Re: How to turn on networking from rescue boot

[Ed Greshko]

On 07/30/2017 05:40 AM, ven...@billoblog.com wrote:
> So...  I did a "sudo dnf upgrade" and things seemed to do well.  However, 
> when I
> rebooted, it hangs on bootup with the statment "Holding until bootup processes
> complete" or something like that -- I'm doing this from memory.  I tried with 
> a
> couple of older kernels, but they also hung.
>
> I assume that this is some transient thing associated with the upgrade.  Over 
> the
> years, I've had glitches appear on an upgrade and disappear on the next 
> upgrade. 
> Accordingly, I'd like to boot into rescue mode and see if I can upgrade again.
>
> However, I've forgotten how to turn on wifi networking from rescue mode.
>
> Can anybody point me to a tutorial?

I can't give you a tutorial since I've not had to boot into rescue mode.  I'm
assuming in rescue mode you are not in a GUI interface.

Well, in that case I'd probably use "nmcli".Network Manager Command Line 
Interface.

Personally, I 'd have to resort to checking out the man page since that is 
something
I rarely use.  But it should get you to where you need to be.

-- 
Fedora Users List - The place to go to speculate endlessly



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

How to turn on networking from rescue boot

[vendor]

So...  I did a "sudo dnf upgrade" and things seemed to do well.  
However, when I rebooted, it hangs on bootup with the statment "Holding 
until bootup processes complete" or something like that -- I'm doing 
this from memory.  I tried with a couple of older kernels, but they also 
hung.


I assume that this is some transient thing associated with the upgrade.  
Over the years, I've had glitches appear on an upgrade and disappear on 
the next upgrade.  Accordingly, I'd like to boot into rescue mode and 
see if I can upgrade again.


However, I've forgotten how to turn on wifi networking from rescue mode.

Can anybody point me to a tutorial?

Thanks,

billo
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: CACHEDIR.TAG

[Patrick Dupre]

OK,

I installed cachedir

===
 Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
 Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
 Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale   | |
 Tel.  (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12   | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
===


> Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2017 at 6:00 PM
> From: "Patrick Dupre" 
> To: fedora 
> Subject: CACHEDIR.TAG
>
> Hello,
> 
> When I tar a folder, I wish to exclude the cache files
> Hence, I try to use
> tar --exclude-caches-all
> But it seems that the directory need to be tagged by a file
> CACHEDIR.TAG
> It looks like that any of my files are tagged.
> find . -name CACHEDIR.TAG | sed -e 's/[/]CACHEDIR.TAG$//g' >/tmp/excludes
> 
> provides an empty file.
> 
> How can I manage CACHEDIR.TAG ?
> 
> Thank.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

CACHEDIR.TAG

[Patrick Dupre]

Hello,

When I tar a folder, I wish to exclude the cache files
Hence, I try to use
tar --exclude-caches-all
But it seems that the directory need to be tagged by a file
CACHEDIR.TAG
It looks like that any of my files are tagged.
find . -name CACHEDIR.TAG | sed -e 's/[/]CACHEDIR.TAG$//g' >/tmp/excludes

provides an empty file.

How can I manage CACHEDIR.TAG ?

Thank.

===
 Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
 Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
 Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale   | |
 Tel.  (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12   | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
===
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Yes you have standing to sue GRSecurity.

[Heinz Diehl]

On 29.07.2017, ni...@redchan.it wrote: 
[]


___
   /|  /|  |  |
   ||__||  |  Please do   |
  /   O O\__ not  |
 /  \ feed the|
/  \ \ troll  |
   /   _\ \ __|
  /|\\ \ ||
 / | | | |\/ ||
/   \|_|_|/   \__||
   /  /  \|| ||
  /   |   | /||  --|
  |   |   |// |  --|
   * _|  |_|_|_|  | \-/
*-- _--\ _ \ //   |
  /  _ \\ _ //   |/
*  /   \_ /- | - |   |
  *  ___ c_c_c_C/ \C_c_c_c

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Yes you have standing to sue GRSecurity.

[nisus]

It has come to my attention that some entities are claiming that you, 
dear Linux Hackers, (1)need to go through some foundation or get some 
permission from upon high in-order to sue the progenitors of GRSecurity 
for their violation of section 6 of the terms underwhich the linux 
kernel is distributed (version 2 of the GPL). And, furthermore, that 
(2)this foundation has no intention of bringing such a suit.


(1) is false.
(2) may very well be true.

You do have standing to sue GRSecurity for their blatant continuing 
copyright violation if GRSecurity has made a derivative work of your 
code contribution to the Linux Kernel as-long as (a)you have not 
assigned your copyrights, and (b)you are not a work-for-hire.


How do you know if you are a work for hire or if you have signed away 
your copyrights?
If you are working for a company and as your job duties you are 
programming the linux kernel, there is a good chance that you are a work 
for hire and thus the company owns said copyrights.


How do you know if you signed away your copyrights? Well if you singed a 
document transferring ownership of your copyrights for the code you 
produced at some point.


If you are not working for a company while hacking linux and you haven't 
assigned your copyrights away then YOU OWN YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS.


This means most of you hobby hackers, if GRSecurity has modified your 
code, YES YOU HAVE STANDING TO SUE.


Yes your "betters" are lying to you.
You have individual separate standing to sue.

Yes you SHOULD consult a lawyer of your own.
Yes you SHOULD consider a joint filing with other individual 
rights-holders willing to bring suit against GRSecurity for their 
blatant violation of your terms, and yes you should consider starting 
CLASS ACTION since the number of Linux Kernel Contributors seemingly 
numbers in the multitudes upon multitudes upon multitudes.


And yes, I am an attorney.
But no, I'm not looking for clients. Just correcting some false 
information that has been spreading.


And yes, GRSecurity will try to claim that the linux-kernel is a work of 
Joint ownership (so as to shield themselves via procedural law) and yes 
they will try to claim fair use (probably de minimus), and yes your 
Lawyer will have to respond to these claims. The Joint ownership claim 
will go down quickly but it will have to be responded to. De minimus 
Fair Use depends on how much code is modified and how signifigant the 
modifications are. Don't let anyone but your own legal council dissuade 
you from bringing suit: Remember the statute of limitations is only a 
few years, so the clock is ticking on the CURRENT violation.


Also make sure you register your copyright of the version of the 
linux-kernel that GRSecurity is using in its violation prior to bringing 
suit. The registration must be for the specific version. Yes you can 
register after the violation has occurred, however if you have 
registered before the violation then you can also pursue recovery of 
legal fees, pursue statutory damages, etc.



( NOTE: If you would like to read on how your copyright is being 
violated by GRSecurity, Bruce Perens posted a good write-up on his 
web-page )
( 
perens.com/blog/2017/06/28/warning-grsecurity-potential-contributory-infringement-risk-for-customers/ 
  )
( There was also a discussion on the linux section of slashdot, and on 
the debian user mailing list, and on the dng devuan mailing list and on 
the openwall mailing list and the fedora legal mailing list )

___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org