Re: question about security group

2014-08-15 Thread clement mutz
%) because I created a advanced 
zone with isolation mode and that worked (access) ;)



 My network is ok because when I configure my zone with security groups I have 
 access
 system vm and at my instances.

 Basic network and Advanced Networks work very differently. Advanced network 
 uses VLANs
 which if configured incorrectly can lead to issues like the one you are 
 facing.

Thank you but when I mean configuration my zone with security group, I talk 
about advanced network and I check Isolation mode :) .





Hi Clement,

Comments inline.

On 08-Aug-2014, at 12:18 am, clement mutz c.m...@servitics.fr wrote:

 Thanks you for your reply. I already trying to configure the firewall Rules 
 (ex : http://i.imgur.com/oiGMMle.png).
 not access at my instances.

From the VM instance, are you able to ICMP ping the virtual router? If you 
cant,
then please check your network VLAN assignments and traffic label configurations


 I haven't access system vm (console, secondary storage).

If you are not able to access the system VMs, then I would first
make sure my Zone network configuration and the hypervisor
network traffic types are configured correctly.


 My network is ok because when I configure my zone with security groups I have 
 access
 system vm and at my instances.

Basic network and Advanced Networks work very differently. Advanced network 
uses VLANs
which if configured incorrectly can lead to issues like the one you are facing.

 What's wrong with my configuration ? I forgot something ?

Start by running tcpdump along the network path and try to isolate
the faulty network configuration.


 Sorry my bad english. I learning ;)

 Thanks you very much.


No problems.




 Clément




 Comments inline.

 On 07-Aug-2014, at 6:24 pm, clement mutz c.m...@servitics.fr wrote:

 Hi Shanker,

 Look under Network - Select View - Security Groups.

 Thanks you, but the problem appear when I choose a advanced zone without 
 security group. So I can't see  Security 
 Groups(http://i.imgur.com/WR18PPl.png) ;)


 Advanced zones you dont have security groups by default. Only EGRESS and 
 INGRESS rules.

 How I can to configure the different access without security group ?

 Looking at your screenshot, go to Network - Isolated Network (vl400) - 
 Egress Rules and
 Network - Isolated Network (vl400) - Source NAT - Configuration - 
 Firewall Rules.


 The ML strips out attachment. You can use http://imgur.com to share images.

 Thanks for your information :)

 I can't choose Security group, when I created a zone with public network (I 
 mean with nic public)  (http://i.imgur.com/52bjasU.png and 
 http://i.imgur.com/UN9RXR2.png)...
 I don't understand why.
 When I created a zone with security group no problem, I can use ACC Ingress 
 and Egress rules but I haven't public interface 
 (http://i.imgur.com/EhBAbvC.png and http://i.imgur.com/GjhFOZD.png).





 - Mail original -
 De: Shanker Balan shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com
 À: CloudStack-Users users@cloudstack.apache.org
 Envoyé: Jeudi 7 Août 2014 13:49:40
 Objet: Re: question about security group

 Comments inline.

 On 07-Aug-2014, at 3:44 pm, clement mutz c.m...@servitics.fr wrote:

 Hi Tejas,

 I cannot see the security group in network tab.

 Look under Network - Select View - Security Groups.


 I can't choose Security group, when I created a zone with public network (I 
 mean with nic public)  (picture 1 and 2)... I don't understand why.
 When I created a zone with security group no problem, I can use ACC Ingress 
 and Egress rules but I haven't public interface (picture 3 and 4).


 The ML strips out attachment. You can use http://imgur.com to share images.

