Re: Raid array empty after restart - SOLVED
On 5/25/20 5:23 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: Yes, I understand that. I still think the behaviour of mdadm in this case is counter-intuitive. When I explicitly ask for the creation of an array called /dev/md0 and the command first of all warns me that this will (not "may") destroy the existing partition table and do I want to proceed, then when I say yes apparently succeeds, I think I'm entitled to think that /dev/md0 has been created, but it hasn't. remember /dev is created at linux boot so the devices names are dynamic (/dev/mdN) if you want give a name to the array and a device name under /dev/md something like: mdadm --create /dev/md/var-even --raid-devices=2 --level=1 --name=var-even /dev/sd[ab]12 the above command uses partition number 12 type fd00 on /dev/sd[ab] and format with: mkfs.ext4 -L 'var-even' /dev/md/var-even to prevent name collisions (if you mount the disk in another computer with identical setup) find the partition uuid with: ls -lht /dev/md/var-even lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 8 May 20 21:48 /dev/md/var-even -> ../md121 and find the uuid pointing to md121 with: ls -lht /dev/disk/by-uuid/ ... lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 11 May 20 21:48 2108ba12-2ee3-5067-8de4-01c454867c5a -> ../../md121 ... and use that uuid in fstab. Gabriel ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Firewalld and none superuser
On 2020-05-26 08:17, Earl Ramirez wrote: > Previously, when I run firewall-cmd --list-all or any firewalld > commands as a regular user it will failed, with authorization failure. > Today I noticed that if I run firewall-cmd --list-all I can see the > rules; however, I am not able to modify the firewall rules without a > superuser privileges. > > Is this the expected behaviour to be able to see the firewall rules as > a regular user or should I file a bug? The ability to run certain firewall commands is controlled by polkit and which policy is in effect. Running Workstation/GNOME, those are allowed without authentication. That is not the case if running the KDE spin. I don't generally use GNOME so I can't comment on when/if those changes were made. In both F31 and F32 GNOME it is not needed to authenticate. -- The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: bash/awk equivalent code to gnu datamash
Sent from ProtonMail, encrypted email based in Switzerland. ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Monday, May 25, 2020 7:58 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 5/25/20 12:08 PM, None via users wrote: > > > Sent from ProtonMail, encrypted email based in Switzerland. > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > > On Monday, May 25, 2020 5:38 PM, Samuel Sieb sam...@sieb.net wrote: > > > > > On 5/25/20 3:12 AM, None via users wrote: > > > > > > > I have heard of R but I am looking for awk/bash, bc or dc solution. A > > > > website does give 3 as q3 instead of 2.75. Please see below > > > > > > I realize that, but I'm saying that datamash and R are also correct. > > > They use the calculation method instead of the splitting method. > > > > > > > I would like to get the same since and correct solution since datamash > > > > and R do not output the same. > > > > > > You're looking for an answer that isn't used much. I just checked > > > LibreOffice Calc and it gives 2.75 as well. I can't check Excel, but I > > > would assume it's the same. > > > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > Fedora Code of Conduct: > > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > > > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > > List Archives: > > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > > Thank you. I see what you mean. I have checked and see here > > http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/60969.html > > Still I wonder if I can get awk/bash/bc/dc it would be nice. > > Why do you want to use a complicated solution instead of the simple > tool? I could easily make a bash script to do it, but what's the point? > Portability. Ability to run on live systems, cell phones with termux and datamash and R are not installed, or there is not enough space to install them :) Hopefully some day I can get a pinephone and install fedora on it and install most of the great software that does the work easy for us. I can use gnuplot to create the boxplots for the five number Summary, but a shell script where it is not installed/unavailable would be nice. Then we can make use of metapost to create the box and whiskers plot. Best Regards, Antonio ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Firewalld and none superuser
Dear All, Previously, when I run firewall-cmd --list-all or any firewalld commands as a regular user it will failed, with authorization failure. Today I noticed that if I run firewall-cmd --list-all I can see the rules; however, I am not able to modify the firewall rules without a superuser privileges. Is this the expected behaviour to be able to see the firewall rules as a regular user or should I file a bug? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: wayland or not with nvidia
On 5/25/20 2:52 PM, hw wrote: On Mon, 2020-05-25 at 10:55 -0700, stan via users wrote: Why do you think this is a fedora or even wayland question? Do you think it is not? Fedora does not distribute NVidia drivers. You got them from a third party. They are not "supported" except maybe by the third party. It is the drivers in the kernel that determine what video resources are available. I don't run wayland because it doesn't provide a service I need, but because nvidia is ubiquitous, if the kernel provides an interface to the device, wayland almost certainly can utilize the device. Does the kernel shipped with Fedora provide such an interface? If so, then why does wayland not use the device? Or does Fedora come with a version of wayland that is made not to work with Fedora kernels? Wayland works perfectly well with Fedora kernels. The proprietary NVidia driver is not part of the Fedora kernels. Fedora does ship an interface for NVidia cards, but it's in the nouveau drivers. If you don't use those, then it's not from Fedora. It's up to NVidia to provide the interface for wayland to use in their drivers. Besides, what's the alternative to nvidia? AMD. They work great out of the box. If you have trouble getting an NVidia card to work on Linux, go complain to NVidia. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Raid array empty after restart
On 5/25/20 2:22 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Mon, 2020-05-25 at 11:03 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 5/25/20 2:25 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Sun, 2020-05-24 at 16:22 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 5/24/20 3:39 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: So although the above message says the existing partition table will be lost, for some reason I'm still getting a partition, while you apparently didn't. I copied the --create command directly from the man page. Is this not the "standard" way you mentioned in an earlier reply? That message is a little misleading. What happened was you created an array out of disks with existing data on them. Only the superblock gets rewritten, the rest of the drive just gets resynced, not erased. So your existing partition table is still there. More than a little misleading. I'd call the message downright wrong. I'll consider reporting it to BZ. It depends on which drive has the partition table and which drive gets cloned to. For example, you have one blank drive and one with a partition table. If the blank one get cloned to the other, then the partition table gets wiped out. If it goes the other way, then your raid has a partition table. But even in that case, depending on where the raid metadata goes and other factors, it could mess up the table or have it point to the wrong place. It's best to just assume that the partition table will be invalid even if it appears to still be there. Unless you're really sure about what you're doing, you should always reinitialize a newly created raid array, not trusting the existing data. That decision was taken by mdadm without input from me, i.e. it's the default. I see there is an "--assume-clean" option which would possibly have skipped that step, though the man page doesn't recommend it unless you know what you're doing, which I clearly don't. All the same, saying "the partition table *will* be lost or meaningless after creating array" is certainly wrong. It's not wrong. You were in a very special case where you are recreating the same raid from two drives that were in exactly the same configuration. In any other case, the partition table would be overwritten or would be invalid. You probably could have even used the "--assume-clean" option to avoid the resync. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Raid array empty after restart - SOLVED
On Tue, 2020-05-26 at 05:42 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 2020-05-26 00:24, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > I still ended up with /dev/md127p1 as before, and /dev/md0 wa's not > > created. > > I didn't think you would. As I mentioned in another post, you didn't start > out with a "fresh" drive. It already > had info on it that mdadm had created and then just reused. If you wanted to > do a really new set-up > you would have had to done something like "dd if=/dev/zero of=" to both of > the physical drives. Yes, I understand that. I still think the behaviour of mdadm in this case is counter-intuitive. When I explicitly ask for the creation of an array called /dev/md0 and the command first of all warns me that this will (not "may") destroy the existing partition table and do I want to proceed, then when I say yes apparently succeeds, I think I'm entitled to think that /dev/md0 has been created, but it hasn't. poc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: wayland or not with nvidia
On Mon, 2020-05-25 at 10:55 -0700, stan via users wrote: > On Mon, 25 May 2020 19:32:02 +0200 > hw wrote: > > > On Mon, 2020-05-25 at 11:03 -0300, George N. White III wrote: > > > On Mon, 25 May 2020 at 10:33, hw wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > what is the current status of wayland with nvidia drivers in > > > > Fedora 32? > > > > > > This is meaningless without mentioning the hardware you want to use. > > > Older hardware is not supported by nvidia drivers, but does work > > > using nouveau. > > > > > > > > > > Some search results seem to indicate that it's supposed to work by > > > > default. > > > > Others indicate that it still doesn't work. > > > > > > Unless the search results specify the hardware they are pretty much > > > useless. > > > > > > > So which hardware exactly does wayland work with? I guess that needs > > to be specified for otherwise wayland is useless. > > > > Since wayland is supposedly the default for Fedora, Fedora surely has > > tons of documentation about this and I just couldn't find it. Or > > maybe Fedora is useless ... > > Why do you think this is a fedora or even wayland question? Do you think it is not? > It is the > drivers in the kernel that determine what video resources are > available. I don't run wayland because it doesn't provide a service I > need, but because nvidia is ubiquitous, if the kernel provides an > interface to the device, wayland almost certainly can utilize the > device. Does the kernel shipped with Fedora provide such an interface? If so, then why does wayland not use the device? Or does Fedora come with a version of wayland that is made not to work with Fedora kernels? > Have you installed the nvidia drivers from rpmfusion? yes > As > George said, nvidia recently stopped providing support for their older > hardware, so if you have that hardware, you are probably out of luck, > unless you install a linux that is older generation. I stopped using > nvidia because of the constant irritation their closed source drivers > caused me, so I can't help with that. Why do George and you assume that the hardware is too old? Please read my question again. Besides, what's the alternative to nvidia? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Raid array empty after restart - SOLVED
