[libreoffice-users] Change colours for authors in recording changes

2013-03-31 Thread jowyta
Hello

How can the colour used to indicate changes by a particular author (i.e.
when By Author is being used for the colour)?

John

-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] Does Libre Office have its own distinct set of fonts?

2013-02-21 Thread jowyta

Hi Paddy

Webdings is a M$ font, see:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Webdings
and is not Unicode.

If you use Unicode characters, e.g. U+2708 for an aeroplane (✈) it 
should render consistently, substituting a character from a font that 
has it if the current font does not (if you have a suitable font installed).



On 21/02/13 17:01, Paddy Landau wrote:

I am wondering if Libre Office has a separate set of fonts from the operating
system, or at least some of the fonts.

I'll explain my problem.

If I have a look at Character Map to find a character that I want (let's say
it is an aeroplane), I can find it in the Webdings font (Unicode 00d2, or
Ò). See screenshot 1:

http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/file/n4039236/Character_Map.png

But when I use that character in Libre Office and set the font to Webdings,
it shows a different character, specifically an in-box. See screenshot 2:

http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/file/n4039236/Libre_Office_characters.png

Note that not all characters do this. For example, the first 52 characters
(A-Z and a-z) are correct.

I would like to know how to solve this discrepancy, so that I can search for
characters in Character Map (or an equivalent program) and then use them in
Libre Office. (I have tried an alternative program, Specimen Font Viewer,
and it shows the same thing as Character Map.)

I am using Linux Ubuntu 12.04 (64-bit, fully updated) with Libre Office
4.0.0.3 (installed directly from the Libre Office website).

Thank you.



--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Does-Libre-Office-have-its-own-distinct-set-of-fonts-tp4039236.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] Hidden field in bibliography

2013-02-21 Thread jowyta

Mirosław

On 21/02/13 18:01, you wrote:


Forget about built-in bibliography feature. It is useless. Even MS
Word bibliography feature, far more sophisticated than Writer's one,
 is considered unusable by academic writers that I know.


First of all, it is not useless, I am using it.

Secondly, if LibreOffice has a facility it should work and well.

I am trying to understand better the behaviour of the bibliography
feature so that I can use it more efficiently, submit some sensible bug
reports to try to help the developers to improve it or both.

So if anyone has information about the internals of this facility, could
they please explain the behaviour:


In the bibliography index/table it is necessary to have a “Type”
allocated to each entry in order that the correct format can be
applied for the entry in the bibliography. For example a book
entry would have different items in it from a Book excerpt or a
Journal entry. There is a “Type” field in the bibliography database
but entering anything in this field, either in the external
database or via Tools  Bibliography Database has no effect on the
entry format. Also, in the form opened by Tools  Bibliography
Database there is no entry box after “Type”.



It seems that the only way to enter a Type is to go to a reference
to the item in the document text, right click on it, click on
Bibliography Entry, an Edit Bibliography Entry dialogue comes up,
click on Edit and a Define Bibliography Entry dialogue come up in
which the Type can be selected from a drop down list. Click OK and
click modify. If you have changed anything it asks if you want to
alter the existing record.



Can anyone explain this behaviour? In particular, where is this
latter Type data stored? Why can’t the Type data in the database be
used for this purpose?


John

--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Base slowness and Java update

2011-10-16 Thread jowyta

On 14/10/11 13:24, Andreas Säger wrote:


This has nothing to do with HSQLDB which is a very fast and reliable
product.
The problem occurs when Linux+Java+Base meet together, embedded or
external HSQLDB, H2 SQL or anySQL over JDBC.
It is not problem with Windows+Java+Base.


Thanks, Andreas, this is helpful and moves us in the right direction.

This bug, https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35023 has been 
marked as not our problem since base runs OK with earlier versions of 
OpenJDK.  However, I do not think that we know this.  The problem could 
be as a result of an intended change in Java such as the tightening up 
of a variable definition or the closing of a vulnerability.  If it is a 
Java bug then we need to be in a position to say that our application 
does not run properly because OpenJDK does not work in the way that the 
Java specifications say it should in the following way...


So, how to we drill down deeper to isolate this problem?

I suggest that if anyone has any sound, practical suggestions as to how 
to further diagnose this problem that they post them on this thread: 
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2011-October/019274.html 
on the development mailing list.


John

--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


[libreoffice-users] Base slowness and Java update

2011-10-13 Thread jowyta

Hello

This topic has rather hijacked my question about base and external data 
tables so I am starting a separate thread.


I am well aware of the problem, as summarised here:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Base

The current workaround involves using an older version of openjdk-jre. 
(Not straightforward, as far as I can tell, if using Debian testing - 
yes, I know I could get Java from elsewhere)


However, base needs to work with up to date Java, in other words some 
bug fixing needs doing.  For this reason I have asked a question on 
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice .


It seems to me that for the OpenJDK people to be able to sort out this 
problem they need to know what it is about Java that is affecting base 
so badly.  And we are not dependent on Oracle as far as I can see, 
OpenJDK is an open source project and anyone can join in.


So if anyone thinks they know which change in openjdk has caused this 
problem or how to find out I would like them to head over to the 
development mailing list and contribute there.  (And thanks, Alex, for 
your suggestion that it may have something to do with accessibility and 
reminding us that many of the developers are currently at the 
LibreOffice annual conference.)


John

--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


[libreoffice-users] Base - using external databases

2011-10-12 Thread jowyta

Hi

A long unresolved problem with OpenOffice.org base was its inability to 
link to more than one external database at a time.  See:

http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42464

It is for this reason (needing to link to more than one table) that I 
have had to use base's internal HQLDB database.


Does anyone know if this issue still applies in LibreOffice base?

John

--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] Base - using external databases

2011-10-12 Thread jowyta

Regina Henschel wrote

jowyta schrieb:


A long unresolved problem with OpenOffice.org base was its
inability to link to more than one external database at a time.
See: http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42464



It is for this reason (needing to link to more than one table) that
I have had to use base's internal HQLDB database.



I don't understand your reasoning. The issue is about connecting to
two different databases with the same odb-document. For example
connecting to MySQL and PostgreSQL at the same time. That has
nothing to do with more than one table. You can have as much tables
in a database as you need.



What is your problem and in which way does the internal HSQLDB helps
you?


My problem was that if I had tables in different files, even if they 
used the same database structure, then base could not link to more than 
one of them.  This seems to be a facility that various people need.


It might be a solution for me if I could have several tables in the same 
file provided that I could manipulate them from base rather than having 
to use a separate database programme.  If this is possible, are there 
some instructions somewhere as to how to extract the data to a separate 
file?


Kind regards

John

--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted