Re: Incompatibility of TriX format

2016-07-24 Thread Martynas Jusevičius
I know I promised a PR, but I see you already committed one. Sorry
about that, I'm only now coming back home from vacation.

On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Andy Seaborne  wrote:
> On 15/07/16 21:01, Martynas Jusevičius wrote:
>>
>> Created an issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1211
>
>
> Great -
>
   > I can make a pull request.
>
> and PR awaited!
>
> Andy
>
>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 2:06 PM, Andy Seaborne  wrote:
>>>
>>> On 14/07/16 11:38, Andy Seaborne wrote:


 On 14/07/16 10:10, Martynas Jusevičius wrote:
>
>
> Hey,
>
> Jena seems to use another DTD than the one hosted by W3C:
> https://www.w3.org/2004/03/trix/trix-1/trix-1.0.dtd vs.
>
>
> https://github.com/apache/jena/blob/master/jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/riot/lang/TriX.java
>

 As per the comments : it uses
 http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2004/HPL-2004-56.html

>
>   From the first glance, at least the root element differs:  vs.
> .
>
> The TriX namespace resolves to that DTD version, so I would expect it
> to be "standard": http://www.w3.org/2004/03/trix/trix-1/
>
> As a result, we are getting parse errors when trying to read TriX that
> conform to W3C DTD:
>
> ERROR riot:84 - [line: 2, col: 54] Unrecognized XML element: trix
>
> Can we agree that the DTD should be fixed?



 Presumably you mean fix the code (it's not DTD driven).

   > I can make a pull request.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> And please raise a JIRA then put the JIRA id in the PR.
>>>
>>> thanks
>>>
>>>

 Good.

 It would be best if the reader works with both forms.

   Andy

>
> Martynas
> atomgraph.com
>

>>>
>


Re: Incompatibility of TriX format

2016-07-19 Thread Andy Seaborne

On 15/07/16 21:01, Martynas Jusevičius wrote:

Created an issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1211


Great -

>>>   > I can make a pull request.

and PR awaited!

Andy



On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 2:06 PM, Andy Seaborne  wrote:

On 14/07/16 11:38, Andy Seaborne wrote:


On 14/07/16 10:10, Martynas Jusevičius wrote:


Hey,

Jena seems to use another DTD than the one hosted by W3C:
https://www.w3.org/2004/03/trix/trix-1/trix-1.0.dtd vs.

https://github.com/apache/jena/blob/master/jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/riot/lang/TriX.java



As per the comments : it uses
http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2004/HPL-2004-56.html



  From the first glance, at least the root element differs:  vs.
.

The TriX namespace resolves to that DTD version, so I would expect it
to be "standard": http://www.w3.org/2004/03/trix/trix-1/

As a result, we are getting parse errors when trying to read TriX that
conform to W3C DTD:

ERROR riot:84 - [line: 2, col: 54] Unrecognized XML element: trix

Can we agree that the DTD should be fixed?



Presumably you mean fix the code (it's not DTD driven).

  > I can make a pull request.



And please raise a JIRA then put the JIRA id in the PR.

thanks




Good.

It would be best if the reader works with both forms.

  Andy



Martynas
atomgraph.com









Re: Incompatibility of TriX format

2016-07-15 Thread Martynas Jusevičius
Created an issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1211

On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 2:06 PM, Andy Seaborne  wrote:
> On 14/07/16 11:38, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>>
>> On 14/07/16 10:10, Martynas Jusevičius wrote:
>>>
>>> Hey,
>>>
>>> Jena seems to use another DTD than the one hosted by W3C:
>>> https://www.w3.org/2004/03/trix/trix-1/trix-1.0.dtd vs.
>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/jena/blob/master/jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/riot/lang/TriX.java
>>>
>>
>> As per the comments : it uses
>> http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2004/HPL-2004-56.html
>>
>>>
>>>  From the first glance, at least the root element differs:  vs.
>>> .
>>>
>>> The TriX namespace resolves to that DTD version, so I would expect it
>>> to be "standard": http://www.w3.org/2004/03/trix/trix-1/
>>>
>>> As a result, we are getting parse errors when trying to read TriX that
>>> conform to W3C DTD:
>>>
>>>ERROR riot:84 - [line: 2, col: 54] Unrecognized XML element: trix
>>>
>>> Can we agree that the DTD should be fixed?
>>
>>
>> Presumably you mean fix the code (it's not DTD driven).
>>
>>  > I can make a pull request.
>
>
> And please raise a JIRA then put the JIRA id in the PR.
>
> thanks
>
>
>>
>> Good.
>>
>> It would be best if the reader works with both forms.
>>
>>  Andy
>>
>>>
>>> Martynas
>>> atomgraph.com
>>>
>>
>


Re: Incompatibility of TriX format

2016-07-14 Thread Andy Seaborne

On 14/07/16 11:38, Andy Seaborne wrote:

On 14/07/16 10:10, Martynas Jusevičius wrote:

Hey,

Jena seems to use another DTD than the one hosted by W3C:
https://www.w3.org/2004/03/trix/trix-1/trix-1.0.dtd vs.
https://github.com/apache/jena/blob/master/jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/riot/lang/TriX.java



As per the comments : it uses
http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2004/HPL-2004-56.html



 From the first glance, at least the root element differs:  vs.
.

The TriX namespace resolves to that DTD version, so I would expect it
to be "standard": http://www.w3.org/2004/03/trix/trix-1/

As a result, we are getting parse errors when trying to read TriX that
conform to W3C DTD:

   ERROR riot:84 - [line: 2, col: 54] Unrecognized XML element: trix

Can we agree that the DTD should be fixed?


Presumably you mean fix the code (it's not DTD driven).

 > I can make a pull request.


And please raise a JIRA then put the JIRA id in the PR.

thanks



Good.

It would be best if the reader works with both forms.

 Andy



Martynas
atomgraph.com







Re: Incompatibility of TriX format

2016-07-14 Thread Andy Seaborne

On 14/07/16 10:10, Martynas Jusevičius wrote:

Hey,

Jena seems to use another DTD than the one hosted by W3C:
https://www.w3.org/2004/03/trix/trix-1/trix-1.0.dtd vs.
https://github.com/apache/jena/blob/master/jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/riot/lang/TriX.java


As per the comments : it uses
http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2004/HPL-2004-56.html



 From the first glance, at least the root element differs:  vs. .

The TriX namespace resolves to that DTD version, so I would expect it
to be "standard": http://www.w3.org/2004/03/trix/trix-1/

As a result, we are getting parse errors when trying to read TriX that
conform to W3C DTD:

   ERROR riot:84 - [line: 2, col: 54] Unrecognized XML element: trix

Can we agree that the DTD should be fixed?


Presumably you mean fix the code (it's not DTD driven).

> I can make a pull request.

Good.

It would be best if the reader works with both forms.

Andy



Martynas
atomgraph.com





Incompatibility of TriX format

2016-07-14 Thread Martynas Jusevičius
Hey,

Jena seems to use another DTD than the one hosted by W3C:
https://www.w3.org/2004/03/trix/trix-1/trix-1.0.dtd vs.
https://github.com/apache/jena/blob/master/jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/riot/lang/TriX.java

>From the first glance, at least the root element differs:  vs. .

The TriX namespace resolves to that DTD version, so I would expect it
to be "standard": http://www.w3.org/2004/03/trix/trix-1/

As a result, we are getting parse errors when trying to read TriX that
conform to W3C DTD:

  ERROR riot:84 - [line: 2, col: 54] Unrecognized XML element: trix

Can we agree that the DTD should be fixed? I can make a pull request.

Martynas
atomgraph.com