Re: yum update issue..

2016-07-04 Thread Samuel Sieb 

On 07/04/2016 05:40 AM, bruce wrote:

Happy 4th guys..

I have a centos 6.5 box with a yum update error. (I know, this is fed,
but thought maybe I could get pointers here on this!)

The laptop runs kernel for elrepo, to be able to use the builtin wifi.


What wifi chipset is it?

If you're running a kernel from that repo, shouldn't they be providing 
the firmware package as well?  What is pulling in the kernel-firmware 
package?  What would be removed if you tried to remove the 
kernel-firmware package?

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Tumblerd? - Re: Really excessive screen behavior

2016-07-04 Thread Robert Moskowitz 
Problem seems to be back, and I see tumblerd eating up most of one cpu.  
Something I did caused this to run.  Can I just kill it or do I need to 
kill more than it?



On 07/04/2016 04:01 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:

On Mon, 4 Jul 2016 15:25:03 -0400
Robert Moskowitz wrote:


Any idea where I should look?  Yes, I know that I need to update to
recent Fedora.  That is on for later this week.  I hope

Anything like the videos linked to in this bugzilla?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352325

This nonsense just started happening to me with the new 4.6
kernel in f24. Not only does the windows 10 virtual machine
flake out, but it bleeds into other screens on my desktop.

I'm running the previous 4.5 kernel at the moment with
no problems cropping up.


--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

no sound after yum update

2016-07-04 Thread bruce 
Hi.

Forgive me for posting here on a centos issue... but, maybe it'll help
someone if they run into the same issue on centos/fed...

Did a yum update yum went through the process, did the update as
expected.

However, after the update.. sound was gone!

Checked for the cards:
  cat /proc/asound/cards

only one card '0'

Did a
  alsactl restore 0  (as root)

Followed this up with a
  pulseaudio -k
  pulseaudio -D  --system  (as root) in a sep window..

Sound appears to be running..

If you have additional info, feel free to add it, might help someone in the
future!

Thanks
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: 2 of 4 systems messed up after dnf system-upgrade

2016-07-04 Thread Samuel Sieb 

On 07/03/2016 04:23 PM, Greg Woods wrote:

[root@cobweb yum.repos.d]# dnf install google-chrome-stable --allowerasing
Last metadata expiration check: 0:08:42 ago on Sun Jul  3 17:09:12 2016.
Error: nothing provides /usr/bin/foomatic-rip needed by
redhat-lsb-printing-4.1-32.fc24.x86_64
[root@cobweb yum.repos.d]#


What does "dnf repoquery --whatprovides /usr/bin/foomatic-rip" tell you?


I also get "no matching packages" responses to "dnf list" on packages
that are already installed:

root@cobweb yum.repos.d]# dnf clean all
72 files removed
[root@cobweb yum.repos.d]# dnf list cups*
[...]
Error: No matching Packages to list


Do you have a file that starts with "cups" in your repos directory?
As someone else mentioned, escape the *.


[root@cobweb yum.repos.d]# rpm -qa | grep cups
cups-filesystem-2.1.0-2.fc23.noarch
python3-cups-1.9.72-8.fc24.x86_64
cups-libs-2.1.0-2.fc23.x86_64
cups-client-2.1.0-2.fc23.x86_64
cups-libs-2.1.0-2.fc23.i686
python2-cups-1.9.72-8.fc24.x86_64
cups-filters-libs-1.6.0-1.fc23.x86_64
cups-pk-helper-0.2.5-6.fc23.x86_64
[root@cobweb yum.repos.d]#

That shows you are missing the necessary package.  Try installing the 
"cups-filters" package.

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: keyboard not bringing monitor back up after power management or dpms screen suspend

2016-07-04 Thread George Avrunin 
On Mon, 4 Jul 2016 15:25:27 -0400, Lester Petrie wrote:

> Yes, I see this also. I have a Dell desktop with AMD graphics. I have 
> turned screen blanking off, so that my screen saver runs all the time 
> after my machine goes idle. I hadn't discovered that switching to a VT 
> and back would activate the screen. I will have to give that a try.

It seems to have come with the 4.6 kernel.  I should have thought of
trying this before (thanks to Tom Horsley in a thread on "Really excessive
screen behavior" for reminding me!) but with kernel-4.5.7-300.fc24.x86_64,
this doesn't arise.  So for now I'm just back to booting to the older
kernel.  

This doesn't seem to be the same as any of the other bugs I could find, so
I've entered it as a new one,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352719

I entered it for the kernel, though maybe it's really an X11 or driver
bug.  Someone with a lot more knowledge of the internals than I have will
have to decide that. 

  George




pgpyyiGpZXHSP.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Really excessive screen behavior

2016-07-04 Thread Robert Moskowitz 



On 07/04/2016 04:01 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:

On Mon, 4 Jul 2016 15:25:03 -0400
Robert Moskowitz wrote:


Any idea where I should look?  Yes, I know that I need to update to
recent Fedora.  That is on for later this week.  I hope

Anything like the videos linked to in this bugzilla?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352325

This nonsense just started happening to me with the new 4.6
kernel in f24. Not only does the windows 10 virtual machine
flake out, but it bleeds into other screens on my desktop.

