Re: F29-30 x86_64 system hanging requiring a hard reset - debugging /var/log/messages

2019-08-27 Thread Philip Rhoades

Tony,


On 2019-08-28 07:09, Tony Nelson wrote:

On 19-08-27 08:07:17, Philip Rhoades wrote:

People,

...there is a consistent "SERVICE_STOP pid=1 uid=0" command that
occurs but I don't know if that is normal or not . .

  ...

That just means that systemd (pid 1) did something that auditd
reported.  There are lots of them.  E.g., your:


Aug  9 22:00:48 localhost audit[1]: SERVICE_STOP pid=1 uid=0
auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:init_t:s0
msg='unit=systemd-hostnamed comm="systemd"
exe="/usr/lib/systemd/systemd" hostname=? a


is about systemd doing something with unit=systemd-hostnamed.



Right - I thought that was probably the case - thanks.



I have a System Load Monitor applet and a Disk Load Monitor in my
taskbar, so I can see if memory is filling up or the disk is busy.




Right - I have 32GB RAM and the same of swap and I hardly ever see the 
swap being used . .




Still, I think you have some other problem if the system completely
hangs instead of just getting very very slow.



Yes, me too . . but how to determine what the problem is . . it looks 
like whatever it is, messages related to it are not being recorded . .


Regards,

Phil.
--
Philip Rhoades

PO Box 896
Cowra  NSW  2794
Australia
E-mail:  p...@pricom.com.au
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: NFS and Firewalld -

2019-08-27 Thread Bob Goodwin



On 8/27/19 6:47 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:

mount 192.168.2.128:/home /mnt/testb

the format is

mount from_where:what_to_mount  mount_point

.
Of course that works.

Thanks Ed.

--
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD
box83  FEDORA-30/64bit LINUX XFCE Fastmail POP3
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: NFS and Firewalld -

2019-08-27 Thread Ed Greshko
On 8/28/19 6:17 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
>
> On 8/27/19 6:05 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>>> The easiest way to resolve the issue is to place the interface on the NFS 
>>> server in the "Trusted" firewall zone.  The setting for that can be found 
>>> in the Network Manager GUI for that interface in the "General 
>>> Configuration" tab.  At least that is what is shown on my KDE system.
>>>
>> .
>> Good, that allows showmount to dis[lay the export list.
> .
> Now what is wrong with my mount command?
>
> [root@box83 bobg]# mount  192.168.2.128 /home /etc/exports /mnt/testb
> mount: bad usage
> Try 'mount --help' for more information.

mount 192.168.2.128:/home /mnt/testb

the format is

mount from_where:what_to_mount  mount_point



-- 
If simple questions can be answered with a simple google query then why are 
there so many of them?
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: NFS and Firewalld -

2019-08-27 Thread Bob Goodwin



On 8/27/19 6:05 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
The easiest way to resolve the issue is to place the interface on the 
NFS server in the "Trusted" firewall zone.  The setting for that can 
be found in the Network Manager GUI for that interface in the 
"General Configuration" tab.  At least that is what is shown on my 
KDE system.



.
Good, that allows showmount to dis[lay the export list.

.
Now what is wrong with my mount command?

[root@box83 bobg]# mount  192.168.2.128 /home /etc/exports /mnt/testb
mount: bad usage
Try 'mount --help' for more information.

[root@box83 bobg]# showmount -e 192.168.2.128
Export list for 192.168.2.128:
/home 192.168.2.0/24

--
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD
box83  FEDORA-30/64bit LINUX XFCE Fastmail POP3
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: NFS and Firewalld -

2019-08-27 Thread Bob Goodwin



On 8/27/19 5:51 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:

On 8/28/19 5:45 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:

My NFS problems continue. The hard drive was replaced, Fedora 30 installed and 
NFS is configured. I think the configuration is good, I followed the 
instructions anyway.

Firewlld appears to be a new stumbling block and I don't know how to fix it. I 
looked at the Firewalld GUI and there is nothing intuitive about it. If I stop 
Firewlld, showmount displays the exports.

[bobg@box83 ~]$ showmount -e 192.168.2.128
clnt_create: RPC: Unable to receive

"systemctl stop firewalld" on the server:

[bobg@box83 ~]$ showmount -e 192.168.2.128
Export list for 192.168.2.128:
/home 192.168.2.0/24

Any help appreciated.

The easiest way to resolve the issue is to place the interface on the NFS server in the 
"Trusted" firewall zone.  The setting for that can be found in the Network Manager GUI 
for that interface in the "General Configuration" tab.  At least that is what is shown on 
my KDE system.


.
Good, that allows showmount to dis[lay the export list.

Thank  you for that.

--
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD
box83  FEDORA-30/64bit LINUX XFCE Fastmail POP3
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: NFS and Firewalld -

2019-08-27 Thread Ed Greshko
On 8/28/19 5:45 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> My NFS problems continue. The hard drive was replaced, Fedora 30 installed 
> and NFS is configured. I think the configuration is good, I followed the 
> instructions anyway.
>
> Firewlld appears to be a new stumbling block and I don't know how to fix it. 
> I looked at the Firewalld GUI and there is nothing intuitive about it. If I 
> stop Firewlld, showmount displays the exports.
>
> [bobg@box83 ~]$ showmount -e 192.168.2.128
> clnt_create: RPC: Unable to receive
>
> "systemctl stop firewalld" on the server:
>
> [bobg@box83 ~]$ showmount -e 192.168.2.128
> Export list for 192.168.2.128:
> /home 192.168.2.0/24
>
> Any help appreciated. 

The easiest way to resolve the issue is to place the interface on the NFS 
server in the "Trusted" firewall zone.  The setting for that can be found in 
the Network Manager GUI for that interface in the "General Configuration" tab.  
At least that is what is shown on my KDE system.

-- 
If simple questions can be answered with a simple google query then why are 
there so many of them?
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


NFS and Firewalld -

2019-08-27 Thread Bob Goodwin
My NFS problems continue. The hard drive was replaced, Fedora 30 
installed and NFS is configured. I think the configuration is good, I 
followed the instructions anyway.


Firewlld appears to be a new stumbling block and I don't know how to fix 
it. I looked at the Firewalld GUI and there is nothing intuitive about 
it. If I stop Firewlld, showmount displays the exports.


[bobg@box83 ~]$ showmount -e 192.168.2.128
clnt_create: RPC: Unable to receive

"systemctl stop firewalld" on the server:

[bobg@box83 ~]$ showmount -e 192.168.2.128
Export list for 192.168.2.128:
/home 192.168.2.0/24

Any help appreciated.


--
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD
box83  FEDORA-30/64bit LINUX XFCE Fastmail POP3
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: F29-30 x86_64 system hanging requiring a hard reset - debugging /var/log/messages

2019-08-27 Thread Tony Nelson

On 19-08-27 08:07:17, Philip Rhoades wrote:

People,

...there is a consistent "SERVICE_STOP pid=1 uid=0" command that
occurs but I don't know if that is normal or not . .

 ...

That just means that systemd (pid 1) did something that auditd
reported.  There are lots of them.  E.g., your:

Aug  9 22:00:48 localhost audit[1]: SERVICE_STOP pid=1 uid=0  
auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:init_t:s0  
msg='unit=systemd-hostnamed comm="systemd"  
exe="/usr/lib/systemd/systemd" hostname=? a


is about systemd doing something with unit=systemd-hostnamed.

I have a System Load Monitor applet and a Disk Load Monitor in my
taskbar, so I can see if memory is filling up or the disk is busy.
Still, I think you have some other problem if the system completely
hangs instead of just getting very very slow.

--

TonyN.:'   
  '  
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


[389-users] FIPS 140-2 and dirsrv-admin

2019-08-27 Thread Paul Whitney
Hi guys,

I have SSL enabled both slapd instances and dirsrv-admin on FIPS enabled CentOS 
7.  The instances seem to start up no problem.  However, the admin console 
(dirsrv-admin) is complaining the password credentials are not valid for the 
NSS FIPS 140-2 DB even through the exact same credentials are presented to the 
SLAPD instances.  I am using a pin.txt file in the correct format for both 
SLAPD and DIRSRV-ADMIN.

Are there compatibility issues with FIPS and 389-DS admin-serv?


Paul M. Whitney
___
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org


[389-users] BIND (DNS)

2019-08-27 Thread Fernando Fuentes
Is there a plugin or a default schema for BIND (named) on Fedora389? Or 
do I have to import the included schema with bind9?


Thanks!

Regards,
-
___
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org


[389-users] Re: LDAp password error

2019-08-27 Thread Fernando Fuentes

Mark,

Thanks. That did the trick!

On 8/26/19 3:57 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote:



On 8/26/19 4:33 PM, Fernando Fuentes wrote:

Hello All,

I am using a web ui to add end delete users. When I reset or try to 
add a password I get:
LDAP error, server says: Constraint violation - invalid password 
syntax - passwords with storage scheme are not allowed


What do I need to turn on to be able to use the web ui to edit passwords?


Not familiar with LAM, but looks like its trying to add a pre-hashed 
password - which is not allowed.  Now you can override it by setting 
this attribute under cn=config:


nsslapd-allow-hashed-passwords: on

But if the LAM pre-hashed password is not in the format the server 
uses then authentication will not work.  This is why we only accept 
clear text passwords when updating userpassword.


Mark



Thanks again!

(Using LAM web ui)
Regards.

___
389-users mailing list --389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of 
Conduct:https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List 
Archives:https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org

--

389 Directory Server Development Team


___
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org


[389-users] Re: 389-console yields error after frest Centos 7 install

2019-08-27 Thread Janet Houser

Well, I feel a little foolish.

Simply doing    "yum install slf4j"  seems to have fixed the error.



[admin]#   VERBOSE=1  /usr/bin/389-console

Java virtual machine used: /usr/lib/jvm/jre/bin/java
classpath used:
/usr/share/java/apache-commons-codec.jar:/usr/share/java/apache-commons-lang.jar:/usr/share/java/slf4j/api.jar:/usr/share/java/slf4j/ext.jar:/usr/share/java/slf4j/jcl-over-slf4j.jar:/usr/share/java/slf4j/jcl.jar:/usr/share/java/slf4j/jdk14.jar:/usr/share/java/slf4j/jul-to-slf4j.jar:/usr/share/java/slf4j/log4j-over-slf4j.jar:/usr/share/java/slf4j/log4j12.jar:/usr/share/java/slf4j/migrator.jar:/usr/share/java/slf4j/nop.jar:/usr/share/java/slf4j/simple.jar:/usr/share/java/slf4j/site.jar:/usr/share/java/slf4j/slf4j-api.jar:/usr/share/java/slf4j/slf4j-ext.jar:/usr/share/java/slf4j/slf4j-jcl.jar:/usr/share/java/slf4j/slf4j-jdk14.jar:/usr/share/java/slf4j/slf4j-log4j12.jar:/usr/share/java/slf4j/slf4j-migrator.jar:/usr/share/java/slf4j/slf4j-nop.jar:/usr/share/java/slf4j/slf4j-simple.jar:/usr/share/java/slf4j/slf4j-site.jar:/usr/lib/java/jss4.jar:/usr/share/java/ldapjdk.jar:/usr/share/java/idm-console-base.jar:/usr/share/java/idm-console-mcc.jar:/usr/share/java/idm-console-mcc_en.jar:/usr/share/java/idm-console-nmclf.jar:/usr/share/java/idm-console-nmclf_en.jar:/usr/share/java/389-console_en.jar
main class used: com.netscape.management.client.console.Console
flags used:
options used:  -Djava.util.prefs.systemRoot=/root/.389-console 
-Djava.util.prefs.userRoot=/root/.389-console

arguments used:


Thanks William   Sorry for the dumb question.


On 8/26/19 5:12 PM, William Brown wrote:

It could be worth checking the rpm versions of the 389-ds-console between your 
test system and your new system?

It could also be good to check `yum whatprovides "*/slf4j-api.jar" ` in case 
there is a missing dependency?

I'm not an expert on the console, so I hope that Mark can answer soon as he's 
our remaining console master.


On 27 Aug 2019, at 04:19, Janet H  wrote:

Additional info...   I just did a yum update on one of my 389-DS centos 7 boxes 
and I'm seeing the same error.   So it must be something about the new java 
files that the 389-console binary doesn't like.
___
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org

—
Sincerely,

William Brown

Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
SUSE Labs
___
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org


___
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org


[389-users] Re: 389-console yields error after frest Centos 7 install

2019-08-27 Thread Janet Houser

Hi William,

Thanks!  I'll work the issue from the OS side and post the solution here 
when I find it.


Cheers,

On 8/26/19 5:12 PM, William Brown wrote:

It could be worth checking the rpm versions of the 389-ds-console between your 
test system and your new system?

It could also be good to check `yum whatprovides "*/slf4j-api.jar" ` in case 
there is a missing dependency?

I'm not an expert on the console, so I hope that Mark can answer soon as he's 
our remaining console master.


On 27 Aug 2019, at 04:19, Janet H  wrote:

Additional info...   I just did a yum update on one of my 389-DS centos 7 boxes 
and I'm seeing the same error.   So it must be something about the new java 
files that the 389-console binary doesn't like.
___
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org

—
Sincerely,

William Brown

Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
SUSE Labs
___
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org


___
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org


F29-30 x86_64 system hanging requiring a hard reset - debugging /var/log/messages

2019-08-27 Thread Philip Rhoades

People,

I have been having fairly regular hangs of the whole system - sometimes 
I have a little warning of a rapidly slowing system and I can 
systematically exit from all the apps and reboot cleanly - but mostly 
not and I have to hit the reset button.  I used to think it was 
overloading the (fast) system (with 32GB RAM) with too many Chrome 
windows and tabs but it happens occasionally when the system is very 
lightly loaded too.  I have new RAM and have checked it with the Pro 
version of MemTest86 a couple of times so I don't think it is RAM.  I 
provide the last lines of the last six /var/log/messages file just prior 
to the hang - there is a consistent "SERVICE_STOP pid=1 uid=0" command 
that occurs but I don't know if that is normal or not . .


Any suggestions about further debugging would be greatly appreciated!

Regards,

Phil.


Aug  9 22:00:45 localhost nm-dispatcher[7265]: req:3 'down' 
[virbr0-nic]: new request (3 scripts)
Aug  9 22:00:45 localhost nm-dispatcher[7265]: req:3 'down' 
[virbr0-nic]: start running ordered scripts...
Aug  9 22:00:48 localhost systemd[1]: systemd-hostnamed.service: 
Succeeded.
Aug  9 22:00:48 localhost audit[1]: SERVICE_STOP pid=1 uid=0 
auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:init_t:s0 
msg='unit=systemd-hostnamed comm="systemd" 
exe="/usr/lib/systemd/systemd" hostname=? a
Aug  9 22:00:54 localhost dhclient[1199]: XMT: Solicit on enp0s31f6, 
interval 35050ms.
Aug  9 22:00:54 localhost dhclient[1199]: RCV: Advertise message on 
enp0s31f6 from fe80::7e8b:caff:fece:f620.

