Re: Sparql To SQL

2014-04-04 Thread Zachary Whitley
I haven't had a chance to work with it yet but you might want to take a look at 
http://ontop.inf.unibz.it/

On Mar 30, 2014, at 5:37 AM, Kamalraj Jairam wrote:

 Hello All,
 
 Whats the best way to convert sparql to SQL using R2RML mappings
 
 and convert resultset from DB to RDF?
 
 Thanks
 
 
 
 
 --
 Kjairam
 Sent with Airmail



Sparql To SQL

2014-03-30 Thread Kamalraj Jairam
Hello All,

Whats the best way to convert sparql to SQL using R2RML mappings

and convert resultset from DB to RDF?

Thanks




--
Kjairam
Sent with Airmail


Re: Sparql To SQL

2014-03-30 Thread Martynas Jusevičius
Hey,

have you tried D2RQ? http://d2rq.org

Martynas

On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Kamalraj Jairam
kjai...@semanticsoftware.com.au wrote:
 Hello All,

 Whats the best way to convert sparql to SQL using R2RML mappings

 and convert resultset from DB to RDF?

 Thanks




 --
 Kjairam
 Sent with Airmail


Re: Sparql To SQL

2014-03-30 Thread Andy Seaborne

On 30/03/14 12:21, Martynas Jusevičius wrote:

Hey,

have you tried D2RQ? http://d2rq.org


+1

The development version has support for R2RML, I gather.



Martynas

On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Kamalraj Jairam
kjai...@semanticsoftware.com.au wrote:

Hello All,

Whats the best way to convert sparql to SQL using R2RML mappings

and convert resultset from DB to RDF?


R2RML is not a rewrite of SPARQL to SQL.  It is an RDF view of the SQL 
data which can in turn be queried via SPARQL.  D2RQ maps basic graph 
patterns to SQL, the rest of SPARQL is handled in the client query engine.


What exactly are you wanting to do?

Andy



Thanks




--
Kjairam
Sent with Airmail




Re: Sparql To SQL

2014-03-30 Thread Erik Antelman
My experience with d2rq was that expecting efficient execution was not
always likely since sparql and SQL have likely impedance mismatch.
(Analogous to object relational mapping difficulties)

I found it very useful for schema and type discovery for importing.
 On Mar 30, 2014 12:53 PM, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote:

 On 30/03/14 12:21, Martynas Jusevičius wrote:

 Hey,

 have you tried D2RQ? http://d2rq.org


 +1

 The development version has support for R2RML, I gather.


 Martynas

 On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Kamalraj Jairam
 kjai...@semanticsoftware.com.au wrote:

 Hello All,

 Whats the best way to convert sparql to SQL using R2RML mappings

 and convert resultset from DB to RDF?


 R2RML is not a rewrite of SPARQL to SQL.  It is an RDF view of the SQL
 data which can in turn be queried via SPARQL.  D2RQ maps basic graph
 patterns to SQL, the rest of SPARQL is handled in the client query engine.

 What exactly are you wanting to do?

 Andy


 Thanks




 --
 Kjairam
 Sent with Airmail





Re: Sparql To SQL

2014-03-30 Thread Paul Tyson
On Sun, 2014-03-30 at 09:37 +, Kamalraj Jairam wrote:
 Hello All,
 
 Whats the best way to convert sparql to SQL using R2RML mappings
 
 and convert resultset from DB to RDF?
 

What are the givens? Do you have existing SPARQL text written against
some RDF produced by some existing R2RML mappings? Or do you have some
SPARQL and some SQL and you want to fill in the R2RML and produce some
RDF?

In any case, it is an interesting scenario that will arise more often as
companies expand their use of RDF while relying mostly on SQL.

There is a higher abstraction that should be explored and possibly
exploited to provide a general pattern for working through these
situations. Since SQL, SPARQL, and R2RML are rule languages compatible
with relational algebra (RA), it should be possible to derive a common
set of RA predicates and classes to create an RDF vocabulary. This
vocabulary can then be used to write queries as production rules in a
generic standard rule language, such as RIF (Rule Interchange Format).
The RIF source can be translated to SQL, SPARQL, or R2RML for execution
in the target system.

Going from RIF to SQL, SPARQL, or R2RML is always going to be easier
than starting from SQL or SPARQL and going to some other format.
Theoretically you should be able to partially translate R2RML to RIF
automatically (SQL embedded in the R2RML will still be opaque). But I
don't know what tools could be used to translate SQL and SPARQL texts to
generic production rules using an RA vocabulary.

