Recover from unintended dd

[Kalpa Welivitigoda]

Hi all,

I wanted to create a live install media from by flash drive using dd.
Following is the command I used,

sudo dd bs=4M if=Fedora-Live-Desktop-x86_64-19-1.iso of=/dev/sdc1

The sad part is /dev/sdc1 happened to be my external hard disk (I wanted to
write the image to my flash disk), this was by mistake.

Now I cannot access files in my external hard disk. My hard disk is 1TB and
had only one partition. With this dd now it has two partitions (sdc1 and
sdc2), following are the outputs of trying to mount them,

$ sudo mount /dev/sdc1 abc/
mount: mount /dev/sdc1 on /tmp/abc failed: Structure needs cleaning

$ sudo mount /dev/sdc2 abc/
mount: /dev/sdc2 is write-protected, mounting read-only
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdc2,
   missing codepage or helper program, or other error

   In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
   dmesg | tail or so.

I googled for the issue and read that it is hard to recover.

Have any of you experienced a similar situation and recovered?

Any help/clue to get the hard disk recovered is highly appreciated.



-- 
Best Regards,

Kalpa Welivitigoda
+94776509215
http://about.me/callkalpa
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: grub recovery

[Chris Murphy]

On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 1:15 PM, peterlesterh...@telfort.nl
 wrote:
> Hi,
> After a Windows update my (dual boot) system won't boot into fedora anymore.
> Somehow the grub bootloader doesn' t start.
>
> After booting this is what I see:
>
> Minimal Bash-like line editing is supported. For the first word TAB lists
> possible command completions. Anywhere else TAB lists possible device or
> file completions.
>
> grub>_
>
> When I issue the command "exit" the Windows bootloader pops up.
>
> I googled on this subject, but found many completely different answers.
> I would appreciate any suggestion. How can I recover my system?

This suggests it's UEFI firmware, because exit causes the firmware to
fallback to the next item in the boot order. But why does the firmware
find grubx64.efi but not grub.cfg which is in the same path, just
because Windows did an update? Kinda strange. For BIOS, I'd expect
exit to fail because there's no fallback.

Possibly the easiest way to handle this is with any F23-F25
netinstaller, and use the rescue boot option found in the
troubleshooting submenu (of GRUB if in fact I'm correct and this
computer has UEFI firmware; if I'm wrong, it'll have a
syslinux/isolinux boot menu). The rescue option is supposed to find
and assemble a Fedora installation per fstab, at /mnt/sysimage. Once
it does that:

# chroot /mnt/sysimage
# ls -l /boot/efi/EFI/fedora

Is there a grub.cfg? If so maybe

# cat /boot/efi/EFI/fedora/grub.cfg | fpaste

Or possibly we have a legacy linux on this computer, so maybe this is better

# tree -L 3 /boot/efi/ | fpaste
# efibootmgr -v | fpaste

And just for grins

# mv /boot/efi/EFI/fedora/grub.cfg /boot/efi/EFI/fedora/grub.cfg.old
# grub2-mkconfig /boot/efi/EFI/fedora/grub.cfg
# exit
# reboot -f


-- 
Chris Murphy
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: grub recovery

[Tod Merley]

The grub command line shell affords you the opportunity to find out what
has happened.  But you need to take the time to learn how to use it.  I
think it would be well worth your time for you and for us.  Then we know
what happened.

You are booting to grub.

Q1:  Is this in a secure boot environment for from a "legacy" configuration?

Q2: What did Windows do?  Changed the name and UUID of a partition?  Format
your Linux partition?   What has happened.

I have gone to not doing dual boot with Windows simply because they do not
wish to play well with other OS.

Would a good solution be to learn how to dual boot from Windows using their
boot loader redirection?

Have a lot of fun!

Tod

On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 1:15 PM, peterlesterh...@telfort.nl <
peterlesterh...@telfort.nl> wrote:

> Hi,
> After a Windows update my (dual boot) system won't boot into fedora
> anymore.
> Somehow the grub bootloader doesn' t start.
>
> After booting this is what I see:
>
>
>
> *Minimal Bash-like line editing is supported. For the first word TAB lists
> possible command completions. Anywhere else TAB lists possible device or
> file completions.grub>_*
>
> When I issue the command "exit" the Windows bootloader pops up.
>
> I googled on this subject, but found many completely different answers.
> I would appreciate any suggestion. How can I recover my system?
>
>
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
>
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: problem with custom partitioning installing 32-bit F25

[Andre Robatino]

I'm not absolutely sure. It's definitely the policy on IRC with #fedora where 
/topic currently says "Fedora 23, 24, 25 Beta  end-user support".
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: how to correctly log without journald (and its blobs)?

