file deletion from usb drive??
Hi, Created external 500G usb hard drive, Added ~300G of dirs/files to it I can see the files from the mounted drive, via the Computer icon of the desktop. Here's the tricky issue! I drill down in the drive/dir icon to get the target dir, which has 1000s of files in it. I select a few using the mouse, select the move to trash menu item, and after it says it's moving files to the trash, I do a refresh/reload, and the files are still there!! So, just how do I delete files from the external drive! Thanks -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F20: yum update does not automatically update grub2
On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 16:04:47 -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote: OK, thanks! I am not sure I understood this correctly, but here is what I did: sudo yum update -y (this brings back the new kernel and installs it). rpm -q --scripts kernel|tail -2 posttrans scriptlet (using /bin/sh): /bin/kernel-install add 3.12.5-302.fc20.x86_64 /boot/vmlinuz-3.12.5-302.fc20.x86_64 || exit $? So, this appears to match whatever you have written above. Now what should I do? Well, it depends. What would you like to do? You could become superuser root, then run exactly the kernel-install command found above, and check the exit return code and watch out for any warning/error it might print. Next step would be to debug the /bin/kernel-install script in an attempt at finding out where it fails. Perhaps it fails within the /sbin/new-kernel-pkg script, perhaps in grubby (that'll be C code then, however), perhaps due to SELinux, or perhaps because it doesn't recognise a valid template in your grub.cfg. You could also spend some time in bugzilla and search for whether somebody else is affected. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#3 stuck for 22s! [httpd:1889]
On 23.12.2013 03:30, Steven P. Ulrick wrote: Hello, Everyone I just ran yum update and rebooted. Some time not long after that reboot, I started getting message like this: Dec 22 20:11:26 afolkey2 kernel: [ 4130.161465] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#3 stuck for 22s! [httpd:1889] [...] I rebooted into an older kernel and have not had any more of these messages popping up. Eventually, my system became unresponsive and I had to reboot. To clarify, does it happen with old or new kernel? I am running Fedora 20 (fully updated) Installation method: fedup Any ideas? It looks like httpd is hanging somewhere doing something and kernel detects this. It might also be that your system is busy on doing I/O operations etc. and httpd process is blocked waiting for CPU time. Mateusz Marzantowicz -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Upgrade stops after Mounting /boot
Chris Murphy writes: On Dec 22, 2013, at 10:35 AM, Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com wrote: Sam Varshavchik writes: Trying to upgrade F19-F20 using fedup --iso with luks-encrypted partitions. The upgrade stops after Mounted /boot, and does not proceed, no further errors. Nothing appears to be running. I did run into bug 1043981, and applied the patch to fix fedup barfing. … nd, this looks like a bone-fida bug with fedup 0.8. If it's just stuck on /home you can edit /etc/fstab to comment out the /home entry, since it's not needed for the upgrade. Then restore fstab after reboot, and reboot again (or mount it manually). Also this case of failure doesn't yet have a work around, and is actually a bug in the F19 installer which was fixed in F20. If it applies to your case, it's best to just reinstall from scratch because the layout is wrong. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1044551 In my case I was able to succesfully upgrade by systemctl cancel-ing the stuck password prompt job from an alternate console. This started the upgrade, which completed without issues. My bug might be the same one here, at least insofar as the LUKS password prompting itself goes. However after kicking the upgrade, I ended up with a working system, unlike this bug. The difference might be that in my case I had regular, individual disk partitions; LVM was never in the picture. pgpp3ZRZbAaYL.pgp Description: PGP signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: file deletion from usb drive??
Allegedly, on or about 23 December 2013, bruce sent: I select a few using the mouse, select the move to trash menu item, and after it says it's moving files to the trash, I do a refresh/reload, and the files are still there!! So, just how do I delete files from the external drive! I dunno about that problem (do you own the files you're trying to delete?), but if you want to delete files, try using a delete command rather than move to trash, then empty trash. Have you done the empty trash step, too? I always set the option to show an actual delete command in the Nautilus file browser. If I actually want to delete files, then messing around with the trashcan is a timewaster. -- [tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp Linux 3.9.10-100.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Sun Jul 14 01:31:27 UTC 2013 x86_64 All mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted, there is no point trying to privately email me, I will only read messages posted to the public lists. George Orwell's '1984' was supposed to be a warning against tyranny, not a set of instructions for supposedly democratic governments. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: can you (theoretically) run only NFSv4 (without earlier versions)?
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote: a long, long time ago, i reported an apparent glitch with NFS on fedora: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2010-January/097465.html in that, at the time, it *appeared* that you couldn't set up NFS so that *only* version 4 was running. before i start messing with this again, anyone know whether that's changed? that is, is it possible to set up a network in which only NFSv4 is running, and no earlier versions are supported? thanks. It's been possible to run nfsv4-only nfs for a long time, with only port 2049 being let through the firewall. It only appears that you can't because because rpc.mountd has to run on the server but it's only involved in the exporting and not the mounting. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: file deletion from usb drive??
I tried adding the delete option to Nautilus, as well as running the rm command from the cmdline find . -name *Booklist.html* | xargs rm -f I've tried all of this as root with no results. On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Tim ignored_mail...@yahoo.com.au wrote: Allegedly, on or about 23 December 2013, bruce sent: I select a few using the mouse, select the move to trash menu item, and after it says it's moving files to the trash, I do a refresh/reload, and the files are still there!! So, just how do I delete files from the external drive! I dunno about that problem (do you own the files you're trying to delete?), but if you want to delete files, try using a delete command rather than move to trash, then empty trash. Have you done the empty trash step, too? I always set the option to show an actual delete command in the Nautilus file browser. If I actually want to delete files, then messing around with the trashcan is a timewaster. -- [tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp Linux 3.9.10-100.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Sun Jul 14 01:31:27 UTC 2013 x86_64 All mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted, there is no point trying to privately email me, I will only read messages posted to the public lists. George Orwell's '1984' was supposed to be a warning against tyranny, not a set of instructions for supposedly democratic governments. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F20 in VirtualBox VM
On Mon, 2013-12-23 at 09:57 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: The OP is not a newbie. He has stated that he has run VBox since forever and that F20 works fine in virt-manager. The last significant post from the OP would indicate he has it running under virt-manager and is not concentrating on trying to find a method to convert VBox VM's to run under virt-manager. Just to clarify: I am not a newbie, I have been a Unix sysadmin for almost 30 years, and been a Linux sysadmin for almost 15 years. I also run Xen virtualization systems at work that implement critical services such as DNS and authentication, so I am not new to the concept of virtualization either. I use VirtualBox at home just to run a couple of Windows VMs. All that said, it still often happens that someone else will think of something that I have not, or have a piece of knowledge that I lack, so even very experienced people may occasionally ask for help on a mailing list. I am not afraid to do that and I have often received very helpful advice. I started this thread because I was trying to install an F20 VM under VirtualBox on an F19 system. I do know how to use VB to connect the DVD ISO to the VM and install an OS. The problem is that when I do this with the F20 ISO, syslinux boots and the first Anaconda selection screen comes up. I select Install Fedora, and I get nothing but a black screen after that. I still have not solved this problem. As a workaround, I attempted to install F20 on a VM under KVM. The install works, but the VM runs dog slow (so slow that it's useless). So as of now, I still do not have a usable F20 VM. But I have moved on to other projects, since this wasn't something that was critically important. And this thread has now degenerated into something that is no longer related to the actual topic. --Greg -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F20: yum update does not automatically update grub2
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 11:52:13 +0100 Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 16:04:47 -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote: OK, thanks! I am not sure I understood this correctly, but here is what I did: sudo yum update -y (this brings back the new kernel and installs it). rpm -q --scripts kernel|tail -2 posttrans scriptlet (using /bin/sh): /bin/kernel-install add 3.12.5-302.fc20.x86_64 /boot/vmlinuz-3.12.5-302.fc20.x86_64 || exit $? So, this appears to match whatever you have written above. Now what should I do? Well, it depends. What would you like to do? You could become superuser root, then run exactly the kernel-install command found above, and check the exit return code and watch out for any warning/error it might print. Thanks! $ sudo rpm -q --scripts kernel|tail -2 posttrans scriptlet (using /bin/sh): /bin/kernel-install add 3.12.5-302.fc20.x86_64 /boot/vmlinuz-3.12.5-302.fc20.x86_64 || exit $? This is all I get. Not sure what it means/how to check the exit return code. Next step would be to debug the /bin/kernel-install script in an attempt at finding out where it fails. Perhaps it fails within the /sbin/new-kernel-pkg script, perhaps in grubby (that'll be C code then, however), perhaps due to SELinux, or perhaps because it doesn't recognise a valid template in your grub.cfg. How does one debug the /bin/kernel-install script? You could also spend some time in bugzilla and search for whether somebody else is affected. Thanks! I will look around, but judging by how no one has complained on this list or pointed to a BZ entry, perhaps not. Many thanks again, and best wishes! Ranjan -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org -- Important Notice: This mailbox is ignored: e-mails are set to be deleted on receipt. Please respond to the mailing list if appropriate. For those needing to send personal or professional e-mail, please use appropriate addresses. FREE 3D EARTH SCREENSAVER - Watch the Earth right on your desktop! Check it out at http://www.inbox.com/earth -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#3 stuck for 22s! [httpd:1889]
On 23.12.2013, Steven P. Ulrick wrote: Dec 22 20:11:26 afolkey2 kernel: [ 4130.161465] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#3 stuck for 22s! [httpd:1889] Dec 22 20:11:50 afolkey2 kernel: [ 4154.123765] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 22s! [httpd:1793] It's the kernel watchdog bailing out. Do you run httpd within a virtual box? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: file deletion from usb drive??
