Re: Stuck Kernel Version.....
Thank you SO much!...I will tackle this just as soon as I get out of work!...(work for Amazon overnights in the IT Dept! GOD!...It's like mental torture!Hahahah!!) On Mon, Feb 25, 2019, 3:31 PM Roger Heflin wrote: > To have a stuck kernel version, then what you have mounted at /boot is > not what is booting your machine. > > You need to find the real /boot where ever it is hiding and mount it > at /boot (and update /etc/fstab) and then do a "dnf reinstall" on each > of the kernels you want to work, and then reboot making sure one of > the new kernels is the default.. > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 10:58 AM David Dusanic > wrote: > > > > > Ok I have gone nuts trying to figure this out, and I'm just about ready > > > to just re-install the OS. (Fedora 29) I have been using Fedora since > > > likeversion 12, and have experienced all kinds of issues but this > > > one baffles me. So: > > > > > > I had updated from fc26 to fc27 successfully, but I have noticed that > > > since upgrading from 27 to 28 that the kernel versions while they have > > > gone up (e.g. from 3.12.203 >> 3.12.207 and these numbers I use are for > > > example only!) I notice that the "fc" number has remained the same (in > > > other words the "fc27" bit of the kernel name!) I have tried everything > > > I have found online from trying to upgrade the kernel through the > > > Terminal to trying to download, install, and compile a newer kernel > > > version and no matter what I've tried that part remains the same. So my > > > last attempt/effort will be a transfer of all my data and a complete > > > re-install of F29. But it would be nice to know what might have caused > > > this...in case it happens again! > > > > > > > > > EGO II > > > > What kernel are you actually running right now on Fedora 29? > > > > Mine is 4.20. > > > > uname -a > > Linux latitude 4.20.10-200.fc29.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Feb 15 18:33:14 UTC > > 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > > > > > -- > > David Dusanic > > ___ > > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: update failed
On Mon, 2019-02-25 at 10:18 -0500, Frank McCormick wrote: > I had added a 3rd party repository a long time > > ago (UnitedRPM)...I have long since forgotten the reason Next time you add an extra repo, it might be worth leaving yourself a note about why. The only files in my root user's home directory are installation notes and log files. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
F28 - Thunar crashes regularly
F28 with Xfce. Thunar 1.6.16 Thunar crashes regularly. Seems to be 'connected' to accessing external devices like 4TB USB drives and Android phone via libmtp and gvfs-mtp (I think :) ). Rather recent. I have always had challenges with my Android (Galaxy S4) with very slow time opening up a directory. Just viewing and dropping files into a high-level folder (like movies) is fast, but opening a folder like Sound to get voice recordings takes a lot of time. Here is a message on the thunar crash last: Feb 25 10:59:27 lx121e abrt-server[32461]: Deleting problem directory ccpp-2019-02-25-23:59:20.598234-32067 (dup of ccpp-2019-02-20-08:15:46.436224-30418) Feb 25 10:59:28 lx121e abrt-notification[32500]: Process 30418 (thunar) crashed in thunar_tree_model_get_value() I am current with updates as of Feb 22. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: LIghtweight editor to replace gedit?
I use mousepad that comes with Xfce. Nice and simple. When I need more (which is often), I use geany. On 2/25/19 10:02 PM, Alex wrote: Hi, I have a fedora29 workstation and frequently need a lightweight editor to make notes, act as an interim cut buffer, and just briefly edit documents before posting them somewhere else. The problem is that gedit crashes, or my desktop crashes, losing all the notes. Sometimes I have ten or so documents of differing degrees going at once, and when it crashes (like it just did again), I lose everything. I need something with some kind of temporary autosave capability, like vim, but graphical. I'm aware of the dozens of console editors (I use vim virtually everywhere), but need something small like gedit, without the bulk and complexity of libreoffice. Thanks, Alex ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Patching oddity
On 2/26/19 3:29 AM, Chris Kottaridis wrote: > I am concerned that I will continue to run into this. > > Is dnf-utils supposed to replace yum-utils ? Yes. yum is depreciated. dnf-utils preferred. -- Right: I dislike the default color scheme Wrong: What idiot picked the default color scheme ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Stuck Kernel Version.....