 --
 @shankerbalan

 M: +91 98860 60539 | O: +91 (80) 67935867
 shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue
 ShapeBlue Services India LLP, 22nd floor, Unit 2201A, World Trade Centre, 
 Bangalore - 560 055

 Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

 IaaS Cloud Design  Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//
 CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/
 CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/
 CloudStack Infrastructure 
 Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/
 CloudStack Bootcamp Training 
 Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/

 This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
 solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
 opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
 represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
 intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based 
 upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender 
 if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a 
 company incorporated in England  Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a 
 company incorporated

Re: question about security group

2014-08-15 Thread clement mutz
--- 10.254.50.123 ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.345/0.906/1.468/0.562 ms

From my computing node I can ping gateway but not system vm :

root@ubuntu:/# ping -c2 10.254.50.254
PING 10.254.50.254 (10.254.50.254) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 10.254.50.254: icmp_req=1 ttl=64 time=1.14 ms
64 bytes from 10.254.50.254: icmp_req=2 ttl=64 time=0.238 ms

--- 10.254.50.254 ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1001ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.238/0.691/1.145/0.454 ms

root@ubuntu:/# ping -c2 10.254.50.209
PING 10.254.50.209 (10.254.50.209) 56(84) bytes of data.

--- 10.254.50.209 ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 1000ms


There is a firewall hidden ? 






Hi Tejas,

 Thanks you for your reply. I already trying to configure the firewall Rules 
 (ex : http://i.imgur.com/oiGMMle.png).
 not access at my instances.

 From the VM instance, are you able to ICMP ping the virtual router? If you 
 cant,
 then please check your network VLAN assignments and traffic label 
 configurations

Yes very good point ! I can't ping the virtual router from the VM instance. 
So for validate my network I duplicate the network configuration creating by 
cloudstack on another xenserver (same environment, same switch ...) ;) . 
So on another xenserver I created two VM (with xencenter) and PING worked.
Picture with network configuration creating by cloudstack (see vl41) 
http://i.imgur.com/K8Bo3kK.png  .
Picture with network configuration creating by me on another xen pool 
http://i.imgur.com/ieYD5Oy.png

On Cloudstack my traffic label http://i.imgur.com/P7ZRbf7.png


 I haven't access system vm (console, secondary storage).

 If you are not able to access the system VMs, then I would first
 make sure my Zone network configuration and the hypervisor
 network traffic types are configured correctly.

---
interfaces  | with isolation mode   | without isolation mode
administration  | Vl50  | Vl50
public  | NONE  | Vl60
guest   | Vl60  | Vl50
Storage | Vl20  | Vl20
---

Like you see It's traffic label configuration. With isolation mode cloudstack 
work without problem.
With isolation mode I declared My guest network (labbel Vl60) like public 
network (testing). And I can ping my Vms system console and storage and my 
instances by Public NIC.
I can ping the administration network too (not possible without isolation mode)

I make sure my zone network configuration (at 99%) because I created a advanced 
zone with isolation mode and that worked (access) ;)



 My network is ok because when I configure my zone with security groups I have 
 access
 system vm and at my instances.

 Basic network and Advanced Networks work very differently. Advanced network 
 uses VLANs
 which if configured incorrectly can lead to issues like the one you are 
 facing.

Thank you but when I mean configuration my zone with security group, I talk 
about advanced network and I check Isolation mode :) .





Hi Clement,

Comments inline.

On 08-Aug-2014, at 12:18 am, clement mutz c.m...@servitics.fr wrote:

 Thanks you for your reply. I already trying to configure the firewall Rules 
 (ex : http://i.imgur.com/oiGMMle.png).
 not access at my instances.

From the VM instance, are you able to ICMP ping the virtual router? If you 
cant,
then please check your network VLAN assignments and traffic label configurations


 I haven't access system vm (console, secondary storage).

If you are not able to access the system VMs, then I would first
make sure my Zone network configuration and the hypervisor
network traffic types are configured correctly.


 My network is ok because when I configure my zone with security groups I have 
 access
 system vm and at my instances.

Basic network and Advanced Networks work very differently. Advanced network 
uses VLANs
which if configured incorrectly can lead to issues like the one you are facing.

 What's wrong with my configuration ? I forgot something ?

Start by running tcpdump along the network path and try to isolate
the faulty network configuration.


 Sorry my bad english. I learning ;)

 Thanks you very much.


No problems.




 Clément




 Comments inline.

 On 07-Aug-2014, at 6:24 pm, clement mutz c.m...@servitics.fr wrote:

 Hi Shanker,

 Look under Network - Select View - Security Groups.