[Matthew Miller]

On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 07:12:29PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> The journal provides several very useful features. I find
> 'systemctl status sshd' (or service of your choice) to be really
> useful. The filtered results are also really nice — much easier than
> grepping because grep isn't field-aware. (Try journalctl -p err.)

Oh! And `journalctl -b` to get logs from this boot, and `journalctl
-b-1` to get logs from the previous, and so on.

-- 
Matthew Miller

Fedora Project Leader
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: how to correctly log without journald (and its blobs)?

[Matthew Miller]

On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 04:03:52PM +0100, Franta Hanzlík wrote:
> What I want is completely eliminate 'journald' program, of course (if I can
> not get rid of the systemd :(

Are you trying to solve a particular problem other than distaste for
journald? If that's what it is, sure, go for it, but please do be aware
that you're straying quite far from what we actually work on testing.

The journal provides several very useful features. I find
'systemctl status sshd' (or service of your choice) to be really
useful. The filtered results are also really nice — much easier than
grepping because grep isn't field-aware. (Try journalctl -p err.)

So that said, if you really want a journald-free system based on
Fedora, you might try uselessd, a "minimized" fork of system.
http://uselessd.darknedgy.net/. We don't include it, but you might be
able to create a Fedora Remix which does. That, however, didn't last
very look due to lack of actual interest in development — so it's not
been updated in two years.

If that's not up your alley, you might try something like Linux From
Scratch to build your own system that works just like you like it — or
try Slackware. Or you might decide that it's not so horrible after all.

-- 
Matthew Miller

Fedora Project Leader
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: New kernels won't boot

[Derrik Walker v2.0]

On 11/20/2016 06:43 PM, Jeffrey Ross wrote:



On 11/10/2016 04:24 PM, David A. De Graaf wrote:


My trusty old IBM T30 laptop will no longer boot with the latest
kernel-4.7.9-200.fc24.i686
kernel-4.8.4-200.fc24.i686
kernel-PAE-4.8.4-200.fc24.i686
It will still boot
kernel-4.7.7-200.fc24.i686

I too am unable to boot the newer kernels from at least 4.8.4 but I 
have a different failure than what you are describing.  I have a 
Lenovo T440p and an older desktop machine with an Intel core 2 duo 
processor, both fail in the same manner.


When the system comes up the system goes into a hibernation mode, if I 
bring it out of hibernation it'll continue the boot and then go into 
hibernation again, eventually after 4 or 5 hibernation cycles I can 
finally get the machine to complete the boot cycle and allow me to log 
in, at this point the system appears to work properly.




I have an HP laptop that wont boot with the 4.8 kernel. Boots fine on 
4.7 kernels. Took me a bit to figure out it was a problem with the 
kernel.  Mine just hangs when the kernel should load with a white dot in 
the upper left-hand corner of the screen.



--
-- Derrik

Derrik Walker v2.0, RHCE
dwal...@doomd.net

"Those UNIX guys, they think weird!" -- John C. Dvorak




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: problem with custom partitioning installing 32-bit F25

[Patrick O'Callaghan]

On Sun, 2016-11-20 at 22:50 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
> > 
> > Ask on the Fedora Test list. F25 is not yet released.
> 
> My understanding that after Branched reaches Beta, it's acceptable to ask on 
> the user list (and F25 is already Gold and will be officially released in 2 
> days, at which point it wouldn't be appropriate to ask on the test list 
> anyway).

I've never heard that but if it's established practice then sure.

poc
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: How Do I Upgrade from Fedora Workstation 23 to 24?

[Matthew Miller]

On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 01:07:24PM +0800, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo wrote:
> I have just downloaded and booted up the Fedora Workstation Live 24
> DVD. It seems that there is no option to upgrade my existing Fedora
> Workstation 23 to 24. The only option appears to be fresh new
> installation in which I would lose all existing data.
> Please advise me on how I can achieve upgrade installation with Fedora
> Workstation 24 Live DVD.