To have a stuck kernel version, then what you have mounted at /boot is not what is booting your machine. You need to find the real /boot where ever it is hiding and mount it at /boot (and update /etc/fstab) and then do a "dnf reinstall" on each of the kernels you want to work, and then reboot making sure one of the new kernels is the default.. On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 10:58 AM David Dusanic wrote: > > > Ok I have gone nuts trying to figure this out, and I'm just about ready > > to just re-install the OS. (Fedora 29) I have been using Fedora since > > likeversion 12, and have experienced all kinds of issues but this > > one baffles me. So: > > > > I had updated from fc26 to fc27 successfully, but I have noticed that > > since upgrading from 27 to 28 that the kernel versions while they have > > gone up (e.g. from 3.12.203 >> 3.12.207 and these numbers I use are for > > example only!) I notice that the "fc" number has remained the same (in > > other words the "fc27" bit of the kernel name!) I have tried everything > > I have found online from trying to upgrade the kernel through the > > Terminal to trying to download, install, and compile a newer kernel > > version and no matter what I've tried that part remains the same. So my > > last attempt/effort will be a transfer of all my data and a complete > > re-install of F29. But it would be nice to know what might have caused > > this...in case it happens again! > > > > > > EGO II > > What kernel are you actually running right now on Fedora 29? > > Mine is 4.20. > > uname -a > Linux latitude 4.20.10-200.fc29.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Feb 15 18:33:14 UTC > 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > > -- > David Dusanic > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Patching oddity
The history of this machine is that Fedora 25 was initially installed and then I have been using the system upgrade to keep upgrading it to the newer release. I just upgraded it to Fedora29 two weeks ago. I use dnfdragora GUI tool to do the patching. When I selected ALL of the packages "to update" I got a transaction error complaining that dnf-utils and yum-utils were in conflict on some files. When I ran it from the command line the dnf-utils package was in a category to be installed with a note about "weak dependency". Not exactly sure what that means. I figured I would apply subsets of the packages available to update but avoid anything that looked like it had anything to do with dnf, such as other dnf-* packages and packages referring to repositories and such. I figured I'd come back to them later. I didn't want a dependency to pull in dnf-utils and get me back in the problem I had. So, I'd select a dozen or so packages in dnfdragora and apply them and then select another group. I apparently wasn't to good at selecting packages that didn't have dnf-* dependencies because every once in a while one of the dnf-* files was brought in due to dependencies. Since none ever included dnf-utils I went and ahead and selected apply. In the end all the packages ended up applying without errors and dnfdragora claimed everything is up to date and there is nothing to do. When I looked dnf-utils is not installed, yum-utils still is. So, I am confused why when I try to apply ALL the updates at once dnf claims dnf-utils needs to be installed, but if I apply them in small groups dnf says everything is up to date but dnf-utils isn't installed ? I am concerned that I will continue to run into this. Is dnf-utils supposed to replace yum-utils ? Is this a ramification of continually upgrading the OS instead of installing a new version and moving over my application ? This was always my concern about upgrading OS's. Experience taught me that an upgrade to a release doesn't leave you in the same place as a fresh install of the same release. But, I should say I love this OS upgrade system. It definitely made my life easier and has gone off with little hitches. Fedora versions cycle so quickly that I would have used a different OS for this project without it. Cudos to the team that implemented it! But if there are minor cleanups necessary, such as cleaning out older packages that are no longer needed and may conflict with newer packages, that would be good to know. Thanks Chris K ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Stuck Kernel Version.....