 Thanks you, but the problem appear when I choose a advanced zone without 
 security group. So I can't see  Security 
 Groups(http://i.imgur.com/WR18PPl.png) ;)


 Advanced zones you dont have security groups by default. Only EGRESS and 
 INGRESS rules.

 How I can to configure the different access without security group ?

 Looking at your screenshot, go to Network - Isolated Network (vl400

Re: question about security group

2014-08-15 Thread clement mutz
Hi Skrev,


 Get the verbose iptables output.

 iptables -Lnv


root@v-2-VM:/var/www# iptables -vnL
Chain INPUT (policy DROP 77 packets, 25256 bytes)
 pkts bytes target prot opt in out source   destination 

0 0 ACCEPT all  --  lo *   0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0   

  988 75720 ACCEPT all  --  eth0   *   0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0   
 state RELATED,ESTABLISHED
 4242  411K ACCEPT all  --  eth1   *   0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0   
 state RELATED,ESTABLISHED
  327 25304 ACCEPT all  --  eth2   *   0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0   
 state RELATED,ESTABLISHED
0 0 DROP   icmp --  *  *   0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0   
 icmptype 13
0 0 ACCEPT icmp --  *  *   0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0   

   10   600 ACCEPT tcp  --  eth0   *   0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0   
 state NEW tcp dpt:3922
0 0 ACCEPT tcp  --  eth0   *   0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0   
 state NEW tcp dpt:8001
0 0 ACCEPT tcp  --  eth1   *   0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0   
 state NEW tcp dpt:8001
0 0 ACCEPT tcp  --  eth2   *   0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0   
 state NEW tcp dpt:443
0 0 ACCEPT tcp  --  eth2   *   0.0.0.0/00.0.0.0/0   
 state NEW tcp dpt:80

Chain FORWARD (policy DROP 0 packets, 0 bytes)
 pkts bytes target prot opt in out source   destination 


Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 5334 packets, 603K bytes)
 pkts bytes target prot opt in out source   destination 




Get the verbose iptables output.

iptables -Lnv
15. aug. 2014 18:24 skrev clement mutz c.m...@servitics.fr følgende:


 Hi,


  What's wrong with my configuration ? I forgot something ?

  Start by running tcpdump along the network path and try to isolate
  the faulty network configuration.

 Ok i running tcpdump on console proxy and i can see packets.


 With the following command on console proxy : tcpdump -vv -i eth1

 Quote
 16:05:14.378905 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4 (len 4), Request who-has
 10.254.50.209 tell 10.254.50.45, length 46
 16:05:15.377608 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4 (len 4), Request who-has
 10.254.50.209 tell 10.254.50.45, length 46
 16:05:16.377600 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4 (len 4), Request who-has
 10.254.50.209 tell 10.254.50.45, length 46
 16:05:17.395947 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4 (len 4), Request who-has
 10.254.50.209 tell 10.254.50.45, length 46
 16:05:18.393719 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4 (len 4), Request who-has
 10.254.50.209 tell 10.254.50.45, length 46
 16:05:18.828127 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 30676, offset 0, flags [DF], proto
 TCP (6), length 56)
 10.254.50.201.58036  10.254.50.45.8250: Flags [P.], cksum 0x7b1c
 (incorrect - 0xdd06), seq 3973496:3973500, ack 1507845368, win 2641,
 options [nop,nop,TS val 826858 ecr 954898], length 4
  seq 3973496:3973500, ack 1507845368, win
 eq 1:5, ack 217, win 331, options [nop,nop,TS val 956151 ecr 826868],
 length 4
 16:05:18.883024 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 30678, offset 0, flags [DF], proto
 TCP (6), length 52)


 I see paquets come on my console proxy

 I didn't touch iptables rules


 iptables -L on console proxy :