I'm running the previous 4.5 kernel at the moment with
no problems cropping up.


Based on your comment, I just rebooted back to kernel 4.4.12 from 4.4.13 
and so far no problem.  Of course don't know it if was due to something 
that takes some fulling around to get running...


--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Really excessive screen behavior

2016-07-04 Thread Robert Moskowitz 



On 07/04/2016 04:01 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:

On Mon, 4 Jul 2016 15:25:03 -0400
Robert Moskowitz wrote:


Any idea where I should look?  Yes, I know that I need to update to
recent Fedora.  That is on for later this week.  I hope

Anything like the videos linked to in this bugzilla?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352325

This nonsense just started happening to me with the new 4.6
kernel in f24. Not only does the windows 10 virtual machine
flake out, but it bleeds into other screens on my desktop.

I'm running the previous 4.5 kernel at the moment with
no problems cropping up.


My problem is that the whole screen blanks out with a dialog box saying 
XScreenSaver 5.35 with one * in the password field.


If I move the mouse around, pieces of the real screen becomes visible, 
or I can .  Qemm has become unusable, now as unless I am 
scrolling constantly, it is switching to this false screensaver.


--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Really excessive screen behavior

2016-07-04 Thread Tom Horsley 
On Mon, 4 Jul 2016 15:25:03 -0400
Robert Moskowitz wrote:

> Any idea where I should look?  Yes, I know that I need to update to 
> recent Fedora.  That is on for later this week.  I hope

Anything like the videos linked to in this bugzilla?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352325

This nonsense just started happening to me with the new 4.6
kernel in f24. Not only does the windows 10 virtual machine
flake out, but it bleeds into other screens on my desktop.

I'm running the previous 4.5 kernel at the moment with
no problems cropping up.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: keyboard not bringing monitor back up after power management or dpms screen suspend

2016-07-04 Thread Lester Petrie 



On 7/4/2016 3:12 PM, George Avrunin wrote:

Some additional information:

- The same thing happens on a very old Dell Inspiron (I think) desktop,
  also with Intel integrated graphics, that my wife uses.  (But the two
  Precision workstations are less than 1.5 years old and the other machine
  is definitely more than 5 years old.  )

- The problem is independent of the display manager (I'm using sddm, but I
  tried with gdm, too) and, mostly, the desktop.  With Gnome, it comes
  back from the initial screen blanking when a key is pressed, but if it
  sits longer it will reach a state where it's necessary to switch to a VT
  and back to get back to the X display.

- The machine is seeing other key events, too, but they just don't wake up
  the display. If I leave the focus in, say, a konsole or a Gnome terminal
  and let the machine blank the screen (waiting long enough on Gnome),
  typing ordinary text won't bring back the display but the typed material
  shows up when I switch to a VT and switch back.

- I tried with a new user, in case this had something to do with settings
  getting upgraded from F23 to F24 or some other misconfiguration in my
  account.  But the same thing happens.

Is anyone else seeing this?  Should I file a bug?  For X, for the Intel
driver, or something else?

  George


Yes, I see this also. I have a Dell desktop with AMD graphics. I have 
turned screen blanking off, so that my screen saver runs all the time 
after my machine goes idle. I hadn't discovered that switching to a VT 
and back would activate the screen. I will have to give that a try.


--
Lester M Petrie
lmpet...@bellsouth.net
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Really excessive screen behavior

2016-07-04 Thread Robert Moskowitz 

System is F22 with Xfce

In the past, occasionally I would get what looks like a ScreenSaver 
popping over what I am viewing.  It almost looks legit in content.  It 
goes away if I  to another task then  back.  QEMM 
seems to make it worst (running an 'old' F21/Xfce image there for a 
specific purpose).



Well with a recent update, I am now getting this flashing regularly.  It 
make using the system very hard.  It is much worst in my QEMM image than 
the main image.



I have looked at the Screensaver settings, and there is nothing there to 
indicate a problem.  Plus I don't think it is really Screensaver which 
is set to lock the screen immediately (after 10 min of inactivity) which 
is not the case here.



Any idea where I should look?  Yes, I know that I need to update to 
recent Fedora.  That is on for later this week.  I hope



--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: keyboard not bringing monitor back up after power management or dpms screen suspend

2016-07-04 Thread George Avrunin 
Some additional information:

- The same thing happens on a very old Dell Inspiron (I think) desktop,
  also with Intel integrated graphics, that my wife uses.  (But the two
  Precision workstations are less than 1.5 years old and the other machine
  is definitely more than 5 years old.  )

- The problem is independent of the display manager (I'm using sddm, but I
  tried with gdm, too) and, mostly, the desktop.  With Gnome, it comes
  back from the initial screen blanking when a key is pressed, but if it
  sits longer it will reach a state where it's necessary to switch to a VT
  and back to get back to the X display.  

