AW: Insufficient address capacity (despite plenty of addresses left)

2015-08-10 Thread Martin Emrich
Yes, all were taken. I changed the description field in the vlan table, 
let's see if it helps. Or do I have to change something else?

Ciao

Martin

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Somesh Naidu [mailto:somesh.na...@citrix.com] 
Gesendet: Freitag, 7. August 2015 21:18
An: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Betreff: RE: Insufficient address capacity (despite plenty of addresses left)

 Each address between 10.13.0.150 and 10.13.0.199 is listed
But are any of these available or all are taken?

 But what about 10.13.0.2 to 10.13.0.149?
Either this range was never added or it was remove. Check the table vlan.

Regards,
Somesh


-Original Message-
From: Martin Emrich [mailto:martin.emr...@empolis.com] 
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2015 8:50 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: AW: Insufficient address capacity (despite plenty of addresses left)

Thanks... I checked the table. Each address between 10.13.0.150 and 10.13.0.199 
is listed. But what about 10.13.0.2 to 10.13.0.149? I could not find an address 
range limit via the GUI, but there seems to be one (which I might even have 
configured myself some time ago)...

Ciao

Martin

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Somesh Naidu [mailto:somesh.na...@citrix.com] 
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 6. August 2015 18:25
An: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Betreff: RE: Insufficient address capacity (despite plenty of addresses left)

Martin,

Can you check the user_ip_address table and see if the IPs in that network are 
marked as being used (though incorrectly).

Regards,
Somesh


-Original Message-
From: Martin Emrich [mailto:martin.emr...@empolis.com] 
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2015 11:21 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Insufficient address capacity (despite plenty of addresses left)

Hi!

One of my shared networks seems to think it is full:


-  In the GUI, it no longer appeared as a choice for creating a new 
instance

-  Attempting to create one via cloudmonkey resulted in the error 
Insufficient address capacity.

After deleting some VMs in this network, it worked again.

Interestingly, there are currently only 47 hosts in this network, which should 
have 253 addresses in total (/24).

I could not find a global setting which could limit the number of IP addresses 
to use, and the account (ROOT admin) is unlimited.

Any ideas?

Thanks

Martin


AW: Insufficient address capacity (despite plenty of addresses left)

2015-08-07 Thread Martin Emrich
Thanks... I checked the table. Each address between 10.13.0.150 and 10.13.0.199 
is listed. But what about 10.13.0.2 to 10.13.0.149? I could not find an address 
range limit via the GUI, but there seems to be one (which I might even have 
configured myself some time ago)...

Ciao

Martin

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Somesh Naidu [mailto:somesh.na...@citrix.com] 
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 6. August 2015 18:25
An: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Betreff: RE: Insufficient address capacity (despite plenty of addresses left)

Martin,

Can you check the user_ip_address table and see if the IPs in that network are 
marked as being used (though incorrectly).

Regards,
Somesh


-Original Message-
From: Martin Emrich [mailto:martin.emr...@empolis.com] 
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2015 11:21 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Insufficient address capacity (despite plenty of addresses left)

Hi!

One of my shared networks seems to think it is full:


-  In the GUI, it no longer appeared as a choice for creating a new 
instance

-  Attempting to create one via cloudmonkey resulted in the error 
Insufficient address capacity.

After deleting some VMs in this network, it worked again.

Interestingly, there are currently only 47 hosts in this network, which should 
have 253 addresses in total (/24).

I could not find a global setting which could limit the number of IP addresses 
to use, and the account (ROOT admin) is unlimited.

Any ideas?

Thanks

Martin