Re: No EDID for VGA
On 08.08.2013 17:46, Jon Cosby wrote: I installed a GeForce 8400 GS graphics card to replace an integrated chipset and can't even boot to the live CD (F18) or rescue mode now. It stops with the output Raw EDID [rows of hex digits all 0] Nouveau EI [ DRM] DDC responded, but no EDID for VGA-1 I have openSUSE installed on this machine, and it runs with no problems. The monitor is an old KDS 17 CRT. Is there any way to get this working? Jon Cosby HDD/F19? $ modinfo drm_kms_helper | grep edid https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt poma -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Firefox and Thunderbird Aug releases
On 09.08.2013, David wrote: Joe did you not read where I said that I was asking for the 'regular Fedora Community users', sucjh as you, and not for myself? And that I was asking because so many other Linux distributions already have them. I already have the latest releases. Updates usually doesn't only fix problems and bring on new features, they introduce new bugs, too. Keep cool for some days, and the stuff will be available in the -stable repos :-) -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Can I run two instances of apache httpd?
Hi all, In my apache configuration, I am using a scripting language (tcl through apache rivet) which implements a heavy application, something that takes some minutes to start when apache starts a new process. Is there a way to separate these heavy apache processes from the rest of the apache? I.e. when the url is /my_heavy_service redirect the request to the apache which has the heavy application loaded, and the rest of the requests be handled by an apache with does not even has mod_rivet loaded? Like starting an apache on a different port (i.e. 8123), which loads my application, and starting a normal apache on port 80, which serves all requests except some, which are directed to the server in port 8123. In general I think it can be done (i.e.: http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/RunningMultipleApacheInstances), but is a way to do this in fedora 19, and keep all this systemctl * httpd stuff? Has anyone attempted this? George -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
nvidia on inspiron
Hello, I reinstall a fedora 19 and I am experiencing troubles with the graphics apparently. With the previous installation fedora 14. I had to install: xorg-x11-drv-nvidia nvidia-settings nvidia-xconfig xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-libs and run: nvidia-xconfig Should I do the same again? Thank. === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | | Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | | Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France === -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: nvidia on inspiron
On Fri, 09 Aug 2013 10:20:11 +0200 Patrick Dupre pdu...@gmx.com wrote: I reinstall a fedora 19 and I am experiencing troubles with the graphics apparently. With the previous installation fedora 14. I had to install: xorg-x11-drv-nvidia nvidia-settings nvidia-xconfig xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-libs and run: nvidia-xconfig Should I do the same again? Most probably, the only thing you need to install is the kmod-nvidia package from rpmfusion repo. It will pull in everything else you need. I never needed to run nvidia-xconfig or similar utilities, and I don't trust them to do a proper configuration. If you need to change resolution away from the optimal one (whatever reason be for wanting that), I suggest that you use xrandr. It is by far the most proper way to configure the display. You may want to familiarize yourself with man xrandr. HTH, :-) Marko -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: nvidia on inspiron
- Original Message - From: Marko Vojinovic Sent: 08/09/13 10:32 AM To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: nvidia on inspiron On Fri, 09 Aug 2013 10:20:11 +0200 Patrick Dupre pdu...@gmx.com wrote: I reinstall a fedora 19 and I am experiencing troubles with the graphics apparently. With the previous installation fedora 14. I had to install: xorg-x11-drv-nvidia nvidia-settings nvidia-xconfig xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-libs and run: nvidia-xconfig Should I do the same again? Most probably, the only thing you need to install is the kmod-nvidia package from rpmfusion repo. It will pull in everything else you need. I never needed to run nvidia-xconfig or similar utilities, and I don't trust them to do a proper configuration. If you need to change resolution away from the optimal one (whatever reason be for wanting that), I suggest that you use xrandr. It is by far the most proper way to configure the display. You may want to familiarize yourself with man xrandr. HTH, :-) Marko OK, Thank Now yum install kmod-nvidia gives: Packages skipped because of dependency problems: 1:kmod-nvidia-319.32-2.fc19.i686 from rpmfusion-nonfree-updates 1:kmod-nvidia-3.10.3-300.fc19.i686-319.32-2.fc19.i686 from rpmfusion-nonfree-updates 1:xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-319.32-7.fc19.i686 from rpmfusion-nonfree-updates 1:xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-libs-319.32-7.fc19.i686 from rpmfusion-nonfree-updates It seems that there are some confusion with kmod-nvidia Which one? === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | | Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | | Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France === -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: nvidia on inspiron
On 09/08/13 09:43, Patrick Dupre wrote: - Original Message - From: Marko Vojinovic Sent: 08/09/13 10:32 AM To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: nvidia on inspiron On Fri, 09 Aug 2013 10:20:11 +0200 Patrick Dupre pdu...@gmx.com wrote: I reinstall a fedora 19 and I am experiencing troubles with the graphics apparently. With the previous installation fedora 14. I had to install: xorg-x11-drv-nvidia nvidia-settings nvidia-xconfig xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-libs and run: nvidia-xconfig Should I do the same again? Most probably, the only thing you need to install is the kmod-nvidia package from rpmfusion repo. It will pull in everything else you need. I never needed to run nvidia-xconfig or similar utilities, and I don't trust them to do a proper configuration. If you need to change resolution away from the optimal one (whatever reason be for wanting that), I suggest that you use xrandr. It is by far the most proper way to configure the display. You may want to familiarize yourself with man xrandr. HTH, :-) Marko OK, Thank Now yum install kmod-nvidia gives: Packages skipped because of dependency problems: 1:kmod-nvidia-319.32-2.fc19.i686 from rpmfusion-nonfree-updates 1:kmod-nvidia-3.10.3-300.fc19.i686-319.32-2.fc19.i686 from rpmfusion-nonfree-updates 1:xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-319.32-7.fc19.i686 from rpmfusion-nonfree-updates 1:xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-libs-319.32-7.fc19.i686 from rpmfusion-nonfree-updates It seems that there are some confusion with kmod-nvidia Which one? I suspect that the answer may be 'none of the above' for your machine. They are probably for more recent hardware. http://www.nvidia.com/object/unix.html -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Can I run two instances of apache httpd?
9.8.2013 11.05 Georgios Petasis petas...@yahoo.gr wrote: In general I think it can be done (i.e.: http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/RunningMultipleApacheInstances), but is a way to do this in fedora 19, and keep all this systemctl * httpd stuff? I have not attempted it, but I think it should be possible. You would just write a new systemd unit that'd start Apache so that it would read its configuration files from a different location. Then you could carefully create the alternative configuration so that the Apache instances do not interfere with each other. - Joonas -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: nvidia on inspiron
Hello, After: yum install xorg-x11-drv-nvidia The display fails, here is the file: /var/log/Xorg.0.log [ 161.317] X.Org X Server 1.14.2 Release Date: 2013-06-25 [ 161.317] X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0 [ 161.317] Build Operating System: 2.6.32-358.14.1.el6.x86_64 [ 161.318] Current Operating System: Linux sophocle 3.10.4-300.fc19.i686.PAE #1 SMP Tue Jul 30 11:53:30 UTC 2013 i686 [ 161.318] Kernel command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-3.10.4-300.fc19.i686.PAE root=/dev/mapper/VolGrpSys2-root ro vconsole.keymap=fr rd.dm=0 rd.md=0 rd.luks=0 vconsole.font=latarcyrheb-sun16 rd.lvm.lv=VolGrpSys2/root nouveau.modeset=0 rd.driver.blacklist=nouveau video=vesa:off [ 161.318] Build Date: 30 July 2013 06:25:54AM [ 161.318] Build ID: xorg-x11-server 1.14.2-9.fc19 [ 161.318] Current version of pixman: 0.30.0 [ 161.318] Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org to make sure that you have the latest version. [ 161.319] Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting, (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. [ 161.319] (==) Log file: /var/log/Xorg.0.log, Time: Fri Aug 9 11:29:47 2013 [ 161.320] (==) Using config file: /etc/X11/xorg.conf [ 161.320] (==) Using config directory: /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d [ 161.320] (==) Using system config directory /usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d [ 161.320] (==) No Layout section. Using the first Screen section. [ 161.320] (==) No screen section available. Using defaults. [ 161.320] (**) |--Screen Default Screen Section (0) [ 161.320] (**) | |--Monitor default monitor [ 161.321] (==) No device specified for screen Default Screen Section. Using the first device section listed. [ 161.321] (**) | |--Device Videocard0 [ 161.321] (==) No monitor specified for screen Default Screen Section. Using a default monitor configuration. [ 161.321] (==) Automatically adding devices [ 161.321] (==) Automatically enabling devices [ 161.321] (==) Automatically adding GPU devices [ 161.321] (==) FontPath set to: catalogue:/etc/X11/fontpath.d, built-ins [ 161.321] (**) ModulePath set to /usr/lib/nvidia/xorg,/usr/lib/xorg/modules [ 161.321] (II) The server relies on udev to provide the list of input devices. If no devices become available, reconfigure udev or disable AutoAddDevices. [ 161.321] (II) Loader magic: 0x82636a0 [ 161.321] (II) Module ABI versions: [ 161.321] X.Org ANSI C Emulation: 0.4 [ 161.321] X.Org Video Driver: 14.1 [ 161.321] X.Org XInput driver : 19.2 [ 161.321] X.Org Server Extension : 7.0 [ 161.322] (II) xfree86: Adding drm device (/dev/dri/card0) [ 161.324] (--) PCI:*(0:1:0:0) 1002:7145:1028:2002 rev 0, Mem @ 0xd000/268435456, 0xefdf/65536, I/O @ 0xee00/256, BIOS @ 0x/131072 [ 161.325] Initializing built-in extension Generic Event Extension [ 161.325] Initializing built-in extension SHAPE [ 161.325] Initializing built-in extension MIT-SHM [ 161.325] Initializing built-in extension XInputExtension [ 161.325] Initializing built-in extension XTEST [ 161.325] Initializing built-in extension BIG-REQUESTS [ 161.325] Initializing built-in extension SYNC [ 161.325] Initializing built-in extension XKEYBOARD [ 161.325] Initializing built-in extension XC-MISC [ 161.325] Initializing built-in extension XINERAMA [ 161.325] Initializing built-in extension XFIXES [ 161.325] Initializing built-in extension RENDER [ 161.325] Initializing built-in extension RANDR [ 161.326] Initializing built-in extension COMPOSITE [ 161.326] Initializing built-in extension DAMAGE [ 161.326] Initializing built-in extension MIT-SCREEN-SAVER [ 161.326] Initializing built-in extension DOUBLE-BUFFER [ 161.326] Initializing built-in extension RECORD [ 161.326] Initializing built-in extension DPMS [ 161.326] Initializing built-in extension X-Resource [ 161.326] Initializing built-in extension XVideo [ 161.328] Initializing built-in extension XVideo-MotionCompensation [ 161.330] Initializing built-in extension SELinux [ 161.332] Initializing built-in extension XFree86-VidModeExtension [ 161.334] Initializing built-in extension XFree86-DGA [ 161.336] Initializing built-in extension XFree86-DRI [ 161.338] Initializing built-in extension DRI2 [ 161.338] (II) glx will be loaded by default. [ 161.338] (II) LoadModule: dri2 [ 161.338] (II) Module dri2 already built-in [ 161.338] (II) LoadModule: glamoregl [ 161.339] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/libglamoregl.so [ 161.363] (II) Module glamoregl: vendor=X.Org Foundation [ 161.363] compiled for 1.14.0, module version = 0.5.0 [ 161.363] ABI class: X.Org ANSI C Emulation, version 0.4 [ 161.363] (II) LoadModule: glx [ 161.363] (II) Loading /usr/lib/nvidia/xorg/libglx.so [ 161.396] (II) Module glx: vendor=NVIDIA Corporation [ 161.396] compiled for 4.0.2, module version = 1.0.0 [ 161.396] Module
Fedora 19 + httpd + chroots
Hi guys, What's the status of running apache under chroots these days? For instance, is this guide relevant or accurate http://www.linux-faqs.info/apache/running-apache-in-chroot-jail ? Thanks -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: nvidia on inspiron
On 09/08/13 10:49, Patrick Dupre wrote: Hello, After: yum install xorg-x11-drv-nvidia The display fails, here is the file: /var/log/Xorg.0.log [ 161.317] snip [ 161.396] (II) NVIDIA GLX Module 319.32 Wed Jun 19 14:13:45 PDT 2013 [ 161.398] Loading extension GLX [ 161.398] (II) LoadModule: nvidia [ 161.398] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nvidia_drv.so [ 161.403] (II) Module nvidia: vendor=NVIDIA Corporation [ 161.403] compiled for 4.0.2, module version = 1.0.0 [ 161.403] Module class: X.Org Video Driver [ 161.414] (EE) NVIDIA: Failed to load the NVIDIA kernel module. Please check your [ 161.414] (EE) NVIDIA: system's kernel log for additional error messages. [ 161.414] (II) UnloadModule: nvidia [ 161.414] (II) Unloading nvidia [ 161.415] (EE) Failed to load module nvidia (module-specific error, 0) [ 161.415] (EE) No drivers available. What should I do? thank. Seek help on the rpmfusion list -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: nvidia on inspiron
On 09/08/13 11:22, John Pilkington wrote: On 09/08/13 10:49, Patrick Dupre wrote: Hello, After: yum install xorg-x11-drv-nvidia The display fails, here is the file: /var/log/Xorg.0.log [ 161.317] snip [ 161.396] (II) NVIDIA GLX Module 319.32 Wed Jun 19 14:13:45 PDT 2013 [ 161.398] Loading extension GLX [ 161.398] (II) LoadModule: nvidia [ 161.398] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nvidia_drv.so [ 161.403] (II) Module nvidia: vendor=NVIDIA Corporation [ 161.403] compiled for 4.0.2, module version = 1.0.0 [ 161.403] Module class: X.Org Video Driver [ 161.414] (EE) NVIDIA: Failed to load the NVIDIA kernel module. Please check your [ 161.414] (EE) NVIDIA: system's kernel log for additional error messages. [ 161.414] (II) UnloadModule: nvidia [ 161.414] (II) Unloading nvidia [ 161.415] (EE) Failed to load module nvidia (module-specific error, 0) [ 161.415] (EE) No drivers available. What should I do? thank. Seek help on the rpmfusion list But I still think you may need the 304.xx series: you haven't mentioned which GPU you have but google suggests 7900 gs http://www.nvidia.com/object/IO_32667.html http://download1.rpmfusion.org/nonfree/fedora/updates/19/i386/ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: nvidia on inspiron
On Fri, 09 Aug 2013 10:43:05 +0200 Patrick Dupre pdu...@gmx.com wrote: Now yum install kmod-nvidia gives: Packages skipped because of dependency problems: 1:kmod-nvidia-319.32-2.fc19.i686 from rpmfusion-nonfree-updates 1:kmod-nvidia-3.10.3-300.fc19.i686-319.32-2.fc19.i686 from rpmfusion-nonfree-updates 1:xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-319.32-7.fc19.i686 from rpmfusion-nonfree-updates 1:xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-libs-319.32-7.fc19.i686 from rpmfusion-nonfree-updates It seems that there are some confusion with kmod-nvidia Which one? Please provide the full yum output. I cannot see what is wrong from the snippet that you gave. Also, keep in mind that there is a kmod-nvidia driver for the recent nvidia graphics cards, then there is another kmod-nvidia-304xx driver for the older cards, and finally there is a kmod-nvidia-173xx driver for ancient cards. It would be a good idea to figure out which hardware you actually have, lspci | grep VGA and then install the appropriate driver. You have the details spelled out here: http://rpmfusion.org/Howto/nVidia (although I'd say that this howto is a tad bit outdated, but it's still mostly correct). HTH, :-) Marko -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: nvidia on inspiron
Thank John for the suggestion. I am not sure to answer to your question. My card ia an ATI Mobility, Radeon x1400 128 MB I cannot find it in the nvidia list. Is it too old? By default, it installs: xorg-x11-drv-nvidia i686 1:319.32-7.fc19 kmod-nvidia-3.9.9-302.fc19.i686.PAE i686 1:319.32-1.fc19 xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-libs i686 1:319.32-7.fc19 I also found the following: http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=287669 - Original Message - From: John Pilkington Sent: 08/09/13 12:53 PM To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: nvidia on inspiron On 09/08/13 11:22, John Pilkington wrote: On 09/08/13 10:49, Patrick Dupre wrote: Hello, After: yum install xorg-x11-drv-nvidia The display fails, here is the file: /var/log/Xorg.0.log [ 161.317] snip [ 161.396] (II) NVIDIA GLX Module 319.32 Wed Jun 19 14:13:45 PDT 2013 [ 161.398] Loading extension GLX [ 161.398] (II) LoadModule: nvidia [ 161.398] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nvidia_drv.so [ 161.403] (II) Module nvidia: vendor=NVIDIA Corporation [ 161.403] compiled for 4.0.2, module version = 1.0.0 [ 161.403] Module class: X.Org Video Driver [ 161.414] (EE) NVIDIA: Failed to load the NVIDIA kernel module. Please check your [ 161.414] (EE) NVIDIA: system's kernel log for additional error messages. [ 161.414] (II) UnloadModule: nvidia [ 161.414] (II) Unloading nvidia [ 161.415] (EE) Failed to load module nvidia (module-specific error, 0) [ 161.415] (EE) No drivers available. What should I do? thank. Seek help on the rpmfusion list But I still think you may need the 304.xx series: you haven't mentioned which GPU you have but google suggests 7900 gs http://www.nvidia.com/object/IO_32667.html http://download1.rpmfusion.org/nonfree/fedora/updates/19/i386/ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | | Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | | Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France === -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: nvidia on inspiron
- Original Message - From: Marko Vojinovic Sent: 08/09/13 01:10 PM To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: nvidia on inspiron On Fri, 09 Aug 2013 10:43:05 +0200 Patrick Dupre pdu...@gmx.com wrote: Now yum install kmod-nvidia gives: Packages skipped because of dependency problems: 1:kmod-nvidia-319.32-2.fc19.i686 from rpmfusion-nonfree-updates 1:kmod-nvidia-3.10.3-300.fc19.i686-319.32-2.fc19.i686 from rpmfusion-nonfree-updates 1:xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-319.32-7.fc19.i686 from rpmfusion-nonfree-updates 1:xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-libs-319.32-7.fc19.i686 from rpmfusion-nonfree-updates It seems that there are some confusion with kmod-nvidia Which one? Please provide the full yum output. I cannot see what is wrong from the snippet that you gave. yum install xorg-x11-drv-nvidia works fine and install: xorg-x11-drv-nvidia i686 1:319.32-7.fc19 kmod-nvidia-3.9.9-302.fc19.i686.PAE i686 1:319.32-1.fc19 xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-libs i686 1:319.32-7.fc19 while yum install kmod-nvidia Loaded plugins: langpacks, refresh-packagekit Resolving Dependencies -- Running transaction check --- Package kmod-nvidia.i686 1:319.32-2.fc19 will be installed -- Processing Dependency: kmod-nvidia-3.10.3-300.fc19.i686 = 1:319.32-2.fc19 for package: 1:kmod-nvidia-319.32-2.fc19.i686 -- Running transaction check --- Package kmod-nvidia-3.10.3-300.fc19.i686.i686 1:319.32-2.fc19 will be installed -- Processing Dependency: kernel-uname-r = 3.10.3-300.fc19.i686 for package: 1:kmod-nvidia-3.10.3-300.fc19.i686-319.32-2.fc19.i686 -- Processing Dependency: nvidia-kmod-common = 1:319.32 for package: 1:kmod-nvidia-3.10.3-300.fc19.i686-319.32-2.fc19.i686 -- Running transaction check --- Package kmod-nvidia-3.10.3-300.fc19.i686.i686 1:319.32-2.fc19 will be installed -- Processing Dependency: kernel-uname-r = 3.10.3-300.fc19.i686 for package: 1:kmod-nvidia-3.10.3-300.fc19.i686-319.32-2.fc19.i686 --- Package xorg-x11-drv-nvidia.i686 1:319.32-7.fc19 will be installed -- Processing Dependency: xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-libs(x86-32) = 1:319.32-7.fc19 for package: 1:xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-319.32-7.fc19.i686 -- Running transaction check --- Package kmod-nvidia-3.10.3-300.fc19.i686.i686 1:319.32-2.fc19 will be installed -- Processing Dependency: kernel-uname-r = 3.10.3-300.fc19.i686 for package: 1:kmod-nvidia-3.10.3-300.fc19.i686-319.32-2.fc19.i686 --- Package xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-libs.i686 1:319.32-7.fc19 will be installed -- Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: 1:kmod-nvidia-3.10.3-300.fc19.i686-319.32-2.fc19.i686 (rpmfusion-nonfree-updates) Requires: kernel-uname-r = 3.10.3-300.fc19.i686 Installed: kernel-PAE-3.9.9-302.fc19.i686 (@updates) kernel-uname-r = 3.9.9-302.fc19.i686.PAE Installed: kernel-PAE-3.10.3-300.fc19.i686 (@updates) kernel-uname-r = 3.10.3-300.fc19.i686.PAE Installed: kernel-PAE-3.10.4-300.fc19.i686 (@updates) kernel-uname-r = 3.10.4-300.fc19.i686.PAE Available: kernel-PAE-3.9.5-301.fc19.i686 (fedora) kernel-uname-r = 3.9.5-301.fc19.i686.PAE Available: kernel-PAEdebug-3.9.5-301.fc19.i686 (fedora) kernel-uname-r = 3.9.5-301.fc19.i686.PAEdebug Available: kernel-PAEdebug-3.10.4-300.fc19.i686 (updates) kernel-uname-r = 3.10.4-300.fc19.i686.PAEdebug Available: kernel-debug-3.9.5-301.fc19.i686 (fedora) kernel-uname-r = 3.9.5-301.fc19.i686.debug Available: kernel-debug-3.10.4-300.fc19.i686 (updates) kernel-uname-r = 3.10.4-300.fc19.i686.debug You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem and yum install kmod-nvidia --skip-broken Loaded plugins: langpacks, refresh-packagekit Resolving Dependencies -- Running transaction check --- Package kmod-nvidia.i686 1:319.32-2.fc19 will be installed -- Processing Dependency: kmod-nvidia-3.10.3-300.fc19.i686 = 1:319.32-2.fc19 for package: 1:kmod-nvidia-319.32-2.fc19.i686 -- Running transaction check --- Package kmod-nvidia-3.10.3-300.fc19.i686.i686 1:319.32-2.fc19 will be installed -- Processing Dependency: kernel-uname-r = 3.10.3-300.fc19.i686 for package: 1:kmod-nvidia-3.10.3-300.fc19.i686-319.32-2.fc19.i686 -- Processing Dependency: nvidia-kmod-common = 1:319.32 for package: 1:kmod-nvidia-3.10.3-300.fc19.i686-319.32-2.fc19.i686 -- Running transaction check --- Package kmod-nvidia-3.10.3-300.fc19.i686.i686 1:319.32-2.fc19 will be installed -- Processing Dependency: kernel-uname-r = 3.10.3-300.fc19.i686 for package: 1:kmod-nvidia-3.10.3-300.fc19.i686-319.32-2.fc19.i686 --- Package xorg-x11-drv-nvidia.i686 1:319.32-7.fc19 will be installed -- Processing Dependency: xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-libs(x86-32) = 1:319.32-7.fc19 for package: 1:xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-319.32-7.fc19.i686 -- Running transaction check --- Package kmod-nvidia-3.10.3-300.fc19.i686.i686 1:319.32-2.fc19
Re: nvidia on inspiron
On 08/09/13 19:11, Patrick Dupre wrote: My card ia an ATI Mobility, Radeon x1400 128 MB Ahhh. A Radeon card is not nVidia -- Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions and self-serving posts -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Change device/partition label
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/08/2013 03:59 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: What's the best and most current way to do it? I was thinking e2label will do it, but it's been so long since I've done it, I'm playing it safe. Ideas? man e2label tune2fs -l /dev/whatever shows the UUID That did it. I was worried about whether e2label would accept a blank label (using ), but that worked without problems. Danke. - -- Mark Haney, Software Developer Mobile: 828-337-6540 Email: mark.ha...@gmail.com Linux augustus.homelinux.org 3.10.4-300.fc19.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSBNyoAAoJEOrjdPlXBuPg4vMIALG+iAma5huvVhSlWJrB8fzA 9rC5oet/VFAMmF64SicEEBDRIvRdQyHkelNsSpVbsrl44Y6WHTwNooSojD50HPfM LJGjd+kVJhYJOHPSwmd+p7sR3+z9UQHPYx+bC1b9dZ+s/4pt92/p/qWo6S3MufUq 4889znxFYU45vJ8hEh55zmMbChkDe25Z/MZZ31U5adLjODfchgeCNi/cwSFaKi6V uIVk4aVFOUrvcgHAElR4kcMSokgeqj6z8pX4qfZrTUlRGVukEszcEm6fkMobGWti kpdsEMXgKv5BWLUL659HvnASo2jh8b9lUsA+n3bYDXFFebi3wUSFrF+Su06Y7yg= =IvsC -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Can I run two instances of apache httpd?
Georgios Petasis pise: Hi all, In my apache configuration, I am using a scripting language (tcl through apache rivet) which implements a heavy application, something that takes some minutes to start when apache starts a new process. Is there a way to separate these heavy apache processes from the rest of the apache? I.e. when the url is /my_heavy_service redirect the request to the apache which has the heavy application loaded, and the rest of the requests be handled by an apache with does not even has mod_rivet loaded? Like starting an apache on a different port (i.e. 8123), which loads my application, and starting a normal apache on port 80, which serves all requests except some, which are directed to the server in port 8123. In general I think it can be done (i.e.: http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/RunningMultipleApacheInstances), but is a way to do this in fedora 19, and keep all this systemctl * httpd stuff? Has anyone attempted this? Yes. You just have multiple Listen lines in your config file and then you have to restart the httpd.service. -- --Zdenek Pytela -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
libreswan on Feodra
Hi, I have installed libreswan 3.3-1 on fc18 from RPM. How do I start the libreswan service on Fedora ? I tried: systemctl status libreswan.service libreswan.service Loaded: error (Reason: No such file or directory) Active: inactive (dead) regards, Kevin -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: libreswan on Feodra
Hello, Try: systemctl status ipsec.service Rami Rosen http://ramirose.wix.com/ramirosen On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Kevin Wilson wkev...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have installed libreswan 3.3-1 on fc18 from RPM. How do I start the libreswan service on Fedora ? I tried: systemctl status libreswan.service libreswan.service Loaded: error (Reason: No such file or directory) Active: inactive (dead) regards, Kevin -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Can I run two instances of apache httpd?
Hello, 2013/8/9 Zdenek Pytela pyt...@phil.muni.cz: Yes. You just have multiple Listen lines in your config file and then you have to restart the httpd.service. I think the main goal was not just to get Apache to listen to multiple ports, but to have two entirely separate Apache instances running, to prevent a badly behaving web application from affecting the better behaving ones. Of course this would likely also involve having them listen to different ports. -Joonas -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: nvidia on inspiron
On Fri, 09 Aug 2013 13:22:10 +0200 Patrick Dupre pdu...@gmx.com wrote: yum install xorg-x11-drv-nvidia works fine and install: xorg-x11-drv-nvidia i686 1:319.32-7.fc19 kmod-nvidia-3.9.9-302.fc19.i686.PAE i686 1:319.32-1.fc19 xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-libs i686 1:319.32-7.fc19 lspci | grep VGA 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] RV515/M54 [Mobility Radeon X1400] This is surreal! :-D Ok, you should really do the following: yum remove *-nvidia* reboot After that, go to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nvidia and read the very first paragraph of the article, nothing more. Just the first paragraph. Or just the last two sentences of the first paragraph. Or better yet, here, let me quote them to you: begin quote Nvidia and chief rival AMD Graphics Technologies (formerly ATI Technologies) have dominated the high performance GPU market, pushing other manufacturers to smaller, niche roles. Nvidia's primary GPU product line labeled GeForce is in direct competition with AMD's Radeon products. end quote The words rival and competition should suggest an important clue here... Moreover, On Fri, 09 Aug 2013 10:20:11 +0200 Patrick Dupre pdu...@gmx.com wrote: I reinstall a fedora 19 and I am experiencing troubles with the graphics apparently. With the previous installation fedora 14. I had to install: xorg-x11-drv-nvidia nvidia-settings nvidia-xconfig xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-libs and run: nvidia-xconfig I really really wonder how well that F14 installation worked, and who gave you the advice to install those packages... HTH, :-) Marko -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: nvidia on inspiron
On 08/09/2013 11:14 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: yum remove *-nvidia* Correction: yum remove \*nvidia\* Your way won't work because bash will expand the wildcards if you don't escape them. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: nvidia on inspiron
On 08/09/2013 01:34 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: Your way won't work because bash will expand the wildcards if you don't escape them. Not necessarily, but that is good practice. Bash will pass wildcards along if there are no matches in the string you type. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: nvidia on inspiron
Hello Joe, Thank. Do not worry, I already removed the nvidia driver because it was not working; Concerning the F14 installation, after double checking, it had been updated to fedora 16 and only nvidia-xconfig-1.0-20.fc16.i686 nvidia-settings-1.0-22.fc16.i686 are installed. Thus I guess that it OK. I have been oriented toward nvidia because a member of list suggested to install these drivers because I was complaining about a frozen laptop after a screen lock! Anyway, thank you. but a wrong way of doing without bad consequences Regards. - Original Message - From: Joe Zeff Sent: 08/09/13 08:34 PM To: Community support for Fedora users Subject: Re: nvidia on inspiron On 08/09/2013 11:14 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: yum remove *-nvidia* Correction: yum remove \*nvidia\* Your way won't work because bash will expand the wildcards if you don't escape them. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | | Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | | Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France === -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: nvidia on inspiron
On 08/09/2013 11:51 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote: Thank. Do not worry, I already removed the nvidia driver because it was not working; Concerning the F14 installation, after double checking, it had been updated to fedora 16 and only nvidia-xconfig-1.0-20.fc16.i686 nvidia-settings-1.0-22.fc16.i686 are installed. Thus I guess that it OK. Great! I'd just wanted to point out (what I consider) the best way to use wildcards with things like yum in case you had any difficulties. And, I presume that you have Good Reasons to be working with F16, even though you know that it's past EOL. You might want to join the fedoraforum at http://fedoraforum.org/ because they have a message board dedicated to older versions in case you need some version-specific information. Hope all is doing well on your box now! -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Can I run two instances of apache httpd?