- The machine is seeing other key events, too, but they just don't wake up
  the display. If I leave the focus in, say, a konsole or a Gnome terminal
  and let the machine blank the screen (waiting long enough on Gnome),
  typing ordinary text won't bring back the display but the typed material
  shows up when I switch to a VT and switch back. 

- I tried with a new user, in case this had something to do with settings
  getting upgraded from F23 to F24 or some other misconfiguration in my
  account.  But the same thing happens.  

Is anyone else seeing this?  Should I file a bug?  For X, for the Intel
driver, or something else?

  George


 


pgpk2xKwKa_z2.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

gdm: No users shown on bootup

2016-07-04 Thread Richard Shaw 
My wife's laptop recently started having an issue where GDM will come up
but no users are listed.

Any attempt to go to a VT shows the dreaded:

A start job is running for Wait for Plymouth Boot to Quit

Which is never does.

Switching the display manager to lightdm works around the login issue but
then screen saver/blanking/power off and locking doesn't work.

It may or may not be related but I've also found that switching to runlevel
3 from a remote ssh session completely locks up the session. No ctl-c or
ctl-d or ctl-z has any effect. I have to force quit the terminal and cannot
reconnect.

I can then login to the system locally because plymouth has been killed of
by changing into multi-user mode and systemctl status shows sshd strangely
running fine!

I can go back into graphical mode to the same gdm problem (no users listed)
and can connect remotely over ssh again.

This system appears to have completely lost it's mind. I've run "rpm -Va"
and nothing jumps out at me, forces fsck, relabeled the whole system. Tried
various incantations of downgraded systemd, gdm, and other packages, tried
the oldest kernel available, all with the same result.

I've probably spent an accumulated 10 hours on this problem and am about to
give up and reinstall...

Thanks,
Richard
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: Chrome no longer working

2016-07-04 Thread Timothy Murphy 
Ed Greshko wrote:

>> I'm running Fedora-24/KDE.
>> I see that Google Chrome is no longer working -
>> when I choose it from Applications->Internet I get the message
>> "KDEinit could not launch /usr/bin/google-chrome-unstable".
>> The version of chrome is google-chrome-unstable-53.0.2783.2-1.x86_64

> Would you care to try the stable version just to compare?
> google-chrome-stable-51.0.2704.106-1.x86_64 is working fine here.

Thanks, that works perfectly.
I was under the impression that the unstable version was the only one.

-- 
Timothy Murphy  
gayleard /at/ eircom.net
School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: yum update issue..

2016-07-04 Thread bruce 
Hey Ed.

Thanks for the reply.

For grins, I placed the exclude line in the elrepo file for the yum update


[elrepo]
name=ELRepo.org Community Enterprise Linux Repository - el6
baseurl=http://elrepo.org/linux/elrepo/el6/$basearch/
http://mirrors.coreix.net/elrepo/elrepo/el6/$basearch/
http://jur-linux.org/download/elrepo/elrepo/el6/$basearch/
http://repos.lax-noc.com/elrepo/elrepo/el6/$basearch/
http://mirror.ventraip.net.au/elrepo/elrepo/el6/$basearch/
mirrorlist=http://mirrors.elrepo.org/mirrors-elrepo.el6
enabled=1
gpgcheck=1
gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-elrepo.org
protect=0

#trying to update... getting an error.. will this work jul 5/16??
exclude=kernel-firmware <

didn't see any change in the error the 'yum update' generated

I've got feelers out to the elrepo people via irc.. thanks!

--and of course, still researching to see how to resolve this..




On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Ed Greshko  wrote:

>
>
> On 07/04/16 20:40, bruce wrote:
> > Happy 4th guys..
> >
> > I have a centos 6.5 box with a yum update error. (I know, this is fed,
> but thought maybe
> > I could get pointers here on this!)
> >
> > The laptop runs kernel for elrepo, to be able to use the builtin wifi.
> >
> > The update process, was the same as usual, as root, run "yum update"
> never had an issue
> > prior to this.
> >
> > The error is:
> > Total90 kB/s | 756 MB
> 144:00
> > Running rpm_check_debug
> > Running Transaction Test
> >
> >
> > Transaction Check Error:
> >   file /lib/firmware/rtlwifi/rtl8192cfw.bin from install of
> > kernel-firmware-2.6.32-642.1.1.el6.noarch conflicts with file from
> package
> > rtlwifi-firmware-20131223git-1.el6.elrepo.noarch
> >   file /lib/firmware/rtlwifi/rtl8192cfwU_B.bin from install of
> > kernel-firmware-2.6.32-642.1.1.el6.noarch conflicts with file from
> package
> > rtlwifi-firmware-20131223git-1.el6.elrepo.noarch
> >   file /lib/firmware/rtlwifi/rtl8192defw.bin from install of
> > kernel-firmware-2.6.32-642.1.1.el6.noarch conflicts with file from
> package
> > rtlwifi-firmware-20131223git-1.el6.elrepo.noarch
> >
> > Error Summary
> > -
> >
> > so my question..  how/what do I need to do to resolve the error, and
> still perfom the
> > updates and not screw up the wifi.
> >
> > By the way, in the event the wifi does screw up, I've got old spare usb
> wifi dongles,
> > but I'd prefer to be able to use the onbard wifi. The laptop is a
> toshiba satellite
> >
> > Thanks for any pointers
>
> I think you have rtlwifi-firmware-20131223git-1.el6.elrepo.noarch
> installed, correct?
>
> If that is the case you could try excluding kernel-firmware in the el6
> repo, which I
> assume is the CentOS repo?
>
> Barring that, you can ask on the elrepo mailing lists as it seems their
> stuff is causing
> you grief and they should have the knowledge to assist.
>
>
> --
> You're Welcome Zachary Quinto
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
>
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