On 2020-05-26 00:24, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > I still ended up with /dev/md127p1 as before, and /dev/md0 wa's not > created. I didn't think you would. As I mentioned in another post, you didn't start out with a "fresh" drive. It already had info on it that mdadm had created and then just reused. If you wanted to do a really new set-up you would have had to done something like "dd if=/dev/zero of=" to both of the physical drives. -- The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Raid array empty after restart
On Mon, 2020-05-25 at 11:03 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 5/25/20 2:25 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Sun, 2020-05-24 at 16:22 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > > On 5/24/20 3:39 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > > > > > So although the above message says the existing partition table will be > > > > lost, for some reason I'm still getting a partition, while you > > > > apparently didn't. I copied the --create command directly from the man > > > > page. Is this not the "standard" way you mentioned in an earlier reply? > > > > > > That message is a little misleading. What happened was you created an > > > > > > array out of disks with existing data on them. Only the superblock gets > > > > > > rewritten, the rest of the drive just gets resynced, not erased. So > > > > > > your existing partition table is still there. > > > > More than a little misleading. I'd call the message downright wrong. > > I'll consider reporting it to BZ. > > It depends on which drive has the partition table and which drive gets > cloned to. For example, you have one blank drive and one with a > partition table. If the blank one get cloned to the other, then the > partition table gets wiped out. If it goes the other way, then your > raid has a partition table. But even in that case, depending on where > the raid metadata goes and other factors, it could mess up the table or > have it point to the wrong place. It's best to just assume that the > partition table will be invalid even if it appears to still be there. > Unless you're really sure about what you're doing, you should always > reinitialize a newly created raid array, not trusting the existing data. That decision was taken by mdadm without input from me, i.e. it's the default. I see there is an "--assume-clean" option which would possibly have skipped that step, though the man page doesn't recommend it unless you know what you're doing, which I clearly don't. All the same, saying "the partition table *will* be lost or meaningless after creating array" is certainly wrong. poc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Driver for Epson Photo Printer
All; I just ordered this printer: Epson SureColor P900 17" Photo Printer Any thoughts on where I can get a driver for it to print large photos? Or even the driver for it's predecessor the P800? Thanks in advance -- `When you say "I wrote a program that crashed Windows", people just stare at you blankly and say "Hey, I got those with the system, *for free*".' (By Linus Torvalds) ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: bash/awk equivalent code to gnu datamash
On 5/25/20 12:08 PM, None via users wrote: Sent from ProtonMail, encrypted email based in Switzerland. ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Monday, May 25, 2020 5:38 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 5/25/20 3:12 AM, None via users wrote: I have heard of R but I am looking for awk/bash, bc or dc solution. A website does give 3 as q3 instead of 2.75. Please see below I realize that, but I'm saying that datamash and R are also correct. They use the calculation method instead of the splitting method. I would like to get the same since and correct solution since datamash and R do not output the same. You're looking for an answer that isn't used much. I just checked LibreOffice Calc and it gives 2.75 as well. I can't check Excel, but I would assume it's the same. users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Thank you. I see what you mean. I have checked and see here http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/60969.html Still I wonder if I can get awk/bash/bc/dc it would be nice. Why do you want to use a complicated solution instead of the simple tool? I could easily make a bash script to do it, but what's the point? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: bash/awk equivalent code to gnu datamash
Sent from ProtonMail, encrypted email based in Switzerland. ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Monday, May 25, 2020 5:38 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 5/25/20 3:12 AM, None via users wrote: > > > I have heard of R but I am looking for awk/bash, bc or dc solution. A > > website does give 3 as q3 instead of 2.75. Please see below > > I realize that, but I'm saying that datamash and R are also correct. > They use the calculation method instead of the splitting method. > > > I would like to get the same since and correct solution since datamash and > > R do not output the same. > > You're looking for an answer that isn't used much. I just checked > LibreOffice Calc and it gives 2.75 as well. I can't check Excel, but I > would assume it's the same. > > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Thank you. I see what you mean. I have checked and see here http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/60969.html Still I wonder if I can get awk/bash/bc/dc it would be nice. Best Regards, Antonio ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Raid array empty after restart
