System VMs are loosing connectiviy
Hello, i have the following problem, in a CS4.3 installation, some system VMs (the console proxy vm, and some virtual routers) are loosing the internet connectivity. Everything is workings and then out of the blue i cannot get a console for the vms, because the console proxy is not accessible. I have to restart the console proxy from the interface in order to make it work. My questions are if anybody has similar problems? How i can further debug it? and what is the minimum command to restart the console proxy (e.g. service networking restart)? Thanks Konstantinos
Re: template download
which version of cloudstack are you using? I have a similar issue with cs4.3 On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 11:18 AM, sebgoa wrote: > Yeah, so I can answer myself to RTFW: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSVM,+templates,+Secondary+storage+troubleshooting > > Item #5 did it, on the ssvm: service cloud stop, service cloud start (fwiw > the restart did not restart) > > then the download will re-kick. > > On Jun 12, 2014, at 11:15 AM, Prashant Kumar Mishra > wrote: > >> ssvm stop-start should help >> >> thanks >> prashant >> -Original Message- >> From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2014 2:32 PM >> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: template download >> >> Hi folks, >> >> If a template fails to download (network issues on ssvm) and I then fix my >> problems. >> >> how do I kick off a new attempt at downloading the template ? >> >> thanks >> >> -sebastien > -- Centralway Factory AG | Konstantinos Karampogias, DevOps | LinkedIn | + 41 44 578 40 00
Re: Console Proxy still not using HTTPS
This link might explain you how is working https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Realhost+IP+changes On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Gopala Krishnan wrote: > Hi, > > Check your SSL certificate intermediate CA setting. It should be need to > enable manually in your cloud database and keystore table. > > 1 for root cert > 2 for intermediate CA > 3 for certificate > > > > > On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 5:10 AM, Владислав Старков < > vladislav.star...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I've install SSL certificate to enable HTTPS for Console Proxy VM, as >> described on >> http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-administration/en/latest/systemvm.html#console-proxy >> >> However my Console window still connecting to Console Proxy VM through >> unencrypted HTTP. >> >> The question is, how to force it to use HTTPS? >> >> Thanks. >> >> >> -- >> Vlad >> > > > > -- > Gopala Krishnan.S > Mobile : +91 9865709094 / +91 9994874447 > *cPanel KnowledgeBase <http://www.cpanelkb.net/>* > *Linux Server Admin Tools* <http://www.gnutoolbox.com> -- Centralway Factory AG | Konstantinos Karampogias, DevOps | LinkedIn | + 41 44 578 40 00
Re: Console Proxy SSL Error
n *.hostname.com and updated >> the >> > >> >certificate via the cloudstack UI. >> > >> > >> > >> >Infrastructure - > SSL certificate >> > >> > >> > >> >Pasted the certificate >> > >> >Pasted the Key >> > >> >DNS domain = hostname.com >> > >> > >> > >> >Once completed, I have optimized the global settings >> > >> > >> > >> >consoleproxy.url.domain = hostname.com >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >When I click console for VM, It shows certificate trusted errors. >> May I >> > >> >know what I done wrong?? >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >-- >> > >> >Gopala Krishnan.S >> > >> >Mobile : +91 9865709094 / +91 9994874447 >> > >> >*cPanel KnowledgeBase <http://www.cpanelkb.net/>* >> > >> >*Linux Server Admin Tools* <http://www.gnutoolbox.com> >> > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > >-- >> > >Gopala Krishnan.S >> > >Mobile : +91 9865709094 / +91 9994874447 >> > >*cPanel KnowledgeBase <http://www.cpanelkb.net/>* >> > >*Linux Server Admin Tools* <http://www.gnutoolbox.com> >> > >> > >> >> >> -- >> Gopala Krishnan.S >> Mobile : +91 9865709094 / +91 9994874447 >> *cPanel KnowledgeBase <http://www.cpanelkb.net/>* >> *Linux Server Admin Tools* <http://www.gnutoolbox.com> >> -- Centralway Factory AG | Konstantinos Karampogias, DevOps | LinkedIn | + 41 44 578 40 00
Re: Public Shared Network, no-vlans