FW: yum update issue..

2016-07-04 Thread Miguel Patrick 


***AVISOLEGAL**
Este mensaje es privado y confidencial y solamente para la persona a la
que va dirigido. Si usted ha recibido este mensaje por error, no debe
revelar, copiar, distribuir o usarlo en ningun sentido. Le rogamos lo
comunique al remitente y borre dicho mensaje y cualquier documento
adjunto que pudiera contener. No hay renuncia a la confidencialidad ni a
ningun privilegio por causa de transmision erronea o mal funcionamiento.
Cualquier opinion expresada en este mensaje pertenece unicamente al
autor remitente, y no representa necesariamente la opinion de Banco
Santander, a no ser que expresamente se diga y el remitente este
autorizado para hacerlo.Los correos electronicos no son seguros, no
garantizan la confidencialidad ni la correcta recepcion de los mismos,
dado que pueden ser interceptados, manipulados, destruidos, llegar con
demora, incompletos, o con virus. Banco Santander no se hace responsable
de las alteraciones que pudieran hacerse al mensaje una vez enviado.Este
mensaje solo tiene una finalidad de informacion, y no debe interpretarse
como una oferta de venta o de compra de valores ni de instrumentos
financieros relacionados.
**DISCLAIMER***
This message is private and confidential and it is intended exclusively
for the addressee. If you receive this message by mistake, you should
not disseminate, distribute or copy this email. Please inform the sender
and delete the message and attachments from your system. No
confidentiality nor any privilege regarding the information is waived or
lost by any mistransmission or malfunction.Any views or opinions
contained in this message are solely those of the author, and do not
necessarily represent those of Banco Santander, unless otherwise
specifically stated and the sender is authorised to do so.E-mail
transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure, confidential, or
error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost,
destroyed, arrive late, incomplete, or contain viruses. Banco Santander
does not accept responsibility for any changes in the contents of this
message after it has been sent.This message is provided for
informational purposes and should not be construed as a solicitation or
offer to buy or sell any securities or related financial instruments.
--- Begin Message ---


On 07/04/16 20:40, bruce wrote:
> Happy 4th guys..
>
> I have a centos 6.5 box with a yum update error. (I know, this is fed, but 
> thought maybe
> I could get pointers here on this!)
>
> The laptop runs kernel for elrepo, to be able to use the builtin wifi.
>
> The update process, was the same as usual, as root, run "yum update" never 
> had an issue
> prior to this.
>
> The error is:
> Total90 kB/s | 756 MB144:00   
>  
> Running rpm_check_debug
> Running Transaction Test
>
>
> Transaction Check Error:
>   file /lib/firmware/rtlwifi/rtl8192cfw.bin from install of
> kernel-firmware-2.6.32-642.1.1.el6.noarch conflicts with file from package
> rtlwifi-firmware-20131223git-1.el6.elrepo.noarch
>   file /lib/firmware/rtlwifi/rtl8192cfwU_B.bin from install of
> kernel-firmware-2.6.32-642.1.1.el6.noarch conflicts with file from package
> rtlwifi-firmware-20131223git-1.el6.elrepo.noarch
>   file /lib/firmware/rtlwifi/rtl8192defw.bin from install of
> kernel-firmware-2.6.32-642.1.1.el6.noarch conflicts with file from package
> rtlwifi-firmware-20131223git-1.el6.elrepo.noarch
>
> Error Summary
> -
>
> so my question..  how/what do I need to do to resolve the error, and still 
> perfom the
> updates and not screw up the wifi.
>
> By the way, in the event the wifi does screw up, I've got old spare usb wifi 
> dongles,
> but I'd prefer to be able to use the onbard wifi. The laptop is a toshiba 
> satellite
>
> Thanks for any pointers

I think you have rtlwifi-firmware-20131223git-1.el6.elrepo.noarch installed, 
correct?

If that is the case you could try excluding kernel-firmware in the el6 repo, 
which I
assume is the CentOS repo?

Barring that, you can ask on the elrepo mailing lists as it seems their stuff 
is causing
you grief and they should have the knowledge to assist.


