download of ISO/template from
 URL has started at all - no progress percentage, etc). Problems deleting
 any ISO/template from GUI (at the moment, zoneid is or is not sent, in
 contrast what it should be - also try for S3 - any region wide SS, afaik)

 MGMT server mounts Secondary Storage on itself, and downloads systemVM
 template from database records (so systemVM from download.cloud.com) - so
 there is no preseed of systemVM template manually.

 S3 interface (Swift can provide S3 support) seems to be working much better
 - but we are still to test it all later...

 :)





 On 29 May 2015 at 08:09, prapul cool prapul_cool2...@yahoo.com.invalid
 wrote:

  Hi,
  Has  any one added swift as secondary storage in cloudstack, if yes
  please share the instructions for it.
 How do we seed systemvm template in this case?
  Thanks,Prapul sriram,PSI cloud solutions.




 --

 Andrija Panić



Re: Swift storage

2015-05-29 Thread Andrija Panic
auth v1, old libraries, lot's of limitations (cant extract/download
ISO/template from ACS, dont see if register/download of ISO/template from
URL has started at all - no progress percentage, etc). Problems deleting
any ISO/template from GUI (at the moment, zoneid is or is not sent, in
contrast what it should be - also try for S3 - any region wide SS, afaik)

MGMT server mounts Secondary Storage on itself, and downloads systemVM
template from database records (so systemVM from download.cloud.com) - so
there is no preseed of systemVM template manually.

S3 interface (Swift can provide S3 support) seems to be working much better
- but we are still to test it all later...

:)





On 29 May 2015 at 08:09, prapul cool prapul_cool2...@yahoo.com.invalid
wrote:

 Hi,
 Has  any one added swift as secondary storage in cloudstack, if yes
 please share the instructions for it.
How do we seed systemvm template in this case?
 Thanks,Prapul sriram,PSI cloud solutions.




-- 

Andrija Panić


Swift storage

2015-05-29 Thread prapul cool
Hi,
    Has  any one added swift as secondary storage in cloudstack, if yes please 
share the instructions for it.
   How do we seed systemvm template in this case?
Thanks,Prapul sriram,PSI cloud solutions.

Re: enable local storage

2015-05-29 Thread Rajani Karuturi
As far as I know, that is not possible.

~Rajani

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 8:41 PM, S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH 
s.brues...@proio.com wrote:

 Is it possible to attach only specific local storage to CS? We using raid1
 for XenServer installation and during installation xs created local storage
 of the rest of this raid1. We installed a new raid5 with ssd and named it
 localSSD. This is the local storage with I want CS installing instances
 on.

 Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards,

 Swen Brüseke

 -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
 Von: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com]
 Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. Mai 2015 15:57
 An: users@cloudstack.apache.org
 Betreff: Re: enable local storage

 After enabling local storage for zone, MS restart is required for local
 storage to be discovered for already added hosts. For new hosts it gets
 added at the time of adding host.

 On 28-May-2015, at 7:03 PM, S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH s.brues...@proio.com
 wrote:

  Hi,
 
  I installed new disks in some of our XenServer hosts and added the raid
 to the XenServer-host. Now I need to add this new storage to CS.
  I enabled local storage for the zone, but I am still unable to see the
 new local storage as primary storage. Is there some kind of cron which
 needs to run before I see this storage on infrastructure tab in CS UI? Does
 the local storage needs to use a specific name or can I use a random name
 as name-label inside XenServer?
 
  Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards,
 
  Swen Brüseke
 
 
 
 
  - proIO GmbH -
  Geschäftsführer: Swen Brüseke
  Sitz der Gesellschaft: Frankfurt am Main
 
  USt-IdNr. DE 267 075 918
  Registergericht: Frankfurt am Main - HRB 86239
 
  Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte
 Informationen.
  Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich
  erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten
 Sie diese Mail.
  Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Mail sind
 nicht gestattet.
 
  This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
  If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in
  error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail.
  Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in
 this e-mail is strictly forbidden.
 
 




 - proIO GmbH -
 Geschäftsführer: Swen Brüseke
 Sitz der Gesellschaft: Frankfurt am Main

 USt-IdNr. DE 267 075 918
 Registergericht: Frankfurt am Main - HRB 86239

 Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte
 Informationen.
 Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich
 erhalten haben,
 informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese Mail.
 Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Mail sind
 nicht gestattet.

