[389-users] Re: invalid bind dn

2017-07-19 Thread Narendra Laga
can please suggest me to how we can add this value.



dn="Directory Manager,dc=text,dc=in" is not a valid dn (err=34)

the attribute for "directory manager" is missing. you need to verify what is teh
proper dn, most likely: "cn=directory Manager,dc=text,dc=in"
but you have to make sure this entry exists


On 07/06/2017 12:14 PM, narendra laga wrote:
...
 Hi,

Please suggest me to reslove this issue.
we are trying to integrate 389 ldap to cyberoam, while doing test connection we 
are
facing below issue.

[05/Jul/2017:05:38:01.814000145 -0400] conn=19 op=0 BIND dn="Directory
Manager,dc=text,dc=in" authzid="(null)", invalid bind dn

Thanks,
Narendra
___
389-users mailing list -- 389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
___
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: is it just me, or is firefox suddenly nad-grindingly slow?

2017-07-19 Thread stan
On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 10:30:53 +0930
Tim  wrote:

> Allegedly, on or about 19 July 2017, Robert P. J. Day sent:
> >   on a regularly-updated F25 system, firefox recently become just
> > excruciatingly slow, and i don't recall tweaking any settings. has
> > something happened lately? anyone else noticing this?   
> 
> Are you using advert blocking, and browsing ad-infested sites?  Some
> of them stall and take forever when you don't let them load the crap.

I've had that happen.  It has to time out on the advertising before it
moves on to the content.  Too bad there isn't an add-on that pretends
to accept all the ad content, and then throws it in the bit bucket
instead of displaying it.  The ones I use seem to block it from ever
reaching the browser, but the feed site knows it was blocked (I get
messages saying their web site won't work properly with ad blocking
enabled).
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: is it just me, or is firefox suddenly nad-grindingly slow?

2017-07-19 Thread Tim
Allegedly, on or about 19 July 2017, Robert P. J. Day sent:
>   on a regularly-updated F25 system, firefox recently become just
> excruciatingly slow, and i don't recall tweaking any settings. has
> something happened lately? anyone else noticing this? 

Are you using advert blocking, and browsing ad-infested sites?  Some of
them stall and take forever when you don't let them load the crap.

-- 
[tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp
Linux 3.9.10-100.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Sun Jul 14 01:31:27 UTC 2013 x86_64 
(always current details of the computer that I'm writing this email on)

Boilerplate:  All mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted, there is
no point trying to privately email me, I only get to see the messages
posted to the mailing list.

Computers are like dentists. They have their uses, but they're both
bloody pains.


___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: is it just me, or is firefox suddenly nad-grindingly slow?

2017-07-19 Thread William Oliver
On Wed, 2017-07-19 at 14:17 -0700, stan wrote:
> [snip]
> 
> 
> It's just you.  I notice slowdowns at popular times for social media,
> which I suspect are my ISP, or those popular sites, throttling
> traffic.  But in general it is behaving how it has always behaved.  I
> recently tried some other browsers because of a problem with the way
> a
> site was behaving (a bug in their site), and I didn't notice any
> difference in speed.
> 
> You could see if one of your add-ons is the cause by starting it from
> the command line
> /usr/bin/firefox -safe-mode
> If it is fast then, restore the add-ons one by one until you find the
> culprit.
> 

Oddly, when I upgraded to F26, I had a noticeable increase in
responsiveness of Firefox.  I don't know if F26 is generally a bit more
snappy than F25 was, or if it's because I deleted all my caches.  On my
last backup, there seemed to be a zillion cached thumbnails and files
that Firefox was keeping, in spite of me severely limiting the amount
of space it was supposed to be using for that kind of stuff.

I've noticed a couple of times that getting rid of the ./.mozilla and
./.cache/mozilla directories (and assorted addon detritus) and starting
over has sped things up, at least for awhile.  Of course, it meant re-
installing my addons, which is a bit of a chore, but I could tell the
difference.