-- 
You're Welcome Zachary Quinto
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
***AVISOLEGAL**
Este mensaje es privado y confidencial y solamente para la persona a la
que va dirigido. Si usted ha recibido este mensaje por error, no debe
revelar, copiar, distribuir o usarlo en ningun sentido. Le rogamos lo
comunique al remitente y borre

Re: yum update issue..

2016-07-04 Thread Ed Greshko 


On 07/04/16 20:40, bruce wrote:
> Happy 4th guys..
>
> I have a centos 6.5 box with a yum update error. (I know, this is fed, but 
> thought maybe
> I could get pointers here on this!)
>
> The laptop runs kernel for elrepo, to be able to use the builtin wifi.
>
> The update process, was the same as usual, as root, run "yum update" never 
> had an issue
> prior to this.
>
> The error is:
> Total90 kB/s | 756 MB144:00   
>  
> Running rpm_check_debug
> Running Transaction Test
>
>
> Transaction Check Error:
>   file /lib/firmware/rtlwifi/rtl8192cfw.bin from install of
> kernel-firmware-2.6.32-642.1.1.el6.noarch conflicts with file from package
> rtlwifi-firmware-20131223git-1.el6.elrepo.noarch
>   file /lib/firmware/rtlwifi/rtl8192cfwU_B.bin from install of
> kernel-firmware-2.6.32-642.1.1.el6.noarch conflicts with file from package
> rtlwifi-firmware-20131223git-1.el6.elrepo.noarch
>   file /lib/firmware/rtlwifi/rtl8192defw.bin from install of
> kernel-firmware-2.6.32-642.1.1.el6.noarch conflicts with file from package
> rtlwifi-firmware-20131223git-1.el6.elrepo.noarch
>
> Error Summary
> -
>
> so my question..  how/what do I need to do to resolve the error, and still 
> perfom the
> updates and not screw up the wifi.
>
> By the way, in the event the wifi does screw up, I've got old spare usb wifi 
> dongles,
> but I'd prefer to be able to use the onbard wifi. The laptop is a toshiba 
> satellite
>
> Thanks for any pointers

I think you have rtlwifi-firmware-20131223git-1.el6.elrepo.noarch installed, 
correct?

If that is the case you could try excluding kernel-firmware in the el6 repo, 
which I
assume is the CentOS repo?

Barring that, you can ask on the elrepo mailing lists as it seems their stuff 
is causing
you grief and they should have the knowledge to assist.


-- 
You're Welcome Zachary Quinto
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

FW: Chrome no longer working

2016-07-04 Thread Miguel Patrick 


***AVISOLEGAL**
Este mensaje es privado y confidencial y solamente para la persona a la
que va dirigido. Si usted ha recibido este mensaje por error, no debe
revelar, copiar, distribuir o usarlo en ningun sentido. Le rogamos lo
comunique al remitente y borre dicho mensaje y cualquier documento
adjunto que pudiera contener. No hay renuncia a la confidencialidad ni a
ningun privilegio por causa de transmision erronea o mal funcionamiento.
Cualquier opinion expresada en este mensaje pertenece unicamente al
autor remitente, y no representa necesariamente la opinion de Banco
Santander, a no ser que expresamente se diga y el remitente este
autorizado para hacerlo.Los correos electronicos no son seguros, no
garantizan la confidencialidad ni la correcta recepcion de los mismos,
dado que pueden ser interceptados, manipulados, destruidos, llegar con
demora, incompletos, o con virus. Banco Santander no se hace responsable
de las alteraciones que pudieran hacerse al mensaje una vez enviado.Este
mensaje solo tiene una finalidad de informacion, y no debe interpretarse
como una oferta de venta o de compra de valores ni de instrumentos
financieros relacionados.
**DISCLAIMER***
This message is private and confidential and it is intended exclusively
for the addressee. If you receive this message by mistake, you should
not disseminate, distribute or copy this email. Please inform the sender
and delete the message and attachments from your system. No
confidentiality nor any privilege regarding the information is waived or
lost by any mistransmission or malfunction.Any views or opinions
contained in this message are solely those of the author, and do not
necessarily represent those of Banco Santander, unless otherwise
specifically stated and the sender is authorised to do so.E-mail
transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure, confidential, or
error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost,
destroyed, arrive late, incomplete, or contain viruses. Banco Santander
does not accept responsibility for any changes in the contents of this
message after it has been sent.This message is provided for
informational purposes and should not be construed as a solicitation or
offer to buy or sell any securities or related financial instruments.
--- Begin Message ---


On 07/04/16 22:05, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I'm running Fedora-24/KDE.
> I see that Google Chrome is no longer working - 
> when I choose it from Applications->Internet I get the message
> "KDEinit could not launch /usr/bin/google-chrome-unstable".
>
> The version of chrome is google-chrome-unstable-53.0.2783.2-1.x86_64

Would you care to try the stable version just to compare? 
google-chrome-stable-51.0.2704.106-1.x86_64 is working fine here.