On 12/23/2013 05:52 AM, bruce wrote: I tried adding the delete option to Nautilus, as well as running the rm command from the cmdline find . -name *Booklist.html* | xargs rm -f I've tried all of this as root with no results. On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Tim ignored_mail...@yahoo.com.au wrote: Allegedly, on or about 23 December 2013, bruce sent: I select a few using the mouse, select the move to trash menu item, and after it says it's moving files to the trash, I do a refresh/reload, and the files are still there!! So, just how do I delete files from the external drive! I dunno about that problem (do you own the files you're trying to delete?), but if you want to delete files, try using a delete command rather than move to trash, then empty trash. Have you done the empty trash step, too? I always set the option to show an actual delete command in the Nautilus file browser. If I actually want to delete files, then messing around with the trashcan is a timewaster. -- [tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp Linux 3.9.10-100.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Sun Jul 14 01:31:27 UTC 2013 x86_64 All mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted, there is no point trying to privately email me, I will only read messages posted to the public lists. George Orwell's '1984' was supposed to be a warning against tyranny, not a set of instructions for supposedly democratic governments. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org Is your disk mounted read-only ? Can you make new files on it ? Regards, John -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: file deletion from usb drive??
John, I can create new dirs on it, I assume I can create files as well. I'm assuming it should be read/write/delete... I've been looking to see exactly how centos/fedora assigns privs/perms when doing auto mount for external/usb hard drives. In the nutilus gui for the computer/drive, there is a item for properties that has permissions.. I did set all of the sections that I saw to read/write/delete in the event this was a perm issue. On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 12:20 PM, John Wendel jwende...@comcast.net wrote: On 12/23/2013 05:52 AM, bruce wrote: I tried adding the delete option to Nautilus, as well as running the rm command from the cmdline find . -name *Booklist.html* | xargs rm -f I've tried all of this as root with no results. On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Tim ignored_mail...@yahoo.com.au wrote: Allegedly, on or about 23 December 2013, bruce sent: I select a few using the mouse, select the move to trash menu item, and after it says it's moving files to the trash, I do a refresh/reload, and the files are still there!! So, just how do I delete files from the external drive! I dunno about that problem (do you own the files you're trying to delete?), but if you want to delete files, try using a delete command rather than move to trash, then empty trash. Have you done the empty trash step, too? I always set the option to show an actual delete command in the Nautilus file browser. If I actually want to delete files, then messing around with the trashcan is a timewaster. -- [tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp Linux 3.9.10-100.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Sun Jul 14 01:31:27 UTC 2013 x86_64 All mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted, there is no point trying to privately email me, I will only read messages posted to the public lists. George Orwell's '1984' was supposed to be a warning against tyranny, not a set of instructions for supposedly democratic governments. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org Is your disk mounted read-only ? Can you make new files on it ? Regards, John -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Απάντ.: f20 - Anyone else having problems installing x64
On 12/21/2013 11:04 PM, Kostas Sfakiotakis issued this missive: Hi, back in the early days of CDR media, we used to consider some drives even incompatible with certain colors. It was a long time ago so if I recall the dark blue ones were the best choose and the silver the worst. Where did your elephant memory recalled that ?? It should have remained in a small drawer in the smallest corner of your brain. Am not sure though brands ( HP, TDK,...) have to do with it, I used to use many of them , just the color. Ah, Kostas! Yes, I dusted the cobwebs from the deepest part of my memory to find that bit about the color of the CD-Rs, but color can still play a part in DVD compatibility. DVD drives are just as sensitive to the laser color and reflectivity of the disk. In addition, there are DVD drives that are compatible with DVD-R(W) media but NOT DVD+R(W) media and vice versa. As far as branding is concerned, there are a limited number of makers of the media and that product is generally purchased and rebranded by the major players. However, I find that going with one of the big labels gives one a better chance at getting reliable media. I've had very good luck compatibility-wise with TDK's DVD-R media and both of HP's DVD-R and DVD+R. Keep in mind we have some pretty funky old systems laying about here and it can be a challenge to get media to read on some of them. On 12/20/2013 11:26 AM, Tim issued this missive: Allegedly, on or about 20 December 2013, Gregory P. Ennis sent: The first DVD was created on a different laptop, and it failed on the Gateway, but worked on the laptop it had been created on. The Gateway machine still had Centos on it so I created another DVD using it, and had no problems booting and installing F20. I have never had a mismatch of DVD drives before, so this was unexpected, at least by me. Cheap blank discs? (Not always very compatible with drives.) Burnt the disc at maximum speed? (Not always the best option.) Also check the color of the disk media. Sometimes the color of the media screws up the wavelength of the reflected laser so it doesn't register correctly. We've had problems with that using cheap DVD-Rs (we stick with TDK or HP now). It was a huge problem back in the early days of CD-R media. -- - Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigitalri...@alldigital.com - - AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 22643734Yahoo: origrps2 - -- -Hello. My PID is Inigo Montoya. You `kill -9'-ed my parent- - process. Prepare to vi. - -- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F20 in VirtualBox VM
On 12/23/2013 9:11 AM, Greg Woods wrote: On Mon, 2013-12-23 at 09:57 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: The OP is not a newbie. He has stated that he has run VBox since forever and that F20 works fine in virt-manager. The last significant post from the OP would indicate he has it running under virt-manager and is not concentrating on trying to find a method to convert VBox VM's to run under virt-manager. Just to clarify: I am not a newbie, I have been a Unix sysadmin for almost 30 years, and been a Linux sysadmin for almost 15 years. I also run Xen virtualization systems at work that implement critical services such as DNS and authentication, so I am not new to the concept of virtualization either. I use VirtualBox at home just to run a couple of Windows VMs. All that said, it still often happens that someone else will think of something that I have not, or have a piece of knowledge that I lack, so even very experienced people may occasionally ask for help on a mailing list. I am not afraid to do that and I have often received very helpful advice. I started this thread because I was trying to install an F20 VM under VirtualBox on an F19 system. I do know how to use VB to connect the DVD ISO to the VM and install an OS. The problem is that when I do this with the F20 ISO, syslinux boots and the first Anaconda selection screen comes up. I select Install Fedora, and I get nothing but a black screen after that. I still have not solved this problem. As a workaround, I attempted to install F20 on a VM under KVM. The install works, but the VM runs dog slow (so slow that it's useless). So as of now, I still do not have a usable F20 VM. But I have moved on to other projects, since this wasn't something that was critically important. And this thread has now degenerated into something that is no longer related to the actual topic. --Greg I stand corrected. My bad. Sorry. I have never had this problem but I see several users post about it. As I recall it the suggestions were 'to install in text mode' or to 'set the resolution' in the boot. I do *not* know if these work, I never needed to try it. Good luck. -- David -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F20: yum update does not automatically update grub2
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 08:20:53 -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote: You could become superuser root, then run exactly the kernel-install command found above, and check the exit return code and watch out for any warning/error it might print. Thanks! $ sudo rpm -q --scripts kernel|tail -2 posttrans scriptlet (using /bin/sh): /bin/kernel-install add 3.12.5-302.fc20.x86_64 /boot/vmlinuz-3.12.5-302.fc20.x86_64 || exit $? This is all I get. You've only queried the kernel package for its scriptlets section. You haven't tried to execute the command you can see in there. Not sure what it means/how to check the exit return code. By evaluating/examining the $? variable after running a program. How does one debug the /bin/kernel-install script? It's better to stop here right away, since I had assumed you would either be capable of performing a few trouble-shooting tasks or be interested enough to want to learn about it. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Thunderbird-lightning Version Incompatibility
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 05:16:46PM -0800, Steven Rosenberg wrote: On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Jonathan Ryshpan jonr...@pacbell.net wrote: The current versions of thunderbird and thunderbird-lightning, namely * thunderbird-24.2.0-2 * thunderbird-lightning-2.6.2-3 don't seem to be compatible. I believe an update was pushed to F19 today to fix this. Yep, that fixed the problem for me, thanks someone :-) FYI, the update that fixed this for me: Dec 23 09:10:35 Updated: thunderbird-lightning-2.6.4-7.fc19.x86_64 And, the one that (I'm pretty sure) broke it for me was: Dec 03 10:21:51 Updated: thunderbird-lightning-2.6.2-3.fc19.x86_64 -- Patrick -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: dual boot
On Dec 22, 2013 3:34 PM, bruce badoug...@gmail.com wrote: hi guys. question regarding how to remotely auto boot/install into a system.. normal operation: -1 drive/1 OS machine gets turned on, boots/starts the OS but if I want to do a remote/auto/programtic install of a new OS, on top of the current OS, how the heck can this be accomplished. I was initially thinking that some form of dual boot is required.. I'm now wondering if it's possible to have a kind of self reinstall process. pointers/comments welcome. thanks -- If you have an OS with grub on the system already, you can perform a medialess installation[1] facilitated by either VNC or kickstart. [1] http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/20/html/Installation_Guide/ap-medialess-install.html --Pete -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F20: yum update does not automatically update grub2
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 18:53:40 +0100 Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 08:20:53 -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote: You could become superuser root, then run exactly the kernel-install command found above, and check the exit return code and watch out for any warning/error it might print. Thanks! $ sudo rpm -q --scripts kernel|tail -2 posttrans scriptlet (using /bin/sh): /bin/kernel-install add 3.12.5-302.fc20.x86_64 /boot/vmlinuz-3.12.5-302.fc20.x86_64 || exit $? This is all I get. You've only queried the kernel package for its scriptlets section. You haven't tried to execute the command you can see in there. sudo /bin/kernel-install add 3.12.5-302.fc20.x86_64 /boot/vmlinuz-3.12.5-302.fc20.x86_64 || exit $? grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template I looked around, but almost all the discussion on the web seems to be circa 2011 when grub moved to grub2 so I am not sure that these seem relevant. (In any case, most of them say run grub2-mkconfig but I was trying to get a more long-term solution.) Not sure what it means/how to check the exit return code. By evaluating/examining the $? variable after running a program. How does one debug the /bin/kernel-install script? It's better to stop here right away, since I had assumed you would either be capable of performing a few trouble-shooting tasks or be interested enough to want to learn about it. I guess I am trying to learn by taking the first step of finding the process of getting to it? Hence the questions. Perhaps the background needed is too much to figure out on one's own. Thanks for your time and patience, though! Best wishes, Ranjan FREE 3D EARTH SCREENSAVER - Watch the Earth right on your desktop! Check it out at http://www.inbox.com/earth -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: can you (theoretically) run only NFSv4 (without earlier versions)?
Quoting Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com: On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote: a long, long time ago, i reported an apparent glitch with NFS on fedora: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2010-January/097465.html in that, at the time, it *appeared* that you couldn't set up NFS so that *only* version 4 was running. before i start messing with this again, anyone know whether that's changed? that is, is it possible to set up a network in which only NFSv4 is running, and no earlier versions are supported? thanks. It's been possible to run nfsv4-only nfs for a long time, with only port 2049 being let through the firewall. It only appears that you can't because because rpc.mountd has to run on the server but it's only involved in the exporting and not the mounting. a followup question, then -- i'm reading the RHEL docs (but i imagine the contents are applicable here as long as we're talking about NFSv4); the section on NFS reads: The mounting and locking protocols have been incorporated into the NFSv4 protocol. The server also listens on the well-known TCP port 2049. As such, NFSv4 does not need to interact with rpcbind [3], lockd, and rpc.statd daemons. does that mean that if i configure my system(s) to run NFSv4 only, those daemons no longer need to be run? better yet, if i configure for NFSv4 *only*, will those daemons even be started? i guess i could peruse /etc/rc.d/init.d/nfs to find out. rday -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Gnome login hangs F20 after fedup upgrade
On Dec 22, 2013 2:49 PM, David Highley dhigh...@highley-recommended.com wrote: user for login. We see by using journalctl -f | less That the shell fails to register before a timeout occurs and that there is a kernal pool segfault and a core dump. We have not been able to determine if they are all related. Except they happen close together. `journalctl _UID=user's uid` might be a helpful filter here - similar to the now obsolete ~/.xsession-errors. --Pete -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Connection fails F19-F20 Rsync
David Highley wrote: David Highley wrote: After doing a fedup upgrade from Fedora 19 to Fedora 20 the Fedora 19 systems are not able to rsync to the Fedora 20 system. If you do: rsync host:: You get: rsync: read error: Connection reset by peer (104) rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(764) [Receiver=3.0.9] If you do it to its self it works fine. We have stopped iptables on both sides, looked for selinux avc errors. We have wiresharked and the hosts are exchanging packets on port 873. In looking at the RPM change log for rsync we see that the compression has been changed. Could that somehow cause this failure? We did forget the most important part. The reverse direction rsync F19-F20 does work. Not sure still why we had not run into this issue before but we finally believe we tracked the issue to a slight difference between the primary and secondary DNS named.conf file. The command netstat -anp grep 873 found that most of the systems were getting tcp6 for rsync and only a few were getting tcp. We are not running tcp6 as our internet provider is not supportting it in our area and we do not see the need anyway for such a small network. We seem to have found and fixed this issue. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F20: yum update does not automatically update grub2
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 13:01:46 -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote: sudo /bin/kernel-install add 3.12.5-302.fc20.x86_64 /boot/vmlinuz-3.12.5-302.fc20.x86_64 || exit $? grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template Great! As expected. Save a backup of the current grub.cfg file. It may make sense to publish it somewhere for others to take a look. Next would be to figure out why grubby (from package grubby) fails as above. The C source file grubby.c says: /* Find a good template to use for the new kernel. An entry is * good if the kernel and mkinitrd exist (even if the entry * is going to be removed). Try and use the default entry, but * if that doesn't work just take the first. If we can't find one, * bail. */ Verify that there is an initramfs image for your installed kernels. If not, recreate the image file. Which kernel packages are installed? Did any of the previous kernel packages add a working entry to grub.cfg? Do all of the entries in grub.cfg work for you except for the latest? What happens if you return to the previous kernel by uninstalling the latest kernel package, then run grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg, then yum update kernel? Does it fail again? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Gnome login hangs F20 after fedup upgrade
Pete Travis wrote: --===6465155735344206330== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c38892b4deff04ee38beb6 --001a11c38892b4deff04ee38beb6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Dec 22, 2013 2:49 PM, David Highley dhigh...@highley-recommended.com wrote: user for login. We see by using journalctl -f | less That the shell fails to register before a timeout occurs and that there is a kernal pool segfault and a core dump. We have not been able to determine if they are all related. Except they happen close together. `journalctl _UID=user's uid` might be a helpful filter here - similar to the now obsolete ~/.xsession-errors. OK, we have done this and included the output for a login attempt. The abrt tracker is indicating that this has been previously reported so maybe with some luck it will get corrected. In the mean time Cinnamon seems to work for an alternative. Dec 23 12:08:25 redwood gnome-session[3721]: OK Dec 23 12:09:03 redwood systemd[4669]: Failed to open private bus connection: Failed to connect to socket /run/user/1000/dbus/user_bus_socket: No such file or directory Dec 23 12:09:03 redwood systemd[4669]: Starting Default. Dec 23 12:09:03 redwood systemd[4669]: Reached target Default. Dec 23 12:09:03 redwood systemd[4669]: Startup finished in 6ms. Dec 23 12:09:05 redwood gnome-session[4676]: gnome-session[4676]: WARNING: Could not parse desktop file gnome-do.desktop or it references a not found TryExec binary Dec 23 12:09:05 redwood gnome-session[4676]: WARNING: Could not parse desktop file gnome-do.desktop or it references a not found TryExec binary Dec 23 12:09:05 redwood gnome-session[4676]: gnome-session[4676]: WARNING: Could not parse desktop file remmina-applet.desktop or it references a not found TryExec binary Dec 23 12:09:05 redwood gnome-session[4676]: WARNING: Could not parse desktop file remmina-applet.desktop or it references a not found TryExec binary Dec 23 12:09:05 redwood gnome-keyring-daemon[4674]: Gkm: using old keyring directory: /home/dhighley/.gnome2/keyrings Dec 23 12:09:05 redwood gnome-keyring-daemon[4674]: Gkm: using old keyring directory: /home/dhighley/.gnome2/keyrings Dec 23 12:09:05 redwood goa[4910]: goa-daemon version 3.10.2 starting [main.c:117, main()] Dec 23 12:09:05 redwood goa[4910]: GoaKerberosIdentityManager: Using polling for change notification for credential cache type 'KEYRING' [goakerberosidentitymanager.c:1393, monitor_credentials_cache()] Dec 23 12:09:05 redwood gnome-session[4676]: GNOME_KEYRING_CONTROL=/run/user/1000/keyring-0YW89L Dec 23 12:09:05 redwood gnome-session[4676]: GPG_AGENT_INFO=/run/user/1000/keyring-0YW89L/gpg:0:1 Dec 23 12:09:05 redwood gnome-session[4676]: GNOME_KEYRING_CONTROL=/run/user/1000/keyring-0YW89L Dec 23 12:09:05 redwood gnome-session[4676]: GPG_AGENT_INFO=/run/user/1000/keyring-0YW89L/gpg:0:1 Dec 23 12:09:05 redwood gnome-session[4676]: SSH_AUTH_SOCK=/run/user/1000/keyring-0YW89L/ssh Dec 23 12:09:05 redwood gnome-session[4676]: GNOME_KEYRING_CONTROL=/run/user/1000/keyring-0YW89L Dec 23 12:09:05 redwood gnome-session[4676]: GPG_AGENT_INFO=/run/user/1000/keyring-0YW89L/gpg:0:1 Dec 23 12:09:05 redwood gnome-session[4676]: SSH_AUTH_SOCK=/run/user/1000/keyring-0YW89L/ssh Dec 23 12:09:05 redwood gnome-session[4676]: GNOME_KEYRING_CONTROL=/run/user/1000/keyring-0YW89L Dec 23 12:09:05 redwood gnome-session[4676]: GPG_AGENT_INFO=/run/user/1000/keyring-0YW89L/gpg:0:1 Dec 23 12:09:05 redwood gnome-session[4676]: SSH_AUTH_SOCK=/run/user/1000/keyring-0YW89L/ssh Dec 23 12:09:05 redwood pulseaudio[4884]: [pulseaudio] bluez5-util.c: Found duplicated D-Bus path for device /org/bluez/hci0 Dec 23 12:09:05 redwood pulseaudio[4980]: [pulseaudio] pid.c: Daemon already running. Dec 23 12:09:05 redwood gnome-session[4676]: (gnome-settings-daemon:4865): smartcard-plugin-WARNING **: smartcard event function failed. Dec 23 12:09:05 redwood gnome-session[4676]: (gnome-settings-daemon:4865): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion 'G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed Dec 23 12:09:06 redwood gnome-session[4676]: (gnome-shell:4986): Gjs-WARNING **: JS ERROR: Exception in callback for signal: sessions-loaded: Error: Argument 'text' (type utf8) may not be null Dec 23 12:09:06 redwood gnome-session[4676]: DateMenuButton._updateClockAndDate@/usr/share/gnome-shell/js/ui/dateMenu.js:198 Dec 23 12:09:06 redwood gnome-session[4676]: wrapper@/usr/share/gjs-1.0/lang.js:213 Dec 23 12:09:06 redwood gnome-session[4676]: DateMenuButton._init@/usr/share/gnome-shell/js/ui/dateMenu.js:139 Dec 23 12:09:06 redwood gnome-session[4676]: wrapper@/usr/share/gjs-1.0/lang.js:213 Dec 23 12:09:06 redwood gnome-session[4676]: _Base._construct@/usr/share/gjs-1.0/lang.js:154 Dec 23 12:09:06 redwood gnome-session[4676]: Class._construct/newClass@/usr/share/gjs-1.0/lang.js:248 Dec 23 12:09:06 redwood gnome-session[4676]:
