Re: DragonFlyBSD 2.0 RELEASE SCHEDULE - Release will be on 20 July 2008
I have tested the patch on DragonFly, but this patch to 9.3.4 has had little testing. Please test HEAD's named. See the commit message for details. I see that http://www.dragonflybsd.org/community/release2_0.shtml says wrong version for BIND. I specifically didn't update to 9.3.5 as requested. I did apply patch from 9.3.5-P1 to existing 9.3.4-P1 and named it as 9.3.4-P2 (my invented name).
Re: DragonFlyBSD 2.0 RELEASE SCHEDULE - Release will be on 20 July 2008
I see that http://www.dragonflybsd.org/community/release2_0.shtml says wrong version for BIND. I specifically didn't update to 9.3.5 as requested. I did apply patch from 9.3.5-P1 to existing 9.3.4-P1 and named it as 9.3.4-P2 (my invented name). I see it listed wrong on webpage twice.
Re: DragonFlyBSD 2.0 RELEASE SCHEDULE - Release will be on 20 July 2008
: : I see that http://www.dragonflybsd.org/community/release2_0.shtml says : wrong version for BIND. I specifically didn't update to 9.3.5 as : requested. I did apply patch from 9.3.5-P1 to existing 9.3.4-P1 and named : it as 9.3.4-P2 (my invented name). : :I see it listed wrong on webpage twice. Try that. -Matt Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DragonFlyBSD 2.0 RELEASE SCHEDULE - Release will be on 20 July 2008
2008/7/11 Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Now is the time for people to list their must-haves and would-likes for the release! Please use this thread. I'll start it off: Fix du and large directories: du -shc .data .data .data 458G.data 458G.data 458G.data -673.8G total I had a patch for this at one stage a long time ago, but I don't know what happened to it. I won't have time to do this before Sunday though (or anytime soon).
Re: DragonFlyBSD 2.0 RELEASE SCHEDULE - Release will be on 20 July 2008
:Fix du and large directories: : :du -shc .data .data .data :458G .data :458G .data :458G .data :-673.8Gtotal : :I had a patch for this at one stage a long time ago, but I don't know :what happened to it. I won't have time to do this before Sunday though :(or anytime soon). Done! I've committed a fix to HEAD. -Matt Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DragonFlyBSD 2.0 RELEASE SCHEDULE - Release will be on 20 July 2008
Matthew Dillon wrote: The release is scheduled for Sunday 20-July-2008! We have about a week left! I will be branching the code base this Sunday (13-July-2008). HAMMER development through next week will continue to occur on HEAD and then be synced to 2.0 for the release. -- We have a security issue with BIND that needs to be resolved, could someone take on that task? I would prefer that just the patch be committed to the current code base if possible, I do not want to bring in a whole new BIND this late in the game. Now is the time for people to list their must-haves and would-likes for the release! Please use this thread. I'll start it off: * BIND security fix * PkgSrc binary packages build for the release Any takers for each of the above items? -Matt Hmm, I'd like nataraid to be updated (there is a code bounty for it ... but this might be a too big of a change for this release?) ... Don't know about anyone else, but since HAMMER should work for non-root FS', I don't see anything other that I'd really need in this release. (well you did say Now is the time for people to list their must-haves and would-likes for the release!) -- Regards, Rumko
Re: DragonFlyBSD 2.0 RELEASE SCHEDULE - Release will be on 20 July 2008
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008, Matthew Dillon wrote: We have a security issue with BIND that needs to be resolved, could someone take on that task? I would prefer that just the patch be committed to the current code base if possible, I do not want to bring in a whole new BIND this late in the game. The patch for the issues from 9.3.5 to 9.3.5-P1 (minus win32 and doc) applies fine to your HEAD contrib/bind-9.3 (which is 9.3.4-P1) other than a few RCS ident conflicts. The original patch is on pkgbox at /home/reed/9.3.5-P1.patch and the updated src is at /home/reed/dragonfly/src/contrib/bind-9.3/ I am doing a test build now on HEAD. Should I be testing with a specific tag? I have tested the security fixes on DragonFly a few times (watching random source ports) but not built from DragonFly source yet.
Re: DragonFlyBSD 2.0 RELEASE SCHEDULE - Release will be on 20 July 2008
:The patch for the issues from 9.3.5 to 9.3.5-P1 (minus win32 and doc) :applies fine to your HEAD contrib/bind-9.3 (which is 9.3.4-P1) other than :a few RCS ident conflicts. : :The original patch is on pkgbox at /home/reed/9.3.5-P1.patch and the :updated src is at /home/reed/dragonfly/src/contrib/bind-9.3/ : :I am doing a test build now on HEAD. Should I be testing with a specific :tag? : :I have tested the security fixes on DragonFly a few times (watching random :source ports) but not built from DragonFly source yet. HEAD is fine. We don't branch until Sunday. I'll leave it in your court then, please commit the fix when you feel it is ready! -Matt Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DragonFlyBSD 2.0 RELEASE SCHEDULE - Release will be on 20 July 2008
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008, Matthew Dillon wrote: HEAD is fine. We don't branch until Sunday. I'll leave it in your court then, please commit the fix when you feel it is ready! Okay, it is committed. I have tested the patch on DragonFly, but this patch to 9.3.4 has had little testing. Please test HEAD's named. See the commit message for details.