I keep wondering if Firefox and the addons aren't dropping cow pies all
over my hidden directories until it's piled so high it can't move.


billo


___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Blocking root login via PAM

2017-07-19 Thread CLOSE Dave
If I run ">/etc/securetty" and add "auth [user_unknown=ignore success=ok
ignore=ignore default=bad] pam_securetty.so" to various /etc/pam.d/*
files (as described in
),
root login on the console is blocked as it should be. But the user gets
no hint of the problem, merely a refreshed login screen. Is there a way
to display a message in this case?
-- 
 Dave Close
 "Age is a very high price to pay for maturity." -- Tom Stoppard
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: F26: particular keystrokes cause Xorg to freeze momentarily, looking for debugging suggestions

2017-07-19 Thread Daniel Miranda
I never manually enabled compose keys, and slash does not seem to be working as 
such. But it does seem like the most likely explanation for the different 
behavior. I'll investigage that avenue further. Thank you Tim!
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


google-chrome-stable v 59 on centos7

2017-07-19 Thread bruce
Hey guys.

(no. this isnt a typo!! sorry 'bout that earlier!)

Got a bit of an issue that's apparently flumoxed other as well. I'm
trying to set up a centos7 box to test out py+selenium+google-chrome.

As far as I can tell, you essentially download/install the bits (yum)
and you can fire up a test. I'm not quite getting there though.

I've set the epel repo for a few things.

Downloaded/installed google-chrome-stable (v59) via yum
downloaded chromedriver as well
installed Xvfb

right not, simply trying to get google-chrome-stable to run from the
cmdline with no errs

as sudo user, started Xvfb :1 &
export DISPLAY=":1"
fired up google-chrome-stable

and got:
google-chrome-stable
Xlib:  extension "RANDR" missing on display ":1".
[1735:1735:0720/000303.549815:ERROR:gl_surface_glx.cc(407)]
glxQueryVersion failed
[1735:1735:0720/000303.549869:ERROR:gl_initializer_x11.cc(156)]
GLSurfaceGLX::InitializeOneOff failed.
[1735:1735:0720/000303.617339:ERROR:gpu_child_thread.cc(174)] Exiting
GPU process due to errors during initialization
[1642:1678:0720/000303.622469:ERROR:browser_gpu_channel_host_factory.cc(103)]
Failed to launch GPU process.


what the heck!!

In researching this, it appears others on centos/ubuntu/etc have
gotten similar output.

If you have a few mins, any thoughts/comments will be appreciated.

Heck, given that this is a cheap instance, I'd glady grant root access
to you as well!

thanks...

ps. If I can get this to operate correctly, then the actual test can occur.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[389-users] Re: multimaster fractional replication import DS

2017-07-19 Thread William Brown
On Wed, 2017-07-19 at 13:31 -0700, ghiureai wrote:
> Hi LIst,
> I have 2 pairs of DS's in multimaster fractional replication with 
> memberof plugging excluded from replication , (DS1 <->DS2 )
> and
> second pair same  fractional multimaster rep config ( DS3<>DS4)
>   I want to import with ldif2db a copy of DS content from first pairs to 
> second  pair, what are implication for exiting replication system , any 
> extra meta -data needs to be clearup after import, what will be the 
> steps order to avoid to have to rebuild the  second replication ?
> 

My advice assumes that DS3/4 are a seperate cluster (probably for
development/staging)

You can just do db2ldif from DS1/2, and ldif2db on DS3, then conduct a
full online reinit from DS3 -> DS4. This should be fine :) 

If you plan to join DS3/4 to DS1/2 and you are staging them for the
process, you'll need to do db2ldif -r from DS1/2, and load the ldif to
both DS3/4, then join the replication agreement. No re-init needed. 