 Chain INPUT (policy DROP)
 target prot opt source   destination
 ACCEPT all  --  anywhere anywhere
 ACCEPT all  --  anywhere anywhere state
 RELATED,ESTABLISHED
 ACCEPT all  --  anywhere anywhere state
 RELATED,ESTABLISHED
 ACCEPT all  --  anywhere anywhere state
 RELATED,ESTABLISHED
 DROP   icmp --  anywhere anywhere icmp
 timestamp-request
 ACCEPT icmp --  anywhere anywhere
 ACCEPT tcp  --  anywhere anywhere state NEW
 tcp dpt:3922
 ACCEPT tcp  --  anywhere anywhere state NEW
 tcp dpt:8001
 ACCEPT tcp  --  anywhere anywhere state NEW
 tcp dpt:8001
 ACCEPT tcp  --  anywhere anywhere state NEW
 tcp dpt:https
 ACCEPT tcp  --  anywhere anywhere state NEW
 tcp dpt:http

 Chain FORWARD (policy DROP)
 target prot opt source   destination

 Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT)
 target prot opt source   destination


 Thanks for your reply.

 Clément

 ---



 Hi,

 I give you my different tests, the first problem I can't ping system vm
 (internal nic and external nic) since same network (since computing node
 for exemple).

 I can ping a host from internal nic (10.254.50.0/24) since system vm.

 IP address of computing node 10.254.50.45.
 IP address of console proxy vm 10.254.50.209


 On console proxy VM :

 root@v-2-VM:~# route -n
 Kernel IP routing table
 Destination

Re: question about security group

2014-08-13 Thread clement mutz
Hi Tejas,

 Thanks you for your reply. I already trying to configure the firewall Rules 
 (ex : http://i.imgur.com/oiGMMle.png).
 not access at my instances.

 From the VM instance, are you able to ICMP ping the virtual router? If you 
 cant,
 then please check your network VLAN assignments and traffic label 
 configurations

Yes very good point ! I can't ping the virtual router from the VM instance. 
So for validate my network I duplicate the network configuration creating by 
cloudstack on another xenserver (same environment, same switch ...) ;) . 
So on another xenserver I created two VM (with xencenter) and PING worked.
Picture with network configuration creating by cloudstack (see vl41) 
http://i.imgur.com/K8Bo3kK.png  .
Picture with network configuration creating by me on another xen pool 
http://i.imgur.com/ieYD5Oy.png

On Cloudstack my traffic label http://i.imgur.com/P7ZRbf7.png


 I haven't access system vm (console, secondary storage).

 If you are not able to access the system VMs, then I would first
 make sure my Zone network configuration and the hypervisor
 network traffic types are configured correctly.

---
interfaces  | with isolation mode   | without isolation mode
administration  | Vl50  | Vl50
public  | NONE  | Vl60
guest   | Vl60  | Vl50
Storage | Vl20  | Vl20
---

Like you see It's traffic label configuration. With isolation mode cloudstack 
work without problem.
With isolation mode I declared My guest network (labbel Vl60) like public 
network (testing). And I can ping my Vms system console and storage and my 
instances by Public NIC.
I can ping the administration network too (not possible without isolation mode)

I make sure my zone network configuration (at 99%) because I created a advanced 
zone with isolation mode and that worked (access) ;)



 My network is ok because when I configure my zone with security groups I have 
 access
 system vm and at my instances.

 Basic network and Advanced Networks work very differently. Advanced network 
 uses VLANs
 which if configured incorrectly can lead to issues like the one you are 
 facing.

Thank you but when I mean configuration my zone with security group, I talk 
about advanced network and I check Isolation mode :) .





Hi Clement,

Comments inline.

On 08-Aug-2014, at 12:18 am, clement mutz c.m...@servitics.fr wrote:

 Thanks you for your reply. I already trying to configure the firewall Rules 
 (ex : http://i.imgur.com/oiGMMle.png).
 not access at my instances.

From the VM instance, are you able to ICMP ping the virtual router? If you 
cant,
then please check your network VLAN assignments and traffic label configurations


 I haven't access system vm (console, secondary storage).

If you are not able to access the system VMs, then I would first
make sure my Zone network configuration and the hypervisor
network traffic types are configured correctly.


 My network is ok because when I configure my zone with security groups I have 
 access
 system vm and at my instances.

