Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Visible currency rounding

2013-07-20 Thread Brian Barker

At 22:30 19/07/2013 -0400, Mark LaPierre wrote:

On 07/19/2013 07:26 PM, Todor Takov wrote:
I needed to implement the so called Bankers' Rounding Function, 
which would round with respect to the 4/5 rule.

[...]


Just one point I would like to make.  If you are working with money 
be sure that the total of the rounded amounts adds up to match the 
original amount.


Example:

$5.39 divided among several accounts.

10.5% to Acct A = 0.56595  = $0.57
13.5% to Acct B = 0.72765  = $0.73
17%   to Acct C = 0.9163   = $0.92
59%   to Acct D = 3.1801   = $3.18
  =
  Total = $5.40

Any summing error needs to be accounted for if you ever want your 
accounts to balance.


I'm not sure you appreciated the significance of the questioner's 
Bankers' Rounding Function.  You've given an excellent example of 
how this works.  Using banker's rounding instead of primary school 
mathematics teachers's rounding on your figures, your first 
dividend, 0.56595, would round to 0.56, not 0.57 (with no change to 
the other figures), and the total of the rounded values would be the 
required $5.39.


Brian Barker


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Visible currency rounding

2013-07-20 Thread Brian Barker

At 08:54 20/07/2013 -0700, Todor Takov wrote:
I have given my reasons in an explanation to a post by Luuk in this 
present discussion.
But I think this is not an overkill, because if we have a 
significantly long number and we just look at the 3 digits to the 
right of the comma separator and just drop the rest of the digits to 
the right of them - we shall be risking to get an incorrect 
result.  The correct way to round the number will be to start at the 
rightmost available digit and drop one digit at a time, until we 
reach the desired digit position. At least this is correct in my opinion.


Paradoxically, this is certainly not the way that rounding - even 
banker's rounding - is normally achieved.


You would round 1.23456 to 1.2346 and then to 1.235 and 1.24 (using 
either scheme).
Single rounding (again using either scheme) gives 1.23.  This makes 
sense, since the original number is clearly closer to 1.23 than to 1.24.


It is a general principle that you should always round numbers once; 
if you do so repeatedly, you will indeed get different 
results.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rounding#Double_rounding says:
In _Martinez v. Allstate_ and _Sendejo v. Farmers_, litigated 
between 1995 and 1997, the insurance companies argued that double 
rounding premiums was permissible and in fact required. The US 
courts ruled against the insurance companies and ordered them to 
adopt rules to ensure single rounding.


Some computer languages and the IEEE 754-2008 standard dictate that 
in straightforward calculations the result should not be rounded 
twice. This has been a particular problem with Java as it is 
designed to be run identically on different machines, special 
programming tricks have had to be used to achieve this with x87 
floating point.[...]


Brian Barker


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Visible currency rounding

2013-07-19 Thread Brian Barker

At 16:26 19/07/2013 -0700, Todor Takov wrote:
I needed to implement the so called Bankers' Rounding Function, 
which would round with respect to the 4/5 rule. And finally I ended 
doing it myself in a short Function in LO Basic. I tried my best, 
although math and programming are not my strong sides. So here it 
is, together with a Subroutine called rounded_test and the very 
Function is called Rounded.


[Over 120 lines of code snipped]

You can call it for each line (item) in an invoice. It will take the 
number you throw at it and will return it rounded to the second 
digit after the comma or point separator. Then when you sum the 
invoice up - the numbers will always be consistent and correctly rounded.


Isn't this somewhat overkill?  If you need just to round to the 
second fractional place - dollars and cents, pounds and pence, 
whatever - the only exception is the case where the third fractional 
place is 5 and the second fractional place is even.  In that case you 
need ROUNDDOWN(); in all other cases, ROUND() will do the job:


=IF(AND(INT(MOD(ABS(Xn)*1000;10))=5;ISEVEN(Xn*100));ROUNDDOWN(Xn;2);ROUND(Xn;2))

(And yes: this works for negative values, too.)