On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 10:06:01 -0500 "Eddie O'Connor" wrote: > Ok I have gone nuts trying to figure this out, and I'm just about > ready to just re-install the OS. (Fedora 29) I have been using Fedora > since likeversion 12, and have experienced all kinds of issues > but this one baffles me. So: > > I had updated from fc26 to fc27 successfully, but I have noticed that > since upgrading from 27 to 28 that the kernel versions while they > have gone up (e.g. from 3.12.203 >> 3.12.207 and these numbers I use > are for example only!) I notice that the "fc" number has remained the > same (in other words the "fc27" bit of the kernel name!) I have tried > everything I have found online from trying to upgrade the kernel > through the Terminal to trying to download, install, and compile a > newer kernel version and no matter what I've tried that part remains > the same. So my last attempt/effort will be a transfer of all my data > and a complete re-install of F29. But it would be nice to know what > might have caused this...in case it happens again! Can you show a listing of /boot? ls -n /boot/vmlinuz* so things are one line per kernel. How about your dnf.conf file? cat /etc/dnf/dnf.conf Do you have the versionlock plugin installed? Have you locked the kernel version using the versionlock plugin? Have you protected the kernel using the /etc/dnf/protected.d/dnf.conf file? Have you tried increasing the number of kernels allowed in dnf.conf? man dnf.conf ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Gnome settings -> Online accounts and tor hidden services
On 2/25/19 6:56 AM, Robin Lee wrote: What would the correct project be? I did find the gnome-online-accounts project. But I wanted to find a project that would correspond to the Network Proxy Settings I would suggest filing it under gnome-online-accounts and they could move it elsewhere if they think there's a better project for it. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: LIghtweight editor to replace gedit?
Hi, Alex wrote: > I have a fedora29 workstation and frequently need a lightweight editor > to make notes, act as an interim cut buffer, and just briefly edit > documents before posting them somewhere else. > > The problem is that gedit crashes, or my desktop crashes, losing all > the notes. Sometimes I have ten or so documents of differing degrees > going at once, and when it crashes (like it just did again), I lose > everything. > > I need something with some kind of temporary autosave capability, like > vim, but graphical. > > I'm aware of the dozens of console editors (I use vim virtually > everywhere), but need something small like gedit, without the bulk and > complexity of libreoffice. Is gvim suitable (in the vim-X11 package)? If you use vim most everywhere, having a gvim window open would seem like a most handy solution. It's not only "like vim, but graphical," it *is* vim, but graphical. :) -- Todd signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: LIghtweight editor to replace gedit?
On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 17:46:38 +0100 David Dusanic wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have a fedora29 workstation and frequently need a lightweight editor > > to make notes, act as an interim cut buffer, and just briefly edit > > documents before posting them somewhere else. > > > > The problem is that gedit crashes, or my desktop crashes, losing all > > the notes. Sometimes I have ten or so documents of differing degrees > > going at once, and when it crashes (like it just did again), I lose > > everything. > > > > I need something with some kind of temporary autosave capability, like > > vim, but graphical. > > > > I'm aware of the dozens of console editors (I use vim virtually > > everywhere), but need something small like gedit, without the bulk and > > complexity of libreoffice. > > > > Thanks, > > Alex > > There are also mousepad from the Xfce project and pluma from Mate, a > fork of the old Gedit from Gnome 2. Another option is leafpad. Ranjan ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: LIghtweight editor to replace gedit?
On Mon, 25 Feb 2019, Alex wrote: Hi, I have a fedora29 workstation and frequently need a lightweight editor to make notes, act as an interim cut buffer, and just briefly edit documents before posting them somewhere else. The problem is that gedit crashes, or my desktop crashes, losing all the notes. Sometimes I have ten or so documents of differing degrees going at once, and when it crashes (like it just did again), I lose everything. I need something with some kind of temporary autosave capability, like vim, but graphical. I'm aware of the dozens of console editors (I use vim virtually everywhere), but need something small like gedit, without the bulk and complexity of libreoffice. I'm intrigued by your problem of gedit crashing. My use of it never does. My only frustration is that if I shutdown and forget to save something, when i reboot my computer other applications (firefox, libreoffice, etc) are restored to their previous sessions. Gedit is one that doesn't get restored; all I get is a fresh blank pane. I've learned to be careful here. I use Xfce, and vi/vim. Fedora w XFCE is intalled on a Dell XPS 13 L322 and a Shuttle, both i7s. fyi, Max Thanks, Alex ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Stuck Kernel Version.....