Στις 9/8/2013 18:31, ο/η Reindl Harald έγραψε: Am 09.08.2013 16:12, schrieb Zdenek Pytela: Georgios Petasis pise: In my apache configuration, I am using a scripting language (tcl through apache rivet) which implements a heavy application, something that takes some minutes to start when apache starts a new process. Is there a way to separate these heavy apache processes from the rest of the apache? I.e. when the url is /my_heavy_service redirect the request to the apache which has the heavy application loaded, and the rest of the requests be handled by an apache with does not even has mod_rivet loaded? Like starting an apache on a different port (i.e. 8123), which loads my application, and starting a normal apache on port 80, which serves all requests except some, which are directed to the server in port 8123. In general I think it can be done (i.e.: http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/RunningMultipleApacheInstances), but is a way to do this in fedora 19, and keep all this systemctl * httpd stuff? Has anyone attempted this? Yes. You just have multiple Listen lines in your config file and then you have to restart the httpd.service and how does this magically have a own, isolated httpd-instance without mod_rivet whcih was the question well i posted a answer with complete examples short after the question but with this idiotic moderation it is worthless I think I have received your answer. After a few hours of looking into this, I have automated it (for my case) in the following bash script: # Steps to create a second running instance of httpd... # 1) Create the needed script for systemctrl... /usr/bin/cp -f /usr/lib/systemd/system/httpd.service \ /usr/lib/systemd/system/httpd-palo.service sed -i s/EnvironmentFile=\/etc\/sysconfig\/httpd/EnvironmentFile=\/etc\/sysconfig\/httpd-palo/g /usr/lib/systemd/system/httpd-palo.service # 2) Prepare the environment file... /usr/bin/cp -f /etc/sysconfig/httpd /etc/sysconfig/httpd-palo # 3) Append our options... echo OPTIONS= -DPaloServices -f conf/httpd-palo.conf /etc/sysconfig/httpd-palo # 4) Copy http.conf... /usr/bin/cp -f /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf /etc/httpd/conf/httpd-palo.conf sed -i s/Listen 80/PidFile \/run\/httpd-palo\/httpd.pid\\nListen 81/g /etc/httpd/conf/httpd-palo.conf sed -i 's/logs\/error_log/logs\/palo_error_log/g' /etc/httpd/conf/httpd-palo.conf sed -i 's/conf\.d/palo_conf.d/g' /etc/httpd/conf/httpd-palo.conf # 5) Create palo_conf.d... mkdir -p /run/httpd-palo rm -rf /etc/httpd/palo_conf.d mkdir -p /etc/httpd/palo_conf.d ln -s /etc/httpd/conf.d/my_palo.conf /etc/httpd/palo_conf.d/my_palo.conf ln -s /etc/httpd/conf.d/my_rivet.conf /etc/httpd/palo_conf.d/my_rivet.conf #ln -s /etc/httpd/conf.d/ssl.conf /etc/httpd/palo_conf.d/ssl.conf chcon -R -u system_u -r object_r -t httpd_config_t /etc/httpd/palo_conf.d /etc/httpd/conf.d systemctl --system daemon-reload systemctl enable httpd-palo.service systemctl enable httpd.service systemctl restart httpd-palo.service systemctl restart httpd.service What it actually does is to copy everything from the httpd configuration, into a new one, named httpd-palo. Which runs in port 81, and has its own config directory, in /etc/httpd/palo_conf.d. There, I create symbolic links from conf files in /etc/httpd/conf.d. One of the configuration files is special (my_palo.conf), as it has two branches, according to whether the name PaloServices is defined: IfDefine PaloServices Alias /palo/appservices /home/palo/opinionBuster/webapps_services Alias /palo/app /home/palo/opinionBuster/webapps Alias /palo /home/palo/opinionBuster/services /ifDefine IfDefine !PaloServices LoadModule proxy_module modules/mod_proxy.so LoadModule proxy_http_module modules/mod_proxy_http.so ProxyRequests Off SSLProxyEngine on ProxyPass/palo http://localhost:81/palo ProxyPassReverse /palo http://localhost:81/palo /IfDefine I am ok with my solution, I now have two independent httpd server instances :-) George -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Can I run two instances of apache httpd?
On 09.08.2013 10:03, Georgios Petasis wrote: Hi all, In my apache configuration, I am using a scripting language (tcl through apache rivet) which implements a heavy application, something that takes some minutes to start when apache starts a new process. Is there a way to separate these heavy apache processes from the rest of the apache? I.e. when the url is /my_heavy_service redirect the request to the apache which has the heavy application loaded, and the rest of the requests be handled by an apache with does not even has mod_rivet loaded? Like starting an apache on a different port (i.e. 8123), which loads my application, and starting a normal apache on port 80, which serves all requests except some, which are directed to the server in port 8123. In general I think it can be done (i.e.: http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/RunningMultipleApacheInstances), but is a way to do this in fedora 19, and keep all this systemctl * httpd stuff? Has anyone attempted this? George It looks like you're in need of proxy server. I'm doing nginx + apache2 + mod_wsgi for django deployments. Nginx is serving static files and apache2 + mod_wsgi is serving apps. This is really nice and simple solution. It is easy to maintain and when I do ps command I know what is what. Mateusz Marzantowicz -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: LibreOffice find/replace tries to replace everything where it matches or not
On 08.08.2013 22:16, Temlakos wrote: Everyone: It's taken me this long to realize what the problem is. But I cannot use Find-and-replace with LibreOffice anymore. It either tries to replace everything under the sun with my Replace text, or else it can't find the search key (typically a multi-word phrase) even though I am staring right at it. Where do I file the bug, and against what? How to Report Bugs in LibreOffice: - https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/BugReport Bugzilla - https://www.libreoffice.org/bugzilla/ Mateusz Marzantowicz -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: sms reader / email client?
