Re: cloudstack 4.11 still support PVLAN?

[Sergey Levitskiy]

PVLAN is supported although there are some prerequisites
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/archived-cloudstack-administration/en/latest/networking_and_traffic.html#isolation-in-advanced-zone-using-private-vlan


On 11/4/18, 7:05 PM, "Ivan Kudryavtsev"  wrote:

Probably MAC-based VLANs and custom scripting will work for you.

вс, 4 нояб. 2018 г. в 22:04, li li :

> Hi Ivan
>
>
>
> my target is:
>
> 1. All the user VM cannot reach other user VM.
>
> 2. All the user VM can reach SMB server and Gateway.
>
>
>
> Any good suggestions?
>
>
>
>
>
> 
> 发件人: Ivan Kudryavtsev 
> 发送时间: Monday, November 5, 2018 10:32:23 AM
> 收件人: users
> 主题: Re: cloudstack 4.11 still support PVLAN?
>
> Hi Li,
> Doesn't look like it's supported. Actually, CloudStack supports isolated
> networks in advanced zones which support the feature above by creation of
> isolated VLAN for every network with the dedicated virtual router and 
other
> stuff.
>
> вс, 4 нояб. 2018 г. в 21:25, li li :
>
> > HI ALL
> >
> > I saw on the wiki that PVLAN for isolation is a very useful function. Is
> > CLOUDSTACK 4.11 still supported? Are there any deployment documents (KVM
> or
> > XENSERVER or XCP-NG)?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/PVLAN+for+isolation+within+a+VLAN
> >
>
>
> --
> With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev
> Bitworks LLC
> Cell RU: +7-923-414-1515
> Cell USA: +1-201-257-1512
> WWW: http://bitworks.software/ 
>


-- 
With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev
Bitworks LLC
Cell RU: +7-923-414-1515
Cell USA: +1-201-257-1512
WWW: http://bitworks.software/ 

Re: cloudstack 4.11 still support PVLAN?

[Ivan Kudryavtsev]

Probably MAC-based VLANs and custom scripting will work for you.

вс, 4 нояб. 2018 г. в 22:04, li li :

> Hi Ivan
>
>
>
> my target is:
>
> 1. All the user VM cannot reach other user VM.
>
> 2. All the user VM can reach SMB server and Gateway.
>
>
>
> Any good suggestions?
>
>
>
>
>
> 
> 发件人: Ivan Kudryavtsev 
> 发送时间: Monday, November 5, 2018 10:32:23 AM
> 收件人: users
> 主题: Re: cloudstack 4.11 still support PVLAN?
>
> Hi Li,
> Doesn't look like it's supported. Actually, CloudStack supports isolated
> networks in advanced zones which support the feature above by creation of
> isolated VLAN for every network with the dedicated virtual router and other
> stuff.
>
> вс, 4 нояб. 2018 г. в 21:25, li li :
>
> > HI ALL
> >
> > I saw on the wiki that PVLAN for isolation is a very useful function. Is
> > CLOUDSTACK 4.11 still supported? Are there any deployment documents (KVM
> or
> > XENSERVER or XCP-NG)?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/PVLAN+for+isolation+within+a+VLAN
> >
>
>
> --
> With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev
> Bitworks LLC
> Cell RU: +7-923-414-1515
> Cell USA: +1-201-257-1512
> WWW: http://bitworks.software/ 
>


-- 
With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev
Bitworks LLC
Cell RU: +7-923-414-1515
Cell USA: +1-201-257-1512
WWW: http://bitworks.software/ 

答复: cloudstack 4.11 still support PVLAN?

[li li]

Hi Ivan



my target is:

1. All the user VM cannot reach other user VM.

2. All the user VM can reach SMB server and Gateway.



Any good suggestions?






发件人: Ivan Kudryavtsev 
发送时间: Monday, November 5, 2018 10:32:23 AM
收件人: users
主题: Re: cloudstack 4.11 still support PVLAN?