On 5/25/20 2:25 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Sun, 2020-05-24 at 16:22 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 5/24/20 3:39 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: So although the above message says the existing partition table will be lost, for some reason I'm still getting a partition, while you apparently didn't. I copied the --create command directly from the man page. Is this not the "standard" way you mentioned in an earlier reply? That message is a little misleading. What happened was you created an array out of disks with existing data on them. Only the superblock gets rewritten, the rest of the drive just gets resynced, not erased. So your existing partition table is still there. More than a little misleading. I'd call the message downright wrong. I'll consider reporting it to BZ. It depends on which drive has the partition table and which drive gets cloned to. For example, you have one blank drive and one with a partition table. If the blank one get cloned to the other, then the partition table gets wiped out. If it goes the other way, then your raid has a partition table. But even in that case, depending on where the raid metadata goes and other factors, it could mess up the table or have it point to the wrong place. It's best to just assume that the partition table will be invalid even if it appears to still be there. Unless you're really sure about what you're doing, you should always reinitialize a newly created raid array, not trusting the existing data. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: wayland or not with nvidia
On Mon, 25 May 2020 19:32:02 +0200 hw wrote: > On Mon, 2020-05-25 at 11:03 -0300, George N. White III wrote: > > On Mon, 25 May 2020 at 10:33, hw wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > what is the current status of wayland with nvidia drivers in > > > Fedora 32? > > > > This is meaningless without mentioning the hardware you want to use. > > Older hardware is not supported by nvidia drivers, but does work > > using nouveau. > > > > > > > Some search results seem to indicate that it's supposed to work by > > > default. > > > Others indicate that it still doesn't work. > > > > Unless the search results specify the hardware they are pretty much > > useless. > > > > So which hardware exactly does wayland work with? I guess that needs > to be specified for otherwise wayland is useless. > > Since wayland is supposedly the default for Fedora, Fedora surely has > tons of documentation about this and I just couldn't find it. Or > maybe Fedora is useless ... Why do you think this is a fedora or even wayland question? It is the drivers in the kernel that determine what video resources are available. I don't run wayland because it doesn't provide a service I need, but because nvidia is ubiquitous, if the kernel provides an interface to the device, wayland almost certainly can utilize the device. Have you installed the nvidia drivers from rpmfusion? As George said, nvidia recently stopped providing support for their older hardware, so if you have that hardware, you are probably out of luck, unless you install a linux that is older generation. I stopped using nvidia because of the constant irritation their closed source drivers caused me, so I can't help with that. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: bash/awk equivalent code to gnu datamash
On 5/25/20 3:12 AM, None via users wrote: I have heard of R but I am looking for awk/bash, bc or dc solution. A website does give 3 as q3 instead of 2.75. Please see below I realize that, but I'm saying that datamash and R are also correct. They use the calculation method instead of the splitting method. I would like to get the same since and correct solution since datamash and R do not output the same. You're looking for an answer that isn't used much. I just checked LibreOffice Calc and it gives 2.75 as well. I can't check Excel, but I would assume it's the same. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: wayland or not with nvidia
On Mon, 2020-05-25 at 11:03 -0300, George N. White III wrote: > On Mon, 25 May 2020 at 10:33, hw wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > what is the current status of wayland with nvidia drivers in Fedora 32? > > > > This is meaningless without mentioning the hardware you want to use. > Older hardware is not supported by nvidia drivers, but does work using > nouveau. > > > > Some search results seem to indicate that it's supposed to work by > > default. > > Others indicate that it still doesn't work. > > Unless the search results specify the hardware they are pretty much > useless. > So which hardware exactly does wayland work with? I guess that needs to be specified for otherwise wayland is useless. Since wayland is supposedly the default for Fedora, Fedora surely has tons of documentation about this and I just couldn't find it. Or maybe Fedora is useless ... ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Raid array empty after restart
On Mon, 2020-05-25 at 06:24 -0600, Greg Woods wrote: > In fairness to systemd, it has never been possible to edit /etc/fstab and > have your changes automatically applied. It has always been necessary to > run some sort of mount command (or reboot) after modifying fstab. Which is what I thought I was doing: * Modify /etc/fstab * Run mount * Mount doesn't give an error, but doesn't mount the correct filesystem. Requiring the systemctl-reload is a significant departure from traditional semantics. I understand that it's been around for a while, but it's nonetheless disconcerting to find that something so basic and well-understood has changed. Surely the mount command could notice that /etc/fstab had changed since systemd last read it and poke it to do the reload? poc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Raid array empty after restart - SOLVED
On Mon, 2020-05-25 at 07:49 -0500, Roger Heflin wrote: > His issue was he did the manual mount on /raid (already in fstab with > > a different device) and systemd immediately unmounted it. The mount > > succeeds with no error, and the umount happens so fast you are left > > confused about what is going on.It did at least note it in > > messages so long as you can guess the stupid action it took. This > > action of systemd is pretty badly designed, since it is overriding > > what had to be someone/somethings explicit action (and even if this is > > documented, documenting stupidity does not make it "right", it is > > still wrong). > > I *think* I've got it now. Re-creating the array made no difference whatever, as it just left everything exactly the same apart from taking many hours in useless resynching (why it does this is a mystery, as it clearly knows the layout and should know that the array was already synchronised). IOW even though I ran: # mdadm --create /dev/md0 --level=1 --raid-devices=2 /dev/sd[de] I still ended up with /dev/md127p1 as before, and /dev/md0 wa's not created. However by putting that into /etc/fstab and running systemctl daemon-reload', I can now mount the array correctly. It even survives a system reboot. Fingers crossed, it seems to be working now. poc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Raid array empty after restart