 This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
 If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in
 error) please notify
 the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail.
 Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in
 this e-mail is strictly forbidden.





cloudstack 4.5.1 ovs on kvm

2015-05-29 Thread Ignazio Cassano
Hi guys,
We read carefully cloudstack documentation to activate gre isolation on kvm
nodes.
First issue we  found is:  ovs does not appear in service network
provider.
Second issue we found : the gre tunnel betweten kvm nodes is not
automatically created also after migrating a vm ; so a vm on first node
cannot ping  a vm on second node.

We solved manually creating gre tunnel between kvm nodes.

Any suggestion is accepted.
Regards
Ignazio and Gianpiero


Re: Swift storage

2015-05-29 Thread Andrija Panic
Nice to hear that :)

Sanjeev, is migration api supported if we use 2 nfs boxes now for secondary
storage or if it must be only 1 nfs box(that will ve converted to staging
store)?
Thx
On May 29, 2015 11:02 AM, Sanjeev N sanj...@apache.org wrote:

 No issues with S3 provider.

 On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  auth v1, old libraries, lot's of limitations (cant extract/download
  ISO/template from ACS, dont see if register/download of ISO/template from
  URL has started at all - no progress percentage, etc). Problems deleting
  any ISO/template from GUI (at the moment, zoneid is or is not sent, in
  contrast what it should be - also try for S3 - any region wide SS, afaik)
 
  MGMT server mounts Secondary Storage on itself, and downloads systemVM
  template from database records (so systemVM from download.cloud.com) -
 so
  there is no preseed of systemVM template manually.
 
  S3 interface (Swift can provide S3 support) seems to be working much
 better
  - but we are still to test it all later...
 
  :)
 
 
 
 
 
  On 29 May 2015 at 08:09, prapul cool prapul_cool2...@yahoo.com.invalid
  wrote:
 
   Hi,
   Has  any one added swift as secondary storage in cloudstack, if yes
   please share the instructions for it.
  How do we seed systemvm template in this case?
   Thanks,Prapul sriram,PSI cloud solutions.
 
 
 
 
  --
 
  Andrija Panić
 



Re: enable local storage

2015-05-29 Thread Prashant s
if you have already created your RAID5 Volume , then YES you can
reintroduce the volume to xenserver
ref: http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX121896

Complete the following procedure:

   1.

   Do a pvscan to get the Universally Unique Identifier (UUID) of an
   existing SR on a local disk. This example uses UUID
   39baf126-a535-549f-58d6-feeda55f7801:

   *# pvscan*

   PV /dev/sda3 VG VG_XenStorage-39baf126-a535-549f-58d6-feeda55f7801
lvm2 [66.87 GB / 57.87 GB free]
   Total: 1 [66.87 GB] / in use: 1 [66.87 GB] / in no VG: 0 [0 ]

   2.

   Note the output above, the VG name of the local drive /dev/sda3 is
   VG_XenStorage-39baf126-a535-549f-58d6-feeda55f7801 . The VG name contains
   the SR UUID that resides on this storage media. In this case, the UUID is
   39baf126-a535-549f-58d6-feeda55f7801.
   3.

   Introduce the SR with the following command:

   *# xe sr-introduce uuid=39baf126-a535-549f-58d6-feeda55f7801 type=lvm
   name-label=”Local storage” content-type=user*
   This command sets up database records for the SR named “Local storage”.
   4.

   Locate the SCSI ID of the device or partition where the SR data is
   stored:
   *# ls -l /dev/disk/by-id/*

   total 0
   lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 Jan 15 09:44
scsi-SATA_ST3500320AS_9QM13WP2 - ../../sdb
   lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 Jan 15 09:44
scsi-SATA_ST3500320AS_9QM13WP2-part1 - ../../sdb1
   lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 Jan 15 09:44 scsi-SATA_ST380815AS_6QZ5Z1AM
- ../../sda
   lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 Jan 15 09:44
scsi-SATA_ST380815AS_6QZ5Z1AM-part1 - ../../sda1
   lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 Jan 15 09:44
scsi-SATA_ST380815AS_6QZ5Z1AM-part2 - ../../sda2
   lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 Jan 15 09:44
scsi-SATA_ST380815AS_6QZ5Z1AM-part3 - ../../sda3

   In this case, the SCSI ID of the device /dev/sda3 is
   scsi-SATA_ST380815AS_6QZ5Z1AM-part3. This is the device name to use in the
   next command, where a PBD (physical block device – a connector between the
   XenServer host and the SR) is created.
   5.