Brian Barker


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Visible currency rounding

2013-07-19 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :)
It's really good to see more people sharing code on this list.  Looks like a 
useful function to have.  

Sometimes it is more useful to have a working bit of code that is a mess rather 
than something elegant that doesn't work.  It follows the philosophy of 
Release early and release often.  if it's working then people use it and 
maybe look at it and maybe edit it to improve it.  If it's beautiful code but 
doesn't work and doesn't get used then no-one sees it and it may never get 
completed.  So it's great to have something working.  Also i can't see anything 
wrong with the code anyway!  

If anyone can improve it or stream-line it then please post the code back to 
this mailing list, or at least to toodr.  

I noticed a couple of things in the Rem statements, Echos and commented out 
bits (that's the ' s, right?),  ie none of which affects the running of the 
program and most never even gets seen by users.  Digits only needs 1 g.  
Accepsts is a tpyo of Accepts.  Exessive a tpyo of excessive.  If Rems and 
stuff are important i'm sure the Docs Team wouldn't mind trying to de-geekify 
them or maybe people here might but i think it really doesn't make much 
difference.  

Just out of curiosity would it be tough to translate this sort of thing into 
Python and make it into an Extension?  Perhaps joined with other code that has 
been on the mailing list here?  

@ Toodr: Would you mind giving permission to license your code under the 
copyleft licensing used by the rest of the code?  So people could share and 
modify?  Looks like you said it would be fine, informally.  GPL?  LGPL?  

Thanks and regards from 
Tom :)  






 From: toodr todorta...@gmail.com
To: users@global.libreoffice.org 
Sent: Saturday, 20 July 2013, 0:26
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: Visible currency rounding
 

I had the same problem. I needed to implement the so called Bankers' Rounding
Function, which would round with respect to the 4/5 rule. And finally I
ended doing it myself in a short Function in LO Basic. I tried my best,
although math  and programming are not my strong sides. So here it is,
together with a Subroutine called rounded_test and the very Function is
called Rounded.


Sub rounded_test
N=20.45454545454545454545
N= Rounded(N)
N=0
End Sub

REM Banker's Rounding Function
REM Accepsts parameter as Double with or without a sign +/-
REM Returns Double  with or without a sign +/-,rounded to the second diggit
after the comma separator
Function Rounded (NumD As Double)
Dim NumI as Integer
Dim position as Integer
position=0
Dim overflow as Integer
overflow=0
Dim NumS as String

REM initilize 2 arrays (integer and string) and we save the number into them
NumS=Format( NumD, 0.)
len01=LEN(NumS)
Dim Stringarray(len01-1) as String
Dim Integerarray(len01-1) as Integer
For i=1 to len01
string0=Mid(NumS,i,1)
    If string0=. Or string0=, Then
    Stringarray(i-1)=.
    Integerarray(i-1)=0
    position=i
    Else
    Stringarray(i-1)=string0
    Integerarray(i-1)=Val(string0)
    End if
next i

