Re: ALLOW MULTIPLE CONNECTIONS TO OPENSMPP
Michael Thanks a lot, it works! Also I usted the variable use-systemid-as-smsboxid on opensmpp.conf to complete the configuration. Regards, Gorki On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 5:22 AM, Mike Nwaogu <michael_nwa...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Yes, there is Gorki. > You'll have to create a different system type for the same user. > > eg: > username_1 password_1 system_type_1 > username_1 password_1 system_type_2 > > > Best Regards, > Michael Nwaogu C > > > On Sunday, March 26, 2017 5:58 AM, Gorki Alfaro <gork...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hello > > I have a question about opensmpp...Is there any way to allow multiple > connections to opemsmpp from the same user ( ESME only one time listed in > smpplogins) ? By now If I try to do this I received the the message > "opensmppbox[] : Multiple login: Disconnect" > > Thanks in advance for your cooperation. > > -Gorki > > > >
ALLOW MULTIPLE CONNECTIONS TO OPENSMPP
Hello I have a question about opensmpp...Is there any way to allow multiple connections to opemsmpp from the same user ( ESME only one time listed in smpplogins) ? By now If I try to do this I received the the message "opensmppbox[] : Multiple login: Disconnect" Thanks in advance for your cooperation. -Gorki
ALLOW MULTIPLE CONNECTIONS TO OPENSMPP from the same account
Hello I have a question about opensmpp...Is there any way to allow multiple connections to opemsmpp from an ESME( only one time listed in smpplogins) ? By now If I try to do this I received the the message "opensmppbox[] : Multiple login: Disconnect" Thanks in advance for your cooperation. -Gorki
Re: Multiple connections same port, different our-port
Am 10.11.2016 14:45, schrieb Davide Bellettini: Hello everybody, I'm wondering if it's possible to establish 8 connections for each of these two configuration block, by using different our-port (10844,10845,10846... and 10836, 10837...) values without copy-pasting the whole configuration 8 times. group = smsc smsc-id = smscname allowed-smsc-id = smscname port = 12248 our-port = 10844 smsc-username = username smsc-password = password smsc = emi host = hostname1 keepalive = 90 throughput = 10 connect-allow-ip = "10.0.0.183;127.0.0.1;10.10.11.34" flow-control = 1 group = smsc smsc-id = smscname allowed-smsc-id = smscname port = 12248 our-port = 10836 smsc-username = username smsc-password = password smsc = emi host = hostname2 keepalive = 90 throughput = 10 connect-allow-ip = "10.0.0.183;127.0.0.1;10.10.11.34" flow-control = 1 the 'our-port' in the EMI/UCP type is optional. If you DO NOT need a specific client-side TCP port to bind for you can use the 'instances = X' in the 'group = smsc' context to "multiply" the connections with a SINGLE group in the config. If you DO meed specific 'our-port' values, then NO, you need to have multiple config groups then. Stipe -- Best Regards, Stipe Tolj --- Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany Kannel Foundation tolj.org system architecture http://www.kannel.org/http://www.tolj.org/ stolj at kannel.org st at tolj.org ---
Multiple connections same port, different our-port
Hello everybody, I'm wondering if it's possible to establish 8 connections for each of these two configuration block, by using different our-port (10844,10845,10846... and 10836, 10837...) values without copy-pasting the whole configuration 8 times. group = smsc smsc-id = smscname allowed-smsc-id = smscname port = 12248 our-port = 10844 smsc-username = username smsc-password = password smsc = emi host = hostname1 keepalive = 90 throughput = 10 connect-allow-ip = "10.0.0.183;127.0.0.1;10.10.11.34" flow-control = 1 group = smsc smsc-id = smscname allowed-smsc-id = smscname port = 12248 our-port = 10836 smsc-username = username smsc-password = password smsc = emi host = hostname2 keepalive = 90 throughput = 10 connect-allow-ip = "10.0.0.183;127.0.0.1;10.10.11.34" flow-control = 1 Cheers Davide -- Davide Bellettini | Developer M: +393429972500 E: davide.bellett...@onebip.com S: dbellettini Onebip S.p.A. Via Generale Gustavo Fara, 28 20124 Milano, Italy www.onebip.com
Multiple connections to multiple hosts - DLRs lost
Hello, I am new to Kannel and attempting to do some load balancing between 2 machines to 2 different hosts. When we do a failover the DLR messages get 'lost'. Watching the traffic this seems to be because the messages goes out one bind and comes back on a different one and Kannel doesn't know what to do with it. Is there a way to resolve this issue? Looking at the documentation it seems the solution is to have the same smsc-id on both instances of kannel and this is the casebut we're still seeing the issue. Can someone point me in the right direction to get this resolved? Many thanks, Zac -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Multiple-connections-to-multiple-hosts---DLRs-lost-tp25457143p25457143.html Sent from the Kannel - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Multiple connections to multiple hosts - DLRs lost
Use mysql or any DB-based storage for dlr's, and name both binds equally. That way both servers would look for DLR's on the same place. Hope it helps. Alejandro On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 6:21 PM, tweezerz zza...@mbmobile.com wrote: Hello, I am new to Kannel and attempting to do some load balancing between 2 machines to 2 different hosts. When we do a failover the DLR messages get 'lost'. Watching the traffic this seems to be because the messages goes out one bind and comes back on a different one and Kannel doesn't know what to do with it. Is there a way to resolve this issue? Looking at the documentation it seems the solution is to have the same smsc-id on both instances of kannel and this is the casebut we're still seeing the issue. Can someone point me in the right direction to get this resolved? Many thanks, Zac -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Multiple-connections-to-multiple-hosts---DLRs-lost-tp25457143p25457143.html Sent from the Kannel - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Multiple connections
Hi, nope, priority queue is in use only by: AT, EMI and SMPP (just commited). Global queue doesn't use priority queue because it used only for retries and there is the FIFO rule. Please try CVS version. Thanks, Alex info.ubichip schrieb: Hello, priority value is in use for the general queue. I think as soon a SMS has been assigned to a SMSC queue, it is not possible to let them going faster. if you are using smpp, it could be done by using another smsc channel and some php code to assign high priority sms to this smsc. hope it helps regards *From:* Gustavo Mohme C. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* mercredi 10 septembre 2008 11:46 *To:* Daniel Camacho - PA *Cc:* users@kannel.org *Subject:* Re: Multiple connections Thanks everyone for the replies. What I did, following info.ubichip advice, was to set all the messages in the queue with a priority value of 3. All the other emergency messages had a priority of 0. Nevertheless, all the emergency messages where still queued at the bottom and only sent when kannel was done sending priority 3 messages. In other words, it seems kannel doesn't respect priority values. Am I doing something wrong? Regards, Gustavo 2008/9/10 Daniel Camacho - PA [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gustavo Mohme C. wrote: Hi All, I've been successfully using Kannel for over a month now and it's working rather well! Here is my scenario: I'm using the latest stable version of Kannel and connect to an SMSC using SMPP. I only have 1 SMPP connection at the moment. On an average day i send around 70,000 sms which I separate on two batches. The problem is that during the sending process(which in total takes around 5 hours each day), if someone sends an sms, it will be processed and queued until all the previous messages have been sent. This means that during 5 hours each day, users will not get an immeadiate reply. To solve this, I was thinking on asking my smsc for another connection and use two connections: 1 transmitter for sending daily sms and 1 transeiver for sending and replying sms. Is such a configuration possible? Is there a better solution to my problem? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Regards, Gustavo -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by *MailScanner* http://www.mailscanner.info/, and is believed to be clean. About the bottle neck in your waiting pool to process and send after the qeued batch is sent (hours). I solved this by doing some work arround. I created a table somewhere in the same databaseserver with (almost) the same send table structure. Almost becouse I manage my own priority field, and a status field for indicating if sent or not. I fill this table with the 70K sms with a priority of 3 and status of 0(not yet sent) A perl cron job runs every minute to select messages from this table and inserting them into the send table. 1 is the highest priority It reads for ALL the messages with a priority of 1, update its status to 1 (marking as sent), and insert ALL' of them in the send table. Next it reads a chunk of 50 for the priority 2, update its status to 1 (marking as sent), and insert this chunk in the send table. Next ir reads a chunk of 25 for the priority 3, update its status to 1 (marking as sent), and insert this chunk in the send table. This will be done every minute (as my crontab allows me) untill all are gone. You can try different chunks per priority. Gerdaniels -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: Multiple connections
My solution was to implement the same kannel send table structure in another whatever table. plus a couplbe of fields (priority and status) A cron job runs a perl script. wich evaluates the rows in this whatever table, and do some select-insert operations from this table to the kannel send table as suggested before sangprabv wrote: Hi, If you use SqlBox, then my tips is to create another table in your DB which used to store MTPUSH messages only. And run another SqlBox daemon to listen to that table. Willy -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. begin:vcard fn:Daniel Camacho n:Camacho;Daniel org:Promociones Acertadas, S.A. adr:Plaza Tigo, 4to. Nivel;;Km. 9.5 Carretera a El Salvador;Guatemala;;;Guatemala email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title:Analista de Sistemas tel;work:(502) 24281470 tel;cell:(502) 53781298 x-mozilla-html:TRUE url:www.promocionesacertadas.com version:2.1 end:vcard
Re: Multiple connections
Gustavo Mohme C. wrote: Hi All, I've been successfully using Kannel for over a month now and it's working rather well! Here is my scenario: I'm using the latest stable version of Kannel and connect to an SMSC using SMPP. I only have 1 SMPP connection at the moment. On an average day i send around 70,000 sms which I separate on two batches. The problem is that during the sending process(which in total takes around 5 hours each day), if someone sends an sms, it will be processed and queued until all the previous messages have been sent. This means that during 5 hours each day, users will not get an immeadiate reply. To solve this, I was thinking on asking my smsc for another connection and use two connections: 1 transmitter for sending daily sms and 1 transeiver for sending and replying sms. Is such a configuration possible? Is there a better solution to my problem? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Regards, Gustavo -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by *MailScanner* http://www.mailscanner.info/, and is believed to be clean. About the bottle neck in your waiting pool to process and send after the qeued batch is sent (hours). I solved this by doing some work arround. I created a table somewhere in the same databaseserver with (almost) the same send table structure. Almost becouse I manage my own priority field, and a status field for indicating if sent or not. I fill this table with the 70K sms with a priority of 3 and status of 0(not yet sent) A perl cron job runs every minute to select messages from this table and inserting them into the send table. 1 is the highest priority It reads for ALL the messages with a priority of 1, update its status to 1 (marking as sent), and insert ALL' of them in the send table. Next it reads a chunk of 50 for the priority 2, update its status to 1 (marking as sent), and insert this chunk in the send table. Next ir reads a chunk of 25 for the priority 3, update its status to 1 (marking as sent), and insert this chunk in the send table. This will be done every minute (as my crontab allows me) untill all are gone. You can try different chunks per priority. Gerdaniels -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. begin:vcard fn:Daniel Camacho n:Camacho;Daniel org:Promociones Acertadas, S.A. adr:Plaza Tigo, 4to. Nivel;;Km. 9.5 Carretera a El Salvador;Guatemala;;;Guatemala email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title:Analista de Sistemas tel;work:(502) 24281470 tel;cell:(502) 53781298 x-mozilla-html:TRUE url:www.promocionesacertadas.com version:2.1 end:vcard
Re: Multiple connections
Thanks everyone for the replies. What I did, following info.ubichip advice, was to set all the messages in the queue with a priority value of 3. All the other emergency messages had a priority of 0. Nevertheless, all the emergency messages where still queued at the bottom and only sent when kannel was done sending priority 3 messages. In other words, it seems kannel doesn't respect priority values. Am I doing something wrong? Regards, Gustavo 2008/9/10 Daniel Camacho - PA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gustavo Mohme C. wrote: Hi All, I've been successfully using Kannel for over a month now and it's working rather well! Here is my scenario: I'm using the latest stable version of Kannel and connect to an SMSC using SMPP. I only have 1 SMPP connection at the moment. On an average day i send around 70,000 sms which I separate on two batches. The problem is that during the sending process(which in total takes around 5 hours each day), if someone sends an sms, it will be processed and queued until all the previous messages have been sent. This means that during 5 hours each day, users will not get an immeadiate reply. To solve this, I was thinking on asking my smsc for another connection and use two connections: 1 transmitter for sending daily sms and 1 transeiver for sending and replying sms. Is such a configuration possible? Is there a better solution to my problem? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Regards, Gustavo -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by *MailScanner* http://www.mailscanner.info/, and is believed to be clean. About the bottle neck in your waiting pool to process and send after the qeued batch is sent (hours). I solved this by doing some work arround. I created a table somewhere in the same databaseserver with (almost) the same send table structure. Almost becouse I manage my own priority field, and a status field for indicating if sent or not. I fill this table with the 70K sms with a priority of 3 and status of 0(not yet sent) A perl cron job runs every minute to select messages from this table and inserting them into the send table. 1 is the highest priority It reads for ALL the messages with a priority of 1, update its status to 1 (marking as sent), and insert ALL' of them in the send table. Next it reads a chunk of 50 for the priority 2, update its status to 1 (marking as sent), and insert this chunk in the send table. Next ir reads a chunk of 25 for the priority 3, update its status to 1 (marking as sent), and insert this chunk in the send table. This will be done every minute (as my crontab allows me) untill all are gone. You can try different chunks per priority. Gerdaniels -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: Multiple connections
Hi, If you use SqlBox, then my tips is to create another table in your DB which used to store MTPUSH messages only. And run another SqlBox daemon to listen to that table. Willy
Multiple connections
Hi All, I've been successfully using Kannel for over a month now and it's working rather well! Here is my scenario: I'm using the latest stable version of Kannel and connect to an SMSC using SMPP. I only have 1 SMPP connection at the moment. On an average day i send around 70,000 sms which I separate on two batches. The problem is that during the sending process(which in total takes around 5 hours each day), if someone sends an sms, it will be processed and queued until all the previous messages have been sent. This means that during 5 hours each day, users will not get an immeadiate reply. To solve this, I was thinking on asking my smsc for another connection and use two connections: 1 transmitter for sending daily sms and 1 transeiver for sending and replying sms. Is such a configuration possible? Is there a better solution to my problem? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Regards, Gustavo
RE: Multiple connections
Hello, try to take a look on the priority value when you send the sms. hope it help _ From: Gustavo Mohme C. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: lundi 8 septembre 2008 10:56 To: users@kannel.org Subject: Multiple connections Hi All, I've been successfully using Kannel for over a month now and it's working rather well! Here is my scenario: I'm using the latest stable version of Kannel and connect to an SMSC using SMPP. I only have 1 SMPP connection at the moment. On an average day i send around 70,000 sms which I separate on two batches. The problem is that during the sending process(which in total takes around 5 hours each day), if someone sends an sms, it will be processed and queued until all the previous messages have been sent. This means that during 5 hours each day, users will not get an immeadiate reply. To solve this, I was thinking on asking my smsc for another connection and use two connections: 1 transmitter for sending daily sms and 1 transeiver for sending and replying sms. Is such a configuration possible? Is there a better solution to my problem? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Regards, Gustavo
RE: Multiple connections
make test and try and you will see, or take a look in the source code ! tell us if your problem has been solved in order to share your experience with the kannel community. regards _ From: Gustavo Mohme C. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: lundi 8 septembre 2008 12:48 To: info.ubichip Subject: Re: Multiple connections thanks! Just one thing, 0 is the highest priority right? On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:30 PM, info.ubichip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, try to take a look on the priority value when you send the sms. hope it help _ From: Gustavo Mohme C. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: lundi 8 septembre 2008 10:56 To: users@kannel.org Subject: Multiple connections Hi All, I've been successfully using Kannel for over a month now and it's working rather well! Here is my scenario: I'm using the latest stable version of Kannel and connect to an SMSC using SMPP. I only have 1 SMPP connection at the moment. On an average day i send around 70,000 sms which I separate on two batches. The problem is that during the sending process(which in total takes around 5 hours each day), if someone sends an sms, it will be processed and queued until all the previous messages have been sent. This means that during 5 hours each day, users will not get an immeadiate reply. To solve this, I was thinking on asking my smsc for another connection and use two connections: 1 transmitter for sending daily sms and 1 transeiver for sending and replying sms. Is such a configuration possible? Is there a better solution to my problem? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Regards, Gustavo
Re: Multiple connections to single SMSC