Basic network and Advanced Networks work very differently. Advanced network 
uses VLANs
which if configured incorrectly can lead to issues like the one you are facing.

 What's wrong with my configuration ? I forgot something ?

Start by running tcpdump along the network path and try to isolate
the faulty network configuration.


 Sorry my bad english. I learning ;)

 Thanks you very much.


No problems.




 Clément




 Comments inline.

 On 07-Aug-2014, at 6:24 pm, clement mutz c.m...@servitics.fr wrote:

 Hi Shanker,

 Look under Network - Select View - Security Groups.

 Thanks you, but the problem appear when I choose a advanced zone without 
 security group. So I can't see  Security 
 Groups(http://i.imgur.com/WR18PPl.png) ;)


 Advanced zones you dont have security groups by default. Only EGRESS and 
 INGRESS rules.

 How I can to configure the different access without security group ?

 Looking at your screenshot, go to Network - Isolated Network (vl400) - 
 Egress Rules and
 Network - Isolated Network (vl400) - Source NAT - Configuration - 
 Firewall Rules.


 The ML strips out attachment. You can use http://imgur.com to share images.

 Thanks for your information :)

 I can't choose Security group, when I created a zone with public network (I 
 mean with nic public)  (http://i.imgur.com/52bjasU.png and 
 http://i.imgur.com/UN9RXR2.png)...
 I don't understand why.
 When I created a zone with security group no problem, I can use ACC Ingress 
 and Egress rules but I haven't public interface 
 (http://i.imgur.com/EhBAbvC.png and http://i.imgur.com/GjhFOZD.png).





 - Mail original -
 De: Shanker Balan shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com
 À: CloudStack-Users users@cloudstack.apache.org
 Envoyé: Jeudi 7 Août 2014 13:49:40
 Objet: Re: question

question about security group

2014-08-07 Thread clement mutz
Hi community !

I'll try to create a zone with public network. I can't ping my VMs (Instances, 
systems VM).

How I can to configure the different access ?

Appreciate all helps.

Best regards,

Cloudstack 4.3 on centos.


Re: question about security group

2014-08-07 Thread clement mutz
Thanks you for your reply. I already trying to configure the firewall Rules (ex 
: http://i.imgur.com/oiGMMle.png). not access at my instances.
I haven't access system vm (console, secondary storage).

My network is ok because when I configure my zone with security groups I have 
access system vm and at my instances.

What's wrong with my configuration ? I forgot something ?

Sorry my bad english. I learning ;)

Thanks you very much.

Clément




Comments inline.

On 07-Aug-2014, at 6:24 pm, clement mutz c.m...@servitics.fr wrote:

 Hi Shanker,

 Look under Network - Select View - Security Groups.

 Thanks you, but the problem appear when I choose a advanced zone without 
 security group. So I can't see  Security 
 Groups(http://i.imgur.com/WR18PPl.png) ;)


Advanced zones you dont have security groups by default. Only EGRESS and 
INGRESS rules.

 How I can to configure the different access without security group ?

Looking at your screenshot, go to Network - Isolated Network (vl400) - Egress 
Rules and
Network - Isolated Network (vl400) - Source NAT - Configuration - Firewall 
Rules.


 The ML strips out attachment. You can use http://imgur.com to share images.

 Thanks for your information :)

 I can't choose Security group, when I created a zone with public network (I 
 mean with nic public)  (http://i.imgur.com/52bjasU.png and 
 http://i.imgur.com/UN9RXR2.png)...
 I don't understand why.
 When I created a zone with security group no problem, I can use ACC Ingress 
 and Egress rules but I haven't public interface 
 (http://i.imgur.com/EhBAbvC.png and http://i.imgur.com/GjhFOZD.png).





 - Mail original -
 De: Shanker Balan shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com
 À: CloudStack-Users users@cloudstack.apache.org
 Envoyé: Jeudi 7 Août 2014 13:49:40
 Objet: Re: question about security group

 Comments inline.

