[Users] Einstein Toolkit Meeting Reminder

2022-06-01 Thread reminders
Hello,

Please consider joining the weekly Einstein Toolkit phone call at
9:00 am US central time on Thursdays. For details on how to connect
and what agenda items are to be discussed, use the link below.

https://docs.einsteintoolkit.org/et-docs/Main_Page#Weekly_Users_Call

--The Maintainers
___
Users mailing list
Users@einsteintoolkit.org
http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [Users] question about ML_CCZ4 parameters

2022-06-01 Thread Erik Schnetter
Bruno

Although I was probably around when the CCZ4 formulation was
implemented, I don't recall.

I usually resolve to archaeology, comparing the equations in the
respective Mathematica scripts to equations found in publications. If
no one else speaks up, I can assist with this – we'd set up a Zoom
meeting, and I can show how to read (or modify!) the Mathematica
script that implements these equations.

-erik

On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 6:21 AM Bruno Giacomazzo
 wrote:
>
> Together with a student of mine we are trying to use the CCZ4 formulation 
> implemented in McLachlan.  We saw that most parameters are the same as in 
> BSSN, but there are damping factors that need to be selected.
>
> In Alic et al 2013 (https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.88.064049) they 
> mention 3 damping factors (k1, k2, and k3), but in the param.ccl of 
> McLachlan/ML_CCZ4 only k1 and k2 are mentioned (assuming they are the same).
>
> Is it because k3 is hardcoded to the value suggested in Alic et al 2013? Or 
> does McLachlan/ML_CCZ4 use a different set of evolution equations (in which 
> case, is there a reference)?
>
> We were able to find some example parameter files (for example the ones from 
> the Parma group https://einstein.pr.infn.it/gravity/Research/BNS2015.html) 
> and we found that they used indeed k1 and k2 from Alic et al 2013:
> ML_CCZ4::dampk1 = 0.05
> ML_CCZ4::dampk2 = 0
>
> We also saw that they added  ML_CCZ4::ML_Theta to the Dissipation vars and set
> ML_CCZ4::apply_dissipation   = "never".
> The other parameters look the same as when using BSSN.
>
> Since I never used ML_CCZ4 I want to be sure that I'm setting the parameters 
> correctly and the damping factors seem to be the most delicate point.
>
> Thanks,
> Bruno
>
> --
>
> Prof. Bruno Giacomazzo
> Department of Physics
> University of Milano-Bicocca
> Piazza della Scienza 3
> 20126 Milano
> Italy
>
> email: bruno.giacoma...@unimib.it
> phone: (+39) 02 6448 2321
> web: http://www.brunogiacomazzo.org
>
> --
> There are only 10 types of people in the world:
> Those who understand binary, and those who don't
> --
>
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@einsteintoolkit.org
> http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users



-- 
Erik Schnetter 
http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/personal/eschnetter/
___
Users mailing list
Users@einsteintoolkit.org
http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users