On 08.08.2013 01:37, Ian Malone wrote: Hi, Having just changed my phone I've got a lot of backed up messages in csv format (without the sender name, so I'm going to have to reconcile it with the separate contacts backup). While there are ways to get tem onto my new phone I'm not really sure I want them there, but some are useful and need to be kept. What I'm wondering is if there's some kind of desktop reader that can handle this. I'd have thought an email client, or groupware like evolution would have a way to handle SMS, but haven't found anything so far (there are addons for *sending*, but not sure they do what I want, which is ability to sort, search and browse received messages). Since csv is plain text with separators you can use any text editor or other text manipulation program from plethora of tools available in UNIX/Linux world - cat, less, grep for example. It might not be easy for e-mail client to understand all combinations of exported data from different mobile devices. This might be the reason you have your data in csv (plain text) and not in proprietary backup file format. Mateusz Marzantowicz -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Change device/partition label
Am 08.08.2013 21:52, schrieb Mark Haney: I know this is an easy one, but I can't seem to find the current correct way to do it. I've got a TB HDD that I need to change the LABEL on. Currently it's 'LIVE' (it's an old production drive) and I really want to just remove the label altogether and mount it with the UUID of the drive. What's the best and most current way to do it? I was thinking e2label will do it, but it's been so long since I've done it, I'm playing it safe. Ideas? man e2label tune2fs -l /dev/whatever shows the UUID signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Firefox and Thunderbird Aug releases
Am 08.08.2013 20:48, schrieb David: Does anyone have any idea when we can expect Firefox 23 and Thunderbird 17.08? [harry@srv-rhsoft:~]$ rpm -q thunderbird thunderbird-17.0.8-1.fc18.x86_64 [harry@srv-rhsoft:~]$ rpm -q firefox firefox-23.0-1.fc18.x86_64 [harry@srv-rhsoft:~]$ rpm -q xulrunner xulrunner-23.0-2.fc18.x86_64 koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?tagID=204inherited=0order=-completion_time signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Firefox and Thunderbird Aug releases
Am 08.08.2013 21:34, schrieb David: On 8/8/2013 2:50 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 08.08.2013 20:48, schrieb David: Does anyone have any idea when we can expect Firefox 23 and Thunderbird 17.08? [harry@srv-rhsoft:~]$ rpm -q thunderbird thunderbird-17.0.8-1.fc18.x86_64 [harry@srv-rhsoft:~]$ rpm -q firefox firefox-23.0-1.fc18.x86_64 [harry@srv-rhsoft:~]$ rpm -q xulrunner xulrunner-23.0-2.fc18.x86_64 koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?tagID=204inherited=0order=-completion_time Thanks. I was thinking more about the 'regular user' that does not know about the need to jump through hoops with Linux from time to time * patience * koji * yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update firefox\* xulrunner\* thunderbird\* choose one of them :-) the 'regular user' implicitly chooses option 1 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Firefox and Thunderbird Aug releases
Am 08.08.2013 21:50, schrieb David: On 8/8/2013 3:39 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: * patience * koji * yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update firefox\* xulrunner\* thunderbird\* choose one of them :-) the 'regular user' implicitly chooses option 1 True. But they are not yet 'official' in my Rawhide install either. I have them in several other Linux installs (other distributions) since Tuesday as a matter of fact. I was wondering if there was some problem here with Fedora mostly bad timing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977325 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Firefox and Thunderbird Aug releases
Am 08.08.2013 22:56, schrieb David: On 8/8/2013 4:39 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 08.08.2013 22:34, schrieb David: On 8/8/2013 4:26 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: I was wondering if there was some problem here with Fedora mostly bad timing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977325 Not to insult anyone but... This same situation happens with each official Mozilla release. I can certainly agree with not following the Daily/Nightly, Alphas and Betas but the official(s) IMHO should arrive more quickly and you would be probably one of the first starting to cry loud if things are broken after untested updates. and broken oftly differs between usecases for me the iditoic chnages to remove options and show the damned tabs *always* even if there is only one and even if your web-app opens a popupd and explicitly requests *no bars, no bullshit, only a window* is broken but i can live with it You must have missed the part in this thread where I wrote that I have been using the Mozilla Firefox and Thunderbird version long before? long before* is laughable in case of FF23 One expects those to break from time to time. And you must have missed, again in this thread, where I wrote that I had offical Firefox and Thunderbird updates on Tuesday Aug 6? and now it is thursday so what is your exactly problem? are you taken repsonsibility that extensions installed with yum are not broken after a new version? if they need a update do you take responsibility for coordinate FF/TB/XULrunner/Extensions packaging, testing and rollout? no? so what... As for the other things that you dislike? Those have been active for months in the pre-releases and writen about for the same time. There have been several articles about how to change those items too blabla - the options for hide the tab-bar are there in about:config but it does not change anything - i am using Firefox since it even had not the name Firefox and was known as Firebird signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Firefox and Thunderbird Aug releases
Am 08.08.2013 22:34, schrieb David: On 8/8/2013 4:26 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: I was wondering if there was some problem here with Fedora mostly bad timing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977325 Not to insult anyone but... This same situation happens with each official Mozilla release. I can certainly agree with not following the Daily/Nightly, Alphas and Betas but the official(s) IMHO should arrive more quickly and you would be probably one of the first starting to cry loud if things are broken after untested updates. and broken oftly differs between usecases for me the iditoic chnages to remove options and show the damned tabs *always* even if there is only one and even if your web-app opens a popupd and explicitly requests *no bars, no bullshit, only a window* is broken but i can live with it signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Firefox and Thunderbird Aug releases
Am 08.08.2013 23:04, schrieb David: On 8/8/2013 4:47 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: On 08/08/2013 01:34 PM, David wrote: I can certainly agree with not following the Daily/Nightly, Alphas and Betas but the official(s) IMHO should arrive more quickly. The people doing the packaging and testing aren't exactly getting paid for their work. If you want the new releases available sooner, there's nothing stopping you from helping out. Joe did you not read where I said that I was asking for the 'regular Fedora Community users' no, you did only make noise, not more and not less updates are released after they gone thorugh updates-testing period if whatever distribution fires them out without - their problem period so *what* is the problem you think you solved by impatience? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Firefox and Thunderbird Aug releases
Am 08.08.2013 23:12, schrieb David: I can not say anything about extensions installed with yum. I use the official extensions from Mozilla. And they work regardless what Fedora does. well, so don't complainif you can't say anything long before* is laughable in case of FF23 I was using Firefox 23 when it was a Daily Is that long before where you live who cares in context of the official release? these are *completly* different binaries with completly different shared libraries and a different compiler, they have *nothing* common with distribution packages I asked a question. Is that *not* what this list if for. Asking questions. but you refused the answers and started to argue with snapshot-builds and whatever - so no you are not helping much with your hurry two days after the release, the people who care have it already and the others have no problem actually One thing it appears that I did do was to pi$$ you off. Byr. Please go argue with yourself the only thing which is pissing me off is when people refuse to understand well suited explanations signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Firefox and Thunderbird Aug releases
Am 08.08.2013 23:41, schrieb David: On 8/8/2013 5:33 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: who cares in context of the official release? these are *completly* different binaries with completly different shared libraries and a different compiler, they have *nothing* common with distribution packages The Linux Firefox 23 that was released by Mozilla on Tuesday works just fine with the official Firefox extension that come from Mozilla. *If* the is a problem with the rpm that Fedora provides/// Sounds like a fedora problem to me. *nobody* said there is a problem *because* nobody knows before testing if you think if it compiles it works is they way to go you never where responsilbe for any IT exepct your private ones - the packager for a distribution is in doubt responsible for the userbase and a untested, broken update levaes a bad taste in the mouth of users which rely that auto-updates are working and not only untested crap I have already gotten a perfectly good explanation. That the release is still in update-testing. While other distro have already released it to the public. I have to much respect to post names but there are three well known names that I currently have installed that do one of the three i guess is Ubuntu, a piece of crap in my opinion but hey, if it is your favor why not using it? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Can I run two instances of apache httpd?
Am 09.08.2013 10:03, schrieb Georgios Petasis: In my apache configuration, I am using a scripting language (tcl through apache rivet) which implements a heavy application, something that takes some minutes to start when apache starts a new process. Is there a way to separate these heavy apache processes from the rest of the apache? I.e. when the url is /my_heavy_service redirect the request to the apache which has the heavy application loaded, and the rest of the requests be handled by an apache with does not even has mod_rivet loaded? Like starting an apache on a different port (i.e. 8123), which loads my application, and starting a normal apache on port 80, which serves all requests except some, which are directed to the server in port 8123. In general I think it can be done (i.e.: http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/RunningMultipleApacheInstances), but is a way to do this in fedora 19, and keep all this systemctl * httpd stuff? Has anyone attempted this? nothing easier than that, you start httpd with a specific httpd.conf the sample below needs some LoadModule in your case because our httpd has statically builtin the used modules since we do not use standard packages for business critical services but they way to go is easy: * your own systemd-unit * your own httpd.conf * your own php.ini * if you want different php-extensions your own php.d * for make it accesable read from a frontend-server read the mod_proxy manual PHP_INI_SCAN_DIR=/Volumes/dune/httpd-worker/conf/php.d PHPIniDir /Volumes/dune/httpd-worker/conf __ [root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ cat /etc/systemd/system/httpd-lounge-worker.service [Unit] Description=HTTP-Worker [Service] Type=simple EnvironmentFile=/Volumes/dune/httpd-worker/conf/systemd-env ExecStart=/usr/sbin/httpd $OPTIONS -D FOREGROUND -f /Volumes/dune/httpd-worker/conf/httpd.conf ExecReload=/usr/bin/kill -HUP $MAINPID Restart=always RestartSec=1 UMask=006 PrivateTmp=yes ReadOnlyDirectories=/etc ReadOnlyDirectories=/usr [Install] WantedBy=multi-user.target __ [root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ cat /Volumes/dune/httpd-worker/conf/systemd-env PHP_INI_SCAN_DIR=/Volumes/dune/httpd-worker/conf/php.d OPENSSL_NO_DEFAULT_ZLIB=1 STOP_TIMEOUT=5 LANG=C __ [root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ cat /Volumes/dune/httpd-worker/conf/httpd.conf ServerName localhost ServerTokens Prod ServerRoot /etc/httpd PHPIniDir /Volumes/dune/httpd-worker/conf PidFile /run/httpd/httpd-worker.pid Timeout30 KeepAlive Off MaxKeepAliveRequests 50 KeepAliveTimeout2 User apache Group apache ServerAdminhostmas...@thelounge.net UseCanonicalName Off HostnameLookups Off ServerSignature Off Listen 127.0.0.1: TypesConfig /etc/mime.types AccessFileName .htaccess DirectoryIndex index.php EnableSendFile On SendBufferSize 65536 AcceptPathInfoOff TraceEnable Off LimitRequestFields 50 LimitRequestFieldSize 1 LimitRequestBody 52428800 LimitInternalRecursion 5 FileETag -INode BufferedLogs On RequestReadTimeout header=5-15,MinRate=500 StartServers1 MinSpareServers 1 MaxSpareServers 4 ServerLimit50 MaxClients 45 ListenBacklog 250 MaxRequestsPerChild
Re: How do I start libvirt in Fedora 19?
