Erasure codes
Is HAMMER ever going to have a network based RAID5? Basically implement Erasure Codes?
Re: Compiling with gcc -march ix86
On Fri, December 24, 2010 5:34 pm, Stephane Russell wrote: Hi, I'm actually trying to compile asterisk on DFBSD. It needs to compile with the compiler option -march=ix86, with x3 (gcc spec). But DFBSD uname -m is returning systematically i386. Is their a workaround for that, that would allow me to compile without hacking the autotools scripts? You could set the environment variable UNAME_M to whatever you think would work; I don't know if that would get picked up during the build process, but it's worth a try. I'm interested in seeing asterisk work.
Re: Random x86-64 seg-fault finally fixed
Matthew Dillon wrote: Partitioning is already desireable for the current 48-core monster and I'd like to have some sort of DragonFly host guest solution that runs at full performance on the bare HW without virtualization. How would this be different than jail(8)? not understanding the 'without virtualization' part - I know some form of HW virt a-la kvm has been discussed a few times - do you mean like segmenting the 'machine' or somesuch?