You don't need the DVD to do an upgrade — you do it within the
installed system itself. Instructions are here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading

You should also find an Upgrade option in Software in Fedora
Workstation, for an all-GUI experience.

-- 
Matthew Miller

Fedora Project Leader
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: New kernels won't boot

[Jeffrey Ross]

On 11/10/2016 04:24 PM, David A. De Graaf wrote:


My trusty old IBM T30 laptop will no longer boot with the latest
kernel-4.7.9-200.fc24.i686
kernel-4.8.4-200.fc24.i686
kernel-PAE-4.8.4-200.fc24.i686
It will still boot
kernel-4.7.7-200.fc24.i686

I too am unable to boot the newer kernels from at least 4.8.4 but I have 
a different failure than what you are describing.  I have a Lenovo T440p 
and an older desktop machine with an Intel core 2 duo processor, both 
fail in the same manner.


When the system comes up the system goes into a hibernation mode, if I 
bring it out of hibernation it'll continue the boot and then go into 
hibernation again, eventually after 4 or 5 hibernation cycles I can 
finally get the machine to complete the boot cycle and allow me to log 
in, at this point the system appears to work properly.


[   41.661105] nouveau :02:00.0: DRM: resuming kernel object tree...
[   41.704285] nouveau :02:00.0: priv: HUB0: 085014  (1870820b)
[   41.704757] nouveau :02:00.0: priv: GPC0: 4188ac 0001 (1b70822e)
[   41.727714] nouveau :02:00.0: priv: HUB0: 10ecc0  (1f70822c)
[   41.748279] nouveau :02:00.0: DRM: resuming client object trees...
[   42.799310] PM: Syncing filesystems ...
[   47.093082] nouveau :02:00.0: DRM: evicting buffers...
[   47.093084] nouveau :02:00.0: DRM: waiting for kernel channels to 
go idle...

[   47.093110] nouveau :02:00.0: DRM: suspending client object trees...
[   47.094368] nouveau :02:00.0: DRM: suspending kernel object tree...
[   47.585291] ip6_tables: (C) 2000-2006 Netfilter Core Team
.
.
.
[   52.205610] Netfilter messages via NETLINK v0.30.
[   52.220236] ip_set: protocol 6
[   63.673308] done.
[   63.673312] PM: Preparing system for sleep (mem)
[   63.673734] Freezing user space processes ... (elapsed 0.063 seconds) 
done.
[   63.737356] Double checking all user space processes after OOM killer 
disable... (elapsed 0.000 seconds)
[   63.737374] Freezing remaining freezable tasks ... (elapsed 0.001 
seconds) done.

[   63.738490] PM: Suspending system (mem)
[   63.738512] Suspending console(s) (use no_console_suspend to debug)
[   63.861830] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Synchronizing SCSI cache

.
.
.
[   79.503546] device virbr0-nic left promiscuous mode
[   79.503570] virbr0: port 1(virbr0-nic) entered disabled state
[   83.960786] nouveau :02:00.0: DRM: evicting buffers...
[   83.960788] nouveau :02:00.0: DRM: waiting for kernel channels to 
go idle...

[   83.960823] nouveau :02:00.0: DRM: suspending client object trees...
[   83.962116] nouveau :02:00.0: DRM: suspending kernel object tree...
[  102.929666] nouveau :02:00.0: DRM: resuming kernel object tree...
[  102.972865] nouveau :02:00.0: DRM: resuming client object trees...
[  103.081139] e1000e: enp0s25 NIC Link is Down
[  103.347125] PM: Syncing filesystems ... done.
[  104.362519] PM: Preparing system for sleep (mem)
[  104.362774] Freezing user space processes ... (elapsed 0.001 seconds) 
done.
[  104.364228] Double checking all user space processes after OOM killer 
disable... (elapsed 0.000 seconds)
[  104.364286] Freezing remaining freezable tasks ... (elapsed 0.001 
seconds) done.

[  104.365463] PM: Suspending system (mem)


Suggestions?

Jeff
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: how to correctly log without journald (and its blobs)?

[Tom H]

On Thu, Nov 17, 2016, Franta Hanzlík  wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Nov 2016, Tom H  wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016, Franta Hanzlík  wrote:
>>>
>>> Eh, excuse for bad formulation. Binary log I can inhibit with
>>> specifiing 'Storage=none' in [Journal] section of
>>> /etc/systemd/journald.conf.
>>>
>>> What I want is completely eliminate 'journald' program,
>>
>> That's not possible. You need journald as an rsyslog forwarder.
>
> Tom thanks for reply.