string0= 'Emptying the variable which will be used to return the number -
string
REM Rounding
If position=0 Then 'an integer without a fraction part - return the number
as it is!
    Rounded=NumD
    Exit Function
Else
End If
If len01-position2 Then     'will be rounding
    For j=1 to len01-position-2        '(len01-position-2) number of diggits 
till the
end of the number string which will be dropped out
        If Integerarray(len01-j)5 Or overflow=1 Or (Integerarray(len01-j)=5 
And
(Stringarray(len01-j-1)=1 Or Stringarray(len01-j-1)=3  Or
Stringarray(len01-j-1)=5  Or Stringarray(len01-j-1)=7  Or
Stringarray(len01-j-1)=9)) Then
            overflow=1
            If Integerarray(len01-j-1)+overflow=9 Then 
            Integerarray(len01-j-1)=Integerarray(len01-j-1)+overflow
            overflow=0
            Else
            Integerarray(len01-j-1)=0
            overflow=1
            End if
        Integerarray(len01-j)=0
        Stringarray(len01-j)=0
        Stringarray(len01-j-1)=CStr(Integerarray(len01-j-1))
        Else
        Integerarray(len01-j)=0
        Stringarray(len01-j)=0
        End If
    Next j
'If we have some left over, remaining after the removal of the exessive
diggits, we shall distribute it 
'among the remaining integer and fractional part
    If overflow=1 Then
        For k=position to 0 step -1
        If k=position-1 Then goto Lbl    'skip this if it is a comma or point
separator
        If k=0 And (Stringarray(k)=- Or Stringarray(k)=+) Then goto Lbl    
'skip
this if it is a +/- sign
            If Integerarray(k)+overflow=9 Then
            Integerarray(k)=Integerarray(k)+overflow
            overflow=0
            Else
            Integerarray(k)=0
            overflow=1
            End if
        Stringarray(k)=CStr(Integerarray(k))
Lbl:    next k
    Else
    End If
'Check if we have a +/- sign in front
    If 

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Visible currency rounding

2013-07-19 Thread Mark LaPierre

On 07/19/2013 07:26 PM, toodr wrote:

I had the same problem. I needed to implement the so called Bankers' Rounding
Function, which would round with respect to the 4/5 rule. And finally I
ended doing it myself in a short Function in LO Basic. I tried my best,
although math  and programming are not my strong sides. So here it is,
together with a Subroutine called rounded_test and the very Function is
called Rounded.


 A whole bunch of code stripped out here 




You can call it for each line (item) in an invoice. It will take the number
you through at it and will return it rounded to the second diggit after the
comma or point separator. Then when you sum the invoice up - the numbers
will always be consistent and correctly rounded.

This is not the best of programming though, but it works.
I hope it will help someone.
Feel free to modify and use it as you please.
Cheers,
toodr


Just one point I would like to make.  If you are working with money be 
sure that the total of the rounded amounts adds up to match the original 
amount.


Example:

$5.39 divided among several accounts.

10.5% to Acct A = 0.56595  = $0.57
13.5% to Acct B = 0.72765  = $0.73
17%   to Acct C = 0.9163   = $0.92
59%   to Acct D = 3.1801   = $3.18
  =
  Total = $5.40

Any summing error needs to be accounted for if you ever want your 
accounts to balance.




--
_
   °v°
  /(_)\
   ^ ^  Mark LaPierre
Registered Linux user No #267004
https://linuxcounter.net/


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Visible currency rounding

2013-07-16 Thread Marino / WellnessWebshop.se

HI!

You are right. I think the rules is simular in Sweden. I think this 
tradition to have the rounded sum on the invoice is to make it easier during 
accounting. But this is not the motivation to make this to complicated. Many 
invoice in Sweden today has no visible currency rounding.


So, I think I will change this to just delete all decimals of all sums in 
the bottom of the invoice.


Thanks for all help!

Regards,
Marino


-Ursprungligt meddelande- 
From: Tom Davies

Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 2:21 AM
To: Tinkerer ; users@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Visible currency rounding

Hi :)
Ahhh, that makes sense.  HMRC are the Vat collectors for the Uk but the 
Swedish one is likely to have similar rules.

Regards from
Tom :)







From: Tinkerer j_taylo...@btinternet.com
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Monday, 15 July 2013, 19:38
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: Visible currency rounding


Tom

Let me put it another way.
Take the following sales:
50 items @ 1.37 VAT @20% = 68.50 VAT = 13.70

If the same items are sold separately, the VAT would be different.
1 item @ 1.37 VAT @ 20% = 0.274 for the VAT
This would be rounded to 27p and 50 x 0.27 = 13.50
Rounding has caused a difference of 20p
When paying tax, you are required to pay what you have collected.
If you calculate as you suggest you may hand over more tax than you have
collected.
What I think he is looking for is a simple way of calculating the VAT due 
on

his total with each individual item rounded down and that cannot be done.
Each item has to be calculated, rounded down and then a total obtained for
the rounded figures.
HMRC take the view that VAT is payable on the total value of cash sales 
plus

the VAT calculated on Invoiced sales.
In my examples the VAT due would be 27.20 assuming that the 100 items sold
would consist of 50 invoiced and 50 cash
sales.