-- 
You're Welcome Zachary Quinto
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
***AVISOLEGAL**
Este mensaje es privado y confidencial y solamente para la persona a la
que va dirigido. Si usted ha recibido este mensaje por error, no debe
revelar, copiar, distribuir o usarlo en ningun sentido. Le rogamos lo
comunique al remitente y borre dicho mensaje y cualquier documento
adjunto que pudiera contener. No hay renuncia a la confidencialidad ni a
ningun privilegio por causa de transmision erronea o mal funcionamiento.
Cualquier opinion expresada en este mensaje pertenece unicamente al
autor remitente, y no representa necesariamente la opinion de Banco
Santander, a no ser que expresamente se diga y el remitente este
autorizado para hacerlo.Los correos electronicos no son seguros, no
garantizan la confidencialidad ni la correcta recepcion de los mismos,
dado que pueden ser interceptados, manipulados, destruidos, llegar con
demora, incompletos, o con virus. Banco Santander no se hace responsable
de las alteraciones que pudieran hacerse al mensaje una vez enviado.Este
mensaje solo tiene una finalidad de informacion, y no debe interpretarse
como una oferta de venta o de compra de valores ni de instrumentos
financieros relacionados.
**DISCLAIMER***
This message is private and confidential and it is intended exclusively
for the addressee. If you receive this message by mistake, you should
not disseminate, distribute or copy this email. Please inform the sender
and delete the message and attachments from your system. No
confidentiality nor any privilege regarding the information is waived or
lost by any mistransmission or malfunction.Any views or opinions
contained in

Re: Chrome no longer working

2016-07-04 Thread Ed Greshko 


On 07/04/16 22:05, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I'm running Fedora-24/KDE.
> I see that Google Chrome is no longer working - 
> when I choose it from Applications->Internet I get the message
> "KDEinit could not launch /usr/bin/google-chrome-unstable".
>
> The version of chrome is google-chrome-unstable-53.0.2783.2-1.x86_64

Would you care to try the stable version just to compare? 
google-chrome-stable-51.0.2704.106-1.x86_64 is working fine here.

-- 
You're Welcome Zachary Quinto
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

FW: Chrome no longer working

2016-07-04 Thread Miguel Patrick 


***AVISOLEGAL**
Este mensaje es privado y confidencial y solamente para la persona a la
que va dirigido. Si usted ha recibido este mensaje por error, no debe
revelar, copiar, distribuir o usarlo en ningun sentido. Le rogamos lo
comunique al remitente y borre dicho mensaje y cualquier documento
adjunto que pudiera contener. No hay renuncia a la confidencialidad ni a
ningun privilegio por causa de transmision erronea o mal funcionamiento.
Cualquier opinion expresada en este mensaje pertenece unicamente al
autor remitente, y no representa necesariamente la opinion de Banco
Santander, a no ser que expresamente se diga y el remitente este
autorizado para hacerlo.Los correos electronicos no son seguros, no
garantizan la confidencialidad ni la correcta recepcion de los mismos,
dado que pueden ser interceptados, manipulados, destruidos, llegar con
demora, incompletos, o con virus. Banco Santander no se hace responsable
de las alteraciones que pudieran hacerse al mensaje una vez enviado.Este
mensaje solo tiene una finalidad de informacion, y no debe interpretarse
como una oferta de venta o de compra de valores ni de instrumentos
financieros relacionados.
**DISCLAIMER***
This message is private and confidential and it is intended exclusively
for the addressee. If you receive this message by mistake, you should
not disseminate, distribute or copy this email. Please inform the sender
and delete the message and attachments from your system. No
confidentiality nor any privilege regarding the information is waived or
lost by any mistransmission or malfunction.Any views or opinions
contained in this message are solely those of the author, and do not
necessarily represent those of Banco Santander, unless otherwise
specifically stated and the sender is authorised to do so.E-mail
transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure, confidential, or
error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost,
destroyed, arrive late, incomplete, or contain viruses. Banco Santander
does not accept responsibility for any changes in the contents of this
message after it has been sent.This message is provided for
informational purposes and should not be construed as a solicitation or
offer to buy or sell any securities or related financial instruments.
--- Begin Message ---
I'm running Fedora-24/KDE.
I see that Google Chrome is no longer working - 
when I choose it from Applications->Internet I get the message
"KDEinit could not launch /usr/bin/google-chrome-unstable".