On Mon, 2020-05-25 at 06:24 -0600, Greg Woods wrote: > I would guess that keeping an eye on dozens of config files to see if > any of them have changed would use a lot of system resources over > time, but I expect there are more serious and less obvious reasons > why this is not done. On a gigaHertz PC with gigabytes of RAM? -- uname -rsvp Linux 3.10.0-1127.8.2.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue May 12 16:57:42 UTC 2020 x86_64 Boilerplate: All unexpected mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted. I will only get to see the messages that are posted to the mailing list. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: fedora 32 live DVD crashes
On Sun, 24 May 2020, Michael Hennebry wrote: I tried adding nomodeset grub_gfxmode=1440x900 , but still got 640x480 . cat cmdline BOOT_IMAGE=vmlinuz initrd=initrd.img root=live:CDLABEL=Fedora-WS-Live-32-1-6 rd.live.image nomodeset grub_gfxmode=1440x900 [liveuser@localhost-live proc]$ xrandr --fb 1440x900 xrandr: Failed to get size of gamma for output default xrandr: screen cannot be larger than 640x480 (desired size 1440x900) [liveuser@localhost-live proc]$ Grrr. -- Michael henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu "Sorry but your password must contain an uppercase letter, a number, a haiku, a gang sign, a heiroglyph, and the blood of a virgin." -- someeecards ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
gonvert and umit/zenmap equivalent
Gonvert and umit (nmap frontend) are no longer available in F32. Any replacements? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: The restorecon problem is coming back
On 2020-05-25 21:52, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Mon, 2020-05-25 at 20:35 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: >> On 2020-05-25 20:20, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: >>> On Mon, 2020-05-25 at 16:56 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: On 2020-05-25 15:36, Ron Yorston wrote: > On 6th May an update to selinux-policy for Fedora 32 (3.14.5-38.fc32) > caused all filesystems to be relabelled. In my case this took over > twelve hours. I was not happy. Thanks for the Heads-UP. I suppose we'll soon find out how many people didn't read this. :-) Lucky for me the time it takes on most of my systems is less than 15 minutes. >>> Didn't even notice it. I just rebooted and it did take longer than >>> usual (a minute or two instead of 30 seconds) but I put that down to my >>> current RAID problems. >> So, you're now at selinux-policy-3.14.5-39.fc32? If you didn't notice it, I >> want your darn fast >> CPU's. :-) > No, 3.14.5-38 as the previous message said. I read that as "to > " rather than "for ". Why "for"? Presumably the > update works for more than one existing version. I see. Oh, and the restorecon happens when the scriplet is run during the update. So, not a "re-label" in the sense of "fixfiles onboot". -- The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: wayland or not with nvidia
On Mon, 25 May 2020 at 10:33, hw wrote: > > Hi, > > what is the current status of wayland with nvidia drivers in Fedora 32? > This is meaningless without mentioning the hardware you want to use. Older hardware is not supported by nvidia drivers, but does work using nouveau. > Some search results seem to indicate that it's supposed to work by default. > Others indicate that it still doesn't work. Unless the search results specify the hardware they are pretty much useless. > The actual result is that it > does not work unless I use the nouveau driver instead. Unfortunately, the > lack of performance with nouveau still requires nvidia drivers. > > If it's supposed to work, how do I get it to work? > -- George N. White III ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: The restorecon problem is coming back
On Mon, 2020-05-25 at 20:35 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 2020-05-25 20:20, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Mon, 2020-05-25 at 16:56 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > > > On 2020-05-25 15:36, Ron Yorston wrote: > > > > > > > On 6th May an update to selinux-policy for Fedora 32 (3.14.5-38.fc32) > > > > caused all filesystems to be relabelled. In my case this took over > > > > twelve hours. I was not happy. > > > > > > Thanks for the Heads-UP. I suppose we'll soon find out how many people > > > didn't read this. :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > Lucky for me the time it takes on most of my systems is less than 15 > > > minutes. > > Didn't even notice it. I just rebooted and it did take longer than > > usual (a minute or two instead of 30 seconds) but I put that down to my > > current RAID problems. > > So, you're now at selinux-policy-3.14.5-39.fc32? If you didn't notice it, I > want your darn fast > CPU's. :-) No, 3.14.5-38 as the previous message said. I read that as "to " rather than "for ". Why "for"? Presumably the update works for more than one existing version. poc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
wayland or not with nvidia
Hi, what is the current status of wayland with nvidia drivers in Fedora 32? Some search results seem to indicate that it's supposed to work by default. Others indicate that it still doesn't work. The actual result is that it does not work unless I use the nouveau driver instead. Unfortunately, the lack of performance with nouveau still requires nvidia drivers. If it's supposed to work, how do I get it to work? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Raid array empty after restart