 On 07-Aug-2014, at 3:44 pm, clement mutz c.m...@servitics.fr wrote:

 Hi Tejas,

 I cannot see the security group in network tab.

 Look under Network - Select View - Security Groups.


 I can't choose Security group, when I created a zone with public network (I 
 mean with nic public)  (picture 1 and 2)... I don't understand why.
 When I created a zone with security group no problem, I can use ACC Ingress 
 and Egress rules but I haven't public interface (picture 3 and 4).


 The ML strips out attachment. You can use http://imgur.com to share images.

 --
 @shankerbalan

 M: +91 98860 60539 | O: +91 (80) 67935867
 shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue
 ShapeBlue Services India LLP, 22nd floor, Unit 2201A, World Trade Centre, 
 Bangalore - 560 055

 Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

 IaaS Cloud Design  Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//
 CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/
 CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/
 CloudStack Infrastructure 
 Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/
 CloudStack Bootcamp Training 
 Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/

 This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
 solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
 opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
 represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
 intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
 its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
 believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
 incorporated in England  Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
 incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. 
 Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
 operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
 registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
 Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

--
@shankerbalan

M: +91 98860 60539 | O: +91 (80) 67935867
shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue
ShapeBlue Services India LLP, 22nd floor, Unit 2201A, World Trade Centre, 
Bangalore - 560 055

Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design  Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/
CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent

Re: VM management Shut down alone

2014-07-31 Thread clement mutz
Hi,

Sorry I didn't see your reply.

I find my error. I launched management VM in same hypervisor that i'll use as a 
compute node.

http://discussions.citrix.com/topic/350142-management-server-shut-down-alone/

Thanks you very much for your reply.

Clément.

- Mail original -
De: Anoop Mohan linux.an...@gmail.com
À: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Envoyé: Mercredi 9 Avril 2014 19:16:38
Objet: Re: VM management Shut down alone

grep -i -E 'exception|unable|fail|invalid|leak|warn|error'
/var/log/cloudstack/management/management-server.log

you will find the error in Cloud-management log


On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 3:28 PM, clement mutz c.m...@servitics.fr wrote:



 Hi everybody,



 I installed a virtual machine centos with this tutorial
 http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-installation/en/latest/qig.html

 I have centos 6.5, xenserver 6.2



 Installation finished with success.

 I have a web access http://IP:8080/client I'm ready for basic
 configuration. But 3 or 5 minute the VM shut down alone clearly.



 What's wrong with Virtual Machine. I must look where (log) ?



 Can you help me ?



 Thanks for your help.



 Clément.



 Responsable SI et RD




-- 
Thanks  Regards,
Anoop Mohan


not access System vm without security group

2014-07-31 Thread clement mutz
Hi community,

I use cloudstack 4.3 on centos with xenserver 6.2.

I created an advanced zone without security group. I have 3 nics :
- nics 1 for guest network (tagged Vlan 40) and administration network.
- nics 2 for public network
- nics 3 for storage network.
 
I have a primary storage iscsi and my secondary storage locate on NFS server.
I followed installation instruction (vhd-utils, cloud-install-sys-tmplt ...)
No problem for creating my zone but I don't access (ping,ssh ...) at my system 
vms (network verified).
I can add Instance ... But not access at my VMs and feature access console.


When I created an advanced zone WITH security group. I don't have problems with 
System'vm. I can ping. I have access with view console when I create different 
instances.


The only difference is nic public network. When I created an advanced zone WITH 
security group I can't use nic public network.. Why ?
 
Where I can look for to help ?
 
Thanks for your help !

Clément.


VM management Shut down alone

2014-04-08 Thread clement mutz


Hi everybody, 



I installed a virtual machine centos with this tutorial 
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-installation/en/latest/qig.html
 

I have centos 6.5, xenserver 6.2 



Installation finished with success. 

I have a web access http://IP:8080/client I'm ready for basic configuration. 
But 3 or 5 minute the VM shut down alone clearly. 



What's wrong with Virtual Machine. I must look where (log) ? 



Can you help me ? 



Thanks for your help. 



Clément. 



Responsable SI et RD