The version of chrome is google-chrome-unstable-53.0.2783.2-1.x86_64

-- 
Timothy Murphy  
gayleard /at/ eircom.net
School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
***AVISOLEGAL**
Este mensaje es privado y confidencial y solamente para la persona a la
que va dirigido. Si usted ha recibido este mensaje por error, no debe
revelar, copiar, distribuir o usarlo en ningun sentido. Le rogamos lo
comunique al remitente y borre dicho mensaje y cualquier documento
adjunto que pudiera contener. No hay renuncia a la confidencialidad ni a
ningun privilegio por causa de transmision erronea o mal funcionamiento.
Cualquier opinion expresada en este mensaje pertenece unicamente al
autor remitente, y no representa necesariamente la opinion de Banco
Santander, a no ser que expresamente se diga y el remitente este
autorizado para hacerlo.Los correos electronicos no son seguros, no
garantizan la confidencialidad ni la correcta recepcion de los mismos,
dado que pueden ser interceptados, manipulados, destruidos, llegar con
demora, incompletos, o con virus. Banco Santander no se hace responsable
de las alteraciones que pudieran hacerse al mensaje una vez enviado.Este
mensaje solo tiene una finalidad de informacion, y no debe interpretarse
como una oferta de venta o de compra de valores ni de instrumentos
financieros relacionados.
**DISCLAIMER***
This message is private and confidential and it is intended exclusively
for the addressee. If you receive this message by mistake, you should
not disseminate, distribute or copy this email. Please inform the sender
and delete the message and attachments from your system. No
confidentiality nor any privilege regarding the information is waived or
lost by any mistransmission or malfunction.Any views or opinions
contained in this message are solely those of the author, and do not
necessarily represent those of Banco Santander, unless otherwise

Chrome no longer working

2016-07-04 Thread Timothy Murphy 
I'm running Fedora-24/KDE.
I see that Google Chrome is no longer working - 
when I choose it from Applications->Internet I get the message
"KDEinit could not launch /usr/bin/google-chrome-unstable".

The version of chrome is google-chrome-unstable-53.0.2783.2-1.x86_64

-- 
Timothy Murphy  
gayleard /at/ eircom.net
School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

yum update issue..

2016-07-04 Thread bruce 
Happy 4th guys..

I have a centos 6.5 box with a yum update error. (I know, this is fed, but
thought maybe I could get pointers here on this!)

The laptop runs kernel for elrepo, to be able to use the builtin wifi.

The update process, was the same as usual, as root, run "yum update" never
had an issue prior to this.

The error is:
Total90 kB/s | 756 MB
144:00
Running rpm_check_debug
Running Transaction Test


Transaction Check Error:
  file /lib/firmware/rtlwifi/rtl8192cfw.bin from install of
kernel-firmware-2.6.32-642.1.1.el6.noarch conflicts with file from package
rtlwifi-firmware-20131223git-1.el6.elrepo.noarch
  file /lib/firmware/rtlwifi/rtl8192cfwU_B.bin from install of
kernel-firmware-2.6.32-642.1.1.el6.noarch conflicts with file from package
rtlwifi-firmware-20131223git-1.el6.elrepo.noarch
  file /lib/firmware/rtlwifi/rtl8192defw.bin from install of
kernel-firmware-2.6.32-642.1.1.el6.noarch conflicts with file from package
rtlwifi-firmware-20131223git-1.el6.elrepo.noarch

Error Summary
-

so my question..  how/what do I need to do to resolve the error, and still
perfom the updates and not screw up the wifi.

By the way, in the event the wifi does screw up, I've got old spare usb
wifi dongles, but I'd prefer to be able to use the onbard wifi. The laptop
is a toshiba satellite

Thanks for any pointers!
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

NetworkManager-wait-online.service is not run

2016-07-04 Thread Juan Orti Alcaine 
Hi,

I'm having problems with some services which depend of network-online.target
Although I've enabled NetworkManager-wait-online.service, it is not
run at boot. Any idea?

[root@xenon ~]# systemctl status network-online.target
● network-online.target - Network is Online
   Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/network-online.target;
static; vendor preset: disabled)
   Active: inactive (dead)
 Docs: man:systemd.special(7)
   http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/NetworkTarget

[root@xenon ~]# systemctl status NetworkManager.service -n5
● NetworkManager.service - Network Manager
   Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/NetworkManager.service;
enabled; vendor preset: enabled)
   Active: active (running) since lun 2016-07-04 10:58:19 CEST; 2h 38min ago
 Main PID: 1191 (NetworkManager)
Tasks: 3 (limit: 512)
   CGroup: /system.slice/NetworkManager.service
   └─1191 /usr/sbin/NetworkManager --no-daemon

jul 04 10:58:27 xenon NetworkManager[1191]:   [1467622707.1465]
manager: startup complete
jul 04 10:58:51 xenon NetworkManager[1191]:   [1467622731.8390]
device (br-lan): link connected
jul 04 10:58:52 xenon NetworkManager[1191]:   [1467622732.2913]
connectivity: check for uri
'http://fedoraproject.org/static/hotspot.txt' failed with 'Error al
resolver «fedoraproject.org»: Name or service not known'
jul 04 10:58:52 xenon NetworkManager[1191]:   [1467622732.2940]
connectivity: check for uri
'http://fedoraproject.org/static/hotspot.txt' failed with 'Error al
resolver «fedoraproject.org»: Name or service not known'
jul 04 10:58:52 xenon NetworkManager[1191]:   [1467622732.6142]
manager: NetworkManager state is now CONNECTED_GLOBAL