His issue was he did the manual mount on /raid (already in fstab with a different device) and systemd immediately unmounted it. The mount succeeds with no error, and the umount happens so fast you are left confused about what is going on.It did at least note it in messages so long as you can guess the stupid action it took. This action of systemd is pretty badly designed, since it is overriding what had to be someone/somethings explicit action (and even if this is documented, documenting stupidity does not make it "right", it is still wrong). On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 7:25 AM Greg Woods wrote: > > > > On Mon, May 25, 2020, 3:29 AM Patrick O'Callaghan > wrote: >> >> I wonder why systemd doesn't notice >> that the file has changed and reload accordingly. > > > The obvious as stupid answer is because it is not designed to work that way. > The process is actually documented; see for example > systemd-fstab-generator(8). > > I would guess that keeping an eye on dozens of config files to see if any of > them have changed would use a lot of system resources over time, but I expect > there are more serious and less obvious reasons why this is not done. > > In fairness to systemd, it has never been possible to edit /etc/fstab and > have your changes automatically applied. It has always been necessary to run > some sort of mount command (or reboot) after modifying fstab. > > --Greg > > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: The restorecon problem is coming back
On 2020-05-25 20:20, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Mon, 2020-05-25 at 16:56 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: >> On 2020-05-25 15:36, Ron Yorston wrote: >> >>> On 6th May an update to selinux-policy for Fedora 32 (3.14.5-38.fc32) >>> caused all filesystems to be relabelled. In my case this took over >>> twelve hours. I was not happy. >> >> Thanks for the Heads-UP. I suppose we'll soon find out how many people >> didn't read this. :-) >> >> >> >> Lucky for me the time it takes on most of my systems is less than 15 minutes. > Didn't even notice it. I just rebooted and it did take longer than > usual (a minute or two instead of 30 seconds) but I put that down to my > current RAID problems. So, you're now at selinux-policy-3.14.5-39.fc32? If you didn't notice it, I want your darn fast CPU's. :-) -- The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Raid array empty after restart
I had a bug submitted on a RHEL contract 2-3 years ago about it. I get emails each quarter saying they are still evaluating it. I am not holding my breath. The reload could have bad effects since it might shuffle things around if fstab changed that really only could happen on a reboot, the only real solution I saw was that once it is clear someone/something else mounted something remove the systemd rule for the mount that it happened to. On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 4:29 AM Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Sun, 2020-05-24 at 18:07 -0500, Roger Heflin wrote: > > Did you originally have /dev/md0p1 in fstab and you have edited fstab > > > > since you booted? > > > > > > > > If so the great and amazing systemd will not be amused and will still > > > > have a job for the old device, you will need to run systemctl > > > > daemon-reload for it to read the fstab file as it is not smart enough > > > > to do that itself. > > That's ... illuminating ... I haven't come across this behaviour > before, but I now see that there is a warning to that effect in > /etc/fstab (which of course I've never noticed before now). It could > explain some of what's happened. I wonder why systemd doesn't notice > that the file has changed and reload accordingly. > > poc > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Raid array empty after restart
On Mon, May 25, 2020, 3:29 AM Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > I wonder why systemd doesn't notice > that the file has changed and reload accordingly. > The obvious as stupid answer is because it is not designed to work that way. The process is actually documented; see for example systemd-fstab-generator(8). I would guess that keeping an eye on dozens of config files to see if any of them have changed would use a lot of system resources over time, but I expect there are more serious and less obvious reasons why this is not done. In fairness to systemd, it has never been possible to edit /etc/fstab and have your changes automatically applied. It has always been necessary to run some sort of mount command (or reboot) after modifying fstab. --Greg > ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Finding Trusted and Reliable Packers and Movers
On Mon, 2020-05-25 at 09:58 +, Mukesh Singal wrote: > Home relocation isn’t a cup of coffee that you would take out easily. > Instead, it’s a hell lot of tougher tasks you might have ever gone through! > It involves a lot of activities that need perfect planning and execution. You > can’t move to and from Mumbai on your own. And if you would, you may face a > lot of hassles, troubles, problems, and annoyance. What is this garbage doing on the Fedora list? poc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: The restorecon problem is coming back
On Mon, 2020-05-25 at 16:56 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 2020-05-25 15:36, Ron Yorston wrote: > > > On 6th May an update to selinux-policy for Fedora 32 (3.14.5-38.fc32) > > caused all filesystems to be relabelled. In my case this took over > > twelve hours. I was not happy. > > > Thanks for the Heads-UP. I suppose we'll soon find out how many people > didn't read this. :-) > > > > Lucky for me the time it takes on most of my systems is less than 15 minutes. Didn't even notice it. I just rebooted and it did take longer than usual (a minute or two instead of 30 seconds) but I put that down to my current RAID problems. poc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: bash/awk equivalent code to gnu datamash
On Sun, 24 May 2020 at 21:35, None via users
wrote:
> Dear fellow fedora users,
>
> If I have a data file called 15.dat with the following content:
>
> $ cat 15.dat
> 1
> 3
> 1
> 0
> 2
>
> And I want to find min, quartile 1, median, quartile 3 and maximum (Five
> number summary)
> We can use datamash like
> $ cat 15.dat | datamash min 1 q1 1 median 1 q3 1 max 1
0 1 1.5 2.756
> Q3 is reported as 2.75 but if we split the data file in half the number is
> 3.