Aug  9 22:00:54 localhost systemd[1]: fprintd.service: Succeeded.
Aug  9 22:00:54 localhost audit[1]: SERVICE_STOP pid=1 uid=0 
auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:init_t:s0 
msg='unit=fprintd comm="systemd" exe="/usr/lib/systemd/systemd" 
hostname=? addr=? term
Aug  9 22:00:55 localhost systemd[1]: NetworkManager-dispatcher.service: 
Succeeded.
Aug  9 22:00:55 localhost audit[1]: SERVICE_STOP pid=1 uid=0 
auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:init_t:s0 
msg='unit=NetworkManager-dispatcher comm="systemd" 
exe="/usr/lib/systemd/systemd" host

1:messages_hang1
 
 
 unix 5466,1 Bot
Aug 12 07:30:12 phil audit[1]: SERVICE_START pid=1 uid=0 auid=4294967295 
ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:init_t:s0 
msg='unit=pmlogger_daily-poll comm="systemd" 
exe="/usr/lib/systemd/systemd" hostname=? add
Aug 12 07:30:12 phil audit[1]: SERVICE_STOP pid=1 uid=0 auid=4294967295 
ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:init_t:s0 
msg='unit=pmlogger_daily-poll comm="systemd" 
exe="/usr/lib/systemd/systemd" hostname=? addr
Aug 12 07:28:54 localhost systemd[1]: Started Check PMIE instances are 
running.
Aug 12 07:28:54 localhost audit[1]: SERVICE_START pid=1 uid=0 
auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:init_t:s0 
msg='unit=pmie_check comm="systemd" exe="/usr/lib/systemd/systemd" 
hostname=? addr=?
Aug 12 07:28:54 localhost audit[1]: SERVICE_STOP pid=1 uid=0 
auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:init_t:s0 
msg='unit=pmie_check comm="systemd" exe="/usr/lib/systemd/systemd" 
hostname=? addr=? t

Aug 12 07:30:12 localhost systemd[1]: Starting Poll log processing...
Aug 12 07:30:12 localhost systemd[1]: pmlogger_daily-poll.service: 
Succeeded.

Aug 12 07:30:12 localhost systemd[1]: Started Poll log processing.
Aug 12 07:30:12 localhost audit[1]: SERVICE_START pid=1 uid=0 
auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:init_t:s0 
msg='unit=pmlogger_daily-poll comm="systemd" 
exe="/usr/lib/systemd/systemd" hostname=
Aug 12 07:30:12 localhost audit[1]: SERVICE_STOP pid=1 uid=0 
auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:init_t:s0 
msg='unit=pmlogger_daily-poll comm="systemd" 
exe="/usr/lib/systemd/systemd" hostname=?

2:messages_hang2

unix 1408,1 Bot
Aug 13 03:03:35 localhost dnf[32442]: RPM Fusion for Fedora 30 - Free
  12 kB/s |  16 kB 00:01
Aug 13 03:03:36 localhost dnf[32442]: RPM Fusion for Fedora 30 - Nonfree 
- Updates 14 kB/s |  14 kB 00:01
Aug 13 03:03:37 localhost dnf[32442]: RPM Fusion for Fedora 30 - Nonfree 
- Updates 32 kB/s |  42 kB 00:01
Aug 13 03:03:38 localhost dnf[32442]: RPM Fusion for Fedora 30 - Nonfree 
  12 kB/s |  15 kB 00:01
Aug 13 03:03:38 localhost dnf[32442]: vivaldi
  55 kB/s | 2.9 kB 00:00

Aug 13 03:03:39 localhost dnf[32442]: Metadata cache created.
Aug 13 03:03:39 localhost systemd[1]: dnf-makecache.service: Succeeded.
Aug 13 03:03:39 localhost systemd[1]: Started dnf makecache.
Aug 13 03:03:39 localhost audit[1]: SERVICE_START pid=1 uid=0 
auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:init_t:s0 
msg='unit=dnf-makecache comm="systemd" exe="/usr/lib/systemd/systemd" 
hostname=? addr
Aug 13 03:03:39 localhost audit[1]: SERVICE_STOP