Hello Pierre-Luc, thanks for the reply. I need for other reasons to stay in advance configuration. I know that i do not need to have a definition for cs-mgmt but I am keeping it because in the future management network will be separated also. What I am trying to do to achieve my objective 1. command listPhysicalNetworks #to get the eth0 2. command addTrafficType physicalnetworkid=e84a8626-3106-4486-9a3f-87b7a435a967 traffictype=Guest kvmnetworklabel=cs-public #Same bridge as the public network 4. command createNetworkOffering displaytext=ExternalNetworkOffering name=ExternalNetworkOffering guestiptype=Shared specifyipranges=false specifyvlan=false traffictype=Guest supportedservices="" 5. command createNetwork displaytext=ExternalNetwork name=ExternalNetwork networkofferingid=512b1b05-50f2-4200-b74d-b8b3c37adc3f zoneid=8cb722f3-33ec-4686-aa4f-68237125c943 startip=192.168.100.2 endid=192.168.100.100 gateway=192.168.100.1 netmask=255.255.255.0 vlan=830 physicalnetworkid=e84a8626-3106-4486-9a3f-87b7a435a967 FAILED because "431: SpecifyVlan should be true if network offering's type is Shared" "431: SpecifyIpRanges should always be true for Shared network offerings" To sum up my objective is to create : a shared guest network, in a specific bridge (which is the same as the public), without vlans, without any service and in the advance networking setup. (internet) [ SWITCH A, public IPs address, no vlans] - -eth0- - [ Cloudstack Hypervisor] - -eth1- - [SWITCH B, vlans, private IPs] Any idea where I am doing it working Thx! On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 7:25 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote: > you can use simple networking zone if you want, if you use advanced > networking zone you should skip the network definition for cs-mgmt > 8000.001e67a0a1f7 no eth1.849 > in cloudstack. Instead when you will define IP range for the management > network of the POD you will specify a vlanID > > so you should define in cloudstack 2 nic: > ex: > eth0 with label cs-public and traffic type=public > eth1 with label cs-guest and traffic type=guest,management > > > > > > Pierre-Luc Dion > Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect > 855-OK-CLOUD (855-652-5683) x1101 > - - - > > *CloudOps*420 rue Guy > Montréal QC H3J 1S6 > www.cloudops.com > @CloudOps_ > > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Konstantinos Karampogias < > konstantinos.karampog...@centralway.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> I suppose that i have to use advance networking zone, since there are >> two nics and vlans to be used in the one of them. >> >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion >> wrote: >> > Are you going to use simple or advanced networking zone? >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Pierre-Luc Dion >> > Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect >> > 855-OK-CLOUD (855-652-5683) x1101 >> > - - - >> > >> > *CloudOps*420 rue Guy >> > Montréal QC H3J 1S6 >> > www.cloudops.com >> > @CloudOps_ >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Konstantinos Karampogias < >> > konstantinos.karampog...@centralway.com> wrote: >> > >> >> This is not a lab, it is a rented server in a datacenter, therefore i >> >> have restricted access to the network components. >> >> >> >> I have defined the network labels (which are the name of the bridges >> >> in the hypervisor) accordingly >> >> root@ch1-cskvm-1:~# brctl show |grep cs >> >> cs-guest8000.001e67a0a1f7 no eth1 >> >> <-- Guest Traffic >> >> cs-mgmt 8000.001e67a0a1f7 no eth1.849 >> >> cs-public 8000.001e67a0a1f6 no eth0 >> >> <-- Public Traffic >> >> >> >> >> >> In cloudstack i have set two physical networks (Physical-network-eth0 >> >> and Physical-network-eth1), during the initial adding of a zone. >> >> >> >> Later, when I try to add a guest network it gives me only >> >> physical-network-eth1 and requires a VLAN. Obviously >> >> that cannot work, is going to the wrong switch. Other experiments >> >> (e.g. adding another Guest Traffic to cs-public) >> >> failed because the network offering field is empty. >> >> >>
Re: Public Shared Network, no-vlans
Hi, I suppose that i have to use advance networking zone, since there are two nics and vlans to be used in the one of them. On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote: > Are you going to use simple or advanced networking zone? > > > > > Pierre-Luc Dion > Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect > 855-OK-CLOUD (855-652-5683) x1101 > - - - > > *CloudOps*420 rue Guy > Montréal QC H3J 1S6 > www.cloudops.com > @CloudOps_ > > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Konstantinos Karampogias < > konstantinos.karampog...@centralway.com> wrote: > >> This is not a lab, it is a rented server in a datacenter, therefore i >> have restricted access to the network components. >> >> I have defined the network labels (which are the name of the bridges >> in the hypervisor) accordingly >> root@ch1-cskvm-1:~# brctl show |grep cs >> cs-guest8000.001e67a0a1f7 no eth1 >> <-- Guest Traffic >> cs-mgmt 8000.001e67a0a1f7 no eth1.849 >> cs-public 8000.001e67a0a1f6 no eth0 >> <-- Public Traffic >> >> >> In cloudstack i have set two physical networks (Physical-network-eth0 >> and Physical-network-eth1), during the initial adding of a zone. >> >> Later, when I try to add a guest network it gives me only >> physical-network-eth1 and requires a VLAN. Obviously >> that cannot work, is going to the wrong switch. Other experiments >> (e.g. adding another Guest Traffic to cs-public) >> failed because the network offering field is empty. >> >> Thanks for the fast reply! >> >> Konstantinos >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion >> wrote: >> > If this is a lab, it will work fine, you will have to define network >> > interface labels in Cloudstack in the networking config of the zone. >> labels >> > are networks name of the hypervisor servers. >> > >> > >> > Pierre-Luc Dion >> > Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect >> > 855-OK-CLOUD (855-652-5683) x1101 >> > - - - >> > >> > *CloudOps*420 rue Guy >> > Montréal QC H3J 1S6 >> > www.cloudops.com >> > @CloudOps_ >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Konstantinos Karampogias < >> > konstantinos.karampog...@centralway.com> wrote: >> > >> >> I have the following architecture >> >> >> >> (internet) --(GW)--[ SWITCH A, public IPs address, no vlans] >> >> ---eth0-[ Cloudstack hosts]-eth1-- [SWITCH B, vlans, private >> >> IPs] >> >> >> >> >> >> I want to create a direct public shared network, in which the VMs >> >> will have routable public IP. >> >> (example >> >> >> http://shankerbalan.net/blog/create-a-shared-network-with-public-ips-in-cloudstack/ >> >> ) >> >> >> >> Can I do that given that >> >> -Management Traffic, Guest Traffic are connected to SWITCH B (Physical >> >> Network -eth1), >> >> -Public Traffic connected to SWITCH A (Physical Network-eth0), >> >> -no vlan in SWITCH A? >> >> >> >> What is the original networking set up I should follow? >> >> >> >> I have been experimenting with cloudstack version 4.3 >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Konstantinos >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Konstantinos Karampogias >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Centralway Factory AG | Konstantinos Karampogias, DevOps | LinkedIn | >> + 41 44 578 40 00 >> -- Centralway Factory AG | Konstantinos Karampogias, DevOps | LinkedIn | + 41 44 578 40 00
Re: Public Shared Network, no-vlans
This is not a lab, it is a rented server in a datacenter, therefore i have restricted access to the network components. I have defined the network labels (which are the name of the bridges in the hypervisor) accordingly root@ch1-cskvm-1:~# brctl show |grep cs cs-guest8000.001e67a0a1f7 no eth1 <-- Guest Traffic cs-mgmt 8000.001e67a0a1f7 no eth1.849 cs-public 8000.001e67a0a1f6 no eth0 <-- Public Traffic In cloudstack i have set two physical networks (Physical-network-eth0 and Physical-network-eth1), during the initial adding of a zone. Later, when I try to add a guest network it gives me only physical-network-eth1 and requires a VLAN. Obviously that cannot work, is going to the wrong switch. Other experiments (e.g. adding another Guest Traffic to cs-public) failed because the network offering field is empty. Thanks for the fast reply! Konstantinos On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote: > If this is a lab, it will work fine, you will have to define network > interface labels in Cloudstack in the networking config of the zone. labels > are networks name of the hypervisor servers. > > > Pierre-Luc Dion > Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect > 855-OK-CLOUD (855-652-5683) x1101 > - - - > > *CloudOps*420 rue Guy > Montréal QC H3J 1S6 > www.cloudops.com > @CloudOps_ > > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Konstantinos Karampogias < > konstantinos.karampog...@centralway.com> wrote: > >> I have the following architecture >> >> (internet) --(GW)--[ SWITCH A, public IPs address, no vlans] >> ---eth0-[ Cloudstack hosts]-eth1-- [SWITCH B, vlans, private >> IPs] >> >> >> I want to create a direct public shared network, in which the VMs >> will have routable public IP. >> (example >> http://shankerbalan.net/blog/create-a-shared-network-with-public-ips-in-cloudstack/ >> ) >> >> Can I do that given that >> -Management Traffic, Guest Traffic are connected to SWITCH B (Physical >> Network -eth1), >> -Public Traffic connected to SWITCH A (Physical Network-eth0), >> -no vlan in SWITCH A? >> >> What is the original networking set up I should follow? >> >> I have been experimenting with cloudstack version 4.3 >> >> >> Thanks, >> Konstantinos >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Konstantinos Karampogias >> -- Centralway Factory AG | Konstantinos Karampogias, DevOps | LinkedIn | + 41 44 578 40 00
Public Shared Network, no-vlans
I have the following architecture (internet) --(GW)--[ SWITCH A, public IPs address, no vlans] ---eth0-[ Cloudstack hosts]-eth1-- [SWITCH B, vlans, private IPs] I want to create a direct public shared network, in which the VMs will have routable public IP. (example http://shankerbalan.net/blog/create-a-shared-network-with-public-ips-in-cloudstack/) Can I do that given that -Management Traffic, Guest Traffic are connected to SWITCH B (Physical Network -eth1), -Public Traffic connected to SWITCH A (Physical Network-eth0), -no vlan in SWITCH A? What is the original networking set up I should follow? I have been experimenting with cloudstack version 4.3 Thanks, Konstantinos -- Konstantinos Karampogias