Hope that helps, 


-- 
Sincerely,

William Brown
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Australia/Brisbane



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: [SOLVDED] Only one problem after F25 -> F26

2017-07-19 Thread Ed Greshko
On 07/20/17 03:21, Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 07/19/2017 12:03 PM, Frank Elsner wrote:
>> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 16:15:01 +0200 Frank Elsner wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> my update from version 25 to 26 of Fedora went (nearly) painless
>>> but I have one annoying problem:
>>>
>>> After succesfull login two windows come up. One asking for the
>>> admin password to configure network, the other for using rfkill.
>>>
>>> If I cancel both the system still works perfect.
>>>
>>> What't behind? How to stop this behaviour?
>> I cant't answer the first question but after
>>
>>   systemctl disable bluetooth
>>   systemctl stop bluetooth
>>
>> the windows don't appear. 
>>
>> The problem is solved for me. I can life without bluetooth.
>>
>> The reason might be that rfkill shows bluetooth soft blocked
>> when asking for the root password.
> Theoretically, you could "rfkill block bluetooth" to hardblock
> bluetooth networking. The system shouldn't ask you about it in the
> future unless you "rfkill unblock bluetooth". The systemd-rfkill.service
> is supposed to track the state of rfkill and restore the state early in
> the boot process. This should allow you to re-enable bluetooth for
> headsets and the like, but just block bluetooth networking.
>
> I've never tinkered with this stuff myself, but that's my reading of the
> way it all works.

As I mentioned in an earlier reply the solution for me was to simply erase 
blueman. 
I can still run bluetooth, which is good, to service my mouse.  Their may have 
been a
way to get blueman to stop asking about network but I didn't feel the desire to 
look
further.

-- 
Fedora Users List - The place to go to speculate endlessly



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: is it just me, or is firefox suddenly nad-grindingly slow?

2017-07-19 Thread stan
On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 16:48:02 -0400 (EDT)
"Robert P. J. Day"  wrote:

>   on a regularly-updated F25 system, firefox recently become just
> excruciatingly slow, and i don't recall tweaking any settings. has
> something happened lately? anyone else noticing this?

It's just you.  I notice slowdowns at popular times for social media,
which I suspect are my ISP, or those popular sites, throttling
traffic.  But in general it is behaving how it has always behaved.  I
recently tried some other browsers because of a problem with the way a
site was behaving (a bug in their site), and I didn't notice any
difference in speed.

You could see if one of your add-ons is the cause by starting it from
the command line
/usr/bin/firefox -safe-mode
If it is fast then, restore the add-ons one by one until you find the
culprit.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: is it just me, or is firefox suddenly nad-grindingly slow?

2017-07-19 Thread Roger Heflin
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Robert P. J. Day  wrote:
>
>   on a regularly-updated F25 system, firefox recently become just
> excruciatingly slow, and i don't recall tweaking any settings. has
> something happened lately? anyone else noticing this?
>
> rday
>

Yes, for a month or 2 now.   Mine appears to be collecting memory, and
I have to exit
and restart every couple of days.The laptop I am using it on has
16gb and firefox is
probably 90% of what is running (that is not gnome).   It did not do
that until the last
few months, and if I leave mine running it will exceed 10gb in a a few
days.   I do tend
to have quite a few tabs open but in general I have always had a
similar number of tabs
open for years.

Roger
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: is it just me, or is firefox suddenly nad-grindingly slow?

2017-07-19 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Wed, 2017-07-19 at 16:48 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>   on a regularly-updated F25 system, firefox recently become just
> excruciatingly slow, and i don't recall tweaking any settings. has
> something happened lately? anyone else noticing this?

I find Chrome a good deal slower. Currently my fastest browser is
Opera, which is really snappy. Pity it's not free.

poc
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Linux anti-virus any good? [CLOSED}

2017-07-19 Thread William
Well, the high-scoring workstation choices cost too much for me, and/or 
did not have a version for Linux.  Server choices are not appropriate 
for my situation.  So I'll stick with rkhunter, chkrootkit, NoScript, 
uBlock Origin, Better Privacy, what's built into Firefox and 
Thunderbird, and trying to be careful with links and attachments in e-mail.


It was an an interesting and educational discussion.  Thank-you, 
everyone.  I consider this closed.


