Re: cache_resolve diagnostic / NFS

2005-12-12 Thread Matthew Dillon

:Hi.
:
:I've got an NFS share mounted from a FreeBSD server that I'm using for
:/usr/obj on a DragonFly machine.
:
:When I delete the /usr/obj/usr on the NFS server (which is actually
:/mnt/dfly/usr) the client machine (DragonFly) prints out a message:
:
:[diagnostic] cache_resolve: had to recurse on usr
:EXDEV case 3 usr error 2
:
:Nothing bad happens, I'm just a little curious about what's getting
:diagnosed. =20
:
:--=20
:Jay.

The first is a warning about the namecache topology losing a vnode
reference in the middle of the topology instead of at a leaf.  It's
harmless and I think it can happen with NFS.

The second one is reporting a race between a file name lookup and a
file or directory removal.  It should also be harmless.

-Matt


Re: DP performance

2005-12-12 Thread Jonathon McKitrick
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 11:07:08AM +0100, Raphael Marmier wrote:
: Danial Thom wrote:
: >
: >What do you think "my word" is? My only point was
: >that I use the usage level at which a machine
: >starts dropping packets to determine its point of
: >capacity. I don't see how I can be wrong about
: >anything, since its hard to argue against that

What OS do you choose to run that comes closest to meeting your standards?

Jonathon McKitrick
--
My other computer is your Windows box.


cache_resolve diagnostic / NFS

2005-12-12 Thread Jay
Hi.

I've got an NFS share mounted from a FreeBSD server that I'm using for
/usr/obj on a DragonFly machine.

When I delete the /usr/obj/usr on the NFS server (which is actually
/mnt/dfly/usr) the client machine (DragonFly) prints out a message:

[diagnostic] cache_resolve: had to recurse on usr
EXDEV case 3 usr error 2

Nothing bad happens, I'm just a little curious about what's getting
diagnosed.  

-- 
Jay.


pgpdbKwFyeKfU.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: DP performance

2005-12-12 Thread Raphael Marmier

Danial Thom wrote:


What do you think "my word" is? My only point was
that I use the usage level at which a machine
starts dropping packets to determine its point of
capacity. I don't see how I can be wrong about
anything, since its hard to argue against that
point. And what do you think Matt's point was? I
don't even think its relevant.

..

Whoever you are, you are maybe knowledgeable. I am personaly not able to 
judge. But your problem is psychological, not technical. I don't know 
what you are looking for by harrassing people on technical forums such 
as this one. But whatever you are looking, nobody can ever give it to you.


At this point, there is enough element here and then for you to realise 
the problem lies within you. Get the appropriate help (maybe even a 
psychatrist for a starter, tough to find a good one though).


best of luck

Raphaƫl