Tink.




--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Visible-currency-rounding-tp4065342p4065571.html

Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? 
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/

Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be 
deleted






--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? 
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/

Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be 
deleted



--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Visible currency rounding

2013-07-16 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :)
Is it the 

AVKORTA
that chops off the end of the decimals?  


English is really a few different languages added together so to be posh we 
use truncate for this sort of thing.  It means the same as chop off but 
Maths geniuses(? genii?) seem to prefer the posher word.  


Regards from 
Tom :)  






 From: Marino / WellnessWebshop.se mar...@wellnesswebshop.se
To: Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk; Tinkerer 
j_taylo...@btinternet.com; users@global.libreoffice.org 
Sent: Tuesday, 16 July 2013, 9:12
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Visible currency rounding
 

HI!

You are right. I think the rules is similar in Sweden. I think this 
tradition to have the rounded sum on the invoice is to make it easier during 
accounting. But this is not the motivation to make this to complicated. Many 
invoice in Sweden today has no visible currency rounding.

So, I think I will change this to just delete all decimals of all sums in 
the bottom of the invoice.

Thanks for all help!

Regards,
Marino


-Ursprungligt meddelande- 
From: Tom Davies
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 2:21 AM
To: Tinkerer ; users@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Visible currency rounding

Hi :)
Ahhh, that makes sense.  HMRC are the Vat collectors for the Uk but the 
Swedish one is likely to have similar rules.
Regards from
Tom :)






 From: Tinkerer j_taylo...@btinternet.com
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Monday, 15 July 2013, 19:38
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: Visible currency rounding


Tom

Let me put it another way.
Take the following sales:
50 items @ 1.37 VAT @20% = 68.50 VAT = 13.70

If the same items are sold separately, the VAT would be different.
1 item @ 1.37 VAT @ 20% = 0.274 for the VAT
This would be rounded to 27p and 50 x 0.27 = 13.50
Rounding has caused a difference of 20p
When paying tax, you are required to pay what you have collected.
If you calculate as you suggest you may hand over more tax than you have
collected.
What I think he is looking for is a simple way of calculating the VAT due 
on
his total with each individual item rounded down and that cannot be done.
Each item has to be calculated, rounded down and then a total obtained for
the rounded figures.
HMRC take the view that VAT is payable on the total value of cash sales 
plus
the VAT calculated on Invoiced sales.
In my examples the VAT due would be 27.20 assuming that the 100 items sold
would consist of 50 invoiced and 50 cash
sales.

Tink.




--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Visible-currency-rounding-tp4065342p4065571.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? 
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be 
deleted




-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? 
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be 
deleted




-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Visible currency rounding

2013-07-16 Thread Marino / WellnessWebshop.se
HI!

AVKORTA is the commando that takes the sum to nearast even sum down = .1-4 will 
be “AVKORTA” down to 0.0. When “HELTAL” will rounding up .5-9. 

Regards,
Marino

From: Tom Davies 
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 3:03 PM
To: Marino / WellnessWebshop.se ; Tinkerer ; users@global.libreoffice.org 
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Visible currency rounding

Hi :)
Is it the 

AVKORTA
that chops off the end of the decimals?  


English is really a few different languages added together so to be posh we 
use truncate for this sort of thing.  It means the same as chop off but 
Maths geniuses(? genii?) seem to prefer the posher word.  