Bill.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


is it just me, or is firefox suddenly nad-grindingly slow?

2017-07-19 Thread Robert P. J. Day

  on a regularly-updated F25 system, firefox recently become just
excruciatingly slow, and i don't recall tweaking any settings. has
something happened lately? anyone else noticing this?

rday

-- 


Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter:   http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:   http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[389-users] multimaster fractional replication import DS

2017-07-19 Thread ghiureai

Hi LIst,
I have 2 pairs of DS's in multimaster fractional replication with 
memberof plugging excluded from replication , (DS1 <->DS2 )

and
second pair same  fractional multimaster rep config ( DS3<>DS4)
 I want to import with ldif2db a copy of DS content from first pairs to 
second  pair, what are implication for exiting replication system , any 
extra meta -data needs to be clearup after import, what will be the 
steps order to avoid to have to rebuild the  second replication ?



Thank you
Isabella

___
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: PDF Otter - Fill in PDFs - Fast, Secure, Free

2017-07-19 Thread Chris Murphy
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 12:53 PM, JD  wrote:
>
>
> On 07/19/2017 12:46 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> https://www.pdfotter.com/
>>
>> https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14805750
>>
>>
>> I haven't checked this out yet, but the forms extensions in PDF these
>> days seem to confuse all the FOSS PDF editors. This is maybe not a
>> good enough substitute for better PDF forms support in free software,
>> but is probably better than depending on Adobe.
>>
>> So the question. Does it work? Do the resulting filled in forms view
>> and print OK on Fedora? What version of PDF does the downloaded form
>> return in?
>>
> I'd much much rather do it all on my own machine, thank you :)


Sure. But I still think it's better to grow the market of supporting
these documents with tools other than Adobe's. Maybe your concerns can
be mitigated by an option to delete in less than 24 hours?

-- 
Chris Murphy
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: [SOLVDED] Only one problem after F25 -> F26

2017-07-19 Thread Rick Stevens
On 07/19/2017 12:03 PM, Frank Elsner wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 16:15:01 +0200 Frank Elsner wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> my update from version 25 to 26 of Fedora went (nearly) painless
>> but I have one annoying problem:
>>
>> After succesfull login two windows come up. One asking for the
>> admin password to configure network, the other for using rfkill.
>>
>> If I cancel both the system still works perfect.
>>
>> What't behind? How to stop this behaviour?
> 
> I cant't answer the first question but after
> 
>   systemctl disable bluetooth
>   systemctl stop bluetooth
> 
> the windows don't appear. 
> 
> The problem is solved for me. I can life without bluetooth.
> 
> The reason might be that rfkill shows bluetooth soft blocked
> when asking for the root password.

Theoretically, you could "rfkill block bluetooth" to hardblock
bluetooth networking. The system shouldn't ask you about it in the
future unless you "rfkill unblock bluetooth". The systemd-rfkill.service
is supposed to track the state of rfkill and restore the state early in
the boot process. This should allow you to re-enable bluetooth for
headsets and the like, but just block bluetooth networking.

I've never tinkered with this stuff myself, but that's my reading of the
way it all works.
--
- Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigitalri...@alldigital.com -
- AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 226437340   Yahoo: origrps2 -
--
-Brain:  The organ with which we think that we think.-
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[SOLVDED] Only one problem after F25 -> F26

2017-07-19 Thread Frank Elsner
On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 16:15:01 +0200 Frank Elsner wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> my update from version 25 to 26 of Fedora went (nearly) painless
> but I have one annoying problem:
> 
> After succesfull login two windows come up. One asking for the
> admin password to configure network, the other for using rfkill.
> 
> If I cancel both the system still works perfect.
> 
> What't behind? How to stop this behaviour?

I cant't answer the first question but after

  systemctl disable bluetooth
  systemctl stop bluetooth

the windows don't appear. 

The problem is solved for me. I can life without bluetooth.

The reason might be that rfkill shows bluetooth soft blocked
when asking for the root password.


--Frank
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: PDF Otter - Fill in PDFs - Fast, Secure, Free

2017-07-19 Thread JD



On 07/19/2017 12:46 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:

https://www.pdfotter.com/

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14805750


I haven't checked this out yet, but the forms extensions in PDF these
days seem to confuse all the FOSS PDF editors. This is maybe not a
good enough substitute for better PDF forms support in free software,
but is probably better than depending on Adobe.

So the question. Does it work? Do the resulting filled in forms view
and print OK on Fedora? What version of PDF does the downloaded form
return in?


I'd much much rather do it all on my own machine, thank you :)
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


PDF Otter - Fill in PDFs - Fast, Secure, Free

2017-07-19 Thread Chris Murphy
https://www.pdfotter.com/

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14805750


I haven't checked this out yet, but the forms extensions in PDF these
days seem to confuse all the FOSS PDF editors. This is maybe not a
good enough substitute for better PDF forms support in free software,
but is probably better than depending on Adobe.

So the question. Does it work? Do the resulting filled in forms view
and print OK on Fedora? What version of PDF does the downloaded form
return in?

-- 
Chris Murphy
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Adobe Acrobat & F26

2017-07-19 Thread Rick Stevens
On 07/19/2017 09:35 AM, Alex Aycinena wrote:
> 
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Antonio M  >
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> >
> Cc: 
> Bcc: 
> Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 09:46:00 +0200
> Subject: Re: Adobe Acrobat & F26
> /opt/Adobe/Reader9/bin/acroread
> No protocol specified
> 
> (acroread:5276): Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open display: :0
> 
> in Fedora 26...
> 
> Antonio Montagnani
> 
> Linux Fedora 26(Workstation)
> inviato da Gmail
> 
> 
> Have you tried logging in under X11 instead of Wayland to see if that
> makes any difference. Other applications give that warning and fail to
> start under Wayland but work under X11.

Also look to see if you're getting an selinux AVC denial.
--
- Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigitalri...@alldigital.com -
- AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 226437340   Yahoo: origrps2 -
--
-   This message printed using recycled bandwidth-
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: routes not being applied to interfaces

2017-07-19 Thread Rick Stevens
On 07/19/2017 08:59 AM, InvalidPath wrote:
> Anyone other ideas?.. Anyone?

There's nothing in the logs that indicate why the new routes aren't
being applied?

I'm not sure how routes are applied with NM, but it appears to run
the standard ifup-routes script, passing it the name of the interface.
Can you check in the /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts directory for a
route-enp62s0u1u2 file or a "route-name-of-network" file?

If you find one, edit the ifup-routes script and add a "set -x" just
after the last comment line, then try:

sudo /bin/bash ./ifup-routes enp62s0u1u2

Perhaps that'll give a hint as to what's going on.

> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 12:59 PM, InvalidPath  > wrote:
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Rick Stevens  > wrote:
> 
> On 07/18/2017 11:05 AM, InvalidPath wrote:
> > Thanks Rick, Yeah I'm certain.  The network interface enp62s0u1u2 
> is the
> > usb-c adapter built into the dock.  So once docked that int comes up
> > and, before the F26 upgrade the routes would get applied. Not they 
> don't :(
> 
> Hmmm. Are you using NM to control this? If so, have you checked NM's
> config for that device (the IPV4 tab, the "Routes..." button).
> 
> > On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Rick Stevens 
> 
> > >> wrote:
> >
> > On 07/18/2017 08:19 AM, InvalidPath wrote:
> > > Anyone?  Seems like an issue of this caliber would be 
> important.  I know
> > > it is for me when I am forced to resort to manually inputting 
> custom
> > > routes each morning.
> >
> > You specifically said "while docked". Are you certain your 
> system is
> > recognizing when it is docked and when it isn't? That's the 
> first thing
> > to check as that's probably more complex than picking up routes 
> (like
> > sorting out suspend issues).
> >
> > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 9:14 AM, InvalidPath 
> 
> >
> > >     > wrote:
> > >
> > > Pre-F26 upgrade I used a route file to apply work
> related routes
> > > while docked, for some reason since the upgrade when
> I look via
> > > route or ip route I am no longer getting the ones
> from the
> > file applied.
> > > I did verify the name of my interface is correct..
> the name
> > changed
> > > once after an update so that's always the first
> thing I check.
> > >
> > > I also have the same routes in the Route tab in Network
> > Manager, and
> > > looking in journalctl I see:
> > >
> > > Jul 17 08:16:53 Vostok audit[1]: SERVICE_START pid=1
> uid=0
> > > auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295
> msg='unit=NetworkManager-dispatcher
> > > comm="systemd"
> > > Jul 17 08:16:53 Vostok dhclient[3662]: bound to
> 10.0.20.186 --
> > > renewal in 1122048 seconds.
> > > Jul 17 08:16:53 Vostok nm-dispatcher[3754]: req:1
> 'pre-up'
> > > [enp62s0u1u2]: new request (1 scripts)
> > > Jul 17 08:16:53 Vostok NetworkManager[1158]: 
> > >  [1500301013.5560] device (enp62s0u1u2): state
> change: ip-check ->
> > > secondaries (reason 'n
> > > Jul 17 08:16:53 Vostok NetworkManager[1158]: 
> > >  [1500301013.5563] device (enp62s0u1u2): state
> change: secondaries
> > > -> activated (reason '
> > > Jul 17 08:16:53 Vostok dnsmasq[1477]: reading
> /etc/resolv.conf
> > > Jul 17 08:16:53 Vostok dnsmasq[1477]: using nameserver
> > 10.0.20.19#53
> > > Jul 17 08:16:53 Vostok NetworkManager[1158]: 
> > >  [1500301013.5650] device (enp62s0u1u2): Activation:
> successful,
> > > device activated.
> > > Jul 17 08:16:53 Vostok dnsmasq[1477]: using nameserver
> > 10.0.20.1#53
> > > Jul 17 08:16:53 Vostok dnsmasq[1477]: using nameserver
> > 10.0.22.1#53
> > > Jul 17 08:16:53 Vostok dnsmasq[1477]: using nameserver
> > 10.0.20.20#53
> > > Jul 

Re: Adobe Acrobat & F26

2017-07-19 Thread Alex Aycinena
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Antonio M 
> To: Community support for Fedora users 
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 09:46:00 +0200
> Subject: Re: Adobe Acrobat & F26
> /opt/Adobe/Reader9/bin/acroread
> No protocol specified
>
> (acroread:5276): Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open display: :0
>
> in Fedora 26...
>
> Antonio Montagnani
>
> Linux Fedora 26(Workstation)
> inviato da Gmail
>

Have you tried logging in under X11 instead of Wayland to see if that makes
any difference. Other applications give that warning and fail to start
under Wayland but work under X11.

Alex
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: routes not being applied to interfaces

2017-07-19 Thread InvalidPath
Anyone other ideas?.. Anyone?

On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 12:59 PM, InvalidPath 
wrote:

>
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Rick Stevens 
> wrote:
>
>> On 07/18/2017 11:05 AM, InvalidPath wrote:
>> > Thanks Rick, Yeah I'm certain.  The network interface enp62s0u1u2 is the
>> > usb-c adapter built into the dock.  So once docked that int comes up
>> > and, before the F26 upgrade the routes would get applied. Not they
>> don't :(
>>
>> Hmmm. Are you using NM to control this? If so, have you checked NM's
>> config for that device (the IPV4 tab, the "Routes..." button).
>>
>> > On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Rick Stevens > > > wrote:
>> >
>> > On 07/18/2017 08:19 AM, InvalidPath wrote:
>> > > Anyone?  Seems like an issue of this caliber would be important.
>> I know
>> > > it is for me when I am forced to resort to manually inputting
>> custom
>> > > routes each morning.
>> >
>> > You specifically said "while docked". Are you certain your system is
>> > recognizing when it is docked and when it isn't? That's the first
>> thing
>> > to check as that's probably more complex than picking up routes
>> (like
>> > sorting out suspend issues).
>> >
>> > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 9:14 AM, InvalidPath <
>> invalid.p...@gmail.com 
>> > > >>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Pre-F26 upgrade I used a route file to apply work related
>> routes
>> > > while docked, for some reason since the upgrade when I look
>> via
>> > > route or ip route I am no longer getting the ones from the
>> > file applied.
>> > > I did verify the name of my interface is correct.. the name
>> > changed
>> > > once after an update so that's always the first thing I check.
>> > >
>> > > I also have the same routes in the Route tab in Network
>> > Manager, and
>> > > looking in journalctl I see:
>> > >
>> > > Jul 17 08:16:53 Vostok audit[1]: SERVICE_START pid=1 uid=0
>> > > auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 msg='unit=NetworkManager-dispa
>> tcher
>> > > comm="systemd"
>> > > Jul 17 08:16:53 Vostok dhclient[3662]: bound to 10.0.20.186 --
>> > > renewal in 1122048 seconds.
>> > > Jul 17 08:16:53 Vostok nm-dispatcher[3754]: req:1 'pre-up'
>> > > [enp62s0u1u2]: new request (1 scripts)
>> > > Jul 17 08:16:53 Vostok NetworkManager[1158]: 
>> > >  [1500301013.5560] device (enp62s0u1u2): state change:
>> ip-check ->
>> > > secondaries (reason 'n
>> > > Jul 17 08:16:53 Vostok NetworkManager[1158]: 
>> > >  [1500301013.5563] device (enp62s0u1u2): state change:
>> secondaries
>> > > -> activated (reason '
>> > > Jul 17 08:16:53 Vostok dnsmasq[1477]: reading /etc/resolv.conf
>> > > Jul 17 08:16:53 Vostok dnsmasq[1477]: using nameserver
>> > 10.0.20.19#53
>> > > Jul 17 08:16:53 Vostok NetworkManager[1158]: 
>> > >  [1500301013.5650] device (enp62s0u1u2): Activation:
>> successful,
>> > > device activated.
>> > > Jul 17 08:16:53 Vostok dnsmasq[1477]: using nameserver
>> > 10.0.20.1#53
>> > > Jul 17 08:16:53 Vostok dnsmasq[1477]: using nameserver
>> > 10.0.22.1#53
>> > > Jul 17 08:16:53 Vostok dnsmasq[1477]: using nameserver
>> > 10.0.20.20#53
>> > > Jul 17 08:16:53 Vostok nm-dispatcher[3754]: req:2 'up'
>> > > [enp62s0u1u2]: new request (7 scripts)
>> > > Jul 17 08:16:53 Vostok nm-dispatcher[3754]: req:2 'up'
>> > > [enp62s0u1u2]: start running ordered scripts...
>> > > Jul 17 08:16:53 Vostok systemd[1]: iscsi.service: Unit cannot
>> be
>> > > reloaded because it is inactive.
>> > > Jul 17 08:16:53 Vostok NetworkManager[1158]: 
>> > >  [1500301013.7452] policy: set 'USB-c Ethernet' (enp62s0u1u2)
>> as
>> > > default for IPv4 routing
>> > > Jul 17 08:16:53 Vostok dnsmasq[1477]: reading /etc/resolv.conf
>> > > Jul 17 08:16:53 Vostok dnsmasq[1477]: using nameserver
>> > 10.0.20.19#53
>> > > Jul 17 08:16:53 Vostok dnsmasq[1477]: using nameserver
>> > 10.0.20.20#53
>> > > Jul 17 08:16:53 Vostok dnsmasq[1477]: using nameserver
>> > 10.0.20.1#53
>> > > Jul 17 08:16:53 Vostok dnsmasq[1477]: using nameserver
>> > 10.0.22.1#53
>> > >
>> > > Any thoughts?
>> > >
>> > > Thanks
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > ___
>> > > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> > 
>> > > To unsubscribe send an email to
>> > users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> > 
>> > >
>> >
>> 

Re: rpmbuild

2017-07-19 Thread Matthew Miller
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 12:50:50AM -0400, Bill Shirley wrote:
> I just recently build a spec file for ndppd (NDP Proxy Daemon) and found out
> you can't comment out by using a single # in a spec file if it is a % command.
> It has to be like this:
> #%%configure

Yeah, this is because macros are expanded even in comments. It works
okay for single-line macros, but fails badly for multiple-line ones,
since then only the first line ends up commented out.



