Re: Incompatibility of TriX format
I know I promised a PR, but I see you already committed one. Sorry about that, I'm only now coming back home from vacation. On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Andy Seabornewrote: > On 15/07/16 21:01, Martynas Jusevičius wrote: >> >> Created an issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1211 > > > Great - > > I can make a pull request. > > and PR awaited! > > Andy > > >> >> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 2:06 PM, Andy Seaborne wrote: >>> >>> On 14/07/16 11:38, Andy Seaborne wrote: On 14/07/16 10:10, Martynas Jusevičius wrote: > > > Hey, > > Jena seems to use another DTD than the one hosted by W3C: > https://www.w3.org/2004/03/trix/trix-1/trix-1.0.dtd vs. > > > https://github.com/apache/jena/blob/master/jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/riot/lang/TriX.java > As per the comments : it uses http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2004/HPL-2004-56.html > > From the first glance, at least the root element differs: vs. > . > > The TriX namespace resolves to that DTD version, so I would expect it > to be "standard": http://www.w3.org/2004/03/trix/trix-1/ > > As a result, we are getting parse errors when trying to read TriX that > conform to W3C DTD: > > ERROR riot:84 - [line: 2, col: 54] Unrecognized XML element: trix > > Can we agree that the DTD should be fixed? Presumably you mean fix the code (it's not DTD driven). > I can make a pull request. >>> >>> >>> >>> And please raise a JIRA then put the JIRA id in the PR. >>> >>> thanks >>> >>> Good. It would be best if the reader works with both forms. Andy > > Martynas > atomgraph.com > >>> >
Re: Incompatibility of TriX format
On 15/07/16 21:01, Martynas Jusevičius wrote: Created an issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1211 Great - >>> > I can make a pull request. and PR awaited! Andy On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 2:06 PM, Andy Seabornewrote: On 14/07/16 11:38, Andy Seaborne wrote: On 14/07/16 10:10, Martynas Jusevičius wrote: Hey, Jena seems to use another DTD than the one hosted by W3C: https://www.w3.org/2004/03/trix/trix-1/trix-1.0.dtd vs. https://github.com/apache/jena/blob/master/jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/riot/lang/TriX.java As per the comments : it uses http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2004/HPL-2004-56.html From the first glance, at least the root element differs: vs. . The TriX namespace resolves to that DTD version, so I would expect it to be "standard": http://www.w3.org/2004/03/trix/trix-1/ As a result, we are getting parse errors when trying to read TriX that conform to W3C DTD: ERROR riot:84 - [line: 2, col: 54] Unrecognized XML element: trix Can we agree that the DTD should be fixed? Presumably you mean fix the code (it's not DTD driven). > I can make a pull request. And please raise a JIRA then put the JIRA id in the PR. thanks Good. It would be best if the reader works with both forms. Andy Martynas atomgraph.com
Re: Incompatibility of TriX format
Created an issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1211 On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 2:06 PM, Andy Seabornewrote: > On 14/07/16 11:38, Andy Seaborne wrote: >> >> On 14/07/16 10:10, Martynas Jusevičius wrote: >>> >>> Hey, >>> >>> Jena seems to use another DTD than the one hosted by W3C: >>> https://www.w3.org/2004/03/trix/trix-1/trix-1.0.dtd vs. >>> >>> https://github.com/apache/jena/blob/master/jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/riot/lang/TriX.java >>> >> >> As per the comments : it uses >> http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2004/HPL-2004-56.html >> >>> >>> From the first glance, at least the root element differs: vs. >>> . >>> >>> The TriX namespace resolves to that DTD version, so I would expect it >>> to be "standard": http://www.w3.org/2004/03/trix/trix-1/ >>> >>> As a result, we are getting parse errors when trying to read TriX that >>> conform to W3C DTD: >>> >>>ERROR riot:84 - [line: 2, col: 54] Unrecognized XML element: trix >>> >>> Can we agree that the DTD should be fixed? >> >> >> Presumably you mean fix the code (it's not DTD driven). >> >> > I can make a pull request. > > > And please raise a JIRA then put the JIRA id in the PR. > > thanks > > >> >> Good. >> >> It would be best if the reader works with both forms. >> >> Andy >> >>> >>> Martynas >>> atomgraph.com >>> >> >
Re: Incompatibility of TriX format
On 14/07/16 11:38, Andy Seaborne wrote: On 14/07/16 10:10, Martynas Jusevičius wrote: Hey, Jena seems to use another DTD than the one hosted by W3C: https://www.w3.org/2004/03/trix/trix-1/trix-1.0.dtd vs. https://github.com/apache/jena/blob/master/jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/riot/lang/TriX.java As per the comments : it uses http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2004/HPL-2004-56.html From the first glance, at least the root element differs: vs. . The TriX namespace resolves to that DTD version, so I would expect it to be "standard": http://www.w3.org/2004/03/trix/trix-1/ As a result, we are getting parse errors when trying to read TriX that conform to W3C DTD: ERROR riot:84 - [line: 2, col: 54] Unrecognized XML element: trix Can we agree that the DTD should be fixed? Presumably you mean fix the code (it's not DTD driven). > I can make a pull request. And please raise a JIRA then put the JIRA id in the PR. thanks Good. It would be best if the reader works with both forms. Andy Martynas atomgraph.com
Re: Incompatibility of TriX format
On 14/07/16 10:10, Martynas Jusevičius wrote: Hey, Jena seems to use another DTD than the one hosted by W3C: https://www.w3.org/2004/03/trix/trix-1/trix-1.0.dtd vs. https://github.com/apache/jena/blob/master/jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/riot/lang/TriX.java As per the comments : it uses http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2004/HPL-2004-56.html From the first glance, at least the root element differs: vs. . The TriX namespace resolves to that DTD version, so I would expect it to be "standard": http://www.w3.org/2004/03/trix/trix-1/ As a result, we are getting parse errors when trying to read TriX that conform to W3C DTD: ERROR riot:84 - [line: 2, col: 54] Unrecognized XML element: trix Can we agree that the DTD should be fixed? Presumably you mean fix the code (it's not DTD driven). > I can make a pull request. Good. It would be best if the reader works with both forms. Andy Martynas atomgraph.com
Incompatibility of TriX format
Hey, Jena seems to use another DTD than the one hosted by W3C: https://www.w3.org/2004/03/trix/trix-1/trix-1.0.dtd vs. https://github.com/apache/jena/blob/master/jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/riot/lang/TriX.java >From the first glance, at least the root element differs: vs. . The TriX namespace resolves to that DTD version, so I would expect it to be "standard": http://www.w3.org/2004/03/trix/trix-1/ As a result, we are getting parse errors when trying to read TriX that conform to W3C DTD: ERROR riot:84 - [line: 2, col: 54] Unrecognized XML element: trix Can we agree that the DTD should be fixed? I can make a pull request. Martynas atomgraph.com