The ultimate payoff from this approach is that it will be possible to
link all of your data relations and operations with meaningful business
terminology and processes. It will enable greater visibility and control
of all data operations, and put important elements of business logic in
transparent rules (e.g. RIF) instead of arcane notations such as SQL
SPARQL (or worse, procedural code).

Regards,
--Paul



Re: Sparql To SQL

2014-03-30 Thread Kamalraj Jairam
Hello All,

This is what i’m trying to do.

Loading data from a legacy database like DB2 or Oracle to Triple Store takes a 
long time (Its an OLTP DB)

I’m firing some federated quries which needs to hit the database directly and 
retrieve the results.

So, i need some process where sparql can be converted to SQL.
--
Kjairam
Sent with Airmail


On 30 March 2014 at 10:22:14 pm, Martynas Jusevičius 
(marty...@graphity.orgmailto:marty...@graphity.org) wrote:

Hey,

have you tried D2RQ? http://d2rq.org

Martynas

On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Kamalraj Jairam
kjai...@semanticsoftware.com.au wrote:
 Hello All,

 Whats the best way to convert sparql to SQL using R2RML mappings

 and convert resultset from DB to RDF?

 Thanks




 --
 Kjairam
 Sent with Airmail


Re: Sparql To SQL

2014-03-30 Thread Kamalraj Jairam
Hello Paul,

These are the informtion i have

1) R2RML mapping for existing DB

2) I have some fedreated queries which hit the triple store containg the data 
which has been loaded from the DB

The Loading  data from DB (100 tables, millions of rows) to TS takes a long 
time. I need a framework to convert Sparql to SQL which will hit the table and 
return RDF result set.

D2RQ is in version .81 and hasn’t changed much. Not sure whether D2RQ is the 
right approach.

Thanks
Kamalraj




--
Kjairam
Sent with Airmail


On 31 March 2014 at 6:59:20 am, Paul Tyson 
(phty...@sbcglobal.netmailto:phty...@sbcglobal.net) wrote:

On Sun, 2014-03-30 at 09:37 +, Kamalraj Jairam wrote:
 Hello All,

 Whats the best way to convert sparql to SQL using R2RML mappings

 and convert resultset from DB to RDF?


What are the givens? Do you have existing SPARQL text written against
some RDF produced by some existing R2RML mappings? Or do you have some
SPARQL and some SQL and you want to fill in the R2RML and produce some
RDF?

In any case, it is an interesting scenario that will arise more often as
companies expand their use of RDF while relying mostly on SQL.

There is a higher abstraction that should be explored and possibly
exploited to provide a general pattern for working through these
situations. Since SQL, SPARQL, and R2RML are rule languages compatible
with relational algebra (RA), it should be possible to derive a common
set of RA predicates and classes to create an RDF vocabulary. This
vocabulary can then be used to write queries as production rules in a
generic standard rule language, such as RIF (Rule Interchange Format).
The RIF source can be translated to SQL, SPARQL, or R2RML for execution
in the target system.

Going from RIF to SQL, SPARQL, or R2RML is always going to be easier
than starting from SQL or SPARQL and going to some other format.
Theoretically you should be able to partially translate R2RML to RIF
automatically (SQL embedded in the R2RML will still be opaque). But I
don't know what tools could be used to translate SQL and SPARQL texts to
generic production rules using an RA vocabulary.

The ultimate payoff from this approach is that it will be possible to
link all of your data relations and operations with meaningful business
terminology and processes. It will enable greater visibility and control
of all data operations, and put important elements of business logic in
transparent rules (e.g. RIF) instead of arcane notations such as SQL
SPARQL (or worse, procedural code).

Regards,
--Paul



Re: Sparql To SQL

2014-03-30 Thread Claude Warren
as mentioned D2RQ maps data from SQL to RDF so that SPARQL statements can
execute against the SQL data.  It can also be used to extract the
relational data as RDF. The newest versions are supposed to do updates of
the SQL as well, but I have not played with those versions.  In the cases I
had SPARQL queries of the SQL working for a project and the performance was
sufficient for our needs.

I have a project (https://github.com/Claudenw/jdbc4sparql) which
essentially takes a SPARQL query and presents the results as a table in a
JDBC driver.  You can present multiple SPARQL statements as multiple
tables.  It is in early development and does not yet support functions and
some other things that it should.

Claude


On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 9:10 PM, Kamalraj Jairam 
kjai...@semanticsoftware.com.au wrote:

 Hello All,

 This is what i’m trying to do.

