Re: [DISCUSS] New Design for the Apache CloudStack Website

2023-09-07 Thread Foysal Kayum
Seems Great .



On Thu, Sep 7, 2023, 4:07 PM Wido den Hollander  wrote:

>
>
> Op 31-08-2023 om 11:41 schreef Rohit Yadav:
> > Thanks Ivet, the new iterated design looks impressive especially some of
> the new graphical elements.
> >
> > +1 to moving forward with the proposed design. Let's collect any further
> feedback and ideas from the community and if there are no objections go
> ahead with updating the preview/staging site (
> https://cloudstack.staged.apache.org/) and eventually publishing the
> website.
> >
> > Just to be clear on the CMS integration - the ASF infra has declined
> supporting a 3rd party git-based CMS that can be used with the project
> website. This is such a shame as I had created PoCs with some rather
> okay-ist git-based CMS such as Netlify-CMS, TinaCMS and SpinalCMS which
> would give similar UI-based workflow like the old Roller-based blog did.
> >
> > Nevertheless, for the purposes of publishing blogs the new Github-based
> document/markdown editor/CMS is fair enough and now allows uploading of
> assets (images, files etc.) and blog that can be edited directly for any
> committer incl. PMC members logged into Github and upon saving such changes
> the website is published by an automatic Github action that builds and
> published the websites. Unfortunately, any non-committer would need to
> follow the PR workflow. I had this documented at
> https://cloudstack.staged.apache.org/website-guide/ that I can help
> further update in this regard.
> >
>
> Thank you Ivet and Rohit, this is looking great! Much better then we had.
>
> I have no real comments not objections to do. It's a great improvement
> over what we currently have.
>
> Wido
>
> >
> > Regards.
> >
> > 
> > From: Ivet Petrova 
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2023 19:04
> > To: Giles Sirett 
> > Cc: d...@cloudstack.apache.org ;
> users@cloudstack.apache.org ; Marketing <
> market...@shapeblue.com>
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] New Design for the Apache CloudStack Website
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I uploaded the design here:
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pef7xWWMPYAA5UkbS_XMUxrz53KB7J5t/view?usp=sharing
> >
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 30 Aug 2023, at 16:31, Giles Sirett  > wrote:
> >
> > Hi Ivet – thanks for pushing forward with this – excited to review a new
> design.
> >
> > On that note, I cant see a link in your mail ☹
> >
> > Kind Regards
> > Giles
> >
> >
> > Giles Sirett
> > CEO
> > giles.sir...@shapeblue.com
> > www.shapeblue.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Ivet Petrova  ivet.petr...@shapeblue.com>>
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2023 10:14 AM
> > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org;
> Marketing mailto:market...@shapeblue.com>>
> > Cc: dev mailto:d...@cloudstack.apache.org>>
> > Subject: [DISCUSS] New Design for the Apache CloudStack Website
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I would like to start a discussion on the design of the Apache
> CloudStack Website and to propose a new design for it.
> >
> > As we all know, the website has not been changed for years in terms of
> design and information. The biggest issue we know we have is that the
> website is not showing the full potential of CloudStack. In addition to it
> during discussions with many community members, I have noted the following
> issues:
> > - the existing website design is old-school
> > - the current homepage does not collect enough information to show
> CloudStack's strengths
> > - current website design is missing images from the ACS UI and cannot
> create a feel for the product in the users
> > - the website has issues on a mobile device
> > - we lack any graphic and diagrams
> > - some important information like how to download is not very visible
> >
> > I collected a lot of feedback during last months and want to propose a
> new up to date design for the website, which is attached below. The new
> design will bring:
> > - improved UX
> > - look and feel corresponding to the CloudStack's capabilities and
> strengths
> > - more graphical elements, diagrams
> > - better branding
> > - more important information, easily accessible for the potential users
> >
> > I hope you will like the new design – all feedback welcome. Once we have
> the design finalised, we will use Rohit’s proposal previously of a CMS,
> which is easy to edit.
> >
> > [cid:B5517475-02DA-472A-BD1D-F3B600AD28ED]
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
>


Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.18.1.0 (RC3)

2023-09-07 Thread Nux
+1 (binding) from me based on previous testing and testing the last 
minute local storage bug.


