Re: post-mortem: f24 boot fails; need help.
The smartctl long test took about 4 hours (I think!). I wish it would notify me when it was actually finished! As best as I could tell (by using "smartctl -l error /dev/sda", it found no problems. thanks, Bill. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: post-mortem: f24 boot fails; need help.
While changing the motherboard battery yesterday (Friday), most cables were disconnected and then later re-connected. That included the hard drive connection to the motherboard. I also disconnected and reconnected both the power cable and the data cable where they plug in to the hard drive itself. The hard drive was removed, vacuumed, and put back into its place. No problems since, but I haven't done a "dnf upgrade" since then. thanks, Bill. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: post-mortem: f24 boot fails; need help.
According to the man page, the "-n" option is non-destructive; the "-w" option is what you described. Regardless, it's too long. Bill. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fw: Systemd keeps trying to re-open an already active LUKS volume
Thanks for forwarding this. Just FYI, I have just filed a bug report, because it looks mire like a bug rather than a misconfiguration on my system: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458524 If anyone happens to know what the problem could be, please update the bug report rather than the mailing list threads. Cheers, Andrej smime.p7s Description: Elektronicky podpis S/MIME ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
kernel errors after updating to 4.11.3-200.fc25.x86_64
What is the meaning of these error messages: WARNING: Kernel Errors Present WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 3538 at drivers/net/wireles ...: 1 Time(s) iwlwifi :0c:00.0: FH_TSSR_TX_ERROR_REG: 0X ...: 1 Time(s) iwlwifi :0c:00.0: FW error in SYNC CMD REPL ...: 1 Time(s) iwlwifi :0c:00.0: Microcode SW error detected. Resta ...: 1 Time(s) iwlwifi :0c:00.0: Start IWL Error Log Dump: ...: 1 Time(s) Thank you. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: VPN l2tp+ipsec: not work with last kernel 4.11.3-200
Il giorno ven, 02/06/2017 alle 18.06 +, Kseniya Blashchuk ha scritto: > Do you use dnsmasq? I had the same issue until I set dns=dnsmasq in > NetworkManager.conf. I don't remember exactly why it's needed, found > somewhere at GitHub. > > No, I do not use dnsmasq. Resolve remote name using remote DNS work (UDP) and also ping to remote IP work (ICMP) I have try last kojo kernel but the problem persist.https://bugzilla.re dhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458222#c2 id="-x-evo-selection-start-marker"> Thanks -- Dario Lesca (inviato dal mio Linux Fedora 25 Workstation)___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: post-mortem: f24 boot fails; need help.
On Sat, 2017-06-03 at 01:32 +, William Mattison wrote: > I tried badblocks last night. I didn't realize how long it would > take. After over 3 hours, I had to abort it to do something else. > > This morning, I retried it, this time with options to show its > progress. It took between 3 1/2 and 3 3/4 hours. Here are the > results: > === > bash.3[~]: badblocks -s -v /dev/sda > Checking blocks 0 to 1953514583 > Checking for bad blocks (read-only test): > done > Pass completed, 0 bad blocks found. (0/0/0 errors) > bash.4[~]: > === > I don't think this completely rules out the hard drive as the > villain, but it's now less of a suspect. Am I correct in guessing > that the non-destructive read-write option (option "-n") would take > over twice as long (7 1/2 or more hours)? > > Thanks, > Bill. > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org I have not followed this thread closely, but did you check the harddisk cable. They are often a source for problems... Louis ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