[root@xenon ~]# systemctl status NetworkManager-wait-online.service
● NetworkManager-wait-online.service - Network Manager Wait Online
   Loaded: loaded
(/usr/lib/systemd/system/NetworkManager-wait-online.service; enabled;
vendor preset: disabled)
   Active: inactive (dead)

[root@xenon ~]# journalctl -b -u NetworkManager-wait-online.service
-- No entries --


-- 
Juan Orti
https://apuntesderootblog.wordpress.com/
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: 2 of 4 systems messed up after dnf system-upgrade

2016-07-04 Thread Andras Simon 
2016-07-04 1:23 GMT+02:00, Greg Woods :
> I have upgraded 4 systems (two laptops and two desktops, all different
> hardware) from F23 to F24. Two of them are working fine, and the others
> seem to be badly messed up in the area of package management. The main
> symptom I see is that google-chrome-stable was uninstalled during the
> upgrade, and I can't reinstall it:
>
> [root@cobweb yum.repos.d]# dnf install google-chrome-stable --allowerasing
> Last metadata expiration check: 0:08:42 ago on Sun Jul  3 17:09:12 2016.
> Error: nothing provides /usr/bin/foomatic-rip needed by
> redhat-lsb-printing-4.1-32.fc24.x86_64
> [root@cobweb yum.repos.d]#
>
> I also get "no matching packages" responses to "dnf list" on packages that
> are already installed:
>
> root@cobweb yum.repos.d]# dnf clean all
> 72 files removed
> [root@cobweb yum.repos.d]# dnf list cups*
> Fedora 24 - x86_64  8.3 MB/s |
> 47 MB 00:05
> google-chrome55 kB/s |
> 3.5 kB 00:00
> Adobe Systems Incorporated   17 kB/s |
> 1.8 kB 00:00
> RPM Fusion for Fedora 24 - Free 839 kB/s |
> 326 kB 00:00
> RPM Fusion for Fedora 24 - Nonfree  311 kB/s |
> 64 kB 00:00
> Steam for Fedora 28 kB/s |
> 7.9 kB 00:00
> Dropbox Repository   25 kB/s |
> 2.4 kB 00:00
> RPM Fusion for Fedora 24 - Nonfree - Updates131 kB/s |
> 18 kB 00:00
> Fedora 24 - x86_64 - Updates7.3 MB/s |
> 8.0 MB 00:01
> RPM Fusion for Fedora 24 - Free - Updates   272 kB/s |
> 75 kB 00:00
> Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:02 ago on Sun Jul  3 17:09:12 2016.
> Error: No matching Packages to list
>
> [root@cobweb yum.repos.d]# rpm -qa | grep cups
> cups-filesystem-2.1.0-2.fc23.noarch
> python3-cups-1.9.72-8.fc24.x86_64
> cups-libs-2.1.0-2.fc23.x86_64
> cups-client-2.1.0-2.fc23.x86_64
> cups-libs-2.1.0-2.fc23.i686
> python2-cups-1.9.72-8.fc24.x86_64
> cups-filters-libs-1.6.0-1.fc23.x86_64
> cups-pk-helper-0.2.5-6.fc23.x86_64
> [root@cobweb yum.repos.d]#
>
> Here, dnf fails to even list packages that "rpm -q" shows are already on
> the system that should match the pattern.
>
> Anybody seen this or have a clue what I can do other than a full reinstall?

Just say

dnf list cups\*

instead of

dnf list cups*

Andras
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: bluetooth applet [SOLVED]

2016-07-04 Thread Samuel Sieb 

On 07/03/2016 11:18 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote:

On 27.06.2016, Samuel Sieb wrote:


After downgrading from blueman-1:2.0.4-2.fc23.i686
   to the previous blueman-2.1-0.3.git7a2e20e.fc23.i686

bluetooth is controllable using the applet and works as desired.



That is odd.  For some reason, the version was downgraded, so you actually
have a newer version now than you did before.


FWIW: I just upgraded a laptop from F23 to F24, and during
"system-upgrade download", I remember the download summary showed that
there were 13 packages to be downgraded - on a bog standard F23.


Yes, sometimes the newer versions of some software haven't been built 
yet for all releases.


However, this one would not have shown up in the "downgraded" list 
because the epoch was bumped, so to dnf/rpm it's actually a "newer" 
version than before.

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Re: bluetooth applet [SOLVED]

2016-07-04 Thread Heinz Diehl 
On 27.06.2016, Samuel Sieb wrote: 

> > After downgrading from blueman-1:2.0.4-2.fc23.i686
> >to the previous blueman-2.1-0.3.git7a2e20e.fc23.i686
> > 
> > bluetooth is controllable using the applet and works as desired.
 
> That is odd.  For some reason, the version was downgraded, so you actually
> have a newer version now than you did before.

FWIW: I just upgraded a laptop from F23 to F24, and during
"system-upgrade download", I remember the download summary showed that
there were 13 packages to be downgraded - on a bog standard F23.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org