Regards from 
Tom :)  






--
  From: Marino / WellnessWebshop.se mar...@wellnesswebshop.se
  To: Tom Davies tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk; Tinkerer 
j_taylo...@btinternet.com; users@global.libreoffice.org 
  Sent: Tuesday, 16 July 2013, 9:12
  Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Visible currency rounding


  HI!

  You are right. I think the rules is similar in Sweden. I think this 
  tradition to have the rounded sum on the invoice is to make it easier during 
  accounting. But this is not the motivation to make this to complicated. Many 
  invoice in Sweden today has no visible currency rounding.

  So, I think I will change this to just delete all decimals of all sums in 
  the bottom of the invoice.

  Thanks for all help!

  Regards,
  Marino


  -Ursprungligt meddelande- 
  From: Tom Davies
  Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 2:21 AM
  To: Tinkerer ; users@global.libreoffice.org
  Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Visible currency rounding

  Hi :)
  Ahhh, that makes sense.  HMRC are the Vat collectors for the Uk but the 
  Swedish one is likely to have similar rules.
  Regards from
  Tom :)





  
   From: Tinkerer j_taylo...@btinternet.com
  To: users@global.libreoffice.org
  Sent: Monday, 15 July 2013, 19:38
  Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: Visible currency rounding
  
  
  Tom
  
  Let me put it another way.
  Take the following sales:
  50 items @ 1.37 VAT @20% = 68.50 VAT = 13.70
  
  If the same items are sold separately, the VAT would be different.
  1 item @ 1.37 VAT @ 20% = 0.274 for the VAT
  This would be rounded to 27p and 50 x 0.27 = 13.50
  Rounding has caused a difference of 20p
  When paying tax, you are required to pay what you have collected.
  If you calculate as you suggest you may hand over more tax than you have
  collected.
  What I think he is looking for is a simple way of calculating the VAT due 
  on
  his total with each individual item rounded down and that cannot be done.
  Each item has to be calculated, rounded down and then a total obtained for
  the rounded figures.
  HMRC take the view that VAT is payable on the total value of cash sales 
  plus
  the VAT calculated on Invoiced sales.
  In my examples the VAT due would be 27.20 assuming that the 100 items sold
  would consist of 50 invoiced and 50 cash
  sales.
  
  Tink.
  
  
  
  
  --
  View this message in context: 
  
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Visible-currency-rounding-tp4065342p4065571.html
  Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
  
  -- 
  To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
  Problems? 
  http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
  Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
  List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
  All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be 
  deleted
  
  
  
  
  -- 
  To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
  Problems? 
  http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
  Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
  List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
  All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be 
  deleted




-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Visible currency rounding

2013-07-15 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :)
Ahhh, that makes sense.  HMRC are the Vat collectors for the Uk but the Swedish 
one is likely to have similar rules.  
Regards from
Tom :)  






 From: Tinkerer j_taylo...@btinternet.com
To: users@global.libreoffice.org 
Sent: Monday, 15 July 2013, 19:38
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: Visible currency rounding
 

Tom

Let me put it another way.
Take the following sales:
50 items @ 1.37 VAT @20% = 68.50 VAT = 13.70

If the same items are sold separately, the VAT would be different.
1 item @ 1.37 VAT @ 20% = 0.274 for the VAT
This would be rounded to 27p and 50 x 0.27 = 13.50
Rounding has caused a difference of 20p
When paying tax, you are required to pay what you have collected.
If you calculate as you suggest you may hand over more tax than you have
collected.
What I think he is looking for is a simple way of calculating the VAT due on
his total with each individual item rounded down and that cannot be done.
Each item has to be calculated, rounded down and then a total obtained for
the rounded figures.
HMRC take the view that VAT is payable on the total value of cash sales plus
the VAT calculated on Invoiced sales.
In my examples the VAT due would be 27.20 assuming that the 100 items sold
would consist of 50 invoiced and 50 cash
sales.

Tink.




--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Visible-currency-rounding-tp4065342p4065571.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted




-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted