Re: [users@httpd] Apache Timeouts, fastcgi, etc settings recommendations for Wordpress site servers?

[Rose, John B]

Red Hat 7

Sent from my iPad

> On Apr 2, 2019, at 4:26 PM, Yann Ylavic  wrote:
> 
> Well, possibly, but then I need the Redhat version..
> 
>> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 10:09 PM Rose, John B  wrote:
>> 
>> 2.4.6 but that can be a bit misleading from what I understand if it is Red 
>> Hat. Apparently they piecemeal add the functionality of later versions of 
>> Apache if you can guess what it is
>> 
>> 
>> From: Yann Ylavic 
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 4:02:15 PM
>> To: users@httpd.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Apache Timeouts, fastcgi, etc settings 
>> recommendations for Wordpress site servers?
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>>> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 8:38 PM Rose, John B  wrote:
>>> 
>>> The result afterwards are a bunch of this type, until we reboot …
>>> 
>>> [Mon Apr 01 14:26:45.998971 2019] [proxy_fcgi:error] [pid 26422:tid 
>>> 139964645857024] (70007)The timeout specified has expired: [client 
>>> xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:63031] AH01075: Error dispatching request to :, referer: 
>>> https://somesite.com/sub1/sub2/
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Linux
>>> 
>>> Apache
>> 
>> Which version of httpd are you running?
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Yann.
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
>> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
> 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org

Re: [users@httpd] Apache Timeouts, fastcgi, etc settings recommendations for Wordpress site servers?

[Yann Ylavic]

Or better, the httpd-2.4.6 rpm version.

On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 10:25 PM Yann Ylavic  wrote:
>
> Well, possibly, but then I need the Redhat version..
>
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 10:09 PM Rose, John B  wrote:
> >
> > 2.4.6 but that can be a bit misleading from what I understand if it is Red 
> > Hat. Apparently they piecemeal add the functionality of later versions of 
> > Apache if you can guess what it is
> >
> > 
> > From: Yann Ylavic 
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 4:02:15 PM
> > To: users@httpd.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Apache Timeouts, fastcgi, etc settings 
> > recommendations for Wordpress site servers?
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 8:38 PM Rose, John B  wrote:
> > >
> > > The result afterwards are a bunch of this type, until we reboot …
> > >
> > > [Mon Apr 01 14:26:45.998971 2019] [proxy_fcgi:error] [pid 26422:tid 
> > > 139964645857024] (70007)The timeout specified has expired: [client 
> > > xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:63031] AH01075: Error dispatching request to :, referer: 
> > > https://somesite.com/sub1/sub2/
> > >
> > >
> > > Linux
> > >
> > > Apache
> >
> > Which version of httpd are you running?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Yann.
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
> >

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org

Re: [users@httpd] Apache Timeouts, fastcgi, etc settings recommendations for Wordpress site servers?

[Yann Ylavic]

Well, possibly, but then I need the Redhat version..

On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 10:09 PM Rose, John B  wrote:
>
> 2.4.6 but that can be a bit misleading from what I understand if it is Red 
> Hat. Apparently they piecemeal add the functionality of later versions of 
> Apache if you can guess what it is
>
> 
> From: Yann Ylavic 
> Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 4:02:15 PM
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Apache Timeouts, fastcgi, etc settings 
> recommendations for Wordpress site servers?
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 8:38 PM Rose, John B  wrote:
> >
> > The result afterwards are a bunch of this type, until we reboot …
> >
> > [Mon Apr 01 14:26:45.998971 2019] [proxy_fcgi:error] [pid 26422:tid 
> > 139964645857024] (70007)The timeout specified has expired: [client 
> > xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:63031] AH01075: Error dispatching request to :, referer: 
> > https://somesite.com/sub1/sub2/
> >
> >
> > Linux
> >
> > Apache
>
> Which version of httpd are you running?
>
> Regards,
> Yann.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org

Re: [users@httpd] Apache Timeouts, fastcgi, etc settings recommendations for Wordpress site servers?

[Rose, John B]

2.4.6 but that can be a bit misleading from what I understand if it is Red Hat. 
Apparently they piecemeal add the functionality of later versions of Apache if 
you can guess what it is


From: Yann Ylavic 
Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 4:02:15 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Apache Timeouts, fastcgi, etc settings 
recommendations for Wordpress site servers?

Hi,

On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 8:38 PM Rose, John B  wrote:
>
> The result afterwards are a bunch of this type, until we reboot …
>
> [Mon Apr 01 14:26:45.998971 2019] [proxy_fcgi:error] [pid 26422:tid 
> 139964645857024] (70007)The timeout specified has expired: [client 
> xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:63031] AH01075: Error dispatching request to :, referer: 
> https://somesite.com/sub1/sub2/
>
>
> Linux
>
> Apache

Which version of httpd are you running?

Regards,
Yann.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org

Re: [users@httpd] Apache Timeouts, fastcgi, etc settings recommendations for Wordpress site servers?

[Yann Ylavic]

Hi,

On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 8:38 PM Rose, John B  wrote:
>
> The result afterwards are a bunch of this type, until we reboot …
>
> [Mon Apr 01 14:26:45.998971 2019] [proxy_fcgi:error] [pid 26422:tid 
> 139964645857024] (70007)The timeout specified has expired: [client 
> xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:63031] AH01075: Error dispatching request to :, referer: 
> https://somesite.com/sub1/sub2/
>
>
> Linux
>
> Apache

Which version of httpd are you running?

Regards,
Yann.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org

[users@httpd] Apache Timeouts, fastcgi, etc settings recommendations for Wordpress site servers?

[Rose, John B]

Hello


If you have servers with dozens of standalone installations of Wordpress, what 
settings are typically changed from the Apache/Fastcgi/PHP defaults with 
regards to timeouts, execution time, etc.


On occasion when users are updating the application, we get a timeout error in 
Apache, and no one can access any PHP driven content. Regular html works ok. 
Only a reboot of the server seems to remedy it.  Restarting Apache and/or 
PHP-FPM does not seem to correct it.


This seems to be the first error entry tied to problems ….

“The timeout specified has expired: [client xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:x] AH01075: 
Error dispatching request to :, referer: 
https://somesite.com/wp-admin/update-core.php?action=do-core-upgrade

The result afterwards are a bunch of this type, until we reboot …

[Mon Apr 01 14:26:45.998971 2019] [proxy_fcgi:error] [pid 26422:tid 
139964645857024] (70007)The timeout specified has expired: [client 
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:63031] AH01075: Error dispatching request to :, referer: 
https://somesite.com/sub1/sub2/


Linux

Apache

FastCGI

PHP-FPM

Mysql

Re: [users@httpd] Apache httpd 2.4.39 GA for Windows

[Steffen]

Sorry, did not know,  new for me. 

Was just informing the community that the change log has undergone a change. 
And the new change log is only available with the next release. 

We and other sites (eg AH etc) making already for years and years a release 
available as soon as it had passed the vote as GA., and you should know that. 
Why now in public this mail after all that years ?

Please off list. 


> Op 2 apr. 2019 om 19:14 heeft William A Rowe Jr  het 
> volgende geschreven:
> 
>> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 2:35 AM Steffen  wrote:
> 
>> The ASF HTTPD project did not mention security vulnerabilities fixed in 
>> the initial changelog 2.4.39.
> 
> To be 100% accurate, the ASF HTTP Server project had not announced the
> release of 2.4.39. It had concluded a vote, but only the RM's announcement
> triggers the release. There is a delay for the RM to stage the artifacts so 
> they
> can be downloaded by anyone from our entire array of mirror sites. And in
> that time, the RM could even pull the release owing to a serious packaging
> glitch, if they should need to (this happened not so long ago at httpd.)
> 
> You jumped the gun by pre-announcing your package as a "release", ahead 
> of the RM's announce and ahead of downloads from the ASF, which is poor 
> form to say the least. 
> 
> Security issues are embargoed until that announcement is broadcast by 
> the RM to the entire public at once. The project will not mention security 
> vulnerabilities fixed until that moment.
> 
> This isn't to say you shouldn't assemble your release of version x.y.z based
> on the vote candidate; in fact any change to that source package will always
> trigger version x.y.z+1, so there is no risk that your build varies from the 
> final
> announced package. Be ahead of the game preparing your binary package,
> but defer any publicity until after the actual announcement.
> 
> 

Re: [users@httpd] Apache httpd 2.4.39 GA for Windows

[William A Rowe Jr]

On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 2:35 AM Steffen 
wrote:

> The ASF HTTPD project did not mention security vulnerabilities fixed in
> the initial changelog 2.4.39.


To be 100% accurate, the ASF HTTP Server project had not announced the
release of 2.4.39. It had concluded a vote, but only the RM's announcement
triggers the release. There is a delay for the RM to stage the artifacts so
they
can be downloaded by anyone from our entire array of mirror sites. And in
that time, the RM could even pull the release owing to a serious packaging
glitch, if they should need to (this happened not so long ago at httpd.)

You jumped the gun by pre-announcing your package as a "release", ahead
of the RM's announce and ahead of downloads from the ASF, which is poor
form to say the least.

Security issues are embargoed until that announcement is broadcast by
the RM to the entire public at once. The project will not mention security
vulnerabilities fixed until that moment.

This isn't to say you shouldn't assemble your release of version x.y.z based
on the vote candidate; in fact any change to that source package will always
trigger version x.y.z+1, so there is no risk that your build varies from
the final
announced package. Be ahead of the game preparing your binary package,
but defer any publicity until after the actual announcement.

[users@httpd] 3rd party authentication - mod_auth_openidc

[Jay Leggett]

We're investigating the use of 
mod_auth_openidc for our 
applications that require 3rd party authentication (Facebook, Google, & etc).  
Does anyone have experience with this module?  If so, has it proven to be 
reliable/stable?



Jay Leggett
Software Engineer
Lenovo United States

[Phone](919) 237-8165
[Email]jlegg...@lenovo.com






[RedLogo]

Re: [users@httpd] Apache httpd 2.4.39 GA for Windows

[Steffen]

The ASF HTTPD project did not mention security vulnerabilities fixed in 
the initial changelog 2.4.39.


Added now to www.apachelounge.com/Changelog-2.4.html

See also http://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_24.html

On 31-3-2019 12:12, Steffen wrote:


Apacharians,


See www.apachelounge.com/viewtopic.php?t=8254

Highlight:

This release is primarily a bug fix & stability release, several http2 
bugs fixed,

and a new module mod_socache_redis.


Enjoy,

Steffen



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org