How To Route SMPP Port According To Free Status

2014-12-03 Thread Aditya Khanna
Hello Everyone,

I'm successfully configured Kannel with Bearerbox, SMSBox, SQLBox and some
SMPP Ports (Using Fake SMSC's).


Now the problem is that When I'm sending 5000 messages through HTTP then it
is show in queue of SMSC.
I'm generating one more request of single message through HTTP.

Now the problem is that this single message is also in proceeding queue.

So, how to manage this type of issue with Kannel. How to send this message
to a free SMSC port.

Please share your valuable suggestions.


Thanks,
Aditya Khanna


Re: How To Route SMPP Port According To Free Status

2014-12-03 Thread MOSES KARIUKI
Hey,

Try creating multiple SMSC groups to achieve multiple connections to the
SMSC to create parallelism. Then choose different smsc ids when sending
from your calling script. Since this is a HTTP connection, the SMSC might
come in only when you exceed their set of SMS/SEC throughput.

Thanks
Moses

On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Aditya Khanna 
aditya.khanna111...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hello Everyone,

 I'm successfully configured Kannel with Bearerbox, SMSBox, SQLBox and some
 SMPP Ports (Using Fake SMSC's).


 Now the problem is that When I'm sending 5000 messages through HTTP then
 it is show in queue of SMSC.
 I'm generating one more request of single message through HTTP.

 Now the problem is that this single message is also in proceeding queue.

 So, how to manage this type of issue with Kannel. How to send this message
 to a free SMSC port.

 Please share your valuable suggestions.


 Thanks,
 Aditya Khanna






Re: How To Route SMPP Port According To Free Status

2014-12-03 Thread spameden
2014-12-03 12:57 GMT+03:00 Aditya Khanna aditya.khanna111...@gmail.com:

 Hello Everyone,

 I'm successfully configured Kannel with Bearerbox, SMSBox, SQLBox and some
 SMPP Ports (Using Fake SMSC's).


 Now the problem is that When I'm sending 5000 messages through HTTP then
 it is show in queue of SMSC.
 I'm generating one more request of single message through HTTP.


Try using sqlbox instead with priority field (alter sqlbox source to
include ORDER by priority field) and INSERT messages with higher priority
(e.g. = 0)

Example:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8458566/implementing-priority-queue-in-kannel



 Now the problem is that this single message is also in proceeding queue.

 So, how to manage this type of issue with Kannel. How to send this message
 to a free SMSC port.


You can always specify free SMSC uplink with: smsc_id= via HTTP call
or  use smsc_id in sqlbox send_sms table.

For higher throughput read about max-pending-submits as well as consult
your upstream SMSC operator.


 Please share your valuable suggestions.


 Thanks,
 Aditya Khanna