Ok I have gone nuts trying to figure this out, and I'm just about ready to just re-install the OS. (Fedora 29) I have been using Fedora since likeversion 12, and have experienced all kinds of issues but this one baffles me. So: I had updated from fc26 to fc27 successfully, but I have noticed that since upgrading from 27 to 28 that the kernel versions while they have gone up (e.g. from 3.12.203 >> 3.12.207 and these numbers I use are for example only!) I notice that the "fc" number has remained the same (in other words the "fc27" bit of the kernel name!) I have tried everything I have found online from trying to upgrade the kernel through the Terminal to trying to download, install, and compile a newer kernel version and no matter what I've tried that part remains the same. So my last attempt/effort will be a transfer of all my data and a complete re-install of F29. But it would be nice to know what might have caused this...in case it happens again! EGO II What kernel are you actually running right now on Fedora 29? Mine is 4.20. uname -a Linux latitude 4.20.10-200.fc29.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Feb 15 18:33:14 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux -- David Dusanic ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: LIghtweight editor to replace gedit?
Hi, I have a fedora29 workstation and frequently need a lightweight editor to make notes, act as an interim cut buffer, and just briefly edit documents before posting them somewhere else. The problem is that gedit crashes, or my desktop crashes, losing all the notes. Sometimes I have ten or so documents of differing degrees going at once, and when it crashes (like it just did again), I lose everything. I need something with some kind of temporary autosave capability, like vim, but graphical. I'm aware of the dozens of console editors (I use vim virtually everywhere), but need something small like gedit, without the bulk and complexity of libreoffice. Thanks, Alex There are also mousepad from the Xfce project and pluma from Mate, a fork of the old Gedit from Gnome 2. -- David Dusanic ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
[389-users] Re: Samba & 389 Directory Server Integration
Thanks Mark! I appreciate the quick reply. I'll try the -Z option and see how it goes. Cheers, ___ 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: update failed
On 2019-02-25 10:01 a.m., Jakub Jelen wrote: On Mon, 2019-02-25 at 09:33 -0500, Frank McCormick wrote: Tried to update my Fedora 29 this morning. It failed with this error: [SKIPPED] google-chrome-stable-72.0.3626.119-1.x86_64.rpm: Already downloaded Package ffmpeg-4.1.1-7.fc29.x86_64.rpm is not signed Package ffmpeg-libs-4.1.1-7.fc29.x86_64.rpm is not signed Package libavdevice-4.1.1-7.fc29.x86_64.rpm is not signed The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful transaction. You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'. Error: GPG check FAILED Is there a work around or should I just wait ? $ dnf info google-chrome-stable Error: No matching Packages to list There is no chrome package in Fedora. If you have issues with updates from third party repositories, it is probably better to ask where you got these repositories from. Note, that chromium works fine. Regards, My google-chrome comes from Google itself, but that wasn't the problem. I had added a 3rd party repository a long time ago (UnitedRPM)...I have long since forgotten the reason, but the ffmpeg package if was offering conflcited with the package(s) from rpm fusion. I dumped UnitedRPM and the problem is gone. Thanks Frank ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: update failed
On 2019-02-25 9:59 a.m., Ed Greshko wrote: On 2/25/19 10:33 PM, Frank McCormick wrote: Tried to update my Fedora 29 this morning. It failed with this error: [SKIPPED] google-chrome-stable-72.0.3626.119-1.x86_64.rpm: Already downloaded Package ffmpeg-4.1.1-7.fc29.x86_64.rpm is not signed Package ffmpeg-libs-4.1.1-7.fc29.x86_64.rpm is not signed Package libavdevice-4.1.1-7.fc29.x86_64.rpm is not signed The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful transaction. You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'. Error: GPG check FAILED Is there a work around or should I just wait ? I don't believe ffmpeg and libavdevice packages are part of fedora. Mine come from rpmfusion. If you do a "dnf info ffmpeg" what do you see in "From repo" section? Yup. They came from UnitedRPM, which was in conflict with the ones from rpmfusion. I don't recall why I added the UnitedRPM repositorybut it's gone now. Thanks Frank ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Stuck Kernel Version.....
Ok I have gone nuts trying to figure this out, and I'm just about ready to just re-install the OS. (Fedora 29) I have been using Fedora since likeversion 12, and have experienced all kinds of issues but this one baffles me. So: I had updated from fc26 to fc27 successfully, but I have noticed that since upgrading from 27 to 28 that the kernel versions while they have gone up (e.g. from 3.12.203 >> 3.12.207 and these numbers I use are for example only!) I notice that the "fc" number has remained the same (in other words the "fc27" bit of the kernel name!) I have tried everything I have found online from trying to upgrade the kernel through the Terminal to trying to download, install, and compile a newer kernel version and no matter what I've tried that part remains the same. So my last attempt/effort will be a transfer of all my data and a complete re-install of F29. But it would be nice to know what might have caused this...in case it happens again! EGO II ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: update failed
On Mon, 2019-02-25 at 09:33 -0500, Frank McCormick wrote: > Tried to update my Fedora 29 this morning. It failed > > with this error: > > > [SKIPPED] google-chrome-stable-72.0.3626.119-1.x86_64.rpm: Already > downloaded > Package ffmpeg-4.1.1-7.fc29.x86_64.rpm is not signed > Package ffmpeg-libs-4.1.1-7.fc29.x86_64.rpm is not signed > Package libavdevice-4.1.1-7.fc29.x86_64.rpm is not signed > The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next > successful > transaction. > You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'. > Error: GPG check FAILED > > > Is there a work around or should I just wait ? $ dnf info google-chrome-stable Error: No matching Packages to list There is no chrome package in Fedora. If you have issues with updates from third party repositories, it is probably better to ask where you got these repositories from. Note, that chromium works fine. Regards, -- Jakub Jelen Software Engineer Security Technologies Red Hat, Inc. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: update failed
On 2/25/19 10:33 PM, Frank McCormick wrote: > Tried to update my Fedora 29 this morning. It failed > > with this error: > > > [SKIPPED] google-chrome-stable-72.0.3626.119-1.x86_64.rpm: Already downloaded > Package ffmpeg-4.1.1-7.fc29.x86_64.rpm is not signed > Package ffmpeg-libs-4.1.1-7.fc29.x86_64.rpm is not signed > Package libavdevice-4.1.1-7.fc29.x86_64.rpm is not signed > The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful > transaction. > You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'. > Error: GPG check FAILED > > > Is there a work around or should I just wait ? > I don't believe ffmpeg and libavdevice packages are part of fedora. Mine come from rpmfusion. If you do a "dnf info ffmpeg" what do you see in "From repo" section? -- Right: I dislike the default color scheme Wrong: What idiot picked the default color scheme ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Gnome settings -> Online accounts and tor hidden services
On Sun, 2019-02-24 at 15:32 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 2/24/19 1:10 PM, Robin Lee wrote: > > On Sun, 2019-02-17 at 17:31 +0100, Robin Lee wrote: > > > On Fri, 2019-02-15 at 15:48 -0500, John Harris wrote: > > > > The only way that I personally know how to do with is by > > > > setting a > > > > system wide > > > > proxy. If you could find the process GNOME uses to sync CalDAV > > > > and > > > > CardDAV, > > > > you could `torify` it. There is no built-in way to do this in > > > > GNOME, > > > > at least > > > > as far as I'm aware. > > > > > > Had a look at gnome-online-accounts, but my hacking skills aren't > > > good > > > enough to figure out if one could modify it that way. > > > > > > I wish Fedora had a special proxy configuration for .onion- > > > addresses > > > > BTW, what is the proper channel to make a feature request like > > this? > > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME What would the correct project be? I did find the gnome-online-accounts project. But I wanted to find a project that would correspond to the Network Proxy Settings Cheers Robin ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
update failed
Tried to update my Fedora 29 this morning. It failed with this error: [SKIPPED] google-chrome-stable-72.0.3626.119-1.x86_64.rpm: Already downloaded Package ffmpeg-4.1.1-7.fc29.x86_64.rpm is not signed Package ffmpeg-libs-4.1.1-7.fc29.x86_64.rpm is not signed Package libavdevice-4.1.1-7.fc29.x86_64.rpm is not signed The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful transaction. You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'. Error: GPG check FAILED Is there a work around or should I just wait ? Thanks ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: LIghtweight editor to replace gedit?