There's also the issue of DLR handling - isn't the good thing about using different username and password is that at least it is a failsafe way of getting DLRs back to the sending box, otherwise they'll end up getting rejected by Kannel ? Me too, two connections to the same SMPP, both over the same VPN link to the same IP and port, using different username and password and, knowing the market, I suppose it's to the same three-letter-branded-cellco than Rodrigo does ;) I don't know why do they want to do it that way (with other cellcos, we usually have one SMPP link and route many shortcut numbers over the same link without the overhead of mantaining many links for the same provider) but since they are the ones writing the rules we can't argue that much about it anyway and so far it worked ok for us. Regarding question A, if you want to connect many boxes to the same SMSC, you'll have to keep in mind that: 1. You cannot run more than one bearerbox for the same setup on the same machine. The bearerbox connecting to the SMSC cannot be replicated without installing a new copy of Kannel (maybe you could install many copies of kannel and assign them different ports for the bearerbox, I suppose... never tried it) 2. You could run many instances of kannel (bearerboxes) on different machines and configure each one to make an http request to a single web server. I think you _should_ be able to connect them to the same SMSC, as long as the other party allows your IP's to connect. Regards, On 4/27/05, Rodrigo Cremaschi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Michael: I can answer to your (B) question with a YES. I have 3 SMPP connections to a single SMSC, same IP, same port, but different username/password for each one of them. Regards, Rodrigo Cremaschi. - Original Message - From: Michael Bildner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: devel@kannel.org Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 6:23 PM Subject: Multiple connections to single SMSC I am not too familiar with the underlying protocols, but is it possible to make multiple connections to a single SMSC (mainly with the SMPP protocol). The two scenarios that I'm concerned with are: (A) Multiple boxes each running a single SMS gateway and each gateway wants to connect to the same SMSC. (B) Single box running a gateway that wants to make multiple connections to the same SMSC (perhaps using different username/passwords). Are these scenarios possible? Thanks. Michael __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- Alejandro Guerrieri Magicom http://www.magicom-bcn.net/ _ Be the first to hear what's new at MSN - sign up to our free newsletters! http://www.msn.co.uk/newsletters
Re: Multiple connections to single SMSC
Me too, two connections to the same SMPP, both over the same VPN link to the same IP and port, using different username and password and, knowing the market, I suppose it's to the same three-letter-branded-cellco than Rodrigo does ;) I don't know why do they want to do it that way (with other cellcos, we usually have one SMPP link and route many shortcut numbers over the same link without the overhead of mantaining many links for the same provider) but since they are the ones writing the rules we can't argue that much about it anyway and so far it worked ok for us. Regarding question A, if you want to connect many boxes to the same SMSC, you'll have to keep in mind that: 1. You cannot run more than one bearerbox for the same setup on the same machine. The bearerbox connecting to the SMSC cannot be replicated without installing a new copy of Kannel (maybe you could install many copies of kannel and assign them different ports for the bearerbox, I suppose... never tried it) 2. You could run many instances of kannel (bearerboxes) on different machines and configure each one to make an http request to a single web server. I think you _should_ be able to connect them to the same SMSC, as long as the other party allows your IP's to connect. Regards, On 4/27/05, Rodrigo Cremaschi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Michael: I can answer to your (B) question with a YES. I have 3 SMPP connections to a single SMSC, same IP, same port, but different username/password for each one of them. Regards, Rodrigo Cremaschi. - Original Message - From: Michael Bildner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: devel@kannel.org Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 6:23 PM Subject: Multiple connections to single SMSC I am not too familiar with the underlying protocols, but is it possible to make multiple connections to a single SMSC (mainly with the SMPP protocol). The two scenarios that I'm concerned with are: (A) Multiple boxes each running a single SMS gateway and each gateway wants to connect to the same SMSC. (B) Single box running a gateway that wants to make multiple connections to the same SMSC (perhaps using different username/passwords). Are these scenarios possible? Thanks. Michael __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- Alejandro Guerrieri Magicom http://www.magicom-bcn.net/