 Loading data from a legacy database like DB2 or Oracle to Triple Store
 takes a long time (Its an OLTP DB)

 I’m firing some federated quries which needs to hit the database directly
 and retrieve the results.

 So, i need some process where sparql can be converted to SQL.
 --
 Kjairam
 Sent with Airmail


 On 30 March 2014 at 10:22:14 pm, Martynas Jusevičius (
 marty...@graphity.orgmailto:marty...@graphity.org) wrote:

 Hey,

 have you tried D2RQ? http://d2rq.org

 Martynas

 On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Kamalraj Jairam
 kjai...@semanticsoftware.com.au wrote:
  Hello All,
 
  Whats the best way to convert sparql to SQL using R2RML mappings
 
  and convert resultset from DB to RDF?
 
  Thanks
 
 
 
 
  --
  Kjairam
  Sent with Airmail




-- 
I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the webhttp://like-like.xenei.com
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren


Re: Sparql To SQL

2014-03-30 Thread Martynas Jusevičius
There are also commercial options, e.g. this:
http://www.revelytix.com/content/spyder

On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Kamalraj Jairam
kjai...@semanticsoftware.com.au wrote:
 Hello Paul,

 These are the informtion i have

 1) R2RML mapping for existing DB

 2) I have some fedreated queries which hit the triple store containg the data 
 which has been loaded from the DB

 The Loading  data from DB (100 tables, millions of rows) to TS takes a long 
 time. I need a framework to convert Sparql to SQL which will hit the table 
 and return RDF result set.

 D2RQ is in version .81 and hasn't changed much. Not sure whether D2RQ is the 
 right approach.

 Thanks
 Kamalraj




 --
 Kjairam
 Sent with Airmail


 On 31 March 2014 at 6:59:20 am, Paul Tyson 
 (phty...@sbcglobal.netmailto:phty...@sbcglobal.net) wrote:

 On Sun, 2014-03-30 at 09:37 +, Kamalraj Jairam wrote:
 Hello All,

 Whats the best way to convert sparql to SQL using R2RML mappings

 and convert resultset from DB to RDF?


 What are the givens? Do you have existing SPARQL text written against
 some RDF produced by some existing R2RML mappings? Or do you have some
 SPARQL and some SQL and you want to fill in the R2RML and produce some
 RDF?

 In any case, it is an interesting scenario that will arise more often as
 companies expand their use of RDF while relying mostly on SQL.

 There is a higher abstraction that should be explored and possibly
 exploited to provide a general pattern for working through these
 situations. Since SQL, SPARQL, and R2RML are rule languages compatible
 with relational algebra (RA), it should be possible to derive a common
 set of RA predicates and classes to create an RDF vocabulary. This
 vocabulary can then be used to write queries as production rules in a
 generic standard rule language, such as RIF (Rule Interchange Format).
 The RIF source can be translated to SQL, SPARQL, or R2RML for execution
 in the target system.

 Going from RIF to SQL, SPARQL, or R2RML is always going to be easier
 than starting from SQL or SPARQL and going to some other format.
 Theoretically you should be able to partially translate R2RML to RIF
 automatically (SQL embedded in the R2RML will still be opaque). But I
 don't know what tools could be used to translate SQL and SPARQL texts to
 generic production rules using an RA vocabulary.

 The ultimate payoff from this approach is that it will be possible to
 link all of your data relations and operations with meaningful business
 terminology and processes. It will enable greater visibility and control
 of all data operations, and put important elements of business logic in
 transparent rules (e.g. RIF) instead of arcane notations such as SQL
 SPARQL (or worse, procedural code).

 Regards,
 --Paul



Re: Sparql To SQL

2014-03-30 Thread Claus Stadler

There is also Sparqlify[1], which we use for exposing OpenStreetMap as LinkedData in the 
LinkedGeoData project[2] (and dumpig the RDF for downloads)[3].
Unfortunately, R2RML support not yet totally stable; we wrote our mappings[4] in what we 
refer to as Sparqlification Mapping Language (SML) [5] (release should be 
ready soon).
In a nutshell, the relation between R2RML to SML is a bit akin to (the SPARQL 
elements of) SPIN to SPARQL, for a pretty comprehensive comparision of examples 
(the R2RML test suite) see [6].