>
R makes it easy to see what is being done:
> fivenum
function (x, na.rm = TRUE)
{
xna <- is.na(x)
if (any(xna)) {
if (na.rm)
x <- x[!xna]
else return(rep.int(NA, 5))
}
x <- sort(x)
n <- length(x)
if (n == 0)
rep.int(NA, 5)
else {
n4 <- floor((n + 3)/2)/2
d <- c(1, n4, (n + 1)/2, n + 1 - n4, n)
0.5 * (x[floor(d)] + x[ceiling(d)])
}
}
--
George N. White III
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: bash/awk equivalent code to gnu datamash
Sent from ProtonMail, encrypted email based in Switzerland.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, May 25, 2020 3:01 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 5/24/20 5:34 PM, None via users wrote:
>
> > Dear fellow fedora users,
> > If I have a data file called 15.dat with the following content:
> > $ cat 15.dat
> > 1
> > 3
> > 1
> > 0
> > 2
>
> I think you dropped the "6" from this copy.
>
> > And I want to find min, quartile 1, median, quartile 3 and maximum (Five
> > number summary)
> > We can use datamash like
> > $ cat 15.dat | datamash min 1 q1 1 median 1 q3 1 max 1 0 1 1.5 2.75 6
> > Q3 is reported as 2.75 but if we split the data file in half the number is
> > 3.
>
> I looked at the various ways of calculating quartiles and I can't find
> one that gives this result, but it is the same result as you can get
> from R (which datamash claims to be equivalent to):
> data <- c(0,1,1,2,3,6)
> summary(data)
>
> Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max.
> 0.000 1.000 1.500 2.167 2.750 6.000
>
> I can't tell you any more than that.
>
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
I have heard of R but I am looking for awk/bash, bc or dc solution. A website
does give 3 as q3 instead of 2.75. Please see below
https://www.hackmath.net/en/calculator/five-number-summary
1 3 1 0 2 6
Minimum: 0
Quartile Q1: 1
Median: 1.5
Quartile Q3: 3
Maximum: 6
Calculation:
Statistical file:
{14, 0, 4, 0, 0, 1, 1, 7, 1, 0, 3, 1, 2, 0}
Minimum: 0
Quartile Q1: 0
Median: 1
Quartile Q3: 3
Maximum: 14
I would like to get the same since and correct solution since datamash and R do
not output the same.
