Re: /usr/Makefile update

[Thomas Nikolajsen]

David Rhodus sdrho...@x wrote:
Should /usr/Makefile be updated with make upgrade ?
I noticed my system still talks about using cvsup and not git.

etc/Makefile.usr is updated to git usage in repo,
but file is only installed by distribution, not by upgrade or installworld 
target.

It would be nice to have this file updated by normal build(7).

 -thomas

Re: /usr/Makefile update

[Sascha Wildner]

David Rhodus schrieb:

Should /usr/Makefile be updated with make upgrade ?
I noticed my system still talks about using cvsup and not git.


I've added it, thanks.

Sascha

--
http://yoyodyne.ath.cx

Re: fdisk implementation [read this before deciding what to do]

[Matthew Dillon]

:I could put up a binary if anybody wants to play with it.  If you guys
:are interested in taking it over, making it an official part of
:Dragonfly, and updating it for the new disk labels, etc, we were
:considering going ahead and releasing the source.  If not, we will
:probably hold off and release it later on as part of some other projects
:after we get a chance to finish it ourselves.  But that might be
:a while.

Well, it sounds quite interesting to me though if it does not yet
support disklabel64's maybe I could get you guys to add that before
submitting it.   The boot1/boot2 images have recently changed in
order to support generating different sets for 32 bit disklabels and
64 bit disklabels.

It would have to be open-sourced with a BSD style license if you want
to submit it.  We might cringe a bit if it needs a manual page
written plus a lot of code cleanup.

-Matt
Matthew Dillon 
dil...@backplane.com