BOOT SIMPLIFIED - EXTLINUX
BOOT SIMPLIFIED - EXTLINUX BIOS - MBR - 1.PART=SWAP - 2.PART=BOOT(EXT4) - 3.PART=/(EXT4) # fdisk -l /dev/sda … Disklabel type: dos … DeviceBoot … Id System /dev/sda1 … 82 Linux swap /dev/sda2 * … 83 Linux = boot /dev/sda3 … 83 Linux = / # cat /etc/fstab UUID=…swapswap … UUID=…/boot ext4 … UUID=12345678-1234-1234-1234-123456789abc / ext4 … ~~ # yum install syslinux-extlinux # cat /boot/extlinux/extlinux.conf ui menu.c32 menu title EXTLINUX FEDORA 20 timeout 50 label Fedora 20 3.12.5-302.fc20.x86_64 kernel /vmlinuz-3.12.5-302.fc20.x86_64 append root=UUID=12345678-1234-1234-1234-123456789abc OPTION1 … initrd /initramfs-3.12.5-302.fc20.x86_64.img # sfdisk --activate=2 /dev/sda # extlinux --install /boot/extlinux # cat /usr/share/syslinux/mbr.bin /dev/sda ~~ http://git.kernel.org/cgit/boot/syslinux/syslinux.git/plain/doc/extlinux.txt?id=syslinux-4.07 Et voilà. poma -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#3 stuck for 22s! [httpd:1889]
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 17:11:13 +0100 Heinz Diehl h...@fritha.org wrote: On 23.12.2013, Steven P. Ulrick wrote: Dec 22 20:11:26 afolkey2 kernel: [ 4130.161465] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#3 stuck for 22s! [httpd:1889] Dec 22 20:11:50 afolkey2 kernel: [ 4154.123765] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 22s! [httpd:1793] It's the kernel watchdog bailing out. Do you run httpd within a virtual box? No. All non-virtual on this issue... -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#3 stuck for 22s! [httpd:1889]
On 23.12.2013, Steven P. Ulrick wrote: No. All non-virtual on this issue... Ok. How high is the load when this happens? Is there a kernel which doesn't lead to these lockups? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
octave-forge ?
Hi: Any idea way the octave-forge package is no longer available in Fedora, the latest seems to be from Fedora 14. Kind regards -- Never, never, in nothing great or small, large or petty, never give in except to convictions of honour and good sense. Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy.'' Winston Churchill https://plus.google.com/+CarlosSepulveda/ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Gnome login hangs F20 after fedup upgrade
On Dec 23, 2013 1:22 PM, David Highley dhigh...@highley-recommended.com wrote: Pete Travis wrote: ... `journalctl _UID=user's uid` might be a helpful filter here - similar to the now obsolete ~/.xsession-errors. OK, we have done this and included the output for a login attempt. The abrt tracker is indicating that this has been previously reported so maybe with some luck it will get corrected. In the mean time Cinnamon seems to work for an alternative. Dec 23 12:08:25 redwood gnome-session[3721]: OK Dec 23 12:09:03 redwood systemd[4669]: Failed to open private bus connection: Failed to connect to socket /run/user/1000/dbus/user_bus_socket: No such file or directory Dec 23 12:09:03 redwood systemd[4669]: Starting Default. Dec 23 12:09:03 redwood systemd[4669]: Reached target Default. Dec 23 12:09:03 redwood systemd[4669]: Startup finished in 6ms. Dec 23 12:09:05 redwood gnome-session[4676]: gnome-session[4676]: WARNING: Could not parse desktop file gnome-do.desktop or it references a not found TryExec binary Dec 23 12:09:05 redwood gnome-session[4676]: WARNING: Could not parse desktop file gnome-do.desktop or it references a not found TryExec binary Dec 23 12:09:05 redwood gnome-session[4676]: gnome-session[4676]: WARNING: Could not parse desktop file remmina-applet.desktop or it references a not found TryExec binary Dec 23 12:09:05 redwood gnome-session[4676]: WARNING: Could not parse desktop file remmina-applet.desktop or it references a not found TryExec binary This bit looks ripe for investigation. Do you have these .desktop files, and do they contain correct references to present and functional binaries? Dec 23 12:09:06 redwood gnome-session[4676]: (gnome-shell:4986): Gjs-WARNING **: JS ERROR: Exception in callback for signal: sessions-loaded: Error: Argument 'text' (type utf8) may not be null ...snip apparent traceback This is suspicious as well. Incompatible extension, perhaps? snip remainder, gnome-shell didn't open so dependents fail too. Have you tried with a new user? If that works, move around your .files to isolate the culprit. --Pete -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: octave-forge ?
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Carlos casep Sepulveda
ca...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Hi:
Any idea way the octave-forge package is no longer available in
Fedora, the latest seems to be from Fedora 14.
According to
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/octave-forge.git/tree/dead.package:
octave-forge will be replaced by individual packages
Perhaps what you're looking for is among:
% repoquery --qf=%{name} octave-\*
octave-NLopt
octave-audio
octave-communications
octave-control
octave-dicom
octave-doc
octave-general
octave-gsl
octave-image
octave-lhapdf
octave-miscellaneous
octave-nnet
octave-octcdf
octave-odepkg
octave-optim
octave-quaternion
octave-shogun
octave-signal
octave-specfun
octave-struct
octave-symbolic
-T.C.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: can you (theoretically) run only NFSv4 (without earlier versions)?
Quoting Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com: On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote: a long, long time ago, i reported an apparent glitch with NFS on fedora: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2010-January/097465.html in that, at the time, it *appeared* that you couldn't set up NFS so that *only* version 4 was running. before i start messing with this again, anyone know whether that's changed? that is, is it possible to set up a network in which only NFSv4 is running, and no earlier versions are supported? thanks. It's been possible to run nfsv4-only nfs for a long time, with only port 2049 being let through the firewall. It only appears that you can't because because rpc.mountd has to run on the server but it's only involved in the exporting and not the mounting. how does one configure fedora 20 to support only NFSv4? i'm used to mucking with /etc/sysconfig/nfs in earlier versions of RH, and tweaking the variables MOUNTD_NFS_V* and RPCNFSDARGS. i don't see those vars in fedora 20 and, according to rpcinfo -p, i'm currently supporting NFS versions both 3 and 4. so how does one turn off NFSv3? thanks. rday -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: octave-forge ?
On 23 December 2013 20:05, T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com wrote:
According to
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/octave-forge.git/tree/dead.package:
octave-forge will be replaced by individual packages
Perhaps what you're looking for is among:
% repoquery --qf=%{name} octave-\*
octave-NLopt
Hi:
:( nope, I'm looking for octave-statistics which seem to be lost.
Maybe I should start packaging it...
Thanks!
--
Never, never, in nothing great or small, large or petty, never give
in except to convictions of honour and good sense. Never yield to
force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the
enemy.''
Winston Churchill
https://plus.google.com/+CarlosSepulveda/
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: can you (theoretically) run only NFSv4 (without earlier versions)?
On 12/24/13 07:16, Robert P. J. Day wrote: Quoting Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com: On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote: a long, long time ago, i reported an apparent glitch with NFS on fedora: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2010-January/097465.html in that, at the time, it *appeared* that you couldn't set up NFS so that *only* version 4 was running. before i start messing with this again, anyone know whether that's changed? that is, is it possible to set up a network in which only NFSv4 is running, and no earlier versions are supported? thanks. It's been possible to run nfsv4-only nfs for a long time, with only port 2049 being let through the firewall. It only appears that you can't because because rpc.mountd has to run on the server but it's only involved in the exporting and not the mounting. how does one configure fedora 20 to support only NFSv4? i'm used to mucking with /etc/sysconfig/nfs in earlier versions of RH, and tweaking the variables MOUNTD_NFS_V* and RPCNFSDARGS. i don't see those vars in fedora 20 and, according to rpcinfo -p, i'm currently supporting NFS versions both 3 and 4. so how does one turn off NFSv3? thanks. In /etc/sysconfig/nfs # Optional arguments passed to rpc.nfsd. See rpc.nfsd(8) RPCNFSDARGS= man 8 rpc.nfsd -N or --no-nfs-version vers This option can be used to request that rpc.nfsd does not offer certain versions of NFS. The current version of rpc.nfsd can sup‐ port NFS versions 2,3,4 and the newer version 4.1. Would seem to be what you are searching. -- Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions and self-serving posts -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Gnome login hangs F20 after fedup upgrade
Pete Travis wrote: --===3837768215548578561== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1135e9d6f7fc3604ee3ba4d1 --001a1135e9d6f7fc3604ee3ba4d1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Dec 23, 2013 1:22 PM, David Highley dhigh...@highley-recommended.com wrote: Pete Travis wrote: ... `journalctl _UID=user's uid` might be a helpful filter here - similar to the now obsolete ~/.xsession-errors. OK, we have done this and included the output for a login attempt. The abrt tracker is indicating that this has been previously reported so maybe with some luck it will get corrected. In the mean time Cinnamon seems to work for an alternative. Dec 23 12:08:25 redwood gnome-session[3721]: OK Dec 23 12:09:03 redwood systemd[4669]: Failed to open private bus connection: Failed to connect to socket /run/user/1000/dbus/user_bus_socket: No such file or directory Dec 23 12:09:03 redwood systemd[4669]: Starting Default. Dec 23 12:09:03 redwood systemd[4669]: Reached target Default. Dec 23 12:09:03 redwood systemd[4669]: Startup finished in 6ms. Dec 23 12:09:05 redwood gnome-session[4676]: gnome-session[4676]: WARNING: Could not parse desktop file gnome-do.desktop or it references a not found TryExec binary Dec 23 12:09:05 redwood gnome-session[4676]: WARNING: Could not parse desktop file gnome-do.desktop or it references a not found TryExec binary Dec 23 12:09:05 redwood gnome-session[4676]: gnome-session[4676]: WARNING: Could not parse desktop file remmina-applet.desktop or it references a not found TryExec binary Dec 23 12:09:05 redwood gnome-session[4676]: WARNING: Could not parse desktop file remmina-applet.desktop or it references a not found TryExec binary This bit looks ripe for investigation. Do you have these .desktop files, and do they contain correct references to present and functional binaries? Dec 23 12:09:06 redwood gnome-session[4676]: (gnome-shell:4986): Gjs-WARNING **: JS ERROR: Exception in callback for signal: sessions-loaded: Error: Argument 'text' (type utf8) may not be null ...snip apparent traceback This is suspicious as well. Incompatible extension, perhaps? snip remainder, gnome-shell didn't open so dependents fail too. Have you tried with a new user? If that works, move around your .files to isolate the culprit. OK, I did find those and some old gnome2 stuff. So I went the drastic route and wiped out all files and directories with gnome in the name. Still get the same results. --Pete --001a1135e9d6f7fc3604ee3ba4d1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable p dir=3Dltrbr On Dec 23, 2013 1:22 PM, quot;David Highleyquot; lt;a href=3Dmailto:dh= igh...@highley-recommended.comdhigh...@highley-recommended.com/agt; wr= ote:br gt;br gt; quot;Pete Travis wrote:quot;br ...br gt; gt; `journalctl _UID=3Dlt;user#39;s uidgt;` might be a helpful fil= ter here - similar tobr gt; gt; the now obsolete ~/.xsession-errors.br gt;br gt; OK, we have done this and included the output for a login attempt. The= br gt; abrt tracker is indicating that this has been previously reported sob= r gt; maybe with some luck it will get corrected. In the mean time Cinnamon= br gt; seems to work for an alternative.br gt; Dec 23 12:08:25 redwood gnome-session[3721]: OKbr gt; Dec 23 12:09:03 redwood systemd[4669]: Failed to open private bus conn= ection: Failed to connect to socket /run/user/1000/dbus/user_bus_socket: No= such file or directorybr gt; Dec 23 12:09:03 redwood systemd[4669]: Starting Default.br gt; Dec 23 12:09:03 redwood systemd[4669]: Reached target Default.br gt; Dec 23 12:09:03 redwood systemd[4669]: Startup finished in 6ms.br gt; Dec 23 12:09:05 redwood gnome-session[4676]: gnome-session[4676]: WARN= ING: Could not parse desktop file gnome-do.desktop or it references a not f= ound TryExec binarybr gt; Dec 23 12:09:05 redwood gnome-session[4676]: WARNING: Could not parse = desktop file gnome-do.desktop or it references a not found TryExec binaryb= r gt; Dec 23 12:09:05 redwood gnome-session[4676]: gnome-session[4676]: WARN= ING: Could not parse desktop file remmina-applet.desktop or it references a= not found TryExec binarybr gt; Dec 23 12:09:05 redwood gnome-session[4676]: WARNING: Could not parse = desktop file remmina-applet.desktop or it references a not found TryExec bi= nary/p p dir=3DltrThis bit looks ripe for investigation.=A0 Do you have these = .desktop files, and do they contain correct references to present and funct= ional binaries?/p p dir=3Dltrgt; br gt; Dec 23 12:09:06 redwood gnome-session[4676]: (gnome-shell:4986): Gjs-W= ARNING **: JS ERROR: Exception in callback for signal: sessions-loaded: Err= or: Argument #39;text#39; (type utf8) may not be nullbr gt; ...snip apparent traceback/p p dir=3DltrThis is suspicious as well. Incompatible extension, perhaps?= /p p dir=3Dltrgt; snip
Re: can you (theoretically) run only NFSv4 (without earlier versions)?
Quoting Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com: On 12/24/13 07:16, Robert P. J. Day wrote: Quoting Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com: On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote: a long, long time ago, i reported an apparent glitch with NFS on fedora: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2010-January/097465.html in that, at the time, it *appeared* that you couldn't set up NFS so that *only* version 4 was running. before i start messing with this again, anyone know whether that's changed? that is, is it possible to set up a network in which only NFSv4 is running, and no earlier versions are supported? thanks. It's been possible to run nfsv4-only nfs for a long time, with only port 2049 being let through the firewall. It only appears that you can't because because rpc.mountd has to run on the server but it's only involved in the exporting and not the mounting. how does one configure fedora 20 to support only NFSv4? i'm used to mucking with /etc/sysconfig/nfs in earlier versions of RH, and tweaking the variables MOUNTD_NFS_V* and RPCNFSDARGS. i don't see those vars in fedora 20 and, according to rpcinfo -p, i'm currently supporting NFS versions both 3 and 4. so how does one turn off NFSv3? thanks. In /etc/sysconfig/nfs # Optional arguments passed to rpc.nfsd. See rpc.nfsd(8) RPCNFSDARGS= man 8 rpc.nfsd -N or --no-nfs-version vers This option can be used to request that rpc.nfsd does not offer certain versions of NFS. The current version of rpc.nfsd can sup‐ port NFS versions 2,3,4 and the newer version 4.1. Would seem to be what you are searching. i tried that and it didn't seem to work, in the sense that when i ran rpcinfo -p to verify the result, here's part of the output: 133 tcp 2049 nfs 1002273 tcp 2049 nfs_acl 133 udp 2049 nfs 1002273 udp 2049 nfs_acl 134 tcp 2049 nfs 134 udp 2049 nfs so isn't that telling me i still have both versions 3 and 4? here's the line i added to the file: RPCNFSDARGS=-N 2 -N 3 rday -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: can you (theoretically) run only NFSv4 (without earlier versions)?
On 12/24/13 08:15, Robert P. J. Day wrote: Quoting Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com: On 12/24/13 07:16, Robert P. J. Day wrote: Quoting Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com: On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote: a long, long time ago, i reported an apparent glitch with NFS on fedora: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2010-January/097465.html in that, at the time, it *appeared* that you couldn't set up NFS so that *only* version 4 was running. before i start messing with this again, anyone know whether that's changed? that is, is it possible to set up a network in which only NFSv4 is running, and no earlier versions are supported? thanks. It's been possible to run nfsv4-only nfs for a long time, with only port 2049 being let through the firewall. It only appears that you can't because because rpc.mountd has to run on the server but it's only involved in the exporting and not the mounting. how does one configure fedora 20 to support only NFSv4? i'm used to mucking with /etc/sysconfig/nfs in earlier versions of RH, and tweaking the variables MOUNTD_NFS_V* and RPCNFSDARGS. i don't see those vars in fedora 20 and, according to rpcinfo -p, i'm currently supporting NFS versions both 3 and 4. so how does one turn off NFSv3? thanks. In /etc/sysconfig/nfs # Optional arguments passed to rpc.nfsd. See rpc.nfsd(8) RPCNFSDARGS= man 8 rpc.nfsd -N or --no-nfs-version vers This option can be used to request that rpc.nfsd does not offer certain versions of NFS. The current version of rpc.nfsd can sup‐ port NFS versions 2,3,4 and the newer version 4.1. Would seem to be what you are searching. i tried that and it didn't seem to work, in the sense that when i ran rpcinfo -p to verify the result, here's part of the output: 133 tcp 2049 nfs 1002273 tcp 2049 nfs_acl 133 udp 2049 nfs 1002273 udp 2049 nfs_acl 134 tcp 2049 nfs 134 udp 2049 nfs so isn't that telling me i still have both versions 3 and 4? here's the line i added to the file: RPCNFSDARGS=-N 2 -N 3 Port 2049 is used by V4. I don't think V3 or V2 uses it I would add to the parameters -U to disable UDP and then attempt a mount while specifying that nfs version 3 be used. That will verify it. -- Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions and self-serving posts -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: can you (theoretically) run only NFSv4 (without earlier versions)?