Hi Li,
Doesn't look like it's supported. Actually, CloudStack supports isolated
networks in advanced zones which support the feature above by creation of
isolated VLAN for every network with the dedicated virtual router and other
stuff.

вс, 4 нояб. 2018 г. в 21:25, li li :

> HI ALL
>
> I saw on the wiki that PVLAN for isolation is a very useful function. Is
> CLOUDSTACK 4.11 still supported? Are there any deployment documents (KVM or
> XENSERVER or XCP-NG)?
>
>
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/PVLAN+for+isolation+within+a+VLAN
>


--
With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev
Bitworks LLC
Cell RU: +7-923-414-1515
Cell USA: +1-201-257-1512
WWW: http://bitworks.software/ 

Re: cloudstack 4.11 still support PVLAN?

[Ivan Kudryavtsev]

Hi Li,
Doesn't look like it's supported. Actually, CloudStack supports isolated
networks in advanced zones which support the feature above by creation of
isolated VLAN for every network with the dedicated virtual router and other
stuff.

вс, 4 нояб. 2018 г. в 21:25, li li :

> HI ALL
>
> I saw on the wiki that PVLAN for isolation is a very useful function. Is
> CLOUDSTACK 4.11 still supported? Are there any deployment documents (KVM or
> XENSERVER or XCP-NG)?
>
>
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/PVLAN+for+isolation+within+a+VLAN
>


-- 
With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev
Bitworks LLC
Cell RU: +7-923-414-1515
Cell USA: +1-201-257-1512
WWW: http://bitworks.software/ 

cloudstack 4.11 still support PVLAN?

[li li]

HI ALL

I saw on the wiki that PVLAN for isolation is a very useful function. Is 
CLOUDSTACK 4.11 still supported? Are there any deployment documents (KVM or 
XENSERVER or XCP-NG)?


https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/PVLAN+for+isolation+within+a+VLAN

Re: Problem creating networks after 4.11 upgrade

[Eric Lee Green]

Yeah, had all sorts of problems with custom network offerings after 
upgrading to 4.11.1, along with problems with launching virtual machines 
(every attempt to launch resulted in a "not enough resources" error), 
couldn't get virtual routers to come up for custom networks, etc. I 
didn't have time in my service window to do any detailed examinations of 
why they were failing, I just downgraded back to 4.9.2 before my service 
window ended. When 4.11 is stable, maybe I'll try upgrading to it again. 
(OS: Centos 7. Old version: 4.9.2. New version: 4.11.1. Hardware: Three 
compute servers with dual hexacore processors and 96gb+ of memory w/KVM. 
End result after two hours of trying to make it work: Downgrade back to 
4.9.2.)


I was thinking about migrating most of my other computer servers into 
the Cloudstack cloud because it's easier for my users to take care of 
their own resources, but I was hoping to do it after migrating to 4.11. 
I guess not.


On 11/4/18 13:14, Jean-Francois Nadeau wrote:


I all,

I was wondering if anyone else had this problem after upgrading from 4.9.
  All our networks are using a custom network offering with no services
defined since the physical network provides DHCP and DNS.   Environment is
CentOS 7, KVM with the openvswitch driver.

Now after the upgrade to 4.11,  creating a network using that same network
offering fails with an  "Unable to convert network offering with specified
id to network profile" error.

The issue is documented here:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/2989

I hope someone can have a look at it.  This is the last issue that blocks
us from upgrading.

best,

Jean-Francois

Problem creating networks after 4.11 upgrade

[Jean-Francois Nadeau]

I all,

I was wondering if anyone else had this problem after upgrading from 4.9.
 All our networks are using a custom network offering with no services
defined since the physical network provides DHCP and DNS.   Environment is
CentOS 7, KVM with the openvswitch driver.

Now after the upgrade to 4.11,  creating a network using that same network
offering fails with an  "Unable to convert network offering with specified
id to network profile" error.

The issue is documented here:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/2989

I hope someone can have a look at it.  This is the last issue that blocks
us from upgrading.

best,

Jean-Francois