Re: cpuwithoverprovisioning incorrect
global setting: configuration table cluster setting: cluster_details table -Wei On Monday, March 18, 2024, Francisco Arencibia Quesada < arencibia.franci...@gmail.com> wrote: > I need to check if this is being set in the database, do you know what > table is holding cpu.overprovisioning.factor values? > > Thanks in advance :) > > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 1:40 PM Francisco Arencibia Quesada < > arencibia.franci...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > it seems that in beta environment is not multiplying by 5 > > > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 12:26 PM Wei ZHOU wrote: > > > >> the issue is that cpunumber is wrong, not cpuwithoverprovisioning, > right ? > >> > >> -Wei > >> > >> On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 12:15 PM Francisco Arencibia Quesada > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > This prod that is ok > >> > 48*2993*5=718320 > >> > > >> > CPUNUMBER | CPUSPEED | CPUWITHOVERPROVISIONING | > >> > +---+--+-+ > >> > |48 | 2993 |718320.0 | > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > beta environment is wrong > >> > 120*2000*5=120 > >> > +---+--+-+ > >> > | CPUNUMBER | CPUSPEED | CPUWITHOVERPROVISIONING | > >> > +---+--+-+ > >> > | 120 | 2000 | 24 | > >> > > >> > > >> > regards > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 11:57 AM Wei ZHOU > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > > then it seems correct > >> > > > >> > > 24 (cpu cores) * 2000 (cpu clock speed in mhz) * 5 (over > provisioning > >> > > factor) = 24 (cpuwithoverprovisioning) > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > -Wei > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 11:52 AM Francisco Arencibia Quesada > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > yes 24 cores. > >> > > > > >> > > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 11:33 AM Wei ZHOU > >> wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > *Francisco Arencibia Quesada.* > >> > *DevOps Engineer* > >> > > > > > > -- > > *Francisco Arencibia Quesada.* > > *DevOps Engineer* > > > > > -- > *Francisco Arencibia Quesada.* > *DevOps Engineer* >
Re: cpuwithoverprovisioning incorrect
I need to check if this is being set in the database, do you know what table is holding cpu.overprovisioning.factor values? Thanks in advance :) On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 1:40 PM Francisco Arencibia Quesada < arencibia.franci...@gmail.com> wrote: > it seems that in beta environment is not multiplying by 5 > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 12:26 PM Wei ZHOU wrote: > >> the issue is that cpunumber is wrong, not cpuwithoverprovisioning, right ? >> >> -Wei >> >> On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 12:15 PM Francisco Arencibia Quesada >> wrote: >> > >> > This prod that is ok >> > 48*2993*5=718320 >> > >> > CPUNUMBER | CPUSPEED | CPUWITHOVERPROVISIONING | >> > +---+--+-+ >> > |48 | 2993 |718320.0 | >> > >> > >> > >> > beta environment is wrong >> > 120*2000*5=120 >> > +---+--+-+ >> > | CPUNUMBER | CPUSPEED | CPUWITHOVERPROVISIONING | >> > +---+--+-+ >> > | 120 | 2000 | 24 | >> > >> > >> > regards >> > >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 11:57 AM Wei ZHOU >> wrote: >> > >> > > then it seems correct >> > > >> > > 24 (cpu cores) * 2000 (cpu clock speed in mhz) * 5 (over provisioning >> > > factor) = 24 (cpuwithoverprovisioning) >> > > >> > > >> > > -Wei >> > > >> > > >> > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 11:52 AM Francisco Arencibia Quesada >> > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > yes 24 cores. >> > > > >> > > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 11:33 AM Wei ZHOU >> wrote: >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > *Francisco Arencibia Quesada.* >> > *DevOps Engineer* >> > > > -- > *Francisco Arencibia Quesada.* > *DevOps Engineer* > -- *Francisco Arencibia Quesada.* *DevOps Engineer*