Best Regards
Antonio
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Finding Trusted and Reliable Packers and Movers
Home relocation isn’t a cup of coffee that you would take out easily. Instead, it’s a hell lot of tougher tasks you might have ever gone through! It involves a lot of activities that need perfect planning and execution. You can’t move to and from Mumbai on your own. And if you would, you may face a lot of hassles, troubles, problems, and annoyance. Why suffer a lot in your moving jaunt, when you could find reliable packers and movers in Mumbai! Yes, chuck out the hassles and troubles. Having good expertise in the industry a professional moving company knows what has to be done and which way. Be a sensible customer and identify the best packers and movers in Mumbai beforehand. How to do that? Check out below given tips: 1. Explore online word and research Thanks to the World Wide Web that has simplified almost every task for us so as finding the right mover. If you are looking for the one in your area, doing an online search would surely be beneficial. This will help you come across several ones that provide the best packing and moving services. Shortlist the ones that match your needs. Join online discussion forums for better help Contacting online discussion forum is yet another way to find the best packers and movers in Mumbai. 2. Ask your relatives or friends Get in touch with people who have moved lately. They can be beneficial to solve all your queries. Ask them, phone them, or seek their help whenever needed. You can even ask for their references that will help you in the long run. So, don’t worry more. Keep every worry aside as the above-suggested tips are gonna help you out. 3. Don't look for cheap deals, go with brand value. Many packers and movers in Mumbai have established themselves in the city. Since the beginning they have been serving people with their home or office shifting jaunts. Those who want to save some bucks look for cheap packers and movers in Mumbai. They in fact, invite troubles for themselves by not checking the background of the mover, but just finding their deals attractive. 4. Enquire about packing and moving process There is a mushrooming number of packers and movers out there who claim to give outstanding services. But the true story tells another tale. Hence, it’s not good but dangerous for your goods if you follow their steps. Many packers and movers in Mumbai have a different process for packing and moving process. You should definitely be aware beforehand how your good will be packed and shipped. You don’t want to end up in broken good when you unpack them. 5. Enquire about insurance of goods If you don’t want to take any risk with your goods, ask packers and movers about insurance. They can guide you about the insurance process. Some packers and movers like TBPM packers and movers will guaranty your good safety. https://www.tbpackersmovers.com ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Raid array empty after restart
On Sun, 2020-05-24 at 18:07 -0500, Roger Heflin wrote: > Did you originally have /dev/md0p1 in fstab and you have edited fstab > > since you booted? > > > > If so the great and amazing systemd will not be amused and will still > > have a job for the old device, you will need to run systemctl > > daemon-reload for it to read the fstab file as it is not smart enough > > to do that itself. That's ... illuminating ... I haven't come across this behaviour before, but I now see that there is a warning to that effect in /etc/fstab (which of course I've never noticed before now). It could explain some of what's happened. I wonder why systemd doesn't notice that the file has changed and reload accordingly. poc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Raid array empty after restart
On Sun, 2020-05-24 at 16:22 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 5/24/20 3:39 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > So although the above message says the existing partition table will be > > lost, for some reason I'm still getting a partition, while you > > apparently didn't. I copied the --create command directly from the man > > page. Is this not the "standard" way you mentioned in an earlier reply? > > > That message is a little misleading. What happened was you created an > > array out of disks with existing data on them. Only the superblock gets > > rewritten, the rest of the drive just gets resynced, not erased. So > > your existing partition table is still there. More than a little misleading. I'd call the message downright wrong. I'll consider reporting it to BZ. poc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: The restorecon problem is coming back
On 2020-05-25 15:36, Ron Yorston wrote: > On 6th May an update to selinux-policy for Fedora 32 (3.14.5-38.fc32) > caused all filesystems to be relabelled. In my case this took over > twelve hours. I was not happy. Thanks for the Heads-UP. I suppose we'll soon find out how many people didn't read this. :-) Lucky for me the time it takes on most of my systems is less than 15 minutes. > > It appears the developers have a workaround for the problem but the > update that applies it will cause all filesystems to be relabelled > if you already have the borked 3.14.5-38.fc32 update. > > The new update is currently in updates-testing and will no doubt be > making its way onto our systems soon enough. The developers say[1]: > >Please note updating from the previous package version >selinux-policy-3.14.5-38.fc32 will have all filesystems relabeling >as a result which cannot be prevented. If relabeling takes a lot >of time, consider unmounting some filesystems, updating manually, >postponing the update to later. > > You have been warned. > > Ron > > [1] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-886cc9af08 > -- The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: X server crashes when system is busy but server is idle
Joe Zeff: >> And for those of us who don't use Gnome? There are two folders of >> that name in different places: /etc/X11 and /usr/share/X11 so which >> one do I look in? Samuel Sieb: > I wasn't aware of that /usr/share one, but local modifications are > supposed to go in /etc. /usr/share/ is for distributed default > configs. It's a per-user keyboard layout option, in the keyboard preferences (on MATE, and friends), so there's a setting for it within your homespace. If I toggle a keyboard option, I see that my .config/dconf/user file gets updated (I'm just looking at the datestamp). I dare say that there's probably a way to preset it for all users, too. -- uname -rsvp Linux 3.10.0-1127.8.2.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue May 12 16:57:42 UTC 2020 x86_64 Boilerplate: All unexpected mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted. I will only get to see the messages that are posted to the mailing list. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
The restorecon problem is coming back
On 6th May an update to selinux-policy for Fedora 32 (3.14.5-38.fc32) caused all filesystems to be relabelled. In my case this took over twelve hours. I was not happy. It appears the developers have a workaround for the problem but the update that applies it will cause all filesystems to be relabelled if you already have the borked 3.14.5-38.fc32 update. The new update is currently in updates-testing and will no doubt be making its way onto our systems soon enough. The developers say[1]: Please note updating from the previous package version selinux-policy-3.14.5-38.fc32 will have all filesystems relabeling as a result which cannot be prevented. If relabeling takes a lot of time, consider unmounting some filesystems, updating manually, postponing the update to later. You have been warned. Ron [1] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-886cc9af08 ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