Quoting Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com: On 12/24/13 08:15, Robert P. J. Day wrote: Quoting Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com: On 12/24/13 07:16, Robert P. J. Day wrote: Quoting Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com: On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote: a long, long time ago, i reported an apparent glitch with NFS on fedora: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2010-January/097465.html in that, at the time, it *appeared* that you couldn't set up NFS so that *only* version 4 was running. before i start messing with this again, anyone know whether that's changed? that is, is it possible to set up a network in which only NFSv4 is running, and no earlier versions are supported? thanks. It's been possible to run nfsv4-only nfs for a long time, with only port 2049 being let through the firewall. It only appears that you can't because because rpc.mountd has to run on the server but it's only involved in the exporting and not the mounting. how does one configure fedora 20 to support only NFSv4? i'm used to mucking with /etc/sysconfig/nfs in earlier versions of RH, and tweaking the variables MOUNTD_NFS_V* and RPCNFSDARGS. i don't see those vars in fedora 20 and, according to rpcinfo -p, i'm currently supporting NFS versions both 3 and 4. so how does one turn off NFSv3? thanks. In /etc/sysconfig/nfs # Optional arguments passed to rpc.nfsd. See rpc.nfsd(8) RPCNFSDARGS= man 8 rpc.nfsd -N or --no-nfs-version vers This option can be used to request that rpc.nfsd does not offer certain versions of NFS. The current version of rpc.nfsd can sup‐ port NFS versions 2,3,4 and the newer version 4.1. Would seem to be what you are searching. i tried that and it didn't seem to work, in the sense that when i ran rpcinfo -p to verify the result, here's part of the output: 133 tcp 2049 nfs 1002273 tcp 2049 nfs_acl 133 udp 2049 nfs 1002273 udp 2049 nfs_acl 134 tcp 2049 nfs 134 udp 2049 nfs so isn't that telling me i still have both versions 3 and 4? here's the line i added to the file: RPCNFSDARGS=-N 2 -N 3 Port 2049 is used by V4. I don't think V3 or V2 uses it I would add to the parameters -U to disable UDP and then attempt a mount while specifying that nfs version 3 be used. That will verify it. as a quick test, i added -U but the only change was that rpcinfo -p showed me that UDP was no longer being accepted for v4 only: 133 tcp 2049 nfs 1002273 tcp 2049 nfs_acl 133 udp 2049 nfs 1002273 udp 2049 nfs_acl 134 tcp 2049 nfs to match what i see under RHEL, i was hoping to see *all* references to NFSv3 disappear from the output of that command. i'll test further later. rday -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: can you (theoretically) run only NFSv4 (without earlier versions)?
On 12/24/13 09:12, Robert P. J. Day wrote: as a quick test, i added -U but the only change was that rpcinfo -p showed me that UDP was no longer being accepted for v4 only: 133 tcp 2049 nfs 1002273 tcp 2049 nfs_acl 133 udp 2049 nfs 1002273 udp 2049 nfs_acl 134 tcp 2049 nfs to match what i see under RHEL, i was hoping to see *all* references to NFSv3 disappear from the output of that command. i'll test further later. I don't know, or think, that the above indicates V3 exists. -- Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions and self-serving posts -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F20: yum update does not automatically update grub2
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 21:18:32 +0100 Michael Schwendt
mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 13:01:46 -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
sudo /bin/kernel-install add
3.12.5-302.fc20.x86_64 /boot/vmlinuz-3.12.5-302.fc20.x86_64 || exit $?
grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template
Great! As expected.
Thanks!
Save a backup of the current grub.cfg file. It may make sense to publish
it somewhere for others to take a look.
Here it is:
#
# DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE
#
# It is automatically generated by grub2-mkconfig using templates
# from /etc/grub.d and settings from /etc/default/grub
#
### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/00_header ###
if [ -s $prefix/grubenv ]; then
load_env
fi
if [ ${next_entry} ] ; then
set default=${next_entry}
set next_entry=
save_env next_entry
set boot_once=true
else
set default=${saved_entry}
fi
if [ x${feature_menuentry_id} = xy ]; then
menuentry_id_option=--id
else
menuentry_id_option=
fi
export menuentry_id_option
if [ ${prev_saved_entry} ]; then
set saved_entry=${prev_saved_entry}
save_env saved_entry
set prev_saved_entry=
save_env prev_saved_entry
set boot_once=true
fi
function savedefault {
if [ -z ${boot_once} ]; then
saved_entry=${chosen}
save_env saved_entry
fi
}
function load_video {
if [ x$feature_all_video_module = xy ]; then
insmod all_video
else
insmod efi_gop
insmod efi_uga
insmod ieee1275_fb
insmod vbe
insmod vga
insmod video_bochs
insmod video_cirrus
fi
}
terminal_output console
set timeout=5
### END /etc/grub.d/00_header ###
### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/10_linux ###
menuentry 'Fedora, with Linux 3.11.10-301.fc20.x86_64' --class fedora
--class gnu-linux --class gnu --class os $menuentry_id_option
'gnulinux-3.11.10-301.fc20.x86_64-advanced-f96397ae-311d-4826-8fb0-6a0fe710dd9c'
{ load_video
set gfxpayload=keep insmod gzio
insmod part_msdos
insmod ext2
set root='hd0,msdos1'
if [ x$feature_platform_search_hint = xy ]; then
search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set=root
--hint-bios=hd0,msdos1 --hint-efi=hd0,msdos1
--hint-baremetal=ahci0,msdos1 --hint='hd0,msdos1'
54f94607-a593-4d5c-b03a-356574992f4e else search --no-floppy --fs-uuid
--set=root 54f94607-a593-4d5c-b03a-356574992f4e fi
linux /vmlinuz-3.11.10-301.fc20.x86_64 resume=/dev/sda2
root=/dev/sda3 ro vconsole.font=latarcyrheb-sun16 nomodeset rhgb
quiet } menuentry 'Fedora, with Linux
0-rescue-26b05c2e8b5144b4b396c604c823681b' --class fedora --class
gnu-linux --class gnu --class os $menuentry_id_option
'gnulinux-0-rescue-26b05c2e8b5144b4b396c604c823681b-advanced-f96397ae-311d-4826-8fb0-6a0fe710dd9c'
{ load_video
insmod gzio insmod part_msdos insmod ext2 set root='hd0,msdos1'
if [ x$feature_platform_search_hint = xy ]; then
search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set=root
--hint-bios=hd0,msdos1 --hint-efi=hd0,msdos1
--hint-baremetal=ahci0,msdos1 --hint='hd0,msdos1'
54f94607-a593-4d5c-b03a-356574992f4e else search --no-floppy --fs-uuid
--set=root 54f94607-a593-4d5c-b03a-356574992f4e fi
linux /vmlinuz-0-rescue-26b05c2e8b5144b4b396c604c823681b
resume=/dev/sda2 root=UUID=f96397ae-311d-4826-8fb0-6a0fe710dd9c ro
vconsole.font=latarcyrheb-sun16 nomodeset rhgb quiet
initrd /initramfs-0-rescue-26b05c2e8b5144b4b396c604c823681b.img }
### END /etc/grub.d/10_linux ###
### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/20_linux_xen ###
### END /etc/grub.d/20_linux_xen ###
### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/20_ppc_terminfo ###
### END /etc/grub.d/20_ppc_terminfo ###
### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/30_os-prober ###
### END /etc/grub.d/30_os-prober ###
### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/40_custom ###
# This file provides an easy way to add custom menu entries. Simply type the
# menu entries you want to add after this comment. Be careful not to change
# the 'exec tail' line above.
### END /etc/grub.d/40_custom ###
### BEGIN /etc/grub.d/41_custom ###
if [ -f ${config_directory}/custom.cfg ]; then
source ${config_directory}/custom.cfg
elif [ -z ${config_directory} -a -f $prefix/custom.cfg ]; then
source $prefix/custom.cfg;
fi
### END /etc/grub.d/41_custom ###
Next would be to figure out
why grubby (from package grubby) fails as above.
The C source file grubby.c says:
/* Find a good template to use for the new kernel. An entry is
* good if the kernel and mkinitrd exist (even if the entry
* is going to be removed). Try and use the default entry, but
* if that doesn't work just take the first. If we can't find one,
* bail. */
Verify that there is an initramfs image for your installed kernels.
Sorry not sure what this means or how to go about this.
If not, recreate the image file. Which kernel packages are installed?
rpm -qa kernel\*
kernel-3.11.10-301.fc20.x86_64
kernel-3.12.5-302.fc20.x86_64
kernel-headers-3.12.5-302.fc20.x86_64
Did any of the previous kernel packages add a working entry to grub.cfg?
This is the first update under F20 so no way for me to know this (this
was a fresh install).