You're welcome.


> It seems to me, as there in conjunction with systemd
> somehow often occurs "That's not possible".
> But is not possible use for this (somehow) systemd option
> "--log-target=kmsg" ?

I've just tried "systemd.log_target=kmsg" on the kernel cmdline with
rsyslog set up and it logged to "/var/log/" but "journalctl -k" has
some log lines that aren't there with the default "journal-or-kmsg"
setting. Perhaps "systemd.log_target=" sets the location that systemd
logs to _at_boot_ rather than a runtime target, especially since
journald has its own kernel cmdline settings that look like
"systemd.journald.forward_to_...=".


> And earlier, I think even in Fedora 21, it was possible to use the option
> "--log-target=syslog" - I think, this option was served just for this
> purpose. Where has she gone? Why now has been dropped?

The last version to have "--log-target=syslog" was 215. I suspect
that, like "--log-target=kmsg", it didn't mean that journald was
bypassed.


> Sorry for this questions, systemd documentation poorly (rather not at
> all) describe this.

systemd is, in general, well-documented but in this instance
"--log-target=" isn't explained clearly.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: grub recovery

[jd1008]

On 11/20/2016 02:15 PM, peterlesterh...@telfort.nl wrote:

Hi,
After a Windows update my (dual boot) system won't boot into fedora 
anymore.

Somehow the grub bootloader doesn' t start.

After booting this is what I see:

/Minimal Bash-like line editing is supported. For the first word TAB 
lists possible command completions. Anywhere else TAB lists possible 
device or file completions.


grub>_/

When I issue the command "exit" the Windows bootloader pops up.

I googled on this subject, but found many completely different answers.
I would appreciate any suggestion. How can I recover my system?

The Solution:
01. Boot a live fedora cd or dvd
02. mount your on-disk  fedora linux on  say /fedora, like so:
  mkdir /fedora
  mount /dev/sd??  /fedora   # where ?? is the disk and partition 
where your fedora is installed.

03. tar cf - dev   | tar -C /fedora -xpvf -
04. chroot /fedora
05. grub2-install --recheck  /dev/sd??
06. grub2-mkconfig -o /etc/grub2.cfg

When the command (at point 8) returns, then
07. cd /dev
08. rm -rf *
Why? because /dev/  is populated  dynamically at boot time.

Let the list know how it went.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: problem with custom partitioning installing 32-bit F25

[Andre Robatino]

> Ask on the Fedora Test list. F25 is not yet released.

My understanding that after Branched reaches Beta, it's acceptable to ask on 
the user list (and F25 is already Gold and will be officially released in 2 
days, at which point it wouldn't be appropriate to ask on the test list anyway).
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: problem with custom partitioning installing 32-bit F25

[Patrick O'Callaghan]

On Sun, 2016-11-20 at 22:14 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
> > 
> > Use a Live version of GParted to do your partitioning first, then install.
> 
> The machine currently has a clean install of F24 (dual-boot with Windows). 
> Normally, the installer makes me delete the existing Fedora partitions to 
> free up space, then it creates new partitions using the free space. If I 
> create empty partitions with GParted or some other tool, will the installer 
> allow using those, and will it automatically know which to assign to /boot, / 
> and swap so I don't have to custom partition to make changes? (Partitioning 
> is not something I'm familiar with or good at.)

Ask on the Fedora Test list. F25 is not yet released.

poc
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: problem with custom partitioning installing 32-bit F25

[Andre Robatino]

> Use a Live version of GParted to do your partitioning first, then install.

The machine currently has a clean install of F24 (dual-boot with Windows). 
Normally, the installer makes me delete the existing Fedora partitions to free 
up space, then it creates new partitions using the free space. If I create 
empty partitions with GParted or some other tool, will the installer allow 
using those, and will it automatically know which to assign to /boot, / and 
swap so I don't have to custom partition to make changes? (Partitioning is not 
something I'm familiar with or good at.)
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: grub recovery

[Rami Rosen]

Hi,
I suggest that first you will make sure that the update of windows did
not destroy the grub entries of Fedora.
You can do it by booting a Fedora LiveCD, then mount the system using
"chroot /mnt/sysimage" (there are a lot of guides about it) and look
at /boot/grub2/grub.cfg.

