Re: open of /dev/speaker for writing: Device not configured

2006-12-07 Thread Sascha Wildner

Vladimir Mitiouchev wrote:

Hi!
I'm trying to run beep.
beep: open of /dev/speaker for writing: Device not configured
I haven't found any modules that looks like speaker driver..


Hm,

seems Joerg removed it in March 2005..

Sascha

--
http://yoyodyne.ath.cx


Re: open of /dev/speaker for writing: Device not configured

2006-12-07 Thread Sascha Wildner

Sascha Wildner wrote:

Vladimir Mitiouchev wrote:

Hi!
I'm trying to run beep.
beep: open of /dev/speaker for writing: Device not configured
I haven't found any modules that looks like speaker driver..


Hm,

seems Joerg removed it in March 2005..


http://www.dragonflybsd.org/cvsweb/src/sys/dev/sound/isa/i386/spkr/Attic/spkr.c

Sascha

--
http://yoyodyne.ath.cx


Re: make buildworld crash, unwind.h

2006-12-07 Thread Simon 'corecode' Schubert

Vladimir Mitiouchev wrote:

Hi!
losalamos:/usr/sources/src$ uname -a
DragonFly losalamos 1.7.0-DEVELOPMENT DragonFly 1.7.0-DEVELOPMENT #0:
Mon Nov 27 18:50:14 CET 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/sources/src/sys/LOSALAMOS  i386

rm -rf /usr/sources/src.
rm -rf /usr/obj
cvsup, cvs...


did you run cvs co -P ?

cheers
 simon

--
Serve - BSD +++  RENT this banner advert  +++ASCII Ribbon   /\
Work - Mac  +++  space for low €€€ NOW!1  +++  Campaign \ /
Party Enjoy Relax   |   http://dragonflybsd.org  Against  HTML   \
Dude 2c 2 the max   !   http://golden-apple.biz   Mail + News   / \



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: make buildworld crash, unwind.h

2006-12-07 Thread Peter Avalos
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 10:37:52AM -0500, Justin C. Sherrill wrote:
 On Thu, December 7, 2006 5:30 am, Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
 
  no, you need
 
  cvs -d /usr/sources/dragonfly_cvs checkout -rDragonFly_Preview -P src
 
  -P == prune empty directories
 
 When is cvsup appropriate vs. cvs?  Using cvsup is what we have documented.
 

It appears that he is using cvsup to get the repo, and usung cvs to update
his src/ tree.

--Peter


pgp84AHQLVLr6.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: make buildworld crash, unwind.h

2006-12-07 Thread Justin C. Sherrill
On Thu, December 7, 2006 3:39 pm, Peter Avalos wrote:

 When is cvsup appropriate vs. cvs?  Using cvsup is what we have
 documented.


 It appears that he is using cvsup to get the repo, and usung cvs to update
 his src/ tree.

Should we be describing that in documentation?  I see both techniques in
use, but I haven't seen a reason one should be described over the other. 
(I always just used cvsup.)




Re: make buildworld crash, unwind.h

2006-12-07 Thread walt
Justin C. Sherrill wrote:
 On Thu, December 7, 2006 3:39 pm, Peter Avalos wrote:
 
 When is cvsup appropriate vs. cvs?  Using cvsup is what we have
 documented.

 It appears that he is using cvsup to get the repo, and usung cvs to update
 his src/ tree.
 
 Should we be describing that in documentation?  I see both techniques in
 use, but I haven't seen a reason one should be described over the other. 
 (I always just used cvsup.)

I love cvsup, but lately we DragonFly fans are completely dependent on a
binary cvsup package because ezm3 won't compile.

The obvious solution is to use csup, which is a cvsup-workalike written
in C.  It works flawlessly on FreeBSD and NetBSD but not (yet) on DFBSD
because of the newer version of cvs that we use.

I've emailed the csup guru (Maxime Henrion) about updating csup, but
I've had no answer from him.  I hope Maxime is in good health and is
just too busy to deal with csup, but I really don't know.

Anyone who is interested in updating csup can get the sources here:
http://www.mu.org/~mux/csup.html#download


Re: make buildworld crash, unwind.h

2006-12-07 Thread Vlad Galu

On 12/7/06, walt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Justin C. Sherrill wrote:
 On Thu, December 7, 2006 3:39 pm, Peter Avalos wrote:

 When is cvsup appropriate vs. cvs?  Using cvsup is what we have
 documented.

 It appears that he is using cvsup to get the repo, and usung cvs to update
 his src/ tree.

 Should we be describing that in documentation?  I see both techniques in
 use, but I haven't seen a reason one should be described over the other.
 (I always just used cvsup.)

I love cvsup, but lately we DragonFly fans are completely dependent on a
binary cvsup package because ezm3 won't compile.

The obvious solution is to use csup, which is a cvsup-workalike written
in C.  It works flawlessly on FreeBSD and NetBSD but not (yet) on DFBSD
because of the newer version of cvs that we use.

I've emailed the csup guru (Maxime Henrion) about updating csup, but
I've had no answer from him.  I hope Maxime is in good health and is
just too busy to deal with csup, but I really don't know.

Anyone who is interested in updating csup can get the sources here:
http://www.mu.org/~mux/csup.html#download


  FWIW, http://mu.org/~mux/csup-snap-20060318.tgz does the trick for
me. My supfile is below:

-- cut here --
*default host=cvsup.dragonflybsd.org
*default base=/usr
*default prefix=/usr
*default release=cvs tag=.
*default delete use-rel-suffix
*default compress

dragonfly-cvs-src
-- and here --


--
If it's there, and you can see it, it's real.
If it's not there, and you can see it, it's virtual.
If it's there, and you can't see it, it's transparent.
If it's not there, and you can't see it, you erased it.


Process for patch/build/install/modify/rebuild/reinstall

2006-12-07 Thread fake

Greetings,

I'm trying to make some code changes in the i810 X server version  
6.9.0nb13 because of breakage.  I'm trying to find the best/fastest way to:

1. modify code
2. build and install
3. test
4. uninstall
5. goto 1.

This is the slow process I've been using:
Modified mk.conf so only i810 X server is built
# cd /usr/pkgsrc/x11/xorg-server
Used pkgsrc to get sources
# bmake fetch-list | sh

1. modify code
# bmake patch
I'm assuming this applies DragonFly patches to the Xorg sources.  Correct  
me if I'm wrong.

Make changes in /usr/pkgsrc/x11/xorg-server/work

2. build and install
# bmake install

3. test

4. uninstall
# bmake deinstall
# bmake clean

5. goto 1.

At first I thought I could modify code in the work directory and run bmake  
from /usr/pkgsrc/x11/xorg-server, but that didn't work.  Please enlighten  
me with a better way.


Thanks in advance!

P.S.
I use vi and am learning cscope without X.  What non-X tools do other  
people use for source code browsing?


Re: Process for patch/build/install/modify/rebuild/reinstall

2006-12-07 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
On Thu, 7 Dec 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I'm trying to make some code changes in the i810 X server version 6.9.0nb13
 because of breakage.  I'm trying to find the best/fastest way to:

I'd suggest you work against Xorg's official release. The monolithic 6.9 
series is not maintained upstream.

I think the code you need is Xorg's driver/xf86-video-intel (by the way 
Intel is really supporting this as open source :)

There is some work on modualr Xorg in pkgsrc. I use it myself (and have 
for a  very long time). I have committed a few things for DragonFly to 
Xorg source.

I can help you with creating a xf86-video-intel package.

I think it would be better to test against supported code versus trying to 
patch old obsolete and unmaintained code.

Hope you get this fake@