Do all of
Re: F20 in VirtualBox VM
On Mon, 2013-12-23 at 12:37 -0500, David wrote: On 12/23/2013 9:11 AM, Greg Woods wrote: I started this thread because I was trying to install an F20 VM under VirtualBox on an F19 system. I do know how to use VB to connect the DVD ISO to the VM and install an OS. The problem is that when I do this with the F20 ISO, syslinux boots and the first Anaconda selection screen comes up. I select Install Fedora, and I get nothing but a black screen after that. I still have not solved this problem. I have never had this problem but I see several users post about it. As I recall it the suggestions were 'to install in text mode' Thanks for that idea. It didn't work, but it did tell me what's wrong. Somehow, the version of VirtualBox that I have doesn't actually support 64-bit VMs, even though it comes from an x86_64 RPM: # rpm -qa | fgrep VirtualBox VirtualBox-4.3-4.3.6_91406_fedora18-1.x86_64 But when I do start the install in text mode (and erase quiet from the kernel command line), the error message is that it's a 32-bit CPU and I'm trying to boot a 64-bit kernel. Is it actually possible to install a 64-bit VM in VirtualBox, and if so, where do I get a version that supports it? The one I got came straight from the Downloads page at virtualbox.org, and when creating the VM by pressing the New button, it doesn't give any 64 bit choices, just Fedora. --Greg -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F20 in VirtualBox VM
On 12/24/13 09:31, Greg Woods wrote: On Mon, 2013-12-23 at 12:37 -0500, David wrote: On 12/23/2013 9:11 AM, Greg Woods wrote: I started this thread because I was trying to install an F20 VM under VirtualBox on an F19 system. I do know how to use VB to connect the DVD ISO to the VM and install an OS. The problem is that when I do this with the F20 ISO, syslinux boots and the first Anaconda selection screen comes up. I select Install Fedora, and I get nothing but a black screen after that. I still have not solved this problem. I have never had this problem but I see several users post about it. As I recall it the suggestions were 'to install in text mode' Thanks for that idea. It didn't work, but it did tell me what's wrong. Somehow, the version of VirtualBox that I have doesn't actually support 64-bit VMs, even though it comes from an x86_64 RPM: # rpm -qa | fgrep VirtualBox VirtualBox-4.3-4.3.6_91406_fedora18-1.x86_64 But when I do start the install in text mode (and erase quiet from the kernel command line), the error message is that it's a 32-bit CPU and I'm trying to boot a 64-bit kernel. Is it actually possible to install a 64-bit VM in VirtualBox, and if so, where do I get a version that supports it? The one I got came straight from the Downloads page at virtualbox.org, and when creating the VM by pressing the New button, it doesn't give any 64 bit choices, just Fedora. FWIW. On my F19 system [egreshko@meimei ~]$ rpm -qa | fgrep VirtualBox VirtualBox-4.3-4.3.6_91406_fedora18-1.x86_64 [egreshko@meimei ~]$ uname -a Linux meimei 3.12.5-200.fc19.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Dec 17 22:21:14 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux On the F20 VM . [egreshko@f20f ~]$ uname -a Linux f20f.greshko.com 3.12.5-302.fc20.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Dec 17 20:42:32 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux So, with the same rpm from Oracle that you have, I have no problem. I guess you're 100% certain your host system is running a 64bit F19? :-) :-) Or, maybe, there is a bug in VBox running on your F19 system that fails to detect your hardware/OS is 64 bit? -- Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions and self-serving posts -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#3 stuck for 22s! [httpd:1889]
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 23:57:09 +0100 Heinz Diehl h...@fritha.org wrote: On 23.12.2013, Steven P. Ulrick wrote: No. All non-virtual on this issue... Ok. How high is the load when this happens? Didn't check this when it was happening... Is there a kernel which doesn't lead to these lockups? Yes: kernel-3.11.10-301.fc20.x86_64 Right now I am FINALLY going to remember to reboot into the offending kernel and see if this happens again. Steven P. Ulrick -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F20: yum update does not automatically update grub2
On Dec 22, 2013, at 3:04 PM, Ranjan Maitra maitra.mbox.igno...@inbox.com wrote: So, add this resume=/dev/sda2 to the stuff on GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX ? Any way to do this without the hardcoding for resume? /etc/sysconfig/grub is a link to /etc/default/grub. You should use resume=uuid=swapuuid and insert the blkid uuid for swap instead as /dev/sdX can change between boots and is not reliable. It's strange that your root= in grub.cfg is not using UUID as well. grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template This is a generic message indicating that it doesn't understand the existing grub.cfg. Can you look in /boot/grub2 and see if there is only grub.cfg or if there is also a grub.cfg.new? If you have a grub.cfg.new with a more recent date/time than grub.cfg then this means grub2-mkconfig is failing. To get more information you can use: bash -x grub2-mkconfig And post those results somewhere like fpaste. Chris Murphy -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: can you (theoretically) run only NFSv4 (without earlier versions)?
On 12/24/13 09:12, Robert P. J. Day wrote: i'll test further later. I decided to test for you. :-) After making the suggested changes. [root@meimei ~]# mount -o ro,nfsvers=4 192.168.0.196:/home /mnt [root@meimei ~]# mount | grep mnt 192.168.0.196:/home on /mnt type nfs4 (ro,relatime,vers=4.0,rsize=262144,wsize=262144,namlen=255,hard,proto=tcp,port=0,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys,clientaddr=192.168.0.18,local_lock=none,addr=192.168.0.196) [root@meimei ~]# umount /mnt [root@meimei ~]# mount -o ro,nfsvers=3 192.168.0.196:/home /mnt mount.nfs: requested NFS version or transport protocol is not supported -- Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions and self-serving posts -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F20 in VirtualBox VM
F20 as a guest, so ~/.VirtualBox/VBoxVMs/guest/Logs/VBox.log https://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Bugtracker poma -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: can you (theoretically) run only NFSv4 (without earlier versions)?
On 12/24/13 09:12, Robert P. J. Day wrote: as a quick test, i added -U but the only change was that rpcinfo -p showed me that UDP was no longer being accepted for v4 only: 133 tcp 2049 nfs 1002273 tcp 2049 nfs_acl 133 udp 2049 nfs 1002273 udp 2049 nfs_acl 134 tcp 2049 nfs to match what i see under RHEL, i was hoping to see *all* references to NFSv3 disappear from the output of that command. i'll test further later. For what it is worth CentOS6.4 reports something similar when running rcpinfo -p on a server with this in /etc/sysconfig/nfs : # Define which protocol versions mountd # will advertise. The values are no or yes # with yes being the default #MOUNTD_NFS_V1=no MOUNTD_NFS_V2=no MOUNTD_NFS_V3=no # ... RPCNFSDARGS=-N 2 -N 3 However if I try to mount with -t nfs on a client I get a nfs4 type mount ( same as with -t nfs4 ) . On the other hand if I ask for a -t nfs -o nfsvers=3 mount it just hangs forever. Only tcp port 2049 is open in iptables although nmap -sU tells me that various NFS related things are listening locally. On the server itself an attempt to mount version 3 results in a : mount.nfs: Interrupted system call so I guess the extra ( local ) udp stuff doesn't actually do anything . peter -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#3 stuck for 22s! [httpd:1889]
3.12.5-302.fc20.x86_64 x 2 [ cut here ] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 17822 at drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c:1027 ehci_endpoint_reset+0x101/0x110() clear_halt for a busy endpoint Call Trace: [81662d11] dump_stack+0x45/0x56 [810691dd] warn_slowpath_common+0x7d/0xa0 [8106924c] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x4c/0x50 [8147a054] ? usb_control_msg+0xd4/0x110 [81492ba1] ehci_endpoint_reset+0x101/0x110 [81478ab5] usb_hcd_reset_endpoint+0x25/0x70 [8147aac8] usb_reset_endpoint+0x28/0x40 [8147ab4e] usb_clear_halt+0x6e/0x80 [81485ccf] usbdev_do_ioctl+0xbbf/0x1060 [a0582b57] ? supdrvIOCtlFast+0x77/0xa0 [vboxdrv] [8148619e] usbdev_ioctl+0xe/0x20 [811c0bbd] do_vfs_ioctl+0x2dd/0x4b0 [811c0e11] SyS_ioctl+0x81/0xa0 [81671d69] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b ---[ end trace 93ba77ce337e7f42 ]--- [ cut here ] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 0 at net/sched/sch_generic.c:264 dev_watchdog+0x266/0x270() NETDEV WATCHDOG: enp0s4f0u2c3i8 (cdc_ether): transmit queue 0 timed out Call Trace: IRQ [81662d11] dump_stack+0x45/0x56 [810691dd] warn_slowpath_common+0x7d/0xa0 [8106924c] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x4c/0x50 [810818ba] ? __queue_work+0x12a/0x310 [81585746] dev_watchdog+0x266/0x270 [815854e0] ? dev_graft_qdisc+0x80/0x80 [81074e26] call_timer_fn+0x36/0x110 [815854e0] ? dev_graft_qdisc+0x80/0x80 [810754ba] run_timer_softirq+0x1ea/0x290 [8106e747] __do_softirq+0xf7/0x240 [8167361c] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30 [810146a5] do_softirq+0x55/0x90 [8106ea25] irq_exit+0xb5/0xc0 [81673fc5] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x45/0x60 [8167295d] apic_timer_interrupt+0x6d/0x80 EOI [8104e486] ? native_safe_halt+0x6/0x10 [8101b0bf] default_idle+0x1f/0xc0 [8101b1dd] amd_e400_idle+0x7d/0x110 [8101b996] arch_cpu_idle+0x26/0x30 [810b9765] cpu_startup_entry+0xe5/0x280 [8103fb58] start_secondary+0x218/0x2c0 ---[ end trace 554a9463b4511f31 ]--- poma -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Gnome login hangs F20 after fedup upgrade
