Re: [ClusterLabs] cluster with redundant links - PCSD offline

2023-02-28 Thread Klaus Wenninger
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 6:25 PM Ken Gaillot  wrote:

> On Sun, 2023-02-26 at 18:15 +0100, lejeczek via Users wrote:
> > Hi guys.
> >
> > I have a simple 2-node cluster with redundant links and I wonder why
> > status reports like this:
> > ...
> > Node List:
> >   * Node swir (1): online, feature set 3.16.2
> >   * Node whale (2): online, feature set 3.16.2
> > ...
> > PCSD Status:
> >   swir: Online
> >   whale: Offline
> > ...
> >
> > Cluster's config:
> > ...
> > Nodes:
> >   swir:
> > Link 0 address: 10.1.1.100
> > Link 1 address: 10.3.1.100
> > nodeid: 1
> >   whale:
> > Link 0 address: 10.1.1.101
> > Link 1 address: 10.3.1.101
> > nodeid: 2
> > ...
> >
> > Is that all normal for a cluster when 'Link 0' is down?
> > I thought redundant link(s) would be for that exact reason - so
> > cluster would remain fully operational.
> >
> > many thanks, L.
>
> If you're referring to the "Offline" under "PCSD Status", yes, that's
> normal. That only affects the pcsd daemon used to coordinate pcs
> commands across all nodes, not the cluster itself. As far as I know,
> pcsd has no way to use multiple links.
>
Well ... chicken and eggs 

Idea of pcsd is to be a basis for setting up all the layers of the
cluster stack - so relying on the knet-layer would be an issue.

That said it would of course be interesting - once knet-layer or
whatever is setup - to be able to use redundancy for pcs.
Excuse my ignorance if there is something available already.
One thing that might be relatively easy to setup might be a
virtual ethernet-connection via knet. Haven't played with that
myself so others might be a better help to configure that - if
pcs doesn't already have support for such a setup.

Klaus

>
> The "online" under "Nodes" is what's relevant to the operation of the
> cluster itself.
> --
> Ken Gaillot 
>
> ___
> Manage your subscription:
> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
>
>
___
Manage your subscription:
https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users

ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/


Re: [ClusterLabs] cluster with redundant links - PCSD offline

2023-02-27 Thread Ken Gaillot
On Sun, 2023-02-26 at 18:15 +0100, lejeczek via Users wrote:
> Hi guys.
> 
> I have a simple 2-node cluster with redundant links and I wonder why
> status reports like this:
> ...
> Node List:
>   * Node swir (1): online, feature set 3.16.2
>   * Node whale (2): online, feature set 3.16.2
> ...
> PCSD Status:
>   swir: Online
>   whale: Offline
> ...
> 
> Cluster's config:
> ...
> Nodes:
>   swir:
> Link 0 address: 10.1.1.100
> Link 1 address: 10.3.1.100
> nodeid: 1
>   whale:
> Link 0 address: 10.1.1.101
> Link 1 address: 10.3.1.101
> nodeid: 2
> ...
> 
> Is that all normal for a cluster when 'Link 0' is down?
> I thought redundant link(s) would be for that exact reason - so
> cluster would remain fully operational.
> 
> many thanks, L.

If you're referring to the "Offline" under "PCSD Status", yes, that's
normal. That only affects the pcsd daemon used to coordinate pcs
commands across all nodes, not the cluster itself. As far as I know,
pcsd has no way to use multiple links.

The "online" under "Nodes" is what's relevant to the operation of the
cluster itself.
-- 
Ken Gaillot 

___
Manage your subscription:
https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users

ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/


[ClusterLabs] cluster with redundant links - PCSD offline

2023-02-26 Thread lejeczek via Users

Hi guys.

I have a simple 2-node cluster with redundant links and I 
wonder why status reports like this:

...
Node List:
  * Node swir (1): online, feature set 3.16.2
  * Node whale (2): online, feature set 3.16.2
...
PCSD Status:
  swir: Online
  whale: Offline
...

Cluster's config:
...
Nodes:
  swir:
    Link 0 address: 10.1.1.100
    Link 1 address: 10.3.1.100
    nodeid: 1
  whale:
    Link 0 address: 10.1.1.101
    Link 1 address: 10.3.1.101
    nodeid: 2
...

Is that all normal for a cluster when 'Link 0' is down?
I thought redundant link(s) would be for that exact reason - 
so cluster would remain fully operational.


many thanks, L.___
Manage your subscription:
https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users

ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/