   Run the xe host-list command to find out the host UUID for the local
   host:
   *# xe host-list*

   uuid ( RO) : 83f2c775-57fc-457b-9f98-2b9b0a7dbcb5
   name-label ( RW): xenserver1
   name-description ( RO): Default install of XenServer

   6.

   Create the PBD using the device SCSI ID, host UUID and SR UUID detected
   above:


*# xe pbd-create sr-uuid=39baf126-a535-549f-58d6-feeda55f7801
   device-config:device=/dev/disk/by-id/scsi-SATA_ST380815AS_6QZ5Z1AM-part3
   host-uuid=83f2c775-57fc-457b-9f98-2b9b0a7dbcb5
   aec2c6fc-e1fb-0a27-2437-9862cffe213e*
   7.

   Attach the PBD created with* xe pbd-plug *command:
   *# xe pbd-plug uuid=aec2c6fc-e1fb-0a27-2437-9862cffe213e*
   The SR should be connected to the XenServer host and be visible in
   XenCenter


Thanks
prashant s


On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Prashant s opsrunb...@gmail.com wrote:

 questions :

 is the SSD disks local to the xenserver , then yes you can create local sr
  add to CS.

 Complete the following procedure to create a Storage Repository (SR) on a
 new local hard drive (HDD):
 *Note*: The stored data in the server will be lost.

1.

Run the following command to find the disk ID of the new device:
*# cat /proc/partitions*
A list of HDDs and partitions are displayed. Find out which device is
your new local disk. Locate it by size. (This is probably “sdb” or
“/cciss/c0d1p0”)
*# ll /dev/disk/by-id*
2.

Find the disk ID of the “sdb” or “cciss/c0d1”disk. The
“scsi-xx” or
“cciss-xx”format is required.
3.

Run the following command to create an SR:
*# xe sr-create content-type=user
device-config:device=/dev/disk/by-id/scsi-x
host-uuid=host-uuid name-label=”Local Storage 2” shared=false type=lvm*
Or
*# xe sr-create content-type=user
device-config:device=/dev/disk/by-id/cciss-x
host-uuid=host-uuid name-label=”Local Storage 2” shared=false type=lvm*

 *for example *

  xe sr-create content-type=user
 device-config:device=/dev/disk/by-id/scsi-SATA_WDC_WD1003FBYX-_WD-WCAW32786419,/dev/disk/by-id/scsi-SATA_WDC_WD1003FBYX-_WD-WMAW30367881-part3
 host-uuid=96f06415-461b-43c9-b86a-4969b81b3d80 name-label=local-sata
 shared=false type=lvm
 d8e67caf-32a7-6234-f8c2-3bbd3a3010be
 [root@dc4xen-c0u16n2 ~]#

 now go back to you CS web ui and look  for the new storage in the primary
 storage secion

 On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 2:42 AM, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org
 wrote:

 As far as I know, that is not possible.

 ~Rajani

 On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 8:41 PM, S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH 
 s.brues...@proio.com wrote:

  Is it possible to attach only specific local storage to CS? We using
 raid1
  for XenServer installation and during installation xs created local
 storage
  of the rest of this raid1. We installed a new raid5 with ssd and named
 it
  localSSD. This is the local storage with I want CS installing
 instances
  

Re: enable local storage

2015-05-29 Thread Prashant s
questions :

is the SSD disks local to the xenserver , then yes you can create local sr
 add to CS.

Complete the following procedure to create a Storage Repository (SR) on a
new local hard drive (HDD):
*Note*: The stored data in the server will be lost.

   1.

   Run the following command to find the disk ID of the new device:
   *# cat /proc/partitions*
   A list of HDDs and partitions are displayed. Find out which device is
   your new local disk. Locate it by size. (This is probably “sdb” or
   “/cciss/c0d1p0”)
   *# ll /dev/disk/by-id*
   2.

   Find the disk ID of the “sdb” or “cciss/c0d1”disk. The
   “scsi-xx” or
   “cciss-xx”format is required.
   3.