-- 
Matthew Miller

Fedora Project Leader
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: F26 and blurry fonts

2017-07-19 Thread Heinz Diehl
On 19.07.2017, Heinz Diehl wrote: 

> To me, v40 is far superior to v35. Fortunately, there's a way to
> switch back to v35 behaviour.

s/superior/inferior;
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: F26 and blurry fonts

2017-07-19 Thread Heinz Diehl
On 18.07.2017, Andreas M. Kirchwitz wrote: 

> Do you know why the font display looks broken with the new v40 engine?
> Is that a bug in the freetype library or something that has to be
> fixed in all applications?

It's not a bug, it's meant to be a feature :-(
https://tinyurl.com/ybf3fkwv

> Starting with F26, Chrome now respects the anti-aliasing config,
> but although I have have turned Hinting on (which is essential for
> nice font rendering, even with AA turned off), Chrome displays those
> fonts without Hinting. That looks horrible. :-(

I've never used Chrome, so I don't know what's going on there. You could do a 
diff
between the latest Chrome that worked and the new one, just to see if
there's something that rings a bell.

> > If you also want subpixel rendering, which now is disabled by default,
> > you can dig into the foption.h file in the config directory of the
> > freetype sourcecode, uncomment the option and recompile.
 
> Does that mean, subpixel rendering has been completely removed
> from the freetype library compiled for F26? Any reason for this?

Seems to be the case. Looking into the latest 2.7.1 source shipped by
Fedora, subpixel rendering isn't enabled in foptions.h. Most probably,
Fedora follows the freetype principal developers opinion(s).
 
> Subpixel rendering has no effect if AA is turned off, right?

As far as I understand it, subpixel rendering is a form of
antialiasing on LCD screens that works because the combination of red,
green and blue appears as white light. A typical example is Micro$ofts
"Cleartype".

To me, v40 is far superior to v35. Fortunately, there's a way to
switch back to v35 behaviour.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Adobe Acrobat & F26

2017-07-19 Thread Antonio M
/opt/Adobe/Reader9/bin/acroread
No protocol specified

(acroread:5276): Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open display: :0

in Fedora 26...

Antonio Montagnani

Linux Fedora 26(Workstation)
inviato da Gmail

2017-07-19 8:09 GMT+02:00 Marc Blanc :

> Le Tue, 18 Jul 2017 15:49:12 -0500,
> Chris Adams  a écrit :
>
>
> >It can also mean it isn't an ELF binary; IIRC at one point
> >/usr/bin/acroread was just a shell script wrapper.  You can run "file
> >/usr/bin/acroread" to see that.
>
> For me in f26 :
>
>
> [mb@mbv ~]$ /opt/Adobe/Reader9/bin/acroread
>
> Gtk-Message: failed to load module "pk-gtk-module"
> Gtk-Message: failed to load module "canberra-gtk-module"
>
> --
> M.B
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Adobe Acrobat & F26

2017-07-19 Thread Marc Blanc
Le Tue, 18 Jul 2017 15:49:12 -0500,
Chris Adams  a écrit :


>It can also mean it isn't an ELF binary; IIRC at one point
>/usr/bin/acroread was just a shell script wrapper.  You can run "file
>/usr/bin/acroread" to see that.

For me in f26 :


[mb@mbv ~]$ /opt/Adobe/Reader9/bin/acroread

Gtk-Message: failed to load module "pk-gtk-module"
Gtk-Message: failed to load module "canberra-gtk-module"

-- 
M.B
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org