Another way is to cat this grub.cfg from the "grub>" prompt (this is a
bit more complex maybe, also for this there are guides).

Assuming there are the Fedora entries, the reason can be that the
"default=" entry is changed to boot into Windows and also hide is set
(hiding the grub menu).
In case of doubts I would suggest posting the contents of grub2.cfg
here/in pastebin + link here.

Regards,
Rami Rosen
http://ramirose.wix.com/ramirosen

On 20 November 2016 at 23:15, peterlesterh...@telfort.nl
 wrote:
> Hi,
> After a Windows update my (dual boot) system won't boot into fedora anymore.
> Somehow the grub bootloader doesn' t start.
>
> After booting this is what I see:
>
> Minimal Bash-like line editing is supported. For the first word TAB lists
> possible command completions. Anywhere else TAB lists possible device or
> file completions.
>
> grub>_
>
> When I issue the command "exit" the Windows bootloader pops up.
>
> I googled on this subject, but found many completely different answers.
> I would appreciate any suggestion. How can I recover my system?
>
>
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: problem with custom partitioning installing 32-bit F25

[Joe Zeff]

On 11/20/2016 01:39 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:

I'm trying to install 32-bit F25 Gold (RC1.3) from the netinst, with custom 
partitioning. The only reason I need custom partitioning is to avoid creating a 
separate /home partition. Unfortunately, due 
tohttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375732  , it won't let me expand 
the / partition to use the space freed after deleting /home. (This bug wasn't 
fixed since 32-bit is no longer a blocker.) Is there any fairly easy way to 
achieve this without custom partitioning in the installer? Or is it likely that 
an updates.img would be made available after release day to work around this 
type of issue?


Use a Live version of GParted to do your partitioning first, then install.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-users] Re: How to Restrict user authentication per application?

[William Brown]

On Sat, 2016-11-19 at 08:29 +, msarm...@arissystem.com wrote:
> Thank you for the reply
> 
> Please take a look at https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/49036 
> I tried to be descriptive and explaining an environment from a point of view
> It might help me explain better.
> 
> By Users, I'm referring to End Users which can use applications - those they 
> are permitted. And I should say that an application checks user's 
> authentication credentials by binding to the directory using them. 
> 
> The expected behaviour is: there be a mechanism where I could place a Rule 
> that userA(DN corresponding to End UserA) can bind to directory only from 
> App1 and not App2 (based on his manager's  request). 
> I think, that mechanism must be an ACI Like behaviour in which bind 
> operation(initiated by an application software, say App1) for a user(User DN 
> corresponding to, say, UserA) could be controller by IP (if UserA is allowed 
> to user App1, App1(from IP1) can bind using UserDN of UserA), and if not it 
> should be defined as Deny Rule. 
> Moreover, having that mechanism, like what is doable in directory ACI on 
> other operations(read,write,search,...), we could expect more mature 
> constraints, e.g. time, a certain user attribute, etc.
> 
> Please let me know what sort of other details could help? or what can I 
> explain.
> 

Okay, I believe I understand now.

Based on some "attribute", you wish to allow a user to authenticate to
some application A, but not to application B depending on the attribute
state. 

I want to break this down.

Directory Server is used for providing Authentication and Authorisation.

Authentication is the process of saying "are you really who you claim to
be". This is the process of saying "is your password correct" for
example.

Authorisation is the process of saying "do you have the permission to
use some resource?"

What you are confusing here is you are trying to solve an
*authorisation* problem by disallowing *authentication* from an IP
address. This is not the right way to approach this in my experience. My
former email is in fact the solution,

You want a user who can *always* authenticate. But then based on
memberShip of a group, you can deny the *authorisation* to the
application.

For example:

uid=user1,ou=People,dc=... is a member of cn=Application-A but is NOT a
member of cn=Application-B

Most applications support a "filter" on their LDAP settings. In that
filter, you would provide something like:

Application A:
'(&(uid=%s)(memberOf=cn=Application-A,...))'

Application B:
'(&(uid=%s)(memberOf=cn=Application-B,...))'

When user1, who is a memberOf cn=Application-A went to authenticate to
Application A, the filter is run. Because the object would be matched by
this filter, the application has now *authorised* that this user can
*authenticate* to the application.