   Run the following command to create an SR:
   *# xe sr-create content-type=user
   device-config:device=/dev/disk/by-id/scsi-x
   host-uuid=host-uuid name-label=”Local Storage 2” shared=false type=lvm*
   Or
   *# xe sr-create content-type=user
   device-config:device=/dev/disk/by-id/cciss-x
   host-uuid=host-uuid name-label=”Local Storage 2” shared=false type=lvm*

*for example *

 xe sr-create content-type=user
device-config:device=/dev/disk/by-id/scsi-SATA_WDC_WD1003FBYX-_WD-WCAW32786419,/dev/disk/by-id/scsi-SATA_WDC_WD1003FBYX-_WD-WMAW30367881-part3
host-uuid=96f06415-461b-43c9-b86a-4969b81b3d80 name-label=local-sata
shared=false type=lvm
d8e67caf-32a7-6234-f8c2-3bbd3a3010be
[root@dc4xen-c0u16n2 ~]#

now go back to you CS web ui and look  for the new storage in the primary
storage secion

On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 2:42 AM, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org wrote:

 As far as I know, that is not possible.

 ~Rajani

 On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 8:41 PM, S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH 
 s.brues...@proio.com wrote:

  Is it possible to attach only specific local storage to CS? We using
 raid1
  for XenServer installation and during installation xs created local
 storage
  of the rest of this raid1. We installed a new raid5 with ssd and named it
  localSSD. This is the local storage with I want CS installing instances
  on.
 
  Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards,
 
  Swen Brüseke
 
  -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
  Von: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com]
  Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. Mai 2015 15:57
  An: users@cloudstack.apache.org
  Betreff: Re: enable local storage
 
  After enabling local storage for zone, MS restart is required for local
  storage to be discovered for already added hosts. For new hosts it gets
  added at the time of adding host.
 
  On 28-May-2015, at 7:03 PM, S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH 
 s.brues...@proio.com
  wrote:
 
   Hi,
  
   I installed new disks in some of our XenServer hosts and added the raid
  to the XenServer-host. Now I need to add this new storage to CS.
   I enabled local storage for the zone, but I am still unable to see the
  new local storage as primary storage. Is there some kind of cron which
  needs to run before I see this storage on infrastructure tab in CS UI?
 Does
  the local storage needs to use a specific name or can I use a random name
  as name-label inside XenServer?
  
   Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards,
  
   Swen Brüseke
  
  
  
  
   - proIO GmbH -
   Geschäftsführer: Swen Brüseke
   Sitz der Gesellschaft: Frankfurt am Main
  
   USt-IdNr. DE 267 075 918
   Registergericht: Frankfurt am Main - HRB 86239
  
   Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte
  Informationen.
   Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich
   erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und
 vernichten
  Sie diese Mail.
   Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Mail sind
  nicht gestattet.
  
   This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
   If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in
   error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail.
   Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in
  this e-mail is strictly forbidden.
  
  
 
 
 
 
  - proIO GmbH -
  Geschäftsführer: Swen Brüseke
  Sitz der Gesellschaft: Frankfurt am Main
 
  USt-IdNr. DE 267 075 918
  Registergericht: Frankfurt am Main - HRB 86239
 
  Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte
  Informationen.
  Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich
  erhalten haben,
  informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese Mail.
  Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Mail sind
  nicht gestattet.
 
  This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
  If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in
  error) please notify
  the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail.
  Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in
  this e-mail is strictly forbidden.
 
 
 



Re: Change Cluster pool master

2015-05-29 Thread Prashant s
im sure you know this .. but if you have forgotten :-)


if you want to be *extra extra safe* , just place the cluster in *unmanaged
state*  in CS web ui.
you will see all your xenservers in the cluster  in disconnected state 

now you can change the xen pool master , upgrade xenserver , patch , reboot
etc ..

after your maintenance , click manage your cluster .

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 8:11 AM, Mārtiņš Jakubovičs mart...@vertigs.lv
wrote:

 Thanks!


 On 2015.05.28. 15:09, Remi Bergsma wrote:

 Hi,

 The commit was added to the 4.3 branch on Dec 3, 2014:
 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=305d8ae

 CloudStack 4.3.2 was released in January 2015, so I would say it was
 included.

 https://blogs.apache.org/cloudstack/entry/announce_announcing_apache_cloudstack_4

 Since XenServer itself is handling HA on the pool, I'd say you can safely
 run 'xe pool-designate-new-master' to elect a new master.  CloudStack will
 pick this up automatically.

 Regards,
 Remi





 2015-05-28 9:33 GMT+02:00 Mārtiņš Jakubovičs mart...@vertigs.lv:

  I am running ASC 4.3.2 and XenServer 6.2 with XS62ESP1013 patch.


 On 2015.05.28. 10:30, Glenn Wagner wrote:

  Hello,

 What version of Xenserver and Cloudstack are you running?