Re: cpuwithoverprovisioning incorrect
it seems that in beta environment is not multiplying by 5 On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 12:26 PM Wei ZHOU wrote: > the issue is that cpunumber is wrong, not cpuwithoverprovisioning, right ? > > -Wei > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 12:15 PM Francisco Arencibia Quesada > wrote: > > > > This prod that is ok > > 48*2993*5=718320 > > > > CPUNUMBER | CPUSPEED | CPUWITHOVERPROVISIONING | > > +---+--+-+ > > |48 | 2993 |718320.0 | > > > > > > > > beta environment is wrong > > 120*2000*5=120 > > +---+--+-+ > > | CPUNUMBER | CPUSPEED | CPUWITHOVERPROVISIONING | > > +---+--+-+ > > | 120 | 2000 | 24 | > > > > > > regards > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 11:57 AM Wei ZHOU wrote: > > > > > then it seems correct > > > > > > 24 (cpu cores) * 2000 (cpu clock speed in mhz) * 5 (over provisioning > > > factor) = 24 (cpuwithoverprovisioning) > > > > > > > > > -Wei > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 11:52 AM Francisco Arencibia Quesada > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > yes 24 cores. > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 11:33 AM Wei ZHOU > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > *Francisco Arencibia Quesada.* > > *DevOps Engineer* > -- *Francisco Arencibia Quesada.* *DevOps Engineer*
Re: cpuwithoverprovisioning incorrect
the issue is that cpunumber is wrong, not cpuwithoverprovisioning, right ? -Wei On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 12:15 PM Francisco Arencibia Quesada wrote: > > This prod that is ok > 48*2993*5=718320 > > CPUNUMBER | CPUSPEED | CPUWITHOVERPROVISIONING | > +---+--+-+ > |48 | 2993 |718320.0 | > > > > beta environment is wrong > 120*2000*5=120 > +---+--+-+ > | CPUNUMBER | CPUSPEED | CPUWITHOVERPROVISIONING | > +---+--+-+ > | 120 | 2000 | 24 | > > > regards > > > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 11:57 AM Wei ZHOU wrote: > > > then it seems correct > > > > 24 (cpu cores) * 2000 (cpu clock speed in mhz) * 5 (over provisioning > > factor) = 24 (cpuwithoverprovisioning) > > > > > > -Wei > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 11:52 AM Francisco Arencibia Quesada > > wrote: > > > > > > yes 24 cores. > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 11:33 AM Wei ZHOU wrote: > > > > > > > > -- > *Francisco Arencibia Quesada.* > *DevOps Engineer*
Re: cpuwithoverprovisioning incorrect
This prod that is ok 48*2993*5=718320 CPUNUMBER | CPUSPEED | CPUWITHOVERPROVISIONING | +---+--+-+ |48 | 2993 |718320.0 | beta environment is wrong 120*2000*5=120 +---+--+-+ | CPUNUMBER | CPUSPEED | CPUWITHOVERPROVISIONING | +---+--+-+ | 120 | 2000 | 24 | regards On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 11:57 AM Wei ZHOU wrote: > then it seems correct > > 24 (cpu cores) * 2000 (cpu clock speed in mhz) * 5 (over provisioning > factor) = 24 (cpuwithoverprovisioning) > > > -Wei > > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 11:52 AM Francisco Arencibia Quesada > wrote: > > > > yes 24 cores. > > > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 11:33 AM Wei ZHOU wrote: > > > -- *Francisco Arencibia Quesada.* *DevOps Engineer*
Re: cpuwithoverprovisioning incorrect
then it seems correct 24 (cpu cores) * 2000 (cpu clock speed in mhz) * 5 (over provisioning factor) = 24 (cpuwithoverprovisioning) -Wei On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 11:52 AM Francisco Arencibia Quesada wrote: > > yes 24 cores. > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 11:33 AM Wei ZHOU wrote: >