When user1, who is NOT a memberOf cn=Application-B went to authenticate
to Application B, the filter is run. Because user1 would not match the
filter, not object is returned. The application knows the user is *not*
authorised for this, and fails to allow the user to login, no matter if
their password is correct or not.

This is exactly the behaviour you want! 

Another benefit of this, is that there is *no way* to do secure
delegation of an attribute on the user for application permissions. You
would have to allow a manager to change *all* authorisation permissions,
or none.

A benefit of users and groups is that the managers can be through ACI's
only allowed to edit groups they are responsible for. For example, the
finance manager could add users to the finance application group, but
could not add users to the linux system administration group!

You can read more about secure group delegation here:

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Directory_Server/10.1/html/Administration_Guide/Advanced_Entry_Management.html#Advanced_Entry_Management-Using_Groups

https://fy.blackhats.net.au/blog/html/2016/05/25/acis_for_group_creation_and_delegataion_in_ds.html

PS: I'm copying this text to the ticket also. 

-- 
Sincerely,

William Brown
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Brisbane


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

problem with custom partitioning installing 32-bit F25

[Andre Robatino]

I'm trying to install 32-bit F25 Gold (RC1.3) from the netinst, with custom 
partitioning. The only reason I need custom partitioning is to avoid creating a 
separate /home partition. Unfortunately, due to 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375732 , it won't let me expand 
the / partition to use the space freed after deleting /home. (This bug wasn't 
fixed since 32-bit is no longer a blocker.) Is there any fairly easy way to 
achieve this without custom partitioning in the installer? Or is it likely that 
an updates.img would be made available after release day to work around this 
type of issue?
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

grub recovery

[peterlesterh...@telfort.nl]

Hi,
After a Windows update my (dual boot) system won't boot into fedora anymore.
Somehow the grub bootloader doesn' t start.
After booting this is what I see:
Minimal Bash-like line editing is supported. For the first word TAB lists 
possible command completions. Anywhere else TAB lists possible device or file 
completions.
grub>_
When I issue the command "exit" the Windows bootloader pops up.
I googled on this subject, but found many completely different answers. 
I would appreciate any suggestion. How can I recover my system?
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Ktorrent problem

[jd1008]

FYI.

Quiting ktorrent does not cause ktorrent to exit.
After I quit, I run ps -ef | grep ktorrent
and it is still running long after I quit.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Racket & Fedora

[Antonio M]

http://cha1tanya.com/2013/06/05/installing-racket-on-fedora.html

Antonio Montagnani

Linux Fedora 24 (Workstation)
inviato da Gmail

2016-11-20 19:11 GMT+01:00 Saša Janiška :

> Hello,
>
> recently moved to Fedora and I’m a bit surprised that there is no
> package for Racket language. Found
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301219 and it seems nobody
> is workin on it, so wonder if any Racketeers can suggest recommend way
> to install/use Racket on Fedora (f25)?
>
>
> Sincerely,
> Gour
>
> --
> The humble sages, by virtue of true knowledge, see with equal
> vision a learned and gentle brāhmana, a cow, an elephant, a dog
> and a dog-eater.
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Racket & Fedora

[Saša Janiška]

Hello,

recently moved to Fedora and I’m a bit surprised that there is no
package for Racket language. Found
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301219 and it seems nobody
is workin on it, so wonder if any Racketeers can suggest recommend way
to install/use Racket on Fedora (f25)?


Sincerely,
Gour

-- 
The humble sages, by virtue of true knowledge, see with equal
vision a learned and gentle brāhmana, a cow, an elephant, a dog
and a dog-eater.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Go language

[Howard Howell]

Never mind, found the link you posted.  Read so fast I skipped it.

Thanks again...
Les H
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Go language

[Howard Howell]

Thank you so much Stan, I am sure this is what I was missing.  Where
did you find this information?

Regards,
Les H
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: /boot on btrfs

[Saša Janiška]

Chris Murphy  writes:

> Some of this is a repeat, as this comes up from time to time.

[…]

Thank you for the input - I’m glad I did the right chocue with XFS for
my Raid1 setup. ;)


Sincerely,
Gour

-- 
Never was there a time when I did not exist,
nor you, nor all these kings; nor in the future
shall any of us cease to be.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org