Good job, Wei!


On 2023-09-07 09:34, Wei ZHOU wrote:

Hi all,

I've created a 4.18.1.0-RC3, with the following artifacts up for a 
vote:


Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.18.1.0-RC20230907T0850
Commit: 4bdff06acd3630180f85ffe2f54add972607bbb4

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the following
location):https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.18.1.0/

PGP release keys (signed using 1503DFE7C8226103):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to 
indicate

"(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)


Rocky linux nuclei

2023-09-07 Thread Mariusz Wojtarek
Does cloudstack supports nmcli ? or it must be network.service ?


[Support Online]
Mariusz Wojtarek
Administrator iT
P: 22 335 28 00
E: mariusz.wojta...@support-online.pl
www.support-online.pl
Poleczki 23 | 02-822 Warszawa
[cidimage005.png@01D77E41.D4CA7110]
   [cidimage007.png@01D77E41.D4CA7110] 




Support OnLine Sp. z o.o., ul. Poleczki 23, 02-822 Warszawa, NIP: 
951-20-32-692, Regon: 017431965, KRS: 078497,
XIII Wydzia? Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru S?dowego w Warszawie, Kapita? 
zak?adowy: 50 000 PLN - op?acony w pe?nej wysoko?ci.
W przypadku podania w ramach niniejszej korespondencji Pa?stwa danych 
osobowych, prosimy zapozna? si? z nast?puj?c? informacj? 
https://www.support-online.pl/dane-osobowe
In case any of your private data was included within this conversation, please 
consult this website https://www.support-online.pl/en/personal-data


Re: [DISCUSS] New Design for the Apache CloudStack Website

2023-09-07 Thread Wido den Hollander




Op 31-08-2023 om 11:41 schreef Rohit Yadav:

Thanks Ivet, the new iterated design looks impressive especially some of the 
new graphical elements.

+1 to moving forward with the proposed design. Let's collect any further 
feedback and ideas from the community and if there are no objections go ahead 
with updating the preview/staging site (https://cloudstack.staged.apache.org/) 
and eventually publishing the website.

Just to be clear on the CMS integration - the ASF infra has declined supporting 
a 3rd party git-based CMS that can be used with the project website. This is 
such a shame as I had created PoCs with some rather okay-ist git-based CMS such 
as Netlify-CMS, TinaCMS and SpinalCMS which would give similar UI-based 
workflow like the old Roller-based blog did.

Nevertheless, for the purposes of publishing blogs the new Github-based 
document/markdown editor/CMS is fair enough and now allows uploading of assets 
(images, files etc.) and blog that can be edited directly for any committer 
incl. PMC members logged into Github and upon saving such changes the website 
is published by an automatic Github action that builds and published the 
websites. Unfortunately, any non-committer would need to follow the PR 
workflow. I had this documented at 
https://cloudstack.staged.apache.org/website-guide/ that I can help further 
update in this regard.



Thank you Ivet and Rohit, this is looking great! Much better then we had.

I have no real comments not objections to do. It's a great improvement 
over what we currently have.


Wido



Regards.


From: Ivet Petrova 
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2023 19:04
To: Giles Sirett 
Cc: d...@cloudstack.apache.org ; users@cloudstack.apache.org 
; Marketing 
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] New Design for the Apache CloudStack Website

Hi All,

I uploaded the design here: 
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pef7xWWMPYAA5UkbS_XMUxrz53KB7J5t/view?usp=sharing


Kind regards,





  


On 30 Aug 2023, at 16:31, Giles Sirett 
mailto:giles.sir...@shapeblue.com>> wrote:

Hi Ivet – thanks for pushing forward with this – excited to review a new design.