Re: cpuwithoverprovisioning incorrect
yes 24 cores. On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 11:33 AM Wei ZHOU wrote: > It looks like cpunumber has already consider the > cpu.overprovisioning.factor > > How many cpu cores does the host have ? 24 ? > > -Wei > > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 11:23 AM Francisco Arencibia Quesada > wrote: > > > > hi wei, > > I have just checked and in both cases overprovisioning is 5. > > > > What else should I do? > > We have XCP-ng clusters running. > > > > Regards > > > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 11:16 AM Wei ZHOU wrote: > > > > > "cpu.overprovisioning.factor" is a cluster-scope setting. > > > Can you please check both the global and cluster settings ? > > > > > > -Wei > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 11:08 AM Francisco Arencibia Quesada > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Good morning guys, > > > > the value I'm having for cpuwithoverprovisioning is wrong, it > should be > > > > multiplied by 5. > > > > I don't know if this is a bug in cloudstack 4.18.1 or what. Could you > > > > please guys, run the query in your cloudstack and send me the > output? any > > > > version >=4.18.1 > > > > > > > > *cloudmonkey list hosts > > > > filter=cpunumber,cpuspeed,name,cpuwithoverprovisioning* > > > > > > > > > > > > [root@localhost ~]# cloudmonkey list hosts > > > > filter=cpunumber,cpuspeed,name,cpuwithoverprovisioning > > > > count = 15 > > > > host: > > > > +-+---+-+--+ > > > > | cpuwithoverprovisioning | cpunumber | name | cpuspeed | > > > > +-+---+-+--+ > > > > | 24 |120| srppdc5001 | 2000 | > > > > | | |s-8618-VM| | > > > > | | |s-8619-VM| | > > > > | | |v-14498-VM | | > > > > | | |v-14499-VM | | > > > > | | |v-14501-VM | | > > > > | | |s-14500-VM | | > > > > | | |s-14502-VM | | > > > > | | |s-14504-VM | | > > > > | 252000 |120| SRPBOXVPDC3006 | 2100 | > > > > | | |v-14522-VM | | > > > > | | |s-14523-VM | | > > > > | | |v-14416-VM | | > > > > | | |s-14415-VM | | > > > > | 252000 |120| srppdc5007 | 2100 | > > > > +-+---+-+--+ > > > > > > > > Thank you in advance. > > > > Kind Regards. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > *Francisco Arencibia Quesada.* > > > > *DevOps Engineer* > > > > > > > > > -- > > *Francisco Arencibia Quesada.* > > *DevOps Engineer* > -- *Francisco Arencibia Quesada.* *DevOps Engineer*
Re: cpuwithoverprovisioning incorrect
It looks like cpunumber has already consider the cpu.overprovisioning.factor How many cpu cores does the host have ? 24 ? -Wei On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 11:23 AM Francisco Arencibia Quesada wrote: > > hi wei, > I have just checked and in both cases overprovisioning is 5. > > What else should I do? > We have XCP-ng clusters running. > > Regards > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 11:16 AM Wei ZHOU wrote: > > > "cpu.overprovisioning.factor" is a cluster-scope setting. > > Can you please check both the global and cluster settings ? > > > > -Wei > > > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 11:08 AM Francisco Arencibia Quesada > > wrote: > > > > > > Good morning guys, > > > the value I'm having for cpuwithoverprovisioning is wrong, it should be > > > multiplied by 5. > > > I don't know if this is a bug in cloudstack 4.18.1 or what. Could you > > > please guys, run the query in your cloudstack and send me the output? any > > > version >=4.18.1 > > > > > > *cloudmonkey list hosts > > > filter=cpunumber,cpuspeed,name,cpuwithoverprovisioning* > > > > > > > > > [root@localhost ~]# cloudmonkey list hosts > > > filter=cpunumber,cpuspeed,name,cpuwithoverprovisioning > > > count = 15 > > > host: > > > +-+---+-+--+ > > > | cpuwithoverprovisioning | cpunumber | name | cpuspeed | > > > +-+---+-+--+ > > > | 24 |120| srppdc5001 | 2000 | > > > | | |s-8618-VM| | > > > | | |s-8619-VM| | > > > | | |v-14498-VM | | > > > | | |v-14499-VM | | > > > | | |v-14501-VM | | > > > | | |s-14500-VM | | > > > | | |s-14502-VM | | > > > | | |s-14504-VM | | > > > | 252000 |120| SRPBOXVPDC3006 | 2100 | > > > | | |v-14522-VM | | > > > | | |s-14523-VM | | > > > | | |v-14416-VM | | > > > | | |s-14415-VM | | > > > | 252000 |120| srppdc5007 | 2100 | > > > +-+---+-+--+ > > > > > > Thank you in advance. > > > Kind Regards. > > > > > > -- > > > *Francisco Arencibia Quesada.* > > > *DevOps Engineer* > > > > > -- > *Francisco Arencibia Quesada.* > *DevOps Engineer*
Re: cpuwithoverprovisioning incorrect
hi wei, I have just checked and in both cases overprovisioning is 5. What else should I do? We have XCP-ng clusters running. Regards On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 11:16 AM Wei ZHOU wrote: > "cpu.overprovisioning.factor" is a cluster-scope setting. > Can you please check both the global and cluster settings ? > > -Wei > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 11:08 AM Francisco Arencibia Quesada > wrote: > > > > Good morning guys, > > the value I'm having for cpuwithoverprovisioning is wrong, it should be > > multiplied by 5. > > I don't know if this is a bug in cloudstack 4.18.1 or what. Could you > > please guys, run the query in your cloudstack and send me the output? any > > version >=4.18.1 > > > > *cloudmonkey list hosts > > filter=cpunumber,cpuspeed,name,cpuwithoverprovisioning* > > > > > > [root@localhost ~]# cloudmonkey list hosts > > filter=cpunumber,cpuspeed,name,cpuwithoverprovisioning > > count = 15 > > host: > > +-+---+-+--+ > > | cpuwithoverprovisioning | cpunumber | name | cpuspeed | > > +-+---+-+--+ > > | 24 |120| srppdc5001 | 2000 | > > | | |s-8618-VM| | > > | | |s-8619-VM| | > > | | |v-14498-VM | | > > | | |v-14499-VM | | > > | | |v-14501-VM | | > > | | |s-14500-VM | | > > | | |s-14502-VM | | > > | | |s-14504-VM | | > > | 252000 |120| SRPBOXVPDC3006 | 2100 | > > | | |v-14522-VM | | > > | | |s-14523-VM | | > > | | |v-14416-VM | | > > | | |s-14415-VM | | > > | 252000 |120| srppdc5007 | 2100 | > > +-+---+-+--+ > > > > Thank you in advance. > > Kind Regards. > > > > -- > > *Francisco Arencibia Quesada.* > > *DevOps Engineer* > -- *Francisco Arencibia Quesada.* *DevOps Engineer*
Re: cpuwithoverprovisioning incorrect
"cpu.overprovisioning.factor" is a cluster-scope setting. Can you please check both the global and cluster settings ? -Wei On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 11:08 AM Francisco Arencibia Quesada wrote: > > Good morning guys, > the value I'm having for cpuwithoverprovisioning is wrong, it should be > multiplied by 5. > I don't know if this is a bug in cloudstack 4.18.1 or what. Could you > please guys, run the query in your cloudstack and send me the output? any > version >=4.18.1 > > *cloudmonkey list hosts > filter=cpunumber,cpuspeed,name,cpuwithoverprovisioning* > > > [root@localhost ~]# cloudmonkey list hosts > filter=cpunumber,cpuspeed,name,cpuwithoverprovisioning > count = 15 > host: > +-+---+-+--+ > | cpuwithoverprovisioning | cpunumber | name | cpuspeed | > +-+---+-+--+ > | 24 |120| srppdc5001 | 2000 | > | | |s-8618-VM| | > | | |s-8619-VM| | > | | |v-14498-VM | | > | | |v-14499-VM | | > | | |v-14501-VM | | > | | |s-14500-VM | | > | | |s-14502-VM | | > | | |s-14504-VM | | > | 252000 |120| SRPBOXVPDC3006 | 2100 | > | | |v-14522-VM | | > | | |s-14523-VM | | > | | |v-14416-VM | | > | | |s-14415-VM | | > | 252000 |120| srppdc5007 | 2100 | > +-+---+-+--+ > > Thank you in advance. > Kind Regards. > > -- > *Francisco Arencibia Quesada.* > *DevOps Engineer*