On 08/08/2013 09:53, Paul W. Frields wrote: On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 10:45:27PM +0800, Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) wrote: Hi, I have just installed virt-manager in Fedora 19. I have looked into the /etc/init.d directory but I can't find any init scripts for libvirt. Is libvirt using systemd, and if so, how do I start it? Thank you very much. It is, and should be enabled by default so it starts automatically at next reboot. To start (as root): systemctl start libvirtd.service Dear Paul, Problem solved. Thank you very much for your reply. -- Yours sincerely, Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Where is the iptables firewall configuration file in Fedora 19?
It's no longer in /etc/sysconfig/iptables. -- Yours sincerely, Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Can I run two instances of apache httpd?
Am 09.08.2013 16:12, schrieb Zdenek Pytela: Georgios Petasis pise: In my apache configuration, I am using a scripting language (tcl through apache rivet) which implements a heavy application, something that takes some minutes to start when apache starts a new process. Is there a way to separate these heavy apache processes from the rest of the apache? I.e. when the url is /my_heavy_service redirect the request to the apache which has the heavy application loaded, and the rest of the requests be handled by an apache with does not even has mod_rivet loaded? Like starting an apache on a different port (i.e. 8123), which loads my application, and starting a normal apache on port 80, which serves all requests except some, which are directed to the server in port 8123. In general I think it can be done (i.e.: http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/RunningMultipleApacheInstances), but is a way to do this in fedora 19, and keep all this systemctl * httpd stuff? Has anyone attempted this? Yes. You just have multiple Listen lines in your config file and then you have to restart the httpd.service and how does this magically have a own, isolated httpd-instance without mod_rivet whcih was the question well i posted a answer with complete examples short after the question but with this idiotic moderation it is worthless signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Installing virt-manager in Fedora 19 did not create a network bridge
Hi, When I installed virt-manager in Ubuntu, it created a network bridge called virbr0. Now that I have installed virt-manager in Fedora 19, it did not create a network bridge. So how do I create a network bridge? Is virt-manager supposed to create a network bridge? I installed virt-manager using the following command. sudo yum install virt-manager Are there any more rpm packages which I am supposed to install? Thank you very much. -- Yours sincerely, Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Where is the iptables firewall configuration file in Fedora 19?
On 9 August 2013 17:47, Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) singapore.mr.teo.en.m...@gmail.com wrote: It's no longer in /etc/sysconfig/iptables. Hi: Mine are there... [casep@ip36 ~]$ sudo cat /etc/sysconfig/iptables # Firewall configuration written by system-config-firewall # Manual customization of this file is not recommended. .. Have you exec system-config-firewall ? Kind regards -- My name is Ozymandias, king of kings: Look on my works, ye Mighty, and despair! Percy Bysshe Shelley http://sites.google.com/site/carlossepulveda -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Where is the iptables firewall configuration file in Fedora 19?
On Saturday, August 10, 2013 05:47:57 AM Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming wrote: It's no longer in /etc/sysconfig/iptables. Fedora 19 used FirewallD by default. If you prefer to use the iptables initscripts, you need to install iptables-services and issue 'systemctl disable firewalld'. -A -- Anthony - http://messinet.com - http://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery 8F89 5E72 8DF0 BCF0 10BE 9967 92DC 35DC B001 4A4E signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Installing virt-manager in Fedora 19 did not create a network bridge
On Friday, August 09, 2013 10:56:16 PM Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming wrote: When I installed virt-manager in Ubuntu, it created a network bridge called virbr0. The bridge is created when you configure and start libvirtd. -A -- Anthony - http://messinet.com - http://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery 8F89 5E72 8DF0 BCF0 10BE 9967 92DC 35DC B001 4A4E signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Enable JavaScript preference checkbox has been removed in Firefox
... and user-set values will be reset to the default according to http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/23.0/releasenotes/ Thank you Mozilla Foundation, you have just made my netbook unusable. What do people suggest? The NoScript addon? A different browser? I don't believe I'm the only one who hates JS and only switches it on for websites that absolutely require it. Andras -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Enable JavaScript preference checkbox has been removed in Firefox
On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 01:34:24 +0200 Andras Simon sza...@gmail.com wrote: ... and user-set values will be reset to the default according to http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/23.0/releasenotes/ Thank you Mozilla Foundation, you have just made my netbook unusable. What do people suggest? The NoScript addon? A different browser? I don't believe I'm the only one who hates JS and only switches it on for websites that absolutely require it. Andras Yes, I'd just use noscript. It gives you much finer grained control than a simple manual on/off option any way. Ananda signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Enable JavaScript preference checkbox has been removed in Firefox
Andras Simon szajmi at gmail.com writes: ... and user-set values will be reset to the default according to http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/23.0/releasenotes/ Thank you Mozilla Foundation, you have just made my netbook unusable. Under about:config , set javascript.enabled to false . -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Enable JavaScript preference checkbox has been removed in Firefox
2013/8/10, আনন্দ কুমার সমাদ্দার asamad...@myopera.com: Yes, I'd just use noscript. It gives you much finer grained control than a simple manual on/off option any way. Last time I tried it, I concluded that manual on/off was much better for me. But that was years ago, noscript may have improved, and I don't seem to have a choice anyway... Thanks, Andras -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Enable JavaScript preference checkbox has been removed in Firefox
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Andras Simon sza...@gmail.com wrote: ... and user-set values will be reset to the default according to http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/23.0/releasenotes/ Thank you Mozilla Foundation, you have just made my netbook unusable. What do people suggest? The NoScript addon? A different browser? I don't believe I'm the only one who hates JS and only switches it on for websites that absolutely require it. Yeah, just use NoScript. They probably killed it because that's what anyone who used that checkbox really wants. Makes sense to me. The real tragedy in Firefox 23 is the death of the blink tag. [1] It's almost not really Mozilla [2] anymore. :-( -T.C. [1] http://www.jwz.org/blog/2013/08/a-light-has-gone-out-on-the-web/ [2] http://www.jwz.org/gruntle/nscpdorm.html -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Where is the iptables firewall configuration file in Fedora 19?