Gedit surely do have autosave capabilities. You can also try xed, which looks nearly exactly the same. -- Michal Schorm Software Engineer Core Services - Databases Team Red Hat -- On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 3:13 PM Richard Shaw wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 8:03 AM Alex wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I have a fedora29 workstation and frequently need a lightweight editor >> to make notes, act as an interim cut buffer, and just briefly edit >> documents before posting them somewhere else. >> >> The problem is that gedit crashes, or my desktop crashes, losing all >> the notes. Sometimes I have ten or so documents of differing degrees >> going at once, and when it crashes (like it just did again), I lose >> everything. >> >> I need something with some kind of temporary autosave capability, like >> vim, but graphical. > > > How about notepadqq? > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/notepadqq > > Thanks, > Richard > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
[389-users] Re: Update userpassword from consummer
Hi, I redid the configuration from scratch, and I've created a new user (uid=lnadmin,ou=special users,dc=example,dc=com) and I gave him administrative rights. This new user belongs to the chained area. I did some tests with this account to modify users attributes including the userPassword attribute from the master server, and it works perfectly. on the other hand, on the slave, modifying other attributes other than userPassword works and the update is chained. But modifying userPassword didn't work, and here are the results : *1) Modify givenname from the slave* ldapmodify -h localhost -p 389 -D "uid=lnadmin,ou=special users,dc=example,dc=com" -w pass -x < EOF modifying entry "uid=adam,ou=people,dc=example,dc=com" *Result* : the modification is done and chained to the master, but I get an error shown in the error log on the slave (see below in bold-red) *Log from the slave *: *Access* : [25/Feb/2019:14:56:06.577269198 +0100] conn=54 fd=67 slot=67 connection from ::1 to ::1 [25/Feb/2019:14:56:06.577393763 +0100] conn=54 op=0 BIND dn="uid=lnadmin,ou=special users,dc=example,dc=com" method=128 version=3 [25/Feb/2019:14:56:06.578398778 +0100] conn=54 op=0 RESULT err=0 tag=97 nentries=0 etime=0.0001044129 dn="uid=lnadmin,ou=special users,dc=example,dc=com" [25/Feb/2019:14:56:06.578704548 +0100] conn=54 op=1 MOD dn="uid=adam,ou=people,dc=example,dc=com" [25/Feb/2019:14:56:06.677356989 +0100] conn=55 fd=68 slot=68 SSL connection from 192.168.40.101 to 192.168.40.102 [25/Feb/2019:14:56:06.684970522 +0100] conn=55 TLS1.2 256-bit AES-GCM [25/Feb/2019:14:56:06.685359430 +0100] conn=55 op=0 BIND dn="cn=replication manager,cn=config" method=128 version=3 [25/Feb/2019:14:56:06.685504876 +0100] conn=55 op=0 RESULT err=0 tag=97 nentries=0 etime=0.0008085105 dn="cn=replication manager,cn=config" [25/Feb/2019:14:56:06.685951988 +0100] conn=55 op=1 SRCH base="" scope=0 filter="(objectClass=*)" attrs="supportedControl supportedExtension" [25/Feb/2019:14:56:06.686522468 +0100] conn=55 op=1 RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=1 etime=0.641275 [25/Feb/2019:14:56:06.686921120 +0100] conn=55 op=2 SRCH base="" scope=0 filter="(objectClass=*)" attrs="supportedControl supportedExtension" [25/Feb/2019:14:56:06.687436239 +0100] conn=55 op=2 RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=1 etime=0.630283 [25/Feb/2019:14:56:06.687958906 +0100] conn=55 op=3 EXT oid="2.16.840.1.113730.3.5.12" name="replication-multimaster-extop" [25/Feb/2019:14:56:06.688118224 +0100] conn=55 op=3 RESULT err=0 tag=120 nentries=0 etime=0.245044 [25/Feb/2019:14:56:06.689082577 +0100] conn=55 op=4 MOD dn="uid=adam,ou=people,dc=example,dc=com" [25/Feb/2019:14:56:06.695724845 +0100] conn=54 op=1 RESULT err=0 tag=103 nentries=0 etime=0.0117138489 [25/Feb/2019:14:56:06.696481191 +0100] conn=54 op=2 UNBIND [25/Feb/2019:14:56:06.696496220 +0100] conn=54 op=2 fd=67 closed - U1 [25/Feb/2019:14:56:06.702453879 +0100] conn=55 op=4 RESULT err=0 tag=103 nentries=0 etime=0.0013403378 csn=5c73f3f60001 [25/Feb/2019:14:56:06.834935702 +0100] conn=55 op=5 EXT oid="2.16.840.1.113730.3.5.5" name="replication-multimaster-extop" [25/Feb/2019:14:56:06.844701440 +0100] conn=55 op=5 RESULT err=0 tag=120 nentries=0 etime=0.0010011286 *Error : [25/Feb/2019:14:56:06.659891340 +0100] - ERR - managed-entries-plugin - mep_mod_post_op - Unable to fetch postop entry.[25/Feb/2019:14:56:06.680435055 +0100] - ERR - chaining database - chaining_back_modify - modify (uid=adam,ou=people,dc=example,dc=com): post betxn failed, error (-1)* *2) Modify userPassword from the slave using clear text password* ldapmodify -h localhost -p 389 -D "uid=lnadmin,ou=special users,dc=example,dc=com" -w pass -x < a écrit : > > > > On 19 Feb 2019, at 00:54, Mark Reynolds wrote: > > > > > > > > On 2/18/19 7:46 AM, wodel youchi wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I did a test, but unfortunately it didn't work for me. > >> > >> This is my LAB: > >> • 389DS Servers : > >> • OS CentOS7 all updates > >> • 389DS version 1.3.8.4-22 > >> • domain : dc=example,dc=com > >> • users on : uid=%u,ou=people,dc=example,dc=com > >> • One master server (idm01.example.com) and one slave > server (idm02.example.com). > >> • Replication configured for userRoot database > (dc=example,dc=com) > >> • Replication uses this user cn=replication > manager,cn=config > >> • Password Policy is configured. > >> • Mail server Zimbra 8.8.11 > >> • OS CentOS7 all updates > >> • Zimbra FOSS 8.8.11. > >> • External authentication configured using LDAP server > >> • Installation of ADPassword connector to allow > change password from Zimbra WebUI > >> • External authentication was configured first on > idm01.example.com to test that change pass works correctly. > >> • External authentication was modified to use > idm02.example.com to
LIghtweight editor to replace gedit?
Hi, I have a fedora29 workstation and frequently need a lightweight editor to make notes, act as an interim cut buffer, and just briefly edit documents before posting them somewhere else. The problem is that gedit crashes, or my desktop crashes, losing all the notes. Sometimes I have ten or so documents of differing degrees going at once, and when it crashes (like it just did again), I lose everything. I need something with some kind of temporary autosave capability, like vim, but graphical. I'm aware of the dozens of console editors (I use vim virtually everywhere), but need something small like gedit, without the bulk and complexity of libreoffice. Thanks, Alex ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
usb devices in gnome boxes with windows
Hi everyone, I write this post to ask for information about a problem I encounter on gnome boxes. I tried to install both Windows 7 and Windows 10 ltsb, but neither of them for having installed Windows guest tools for Spice when I insert a USB key (usb2, usb3 etc.) and from the settings of boxes I apply the shared USB stick, this is detected in Windows, but not configured and therefore remains unusable. I wanted to know if someone has encountered the same problem and possibly help me to solve it or to virtualize windows is better to use Virtualbox? I thank you all ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
dnf-utils conflicts with yum-utils
Today's update, which wanted to install dnf-utils, failed due to conflicts with yum-utils. I was able to remove yum-utils and then transactions completed. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