 Glenn Wagner
 Senior Consultant, South Africa



 Phone: +27 21 527 0091 | Mobile: +27 73 917 4111

 glenn.wag...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeBlue
 ShapeBlue SA (Pty) Ltd, 2nd Floor, Oudehuis Centre, 122 Main Rd,
 Somerset
 West, Cape Town 7130

 -Original Message-
 From: Mārtiņš Jakubovičs [mailto:mart...@vertigs.lv]
 Sent: 28 May 2015 09:09 AM
 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
 Subject: Change Cluster pool master

 Hello,

 I want just to be sure.
 Is it safe change running cluster's XenServer's pool master (xe
 pool-designate-new-master host-uuid=uuid)?
 In XenServer pool without CloudStack it works great and without issues,
 but how about with CloudStack?
 Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related
 services

 IaaS Cloud Design  Build
 http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//
 CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/
 
 CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/
 CloudStack Software Engineering
 http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/
 CloudStack Infrastructure Support
 http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/
 CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses
 http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/

 This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
 intended
 solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views
 or
 opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
 represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not
 the
 intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
 upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the
 sender
 if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is
 a
 company incorporated in England  Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP
 is a
 company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape
 Blue
 Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in
 Brasil
 and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd
 is
 a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under
 license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.







Re: Swift storage

2015-05-29 Thread Sanjeev N
yes all the existing nfs storages will be converted to staging storage
after migrating from nfs to s3.

On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
wrote:

 Nice to hear that :)

 Sanjeev, is migration api supported if we use 2 nfs boxes now for secondary
 storage or if it must be only 1 nfs box(that will ve converted to staging
 store)?
 Thx
 On May 29, 2015 11:02 AM, Sanjeev N sanj...@apache.org wrote:

  No issues with S3 provider.
 
  On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
 
  wrote:
 
   auth v1, old libraries, lot's of limitations (cant extract/download
   ISO/template from ACS, dont see if register/download of ISO/template
 from
   URL has started at all - no progress percentage, etc). Problems
 deleting
   any ISO/template from GUI (at the moment, zoneid is or is not sent, in
   contrast what it should be - also try for S3 - any region wide SS,
 afaik)
  
   MGMT server mounts Secondary Storage on itself, and downloads systemVM
   template from database records (so systemVM from download.cloud.com) -
  so
   there is no preseed of systemVM template manually.
  
   S3 interface (Swift can provide S3 support) seems to be working much
  better
   - but we are still to test it all later...
  
   :)
  
  
  
  
  
   On 29 May 2015 at 08:09, prapul cool prapul_cool2...@yahoo.com.invalid
 
   wrote:
  
Hi,
Has  any one added swift as secondary storage in cloudstack, if
 yes
please share the instructions for it.
   How do we seed systemvm template in this case?
Thanks,Prapul sriram,PSI cloud solutions.
  
  
  
  
   --
  
   Andrija Panić
  
 



storage migration of vm on local storage

2015-05-29 Thread S . Brüseke - proIO GmbH
Hi,

documentation is a little bit confusing about this. Is it possible in CS 4.3 
(XenServer 6.2 SP! as hypervisor) to migrate a vm if this vm is on local 
storage without to stop the vm?

Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards,

Swen Brüseke




- proIO GmbH -
Geschäftsführer: Swen Brüseke
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Frankfurt am Main

USt-IdNr. DE 267 075 918
Registergericht: Frankfurt am Main - HRB 86239

Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte Informationen. 
Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten 
haben, 
informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese Mail. 
Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Mail sind nicht 
gestattet. 

This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. 
If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) 
please notify 
the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail.  
Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this 
e-mail is strictly forbidden. 




Re: Swift storage

2015-05-29 Thread Andrija Panic
Interesting so its suported to have 2 staging nfs. Great.

Thx Sanjeev
On May 29, 2015 5:32 PM, Sanjeev N sanj...@apache.org wrote:

 yes all the existing nfs storages will be converted to staging storage
 after migrating from nfs to s3.

 On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  Nice to hear that :)
 
  Sanjeev, is migration api supported if we use 2 nfs boxes now for
 secondary
  storage or if it must be only 1 nfs box(that will ve converted to staging
  store)?
  Thx
  On May 29, 2015 11:02 AM, Sanjeev N sanj...@apache.org wrote:
 
   No issues with S3 provider.
  