On Saturday, August 10, 2013 07:21:32 AM Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming wrote: On 10/08/2013 06:03, Anthony Messina wrote: On Saturday, August 10, 2013 05:47:57 AM Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming wrote: It's no longer in /etc/sysconfig/iptables. Fedora 19 used FirewallD by default. If you prefer to use the iptables initscripts, you need to install iptables-services and issue 'systemctl disable firewalld'. -A Dear Anthony, How do I configure firewalld? Is there a GUI interface? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FirewallD To enable or disable firewall features for example in zones, you can either use the graphical configuration tool firewall-config or the command line client firewall-cmd -A -- Anthony - http://messinet.com - http://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery 8F89 5E72 8DF0 BCF0 10BE 9967 92DC 35DC B001 4A4E signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Enable JavaScript preference checkbox has been removed in Firefox
2013/8/10, Andre Robatino robat...@fedoraproject.org: Andras Simon szajmi at gmail.com writes: ... and user-set values will be reset to the default according to http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/23.0/releasenotes/ Thank you Mozilla Foundation, you have just made my netbook unusable. Under about:config , set javascript.enabled to false . Thanks a lot for saving my sanity! Andras -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Enable JavaScript preference checkbox has been removed in Firefox
2013/8/10, T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com: Yeah, just use NoScript. They probably killed it because that's what anyone who used that checkbox really wants. I'm not sure I do. But thanks for the suggestion anyway! Andras -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Re: Enable JavaScript preference checkbox has been removed in Firefox
On Sat 10 August 2013 01:44:45 Andras Simon wrote: 2013/8/10, আনন্দ কুমার সমাদ্দার asamad...@myopera.com: Yes, I'd just use noscript. It gives you much finer grained control than a simple manual on/off option any way. Last time I tried it, I concluded that manual on/off was much better for me. But that was years ago, noscript may have improved, and I don't seem to have a choice anyway... Noscript works well these days, however you can disable JS in about:config Set javascript.enabled to false HTH Colin -- Fedora 19 (Schrödinger's Cat) Registered Linux user number #342953 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Enable JavaScript preference checkbox has been removed in Firefox
On Friday, August 9, 2013, Andras Simon sza...@gmail.com wrote: 2013/8/10, T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com: Yeah, just use NoScript. They probably killed it because that's what anyone who used that checkbox really wants. I'm not sure I do. But thanks for the suggestion anyway! Well, in addition to the per-site configuration it's famous for, it also has a turn on just for this site right now mode, so you can temporarily turn it on when you need it and just close the tab when you're done, without having to go into about:config to turn it off. That also means you can turn it on for one tab without affecting others. So you still might. ;-) -T.C. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Enable JavaScript preference checkbox has been removed in Firefox
2013/8/10, T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com: On Friday, August 9, 2013, Andras Simon sza...@gmail.com wrote: 2013/8/10, T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com: Yeah, just use NoScript. They probably killed it because that's what anyone who used that checkbox really wants. I'm not sure I do. But thanks for the suggestion anyway! Well, in addition to the per-site configuration it's famous for, it also has a turn on just for this site right now mode, so you can temporarily turn it on when you need it and just close the tab when you're done, without having to go into about:config to turn it off. That also means you can turn it on for one tab without affecting others. So you still might. ;-) turn on just for this site right now mode? Sounds great! You're right, I very well might :-) Thanks, Andras -T.C. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Enable JavaScript preference checkbox has been removed in Firefox
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Andras Simon sza...@gmail.com wrote: What do people suggest? The NoScript addon? A different browser? I don't believe I'm the only one who hates JS and only switches it on for websites that absolutely require it. Prefbar http://prefbar.mozdev.org F8 to show/hide, there's a checkbox to enable/disable JS FC -- During times of Universal Deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act Durante épocas de Engaño Universal, decir la verdad se convierte en un Acto Revolucionario - George Orwell -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Enable JavaScript preference checkbox has been removed in Firefox
2013/8/10, Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com: On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Andras Simon sza...@gmail.com wrote: What do people suggest? The NoScript addon? A different browser? I don't believe I'm the only one who hates JS and only switches it on for websites that absolutely require it. Prefbar http://prefbar.mozdev.org F8 to show/hide, there's a checkbox to enable/disable JS Thanks for yet another promising option! Andras -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Enable JavaScript preference checkbox has been removed in Firefox
Am 10.08.2013 01:34, schrieb Andras Simon: ... and user-set values will be reset to the default according to http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/23.0/releasenotes/ Thank you Mozilla Foundation, you have just made my netbook unusable. What do people suggest? The NoScript addon? A different browser? I don't believe I'm the only one who hates JS and only switches it on for websites that absolutely require it noscript what makes me much more angry is that the idiotic tab-bar is now always present and browser.tabs.autoHide;true is ignored, this absolutely braindead for web-applications opening dialogs which should have no bars at all but more frustrating is the general attitude all over the software wold to hide any options because the developers thinking all their users are idiots and finally the next generation of users *will* be idiots because they never had a chance to see and learn anything signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Where is the iptables firewall configuration file in Fedora 19?
On 10/08/2013 06:03, Anthony Messina wrote: On Saturday, August 10, 2013 05:47:57 AM Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming wrote: It's no longer in /etc/sysconfig/iptables. Fedora 19 used FirewallD by default. If you prefer to use the iptables initscripts, you need to install iptables-services and issue 'systemctl disable firewalld'. -A Dear Anthony, How do I configure firewalld? Is there a GUI interface? -- Yours sincerely, Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Enable JavaScript preference checkbox has been removed in Firefox
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: but more frustrating is the general attitude all over the software wold to hide any options because the developers thinking all their users are idiots and finally the next generation of users *will* be idiots because they never had a chance to see and learn anything Exactly my thoughts. Thats why I use SeaMonkey, the browser suite that used to be Mozilla instead of the evermore crippled Firefox FC -- During times of Universal Deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act Durante épocas de Engaño Universal, decir la verdad se convierte en un Acto Revolucionario - George Orwell -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Was Mate desktop, ten caja instances. Now Nouveau
On 07/23/2013 11:03 PM, Roger wrote: snip After that I tried to upgrade from nouveau to NVIDIA drivers. /snip Why? vdpau and XvMC When nouveau support them, I'll reconsider. Buts its been years now, and still no support for them in nouveau. -- Kevin J. Cummings kjch...@verizon.net cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net cummi...@kjc386.framingham.ma.us Registered Linux User #1232 (http://www.linuxcounter.net/) -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Enable JavaScript preference checkbox has been removed in Firefox
On 10 August 2013 01:34, Andras Simon sza...@gmail.com wrote: ... and user-set values will be reset to the default according to http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/23.0/releasenotes/ Thank you Mozilla Foundation, you have just made my netbook unusable. What do people suggest? The NoScript addon? A different browser? I don't believe I'm the only one who hates JS and only switches it on for websites that absolutely require it. Andras -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org Personally, I am not with or against this change, but here's their rationale http://limi.net/checkboxes-that-kill -- Ahmad Samir -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Enable JavaScript preference checkbox has been removed in Firefox
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 01:44:45 +0200, Andras Simon sza...@gmail.com wrote: 2013/8/10, আনন্দ কুমার সমাদ্দার asamad...@myopera.com: Yes, I'd just use noscript. It gives you much finer grained control than a simple manual on/off option any way. Last time I tried it, I concluded that manual on/off was much better for me. But that was years ago, noscript may have improved, and I don't seem to have a choice anyway... You can use about:config to control this, although it's significantly less convenient. You could switch to using seamonkey, which is similar, but lets you control more stuff through preferences. I have heard mentions of other extensions for turning javascript on and off easily. Note also that they have also removed the ability to disable loading of images. As far as I know you can't even do this with about:config. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Enable JavaScript preference checkbox has been removed in Firefox
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 16:45:02 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com wrote: Yeah, just use NoScript. They probably killed it because that's what anyone who used that checkbox really wants. Makes sense to me. NoScript isn't as safe in at least some regards. There are some places that javascript is interpreted that noscript doesn't (or at least didn't) control and that javascript attacks could succeed in spite of noscript. (The particular example was using javascript in a url after a redirect to compromise firefox.) However, manualling switching between allowing and blocking javascript is risky, as it is easy to make a mistake. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