On that note, I cant see a link in your mail ☹

Kind Regards
Giles


Giles Sirett
CEO
giles.sir...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com




From: Ivet Petrova 
mailto:ivet.petr...@shapeblue.com>>
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2023 10:14 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org; Marketing 
mailto:market...@shapeblue.com>>
Cc: dev mailto:d...@cloudstack.apache.org>>
Subject: [DISCUSS] New Design for the Apache CloudStack Website

Hello,

I would like to start a discussion on the design of the Apache CloudStack 
Website and to propose a new design for it.

As we all know, the website has not been changed for years in terms of design 
and information. The biggest issue we know we have is that the website is not 
showing the full potential of CloudStack. In addition to it during discussions 
with many community members, I have noted the following issues:
- the existing website design is old-school
- the current homepage does not collect enough information to show CloudStack's 
strengths
- current website design is missing images from the ACS UI and cannot create a 
feel for the product in the users
- the website has issues on a mobile device
- we lack any graphic and diagrams
- some important information like how to download is not very visible

I collected a lot of feedback during last months and want to propose a new up 
to date design for the website, which is attached below. The new design will 
bring:
- improved UX
- look and feel corresponding to the CloudStack's capabilities and strengths
- more graphical elements, diagrams
- better branding
- more important information, easily accessible for the potential users

I hope you will like the new design – all feedback welcome. Once we have the 
design finalised, we will use Rohit’s proposal previously of a CMS, which is 
easy to edit.

[cid:B5517475-02DA-472A-BD1D-F3B600AD28ED]

Kind regards,



Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.18.1.0 (RC3)

2023-09-07 Thread Rohit Yadav
+1 binding, have manually tested the new changes since RC2 in an adv zone KVM 
env with nfs and local storage.

Regards.

Regards.

From: Wei ZHOU 
Sent: Thursday, September 7, 2023 2:05:26 PM
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org ; users 

Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.18.1.0 (RC3)

Hi all,

You can find the (unofficial) packages at
http://download.cloudstack.org/testing/4.18.1.0-RC20230907T0850/ for your
convenience.

Kind regards
Wei





 

On Thu, 7 Sept 2023 at 10:34, Wei ZHOU  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I've created a 4.18.1.0-RC3, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.18.1.0-RC20230907T0850
> Commit: 4bdff06acd3630180f85ffe2f54add972607bbb4
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the following
> location):https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.18.1.0/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using 1503DFE7C8226103):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>


Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.18.1.0 (RC3)

2023-09-07 Thread Wei ZHOU
Hi all,

This vote will be closed on Tuesday, 12th September.

Please feel free to share your thoughts, testing results, issues, etc.
Thanks !

-Wei

On Thu, 7 Sept 2023 at 10:34, Wei ZHOU  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I've created a 4.18.1.0-RC3, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.18.1.0-RC20230907T0850
> Commit: 4bdff06acd3630180f85ffe2f54add972607bbb4
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the following
> location):https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.18.1.0/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using 1503DFE7C8226103):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>


Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.18.1.0 (RC3)

2023-09-07 Thread Wei ZHOU
Hi all,

You can find the (unofficial) packages at
http://download.cloudstack.org/testing/4.18.1.0-RC20230907T0850/ for your
convenience.

Kind regards
Wei




On Thu, 7 Sept 2023 at 10:34, Wei ZHOU  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I've created a 4.18.1.0-RC3, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.18.1.0-RC20230907T0850
> Commit: 4bdff06acd3630180f85ffe2f54add972607bbb4
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the following
> location):https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.18.1.0/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using 1503DFE7C8226103):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>


[VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.18.1.0 (RC3)

2023-09-07 Thread Wei ZHOU
Hi all,

I've created a 4.18.1.0-RC3, with the following artifacts up for a vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.18.1.0-RC20230907T0850
Commit: 4bdff06acd3630180f85ffe2f54add972607bbb4

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the following
location):https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.18.1.0/

PGP release keys (signed using 1503DFE7C8226103):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate
"(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)