On Dec 23, 2013 4:47 PM, David Highley dhigh...@highley-recommended.com wrote: OK, I did find those and some old gnome2 stuff. So I went the drastic route and wiped out all files and directories with gnome in the name. Still get the same results. And with the new user account? This is a crucial test, because tweaking your config files and troubleshooting the display stack are very different. --Pete -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F20: yum update does not automatically update grub2
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 18:52:45 -0700 Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote: On Dec 22, 2013, at 3:04 PM, Ranjan Maitra maitra.mbox.igno...@inbox.com wrote: So, add this resume=/dev/sda2 to the stuff on GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX ? Any way to do this without the hardcoding for resume? /etc/sysconfig/grub is a link to /etc/default/grub. You should use resume=uuid=swapuuid and insert the blkid uuid for swap instead as /dev/sdX can change between boots and is not reliable. It's strange that your root= in grub.cfg is not using UUID as well. Thanks very much! So I will add resume=uuid= (gigantic alphanumeric number) to the GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX? Here is what /etc/default/grub reads currently: GRUB_TIMEOUT=5 GRUB_DISTRIBUTOR=$(sed 's, release .*$,,g' /etc/system-release) GRUB_DEFAULT=saved GRUB_DISABLE_SUBMENU=true GRUB_TERMINAL_OUTPUT=console GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX=vconsole.font=latarcyrheb-sun16 $([ -x /usr/sbin/rhcrashkernel-param ] /usr/sbin/rhcrashkernel-param || :) nomodeset rhgb quiet GRUB_DISABLE_RECOVERY=true Should I put this before the nomodeset? grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template This is a generic message indicating that it doesn't understand the existing grub.cfg. Can you look in /boot/grub2 and see if there is only grub.cfg or if there is also a grub.cfg.new? No, there is not. Here is what i have in /boot/grub2: ~$ ll /boot/grub2/ total 25K drwxrwxr-x. 2 root root 1.0K Dec 18 19:05 fonts/ drwxrwxr-x. 2 root root 9.0K Dec 22 08:51 i386-pc/ drwxrwxr-x. 2 root root 1.0K Dec 22 08:51 locale/ drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 1.0K May 9 2012 themes/ -rw-rw-r--. 1 root root 84 Dec 18 19:05 device.map -rw---. 1 root root 3.6K Dec 23 13:01 grub.cfg -rw-rw-r--. 1 root root 1.0K Dec 19 01:17 grubenv (Not sure why I have a i386-pc..but this is an x86_64 machine.) If you have a grub.cfg.new with a more recent date/time than grub.cfg then this means grub2-mkconfig is failing. To get more information you can use: bash -x grub2-mkconfig And post those results somewhere like fpaste. $ fpaste bash -x grub2-mkconfig Uploading (0.1KiB)... http://ur1.ca/g90la - http://paste.fedoraproject.org/64141/87859483 Thanks very much again! Best wishes, Ranjan Chris Murphy -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org -- Important Notice: This mailbox is ignored: e-mails are set to be deleted on receipt. Please respond to the mailing list if appropriate. For those needing to send personal or professional e-mail, please use appropriate addresses. FREE ONLINE PHOTOSHARING - Share your photos online with your friends and family! Visit http://www.inbox.com/photosharing to find out more! -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F20: yum update does not automatically update grub2
On Dec 23, 2013, at 9:32 PM, Ranjan Maitra maitra.mbox.igno...@inbox.com wrote: So I will add resume=uuid= (gigantic alphanumeric number) to the GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX? Correct. Here is what /etc/default/grub reads currently: GRUB_TIMEOUT=5 GRUB_DISTRIBUTOR=$(sed 's, release .*$,,g' /etc/system-release) GRUB_DEFAULT=saved GRUB_DISABLE_SUBMENU=true GRUB_TERMINAL_OUTPUT=console GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX=vconsole.font=latarcyrheb-sun16 $([ -x /usr/sbin/rhcrashkernel-param ] /usr/sbin/rhcrashkernel-param || :) nomodeset rhgb quiet GRUB_DISABLE_RECOVERY=true Should I put this before the nomodeset? Or after it, or at the end before the last . It doesn't matter. (Not sure why I have a i386-pc..but this is an x86_64 machine.) GRUB is 32-bit on BIOS, and 64-bit on UEFI. $ fpaste bash -x grub2-mkconfig Uploading (0.1KiB)... http://ur1.ca/g90la - http://paste.fedoraproject.org/64141/87859483 That didn't work. I'm not sure how to output it to a file, as 'bash -x grub2-mkconfig bashgrub.txt' doesn't output the debug output from bash -x, it just creates a file from grub2-mkconfig. So unless you know how to do that, I'd just run the command in gnome-terminal, copy-paste it into a text file. Then fpaste the text file. Chris Murphy -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F20 in VirtualBox VM
On Tue, 2013-12-24 at 09:41 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: FWIW. On my F19 system [egreshko@meimei ~]$ rpm -qa | fgrep VirtualBox VirtualBox-4.3-4.3.6_91406_fedora18-1.x86_64 [egreshko@meimei ~]$ uname -a Linux meimei 3.12.5-200.fc19.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Dec 17 22:21:14 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ uname -a Linux mongoliad.gregandeva.net 3.11.10-200.fc19.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Dec 2 20:28:03 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ rpm -qa | fgrep VirtualBox VirtualBox-4.3-4.3.6_91406_fedora18-1.x86_64 maybe, there is a bug in VBox running on your F19 system that fails to detect your hardware/OS is 64 bit? That's certainly what it looks like. I may also try an older version of VB, or update my kernel to the most recent version. --Greg -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F20: yum update does not automatically update grub2
Thanks! On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 22:25:52 -0700 Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote: On Dec 23, 2013, at 9:32 PM, Ranjan Maitra maitra.mbox.igno...@inbox.com wrote: So I will add resume=uuid= (gigantic alphanumeric number) to the GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX? Correct. Here is what /etc/default/grub reads currently: GRUB_TIMEOUT=5 GRUB_DISTRIBUTOR=$(sed 's, release .*$,,g' /etc/system-release) GRUB_DEFAULT=saved GRUB_DISABLE_SUBMENU=true GRUB_TERMINAL_OUTPUT=console GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX=vconsole.font=latarcyrheb-sun16 $([ -x /usr/sbin/rhcrashkernel-param ] /usr/sbin/rhcrashkernel-param || :) nomodeset rhgb quiet GRUB_DISABLE_RECOVERY=true Should I put this before the nomodeset? Or after it, or at the end before the last . It doesn't matter. (Not sure why I have a i386-pc..but this is an x86_64 machine.) GRUB is 32-bit on BIOS, and 64-bit on UEFI. $ fpaste bash -x grub2-mkconfig Uploading (0.1KiB)... http://ur1.ca/g90la - http://paste.fedoraproject.org/64141/87859483 That didn't work. I'm not sure how to output it to a file, as 'bash -x grub2-mkconfig bashgrub.txt' doesn't output the debug output from bash -x, it just creates a file from grub2-mkconfig. So unless you know how to do that, I'd just run the command in gnome-terminal, copy-paste it into a text file. Then fpaste the text file. Thanks again! Does this work? fpaste tmp.txt Uploading (3.9KiB)... http://ur1.ca/g90wb - http://paste.fedoraproject.org/64157/13878647 Best wishes, Ranjan Chris Murphy -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org -- Important Notice: This mailbox is ignored: e-mails are set to be deleted on receipt. Please respond to the mailing list if appropriate. For those needing to send personal or professional e-mail, please use appropriate addresses. Receive Notifications of Incoming Messages Easily monitor multiple email accounts access them with a click. Visit http://www.inbox.com/notifier and check it out! -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F20 in VirtualBox VM
On 12/24/13 13:27, Greg Woods wrote: On Tue, 2013-12-24 at 09:41 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: FWIW. On my F19 system [egreshko@meimei ~]$ rpm -qa | fgrep VirtualBox VirtualBox-4.3-4.3.6_91406_fedora18-1.x86_64 [egreshko@meimei ~]$ uname -a Linux meimei 3.12.5-200.fc19.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Dec 17 22:21:14 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ uname -a Linux mongoliad.gregandeva.net 3.11.10-200.fc19.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Dec 2 20:28:03 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ rpm -qa | fgrep VirtualBox VirtualBox-4.3-4.3.6_91406_fedora18-1.x86_64 maybe, there is a bug in VBox running on your F19 system that fails to detect your hardware/OS is 64 bit? That's certainly what it looks like. I may also try an older version of VB, or update my kernel to the most recent version. I guess I'd be interested in the output of cat /proc/cpuinfo -- Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions and self-serving posts -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F20 in VirtualBox VM
On 12/24/13 14:06, Ed Greshko wrote: I guess I'd be interested in the output of cat /proc/cpuinfo And maybe lshw -C processor | grep width lscpu | grep CPU op-mode for completeness. :-) Who knows how VBox goes about making its decisions. BTW, everything worked fine for me on earlier F19 kernels. -- Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions and self-serving posts -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#3 stuck for 22s! [httpd:1889]
On 24.12.2013, Steven P. Ulrick wrote: Is there a kernel which doesn't lead to these lockups? Yes: kernel-3.11.10-301.fc20.x86_64 Right now I am FINALLY going to remember to reboot into the offending kernel and see if this happens again. If you can reproduce this with a vanilla 3.12.5/.6, you could suggest reporting it on either the Linux kernel mailing list or bugzilla.kernel.org. If it turns out to be easily reproducible, you maybe could consider a git bisect, too... -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