   On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Andrija Panic 
 andrija.pa...@gmail.com
  
   wrote:
  
auth v1, old libraries, lot's of limitations (cant extract/download
ISO/template from ACS, dont see if register/download of ISO/template
  from
URL has started at all - no progress percentage, etc). Problems
  deleting
any ISO/template from GUI (at the moment, zoneid is or is not sent,
 in
contrast what it should be - also try for S3 - any region wide SS,
  afaik)
   
MGMT server mounts Secondary Storage on itself, and downloads
 systemVM
template from database records (so systemVM from download.cloud.com)
 -
   so
there is no preseed of systemVM template manually.
   
S3 interface (Swift can provide S3 support) seems to be working much
   better
- but we are still to test it all later...
   
:)
   
   
   
   
   
On 29 May 2015 at 08:09, prapul cool
 prapul_cool2...@yahoo.com.invalid
  
wrote:
   
 Hi,
 Has  any one added swift as secondary storage in cloudstack, if
  yes
 please share the instructions for it.
How do we seed systemvm template in this case?
 Thanks,Prapul sriram,PSI cloud solutions.
   
   
   
   
--
   
Andrija Panić
   
  
 



Re: CS 4.3.2 - VPC VPN client IP not routable to network

2015-05-29 Thread Andrija Panic
Dave, VPC setup is fine...

You configured site-to-site VPN (remote customer VPN gateway) or Remote VPN
(l2tp/ipsec) ?

On 29 May 2015 at 21:51, Dave Hoffman david.hoff...@appcore.com wrote:

 We have a VPC configured with a 10.0.0.0/16 and a network within the VPC
 with a 10.0.0.0/24 network.

 After setting up a VPN on the gateway and connecting I get an address of
 10.1.2.8 and I cannot access the VM within the network.

 Is there something wrong with the config that we're missing?

 --
 Thanks,
 *Dave Hoffman*
 System Administrator | Appcore - the business of cloud computing®

 Office +1.800.735.7104  |  Fax +1.515.612.7878
 Direct +1.515.612.7808  |  Mobile +1.515.966.4633
 dave.hoff...@appcore.com  |  www.appcore.com
 --

 The information in this message is intended for the named recipients only.
 It may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise
 protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are
 hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking
 of any action in reliance on the contents of this message is strictly
 prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, do not print it or
 disseminate it or its contents. In such event, please notify the sender by
 return e-mail and delete the e-mail file immediately thereafter. Thank you.




-- 

Andrija Panić


Re: CS 4.3.2 - VPC VPN client IP not routable to network

2015-05-29 Thread Andrija Panic
Nevermind, so it's remote VPN.

This range (10.1.2.8-x) is default range assinged to VPN clients (your
laptop etc). (global config:
remote.access.vpn.client.iprange) - this range overlaps with your VPC range
10.x.x.x
you can change this value in global config to i.e
192.168.56.5-192.168.56.50 and then create user accounts etc...that will
get this settings attached.
this range is a property attached of the ACCOUNT.

Meaning, as a cloud wide admin, login to ACS, and edit existing account,
there is SETTINGS tab on the account, and change remote VPN IP range.to
something else than 10.x.x.x
Also be sure to route all traffic over VPN connections, so you can actuallt
access your VMs inside VPC.


cheers



On 29 May 2015 at 22:00, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote:

 Dave, VPC setup is fine...

 You configured site-to-site VPN (remote customer VPN gateway) or Remote
 VPN (l2tp/ipsec) ?

 On 29 May 2015 at 21:51, Dave Hoffman david.hoff...@appcore.com wrote:

 We have a VPC configured with a 10.0.0.0/16 and a network within the VPC
 with a 10.0.0.0/24 network.

 After setting up a VPN on the gateway and connecting I get an address of
 10.1.2.8 and I cannot access the VM within the network.

 Is there something wrong with the config that we're missing?

 --
 Thanks,
 *Dave Hoffman*
 System Administrator | Appcore - the business of cloud computing®

 Office +1.800.735.7104  |  Fax +1.515.612.7878
 Direct +1.515.612.7808  |  Mobile +1.515.966.4633
 dave.hoff...@appcore.com  |  www.appcore.com
 --

 The information in this message is intended for the named recipients only.
 It may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise
 protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are
 hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking
 of any action in reliance on the contents of this message is strictly
 prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, do not print it or
 disseminate it or its contents. In such event, please notify the sender by
 return e-mail and delete the e-mail file immediately thereafter. Thank
 you.




 --

 Andrija Panić




-- 

Andrija Panić