Cheers,
Claus

[1] https://github.com/AKSW/Sparqlify (Instructions for installing Sparqlify 
from the debian package are included there)
[2] LinkedGeoData: http://linkedgeodata.org
[3] http://downloads.linkedgeodata.org/releases
[4] 
https://github.com/GeoKnow/LinkedGeoData/blob/master/linkedgeodata-core/src/main/resources/org/aksw/linkedgeodata/sml/LinkedGeoData-Triplify-IndividualViews.sml
[5] http://sml.aksw.org
[6] http://sml.aksw.org/comparison/sml-r2rml-loc-table.html

On 31.03.2014 01:29, Martynas Jusevičius wrote:

There are also commercial options, e.g. this:
http://www.revelytix.com/content/spyder

On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Kamalraj Jairam
kjai...@semanticsoftware.com.au wrote:

Hello Paul,

These are the informtion i have

1) R2RML mapping for existing DB

2) I have some fedreated queries which hit the triple store containg the data 
which has been loaded from the DB

The Loading  data from DB (100 tables, millions of rows) to TS takes a long 
time. I need a framework to convert Sparql to SQL which will hit the table and 
return RDF result set.

D2RQ is in version .81 and hasn't changed much. Not sure whether D2RQ is the 
right approach.

Thanks
Kamalraj




--
Kjairam
Sent with Airmail


On 31 March 2014 at 6:59:20 am, Paul Tyson 
(phty...@sbcglobal.netmailto:phty...@sbcglobal.net) wrote:

On Sun, 2014-03-30 at 09:37 +, Kamalraj Jairam wrote:

Hello All,

Whats the best way to convert sparql to SQL using R2RML mappings

and convert resultset from DB to RDF?


What are the givens? Do you have existing SPARQL text written against
some RDF produced by some existing R2RML mappings? Or do you have some
SPARQL and some SQL and you want to fill in the R2RML and produce some
RDF?

In any case, it is an interesting scenario that will arise more often as
companies expand their use of RDF while relying mostly on SQL.

There is a higher abstraction that should be explored and possibly
exploited to provide a general pattern for working through these
situations. Since SQL, SPARQL, and R2RML are rule languages compatible
with relational algebra (RA), it should be possible to derive a common
set of RA predicates and classes to create an RDF vocabulary. This
vocabulary can then be used to write queries as production rules in a
generic standard rule language, such as RIF (Rule Interchange Format).
The RIF source can be translated to SQL, SPARQL, or R2RML for execution
in the target system.

Going from RIF to SQL, SPARQL, or R2RML is always going to be easier
than starting from SQL or SPARQL and going to some other format.
Theoretically you should be able to partially translate R2RML to RIF
automatically (SQL embedded in the R2RML will still be opaque). But I
don't know what tools could be used to translate SQL and SPARQL texts to
generic production rules using an RA vocabulary.

The ultimate payoff from this approach is that it will be possible to
link all of your data relations and operations with meaningful business
terminology and processes. It will enable greater visibility and control
of all data operations, and put important elements of business logic in
transparent rules (e.g. RIF) instead of arcane notations such as SQL
SPARQL (or worse, procedural code).

Regards,
--Paul



--
Dipl. Inf. Claus Stadler
Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig
Research Group: http://aksw.org/
Workpage  WebID: http://aksw.org/ClausStadler
Phone: +49 341 97-32260



Re: Sparql To SQL

2014-03-30 Thread Juan Sequeda
If you want a commercial tool, please take a look at our tool, Ultrawrap:
http://capsenta.com/ultrawrap/

Juan Sequeda
+1-575-SEQ-UEDA
www.juansequeda.com


On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Kamalraj Jairam 
kjai...@semanticsoftware.com.au wrote:

 Hello All,

 This is what i’m trying to do.

 Loading data from a legacy database like DB2 or Oracle to Triple Store
 takes a long time (Its an OLTP DB)

 I’m firing some federated quries which needs to hit the database directly
 and retrieve the results.

 So, i need some process where sparql can be converted to SQL.
 --
 Kjairam
 Sent with Airmail


 On 30 March 2014 at 10:22:14 pm, Martynas Jusevičius (
 marty...@graphity.orgmailto:marty...@graphity.org) wrote:

 Hey,

 have you tried D2RQ? http://d2rq.org

 Martynas

 On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Kamalraj Jairam
 kjai...@semanticsoftware.com.au wrote:
  Hello All,
 
  Whats the best way to convert sparql to SQL using R2RML mappings
 
  and convert resultset from DB to RDF?
 
  Thanks
 
 
 
 
  --
  Kjairam
  Sent with Airmail